DUAL TRAINING IN RUSSIA: FROM THE CONCEPT TO PRACTICE
https://doi.org/10.17853/1994-5639-2016-3-44-56
Abstract
The purpose of the present article is to judge and justify the conditions of system elements application of dual training at implementation of programs of professional education for increase of efficiency of functioning and quality of preparation of qualified personnel by institutions of the secondary professional education (SPE).
Methods. The methods used in work involve the comparative analysis of practice of application of dual training in system of professional education of Germany and regions of Russia for the purpose of identification of the existing problems and definition of optimum organizational and legal and didactic conditions.
Results. The essence of system of dual training, its strong and weaknesses reveals. Necessary and indispensable conditions of application of dual training in modern regional systems of professional education are proved.
Scientific novelty. According to the author, modern publications on problems and ways of development of professional education in Russia contain enough antinomy of standard and legal and organizational and administrative character. In particular, operating by the concept «dual education», an identification of the practice-focused and dual training introduction «the list 50 of the most demanded in labor market, the new and perspective professions that demand secondary professional education» as opposed to the existing list of professions and the constitutional guarantee of public and free secondary professional education. Standard and legal, and didactic conditions of application of elements of dual training in regional systems of professional education are proved theoretically.
Practical significance. Implementation of the research outcomes can be useful to pedagogical staff of institutions of secondary professional education, representatives of employers and Chambers of Commerce and Industry to the organization and use of system of dual training in training of skilled workers (serving) and experts of middle ranking.
About the Author
Alexander A. ListvinRussian Federation
Сandidate of Рedagogical Sciences, Associate Professor, Department of Vocational and Technological Education, Cherepovets State University, Cherepovets (RF).
References
1. Batyšev S. Blochno-modul’noe obuchenie. [Block-modular training]. Moscow: Publishing House ТОО «Promservis», 1997. 258 р. (In Russian)
2. Gosudarstvennaja programma Rossijskoj Federacii «Razvitie obrazo-vanija» na 2013 – 2020 gody. [The State programme of the Russian Federation «development education» in 2013–2020years]. Postanovlenie Pravitel’stva RF ot 15.04.2014 g. No 295. [Decree of the Government of the Russian Federation, d.d. 15 April, 2014, No 295]. Available at: http://www.consultant.ru/document. (In Russian)
3. Nekrasov S. I., Zakharchenko L. V., Nekrasova Y. A. Pilot project «E-learning»: a critical view of specialists. Professional’noe obrazovanie. Stolica. [Professional Education. The Capital]. 2015. No 4. P. 9–16. (In Russian)
4. Obrazovanie v Germanii. [Education in Germany]. Didaktika. [Didactics]. Mezhdunarodnyj seminar, Djussel’dorf. [International seminar, Dusseldorf]. 2015. Available at: http://www.ica-amk.ru/despo/event (In Russian)
5. Strategija razvitija chernoj metallurgii Rossii na 2014 – 2020 gody i na perspektivu do 2030 goda. [Strategy for the development of Russian steel on the 2014–2020 years and up to the year 2030]. Prikaz Minpromtorga Rossii ot 05.05 2014 g. No 839. [The Order of the Ministry of Industry and Trade of Russia, d.d. 05 May, 2014, No 839]. Available at: http://www.consultant.ru/document /cons_doc_LAW_165502/? frame = 2. (In Russian)
6. Fedotova G. A. Professional’noe obrazovanie i podgotovka po rabochim professijam v FRG. [Vocational education and training on the CHIM professions in Germany]. Moscow: Institut razvitija professional’nogo obrazovanija. [Institute of Professional Education Development]. 2001. 72 p. (In Russian)
7. Fedotov G. A. Razvitie dual’noj formy professional’nogo obrazovanija v uslovijah social’nogo partnerstva. [Development of a dual form of professional education in the conditions of social partnership]. Moscow: Akademija poslediplomnogo obrazovanija. [Academy of Postdegree Education]. 1998. 225 p. (In Russian)
8. Šauro E. V. Dual’noe obuchenie: iz opyta uchastija v pilotnom proekte. [Dual learning: from the experience of participation in the pilot project]. Professional’noe obrazovanie. Stolica. [Professional Education. The Capital]. 2015. No 5. P. 43–45. (In Russian)
9. Hensen R. F., Hippach-Schneider U. VET in Europe – Country Report Germany. 10th edition. Bonn, Germany: BIBB. 2012. 96 p. (Translated from English)
10. How the dual system – practical vocational and academic – works in Germany. Bonn, Germany: BIBB, 2012. 31 p. (Translated from English)
11. Ordinance on Vocational Education and Training in the Occupation of Mechatronics Fitter (English Version). Bonn, Germany: BIBB, 2013. 41 p. (Translated from English)
12. Rothe G. Die Systeme beruflicher Qualifizierung Deutschlands, Oesterreich und der Schweiz imVergleich. Wien, 2001. P. 1–5. (Translated from German)
13. Schelten A. Begriffe und Konzepte der berufspädagogischen Fachsprache. – Stuttgart: Franz Steiner Verlag, 2005. 164 р. (Translated from German)
14. Schelten A. Einfuhrung in die Berufspedagogik, Stuttgart: Stainer, 1991. 289 р. (Translated from German)
15. Schulz K. The dual system of vocational training in Germany – presentation and criticism. Munchen [inter alia]: Grin Verlag, 2004. 28 p. (Translated from English)
Review
For citations:
Listvin A.A. DUAL TRAINING IN RUSSIA: FROM THE CONCEPT TO PRACTICE. The Education and science journal. 2016;(3):44-56. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17853/1994-5639-2016-3-44-56
Views:
3195
Email this article 