PROFESSIONAL TEACHERS’ DEVELOPMENT OF EDUCATIONAL COMPLEXES IN THE CONDITIONS OF INTRODUCTION OF THE FEDERAL STATE EDUCATIONAL STANDARD

RETRACTED ARTICLE

The aim of this publication is to familiarize readers with the particularities of training of school teams for the introduction of the Federal State Educational Standard (hereinafter – FSES) in the initial stage and considering the features of creating a component of model, namely, program of management training to the introduction of the (FSES). The purpose of the study is to developmethodological bases of construction models of implementation of the Federal state educational standard as a system innovation.

Methods. The theoretical and methodological basis of the investigation involves: concepts of motivation of work and reflexive-humanistic psychology; ideas of contextual and projective training, and also acmeological approach to continuous education of adults.

Results and scientific novelty. The specifics of the program of professional development of shots for education corresponding to modern realities are described. This program assumes preparation of the school teams consisting of heads of the educational organizations, their deputies, methodologists and teachers. Adequate forms of carrying out internal and correspondence occupations with the organization of productive educational activity of listeners are selected; the complex of tasks for course and intersession occupations is developed. Training of listeners according to the developed program is based as the organizational and pedagogical cascade and cluster model combining resident instruction of the managerial personnel in the organizations of system of professional development with their innovative activity in the educational organizations. The course includes some levels: the basic, technological and organizational-activity-based. The basic level assumes development of the maintenance of FSES and development of innovative potential of listeners; technological level – technologies of conducting group work on development of FSES are mastered; organizational-activity-based level – administrative competences of area of intra firm professional development of teachers of an educational complex are developed.

Practical significance. Results of the carried experiment have showed that the cascade and cluster model of intra firm professional development combining through on-campus and distance education modes of preparation and retraining of pedagogical workers can form a basis to administrative strategy at the solution of actual tasks of formation of personal orientations, metasubject, subject design, communicative, reflexive competences at members of school teams and their readiness for independent activity and professional development in the conditions of introduction of FSES of the last generation.

1. Anisimov O. S. Strategicheskoe myshlenie: problemy dostizhenija razumnogo urovnja. [Strategic thinking: problems of achievement of reasonable level]. Moscow, 2012. 554 p. (In Russian)

2. Bakuradze A. B. Aksiologicheskaja priroda upravlenija social’noj organizaciej: monografija. [Axiological nature of management of the social organization]. Moscow: Federal’noe gosudarstvennoe avtonomnoe obrazovatel’noe uchrezhdenie dopolnitel’nogo professional’nogo obrazovanija «Akademija povyshenija kvalifikacii i professional’noj perepodgotovki rabotnikov obrazovanija». [Federal Public Autonomous

3. Educational Institution of Additional Professional Education «Academy of Professional Development and Professional Retraining of Educators»]. 2013.162 p. (In Russian)

4. Verbickij A. A. Aktivnoe obuchenie v vysshej shkole: kontekstnyj podhod. [Active training at the higher school: contextual approach]. Moscow: Vysshaja shkola. [Higher school]. 1991. (In Russian)

5. Davydova N. N. Organizational and administrative model of interaction of educational institutions as factor of innovative development of regional education.

6. Obrazovanie i nauka. [Education and Science]. 2010. № 8 (76). P. 32–42. (In Russian)

7. Zagvjazinskij V. I., Strokova T. A. Ways of prevention of resistance to innovations. Innovacionnye proekty i programmy v obrazovanii. [Innovative Projects

8. and Programs in Education]. 2014. № 6. P. 29–36. (In Russian)

9. Zagvjazinskij V I., Emel’janova I. N. Teorija obuchenija i vospitanija. [Theory of training and education]. Moscow: Publishing House JuRAJT, 2014. 320 p. (In Russian)

10. Kovaleva T. M. T’jutorskoe soprovozhdenie kak opredelennyj tip podderzhki upravlencheskoj komandy v sfere obrazovanija. [Tyyutorskoye maintenance as a certain type of support of a management team in education]. Jekspertiza i konsul’tacionnaja podderzhka innovacij v sisteme obrazovanija. [Examination and consulting support of innovations in an education system]. Ed. by T. M. Kovaleva. Moscow: Publishing House Rossijskaja politicheskaja jenciklopedija. [Russian Political Encyclopedia]. 2004. (In Russian)

11. Kudrikova D. N., Uzjanova I. M. Psychological maintenance of realization of introduction of Federal State Educational Standards of the second generation. Jeksperiment i innovacii v shkole. [Experiment and Innovations at School]. 2011. № 3. (In Russian)

12. Leont’ev A. N. Dejatel’nost’. Soznanie. Lichnost’. [Activity. Consciousness. Personality]. Moscow, 1977. (In Russian)

