PSYCHOLOGICAL AMORTIZATION FACTORS FOR MEDIA IMPACT IN DEVELOPMENT OF CHILDREN FROM DIFFERENT SOCIAL GROUPS
https://doi.org/10.17853/1994-5639-2016-3-70-89
Abstract
The aim of this publication is to analyze the domestic and foreign psychological researches on influence of TV-programs on social, cognitive and emotional development of children.
Methods. Methods involve a comparative historical and psychological analysis of papers, manuscripts and archival records of television companies.
Results. The present study demonstrates that educational television, subsequently on-line resources for children, affect operative cognitive functions, increase cognitive motivation, and contribute to the formation of other important cognitive and social skills. However, the impact on children on-screen resources depends on the status and education level of the family.
Scientific novelty. Much attention is given to the fact that it is the first attempt to provide historical and psychological analysis of world-wide studies of the effects of children’s television, from the main countries-producers of TV and video programs for children of different age – Russia, USA, Germany, France, Israel, etc.
Criteria and matrix for comparison of heterogeneous researches, the domestic theory of child development, cultural-historical approach, the theory of stage formation of mental actions, activity theory had been chosen.
Practical significance of the research is that these criteria can be used to assess any of the videos, their educational potential. Psychologists involved in the process of television production, this article will help to simulate the learning process taking into account the age of the children and their socio-cultural origin.
About the Authors
Olga I. MakhovskayaRussian Federation
Candidate of Psychological Sciences, Senior Research Fellow of Laboratory for Psychology and Psychophysiology Creativity, Institute of Psychology of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow (RF).
Fyodor O. Marchenko
Russian Federation
Candidate of Psychological Sciences, Research Fellow, The Institute of Education, National Research University Higher School of Economics, Moscow (RF).
References
1. Marchenko F. O. Istoriko-psihologicheskij analiz jekspertizy teleprogramm. [The historical and psychological analysis of examination of TV programs for children]. Camd. diss. Moscow: Institut psihologii Rossijskoj Akademii Nauk. [Institute of psychology of the Russian Academy of Sciences]. 30 p. (In Russian)
2. Makhovskaya O. I., Marchenko F. O. Deti i televidenie. [Children and television]. Moscow: Publishing House Infra-M, 179 p. (In Russian)
3. Adachi P. J., Willoughby T. More than just fun and games: The longitudinal relationships between strategic video games, self reported problem solving skills, and academic grades. Journal of Youth and Adolescence. 2013. Vol. 42 (1). P. 123–134. (Translated from English)
4. Anderson C. A., Shibuya A., Ihori N., Swing E. L., Bushman B. J., Sakamoto A., Saleem M. Violent video game effects on aggression, empathy, and prosocial behavior in Eastern and Western countries: A meta-analytic review. Psychological Bulletin. 2010. Vol. 136. P. 151–173. (Translated from English)
5. Anderson D. R., Field D. E. Die Aufmerksamkeit des KindesbeimFernsehen: Folgerungenfuer die Programmproduktion. Wieverstehen Kinder Fernsehprogramme? / M. Meyer (Ed.). Muenchen: Saur, 1984. P. 52–92. (Translated from German)
6. Anderson D. R., Field D. E., Collins P. A., Lorch E. P., Nathan J. G. Estimates of young children’s time with television: A methodological comparison of parents reports with time-lapse home observation. Child Development. 1985. Vol. 56. P. 1345–1357. (Translated from English)
7. Ball-Rokeach S., DeFleur M. A Dependency Model of Mass Media Effects. Communication Research. 1976. No 3. P. 3–7. (Translated from English)
8. Bandura А. Psychological Modeling: Conflicting Theories. Chicago: Aldine Atherton, 1971. 210 p. (Translated from English)
9. Chen К.-С., Jang S.-J. Motivation in online learning: Testing a model of self-determination theory. Computers in Human Behavior. 2010. Vol. 26. P. 741– 752. (Translated from English)
10. Conner J., Slattery A. New Media and the Power of Youth Organizing: Minding the Gaps. Equity & Excellence in Education. 2014. Vol. 47. No 1. P. 14–30. (Translated from English)
11. Delmar R., Nowell-Smith G. Watching «teszelin». Parents talking television / P. Simpson (Ed.). London: Comedia, 1987. Р. 11–18. (Translated from English)
12. Ekman P., Friesen W. V. The repertoire of nonverbal behavior: Categories, origins, usage, and coding. Semiotica. 1969. No 1. P. 49–98. (Translated from English)
13. EwoldsenD.R., EnoC.A., OkdieB.M., VelezJ.A., GuadagnoR.E., DeCoster J. Effect of playing violent video games cooperatively or competitively on subsequent cooperative behavior. Cyberpsychology, Behavior and Social Networking. 2012. Vol. 15 (5). P. 277–280. (Translated from English)
14. Ferguson C. J., Olson C. K. Friends, fun, frustration and fantasy: Child motivations for video game play. Motivation and Emotion. 2013. Vol. 37 (1). P. 154–164. (Translated from English)
15. Feshbach S. The Stimulating Versus Cathartic effects of a Vicarigous Agressive Activity. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology. 1961. Vol. 63. P. 381–385. (Translated from English)
16. Fetler M. Television viewing and school achievement. Journal of Communication. 1984. Vol. 34. P. 104–118. (Translated from English)
17. Fiske S. T. Social Cognition and Social Perception. Annual Review of Psychology. 1993. Vol. 44. P. 155–194. (Translated from English)
18. Frijda N. H. The laws of emotion. American Psychologist. 1988. Vol. 43. P. 349–356. (Translated from English)
19. Jackson L. A., Witt E. A., Games A. I., Fitzgerald H. E., von Eye A., Zhao Y. Information technology use and creativity: Findings from the Children and Technology Project. Computers in Human Behavior. 2012. Vol. 28 (2). P. 370– 376. (Translated from English)
20. Goldman S., Booker A., McDermott M. Mixing the digital, social, and cultural: Learning, identity, and agency in youth participation. Youth, identity, and digital media / D. Buckingham (Ed.). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press. 2008. 216 р.
21. Granic I., Lobel А., Engels R. The Benefits of Playing Video Games. American Psychologist. 2014. Vol. 69. No 1 (January). P. 66–78. (Translated from English)
22. Klapper J. T. Mass communication, attitude stability and change. Attitude, ego involvement and change / C. W. Sherif, M. Sherif (Ed.). 1967. 326 р. (Translated from English)
23. Lasswell H. D. Propaganda technique in the world war. N.Y.: Knopf, 1927. 268 р. (Translated from English)
24. Lenhart A., Kahne J., Middaugh E., Macgill A. R., Evans C., Vitak J. Teens, video games, and civics: Teens’ gaming experiences are diverse and include significant social interaction and civic engagement. Pew Internet & American Life Project. Retrieved from the Pew Internet & American Life Project website: http://www.pewinternet.org/ Reports/2008/Teens-Video-Games-and-Civics.aspx. (Translated from English)
25. Lemola S., Brand S., Vogler N., Perkinson-Gloor N., Allemand M., Grob A. Habitual computer game playing at night is related to depressive symptoms. Personality and Individual Differences. 2011. Vol. 51 (2). P. 117–122. (Translated from English)
26. Masten A. S., Narayan A. J. Child Development in the Context of Disaster, War, and Terrorism: Pathways of Risk and Resilience. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 2012. Vol. 63. P. 227–257. (Translated from English)
27. Meringoff L. K. Influence of the medium on children’s story apprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology. 1980. Vol. 72. P. 240–249. (Translated from English)
28. Meyrowits J. Multiple media literacies. Journal of Communication. 1985. Vol. 48 (1). P. 56–68. (Translated from English)
29. McQuail D. Audience analyses. Thousand Oaks: Sage, 1999. 176 p. (Translated from English)
30. Michel B. Emotionenbei der Rezaption von TV-Nachrichten. Universitaet Saarbruecken: Unveroeffentlichte Diplomarbeit, 2002. P. 47–54. (Translated from German)
31. Phillips D. P. Teenage and adult temporal fluctuation in suicide and auto fatalities. Suicide in the young / H. D. Sudak (Ed.). Boston: John Wright, 1984. 400 p. (Translated from German)
32. PostmanN.The disappearance of childhood. N.Y.: Delacorte, 1982. 178 p. (Translated from English)
33. Rice M. L., Huston A. C., Truglio R., Wright J. Words from «Sesame Street»: Learning vocabulary while viewing. Developmental Psychology. 1990. Vol. 26 (3). P. 421–428. (Translated from English)
34. Salomon G. Television Watching and Mental Effort: A Social Psychological View // Children’s Understanding of Television / J. Bryant, D. R. Anderson (Ed.). N. Y.: Academic, 1977. 384 р. (Translated from English)
35. Schramm W., Lyle J., Parker E. Television in the Lives of our Children. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1961. 324 p. (Translated from English)
36. Stephenson W. Play Theory of Mass Communication. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1967. 210 p. (Translated from English)
37. Stipp H. Neue Techniken. Neue Zuschauer? Media Perspektiven. 1989. B. 3, P. 164–167. (Translated from German)
38. Van Evra J. Television and child development. Mahwah, N. J.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1997. 294 p. (Translated from English)
39. Zohoori A. A cross-cultural analysis of children’s TV use. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media. 1988. P. 105–113. (Translated from English)
40. Verhagen T., Feldberg F., van den Hooff D., Meents S., Merikivi J. Understanding users’ motivations to engage in virtual worlds: A multipurpose model and empirical testing. Computers in Human Behavior. 2012. Vol. 28. P. 484–495. (Translated from English)
41. Wu J.-H., Tennyson R. D., Hsia T.-L. A study of student satisfaction in a blended e-learning system environment. Computers & Education. 2010. Vol. 55, No 1. С. 155–164. (Translated from English)
Review
For citations:
Makhovskaya O.I., Marchenko F.O. PSYCHOLOGICAL AMORTIZATION FACTORS FOR MEDIA IMPACT IN DEVELOPMENT OF CHILDREN FROM DIFFERENT SOCIAL GROUPS. The Education and science journal. 2016;(3):70-89. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17853/1994-5639-2016-3-70-89