13. MakKlelland D. Motivacija dostizhenija. [Motivation of achievement]. S.-Petersburg: Piter, 2007. 672 p. (In Russian)

14. Moksheev V. A. Iz opyta konsul’tacionnogo soprovozhdenija dejatel’nosti regional’nyh jeksperimental’nyh ploshhadok v ramkah proekta «Regional’naja sistema

15. upravlenija kachestvom obrazovanija». [From experience of consulting maintenance of activity of regional experimental platforms within the «Regional Control System of Quality of Education» project]. Jekspertiza i konsul’tacionnaja podderzhka innovacij v sisteme obrazovanija. [Examination and consulting support of innovations in an education system]. Ed. by T. M. Kovaleva. Moscow: Publishing House Rossijskaja politicheskaja jenciklopedija. [Russian Political Encyclopedia]. 2004. (In Russian)

16. Pedagogicheskaja prakseologija. [Pedagogical praxeology]. I. A. Kolesnikova, E. V. Titova. Moscow: Publishing House Akademija. [Academy]. 2005. (In Russian)

17. Potashnik M. M. Upravlenie kachestvom obrazovanija. [Education quality management]. Ed. by M. M. Potashnik. Moscow: Publishing House Pedagogicheskoe obshhestvo Rossii. [Pedagogical Society of Russia]. 2000. 448 p. (In Russian)

18. Potashnik M. M., Levit M. V. Kak pomoch’ uchitelju v osvoenii FGOS? [How to help the teacher with development of Federal State Educational Standard?]. Moscow: Publishing House Pedagogicheskoe obshhestvo Rossii. [Pedagogical Society of Russia]. 2014. 112 p. (In Russian)

19. Potashnik M. M., Solozhnin A. Upravlenie obrazovaniem na municipal’nom urovne: Pedagogicheskoe obshhestvo Rossii. [Management of education at the municipal level: Pedagogical society of Russia]. 2014. 482 p. (In Russian)

20. Sidenko A. S. Components of the research project as means of forming of justification of a subject of dissertation research. Innovacionnye proekty i programmy v obrazovanii. [Innovative Projects and Programs in Education]. 2012. № 2. P. 68–77. (In Russian)

21. Sidenko A. S., Hmeljova V. S. Maintenance of experimental and innovative activity of experimental platforms. Municipal’noe obrazovanie. [Municipal ducation].

22. № 4. P. 46–48. (In Russian)

23. Sidenko E. A. The main difficulties of teachers upon transition to Federal State Educational Standard of the second generation. Jeksperiment i innovacii v shkole. [Experiment and Innovations at School]. 2012. № 2. P. 4–7. (In Russian)

24. Sidenko E. A. Professional development of the teacher in the conditions of introduction of FGOS of new generation. Obrazovanie i nauka. [Education and Science]. 2012. № 8 (97). P. 5–24. (In Russian)

25. Sidenko E. A. Training of motivation of achievement in foreign psychology and pedagogical practice. Innovacionnye proekty i programmy v obrazovanii. [Innovative Projects and Programs in Education]. 2010. № 5. (In Russian)

26. Sidenko A. S. The model of school preparation for implementing the federal state educational standards of the second generation. Obrazovanie i nauka. [Education and Science]. 2012. № 1. P. 3–16. (In Russian)

27. Terent’eva S. T. New educational standards as instrument of development of school. Municipal’noe obrazovanie: innovacii i jeksperiment. [Municipal education: Innovation and Experiment]. 2011. № 6. P. 24–26. (In Russian)

28. Testov V. A. Concept of a pedagogical paradigm. Innovacionnye proekty i programmy v obrazovanii. [Innovative Projects and Programs in Education]. 2013. № 5. P. 16–20. (In Russian)

29. Fel’dshtejn D. I. Psychology and pedagogical problems of creation of new school in the conditions of significant changes of the child and a situation of his development. Innovacionnye proekty i programmy v obrazovanii. [Innovative Projects and Programs in Education]. 2011. № 3. P. 23–28. (In Russian)

30. Fishman L. I. Professional development: desirable and valid. Jeksperiment i innovacii v shkole. [Experiment and Innovations at School]. 2011. № 6. P. 26–29. (In Russian)

31. Fomenko S. L. Process of development of the concept, contents and technologies of competence-based approach in education by pedagogical staff. Innovacionnye proekty i programmy v obrazovanii. [Innovative Projects and Programs in Education]. 2013. № 4. P. 27–31. (In Russian)

32. Chapaev N. K., Choshanov M. A. Creative pedagogics: problems, contradictions, ways of their permission. Innovacionnye proekty i programmy v obrazovanii. [Innovative Projects and Programs in Education]. 2012. № 3. P. 30–41. (In Russian)

33. Shkljarova O. A., Demin S. V. Formation of a management team on development of a personnel resource in educational institution. Innovacionnye proekty i programmy v obrazovanii. [Innovative Projects and Programs in Education]. 2013. № 5. P. 25–29. (In Russian)