RATING CREATION FOR PROFESSIONAL EDUCATIONAL ORGANIZATIONS BASED ON THE ITEM RESPONSE THEORY
https://doi.org/10.17853/1994-5639-2016-4-46-64
Abstract
The aim of the investigation is to theoretically justify and describe approval of the measurement of the level of provision of educational services, education qualities and rating of vocational educational organizations.
Methods. The fundamentals of methodology of the research conducted by authors are made by provisions of system approach; research on a schematization and modeling of pedagogical objects; the provision of the theory of measurement of latent variables. As the main methods of research the analysis, synthesis, the comparative analysis, statistical methods of processing of results of research are applied.
Results. The paper gives a short comparative analysis of potentials of qualitative approach and strong points of the theory of latent variables in evaluating the quality of education and ratings of the investigated object. The technique of measurement of level of rendering educational services at creation of a rating of the professional educational organizations is stated.
Scientific novelty. Pedagogical opportunities of the theory of measurement of latent variables are investigated; the principles of creation of ratings of the professional educational organizations are designated.
Practical significance. The operational construct of the latent variable «quality of education» for the secondary professional education (SPE) approved in the Perm Territory which can form base of formation of similar constructs for creation of a rating of the professional educational organizations in other regions is developed.
About the Authors
N. E. Erganova
Ural Federal University named after the first President of Russia B. N. Yeltsyn
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Doctor of Pedagogical Sciences, Professor, Department of Human Resource Management and Psychology,
Yekaterinburg
L. V. Kolyasnikova
Russian State Vocational Pedagogical University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Candidate of Pedagogical Sciences, Associate Professor, Chief of the Department of Quality Evaluation and Development of Educational Programs,
Yekaterinburg
References
1. Averkin V. N., Kaplunovich T. A., Osipov A. A. Rejtingovanie v sfere obrazovanija
2. kak faktor jeffektivnogo upravlenija realizaciej obrazovatel'noj politiki. [Rating in education as factor of effective management of the implementation of educational policy]. Rejtingi v obrazovanii: ot razovyh praktik k kul'turnym reshenijam. [Rating in education: from single solutions to cultural practices]. Moscow: Vysshaja shkola jekonomiki. [Higher School of Economics]. 2014. Р. 74–87. (In Russian)
3. Agranovich M. L. Zachem nam rejtingi i kak s nimi borot'sja. [Why do we need ratings and how to fight them]. Rejtingi v obrazovanii: ot razovyh praktik k kul'turnym reshenijam. [Rating in education: from single solutions to cultural practices]. Moscow: Vysshaja shkola jekonomiki. [Higher School of Economics]. 2014. Р. 19–26. (In Russian)
4. Kosaretsky S. G., Sedelnikov A. A. Normativnoe regulirovanie nezavisimoj ocenki kachestva obrazovanija v Rossijskoj Federacii. [Regulatory control of education quality independent evaluation in the Russian Federation]. Rejtingi v obrazovanii: ot razovyh praktik k kul'turnym reshenijam. [Rating in education: from single solutions to cultural practices]. Moscow: Vysshaja shkola jekonomiki. [Higher School of Economics]. 2014. Р. 38–50. (In Russian)
5. Kulemin N. A. Kvalimetricheskij monitoring upravlenija kachestvom obrazovanija: koncepcija, tehnologija, model'. [Qualimetric monitoring of the quality control of education: the concept, the technology mode. Moscow; Izhevsk: Publishing House Alfavit. [Alphabet]. 2000. 187 p. (In Russian)
6. Maslak A. A., Danilov А. А. Razrabotka metodiki izmerenija kachestva obrazovanija v shkole. [Development measuring school education quality method]. Slavyansk-On-Kuban: SGPI, 2009. 67 p. (In Russian)
7. Mertsalova T. A. Regional'nye strategii razvitija nezavisimogo rejtingovanija. Regional development strategies of independent rating. Rejtingi v obrazovanii: ot razovyh praktik k kul'turnym reshenijam. [Rating in education: from single solutions to cultural practices]. Moscow: Vysshaja shkola jekonomiki. [Higher School of Economics]. 2014. Р. 51–73. (In Russian)
8. Pozdnyakov S. A. Metod i algoritmy izmerenija latentnyh peremen¬nyh pri upravlenii v obrazovatel'nyh sistemah. [Method and algorithms latent variables measurement in management of educational systems]. Cand. diss. Kursk, 2009. 168 p. (In Russian)
9. Principy rejtingovanija v obrazovanii v Rossijskoj Federacii (dlja obrazovatel'nyh sistem i organizacij doshkol'nogo, obshhego i dopolnitel'nogo obrazovanija detej). [Principles of rating in education of the Russian Federation (for the educational systems and institutions of pre-school, primary and additional education of children)]. Rejtingi v obrazovanii: ot razovyh praktik k kul'turnym reshenijam. [Ratings in education: from single solutions to cultural practices]. Moscow: Moscow: Vysshaja shkola jekonomiki. [Higher School of Economics].2014. P. 11–18. (In Russian)
10. Rachevsky E. L. Bolotov V. A., Chepurnykh E. E., Usachev A. A. Publichnye rejtingi v obrazovanii: ocenka kachestva i kachestvo ocenki. [Public ratings in education: quality assessment and assessment quality]. Rejtingi v obrazovanii: ot razovyh praktik k kul'turnym reshenijam. [Rating in education: from single solutions to cultural practices]. Moscow: Vysshaja shkola jekonomiki. [Higher School of Economics]. 2014. P. 5–9. (In Russian)
11. Tretyakova T. V. Sistema ocenki kachestva obrazovanija i ee postroenie v regionah s territorial'nymi i nacional'nymi osobennostjami. [Education quality assessment system and it’s creation in regions with territorial and national features]. Abstract of doct. diss. Yakutsk, 2010. 45 p. (In Russian)
12. Erganova N. Y., Kolyasnikova L. V., Igonina Y. V. Theoretical and practical aspects of identification and evaluation of school education quality. Obrazovanie i nauka. [Education and Science]. 2014. № 3. Р. 35–48. (In Russian)
13. Erganova N. Y., Kolyasnikova L. V., Igonina Y. V. Theoretical and Practical Aspects of Identification and Evaluation of School Education Quality. Obrazovanie i nauka. [Education and Science]. 2014. № 4. Р. 91–112. (In Russian)
14. Andrich D. Advanced Social and Educational Measurement. Perth: Murdoch University, 2001. 128 p. (Translated from English)
15. Bond T. G., Fox C. M. Applying the Rasch model. Fundamental Measurement in the Human Sciences. Mahwah, New Jersy: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc., Publishers, 2001. 255 p. (Translated from English)
16. Getting Started RUMM 2010. RaschUnidimensional Measurement Models. Pert: RUMM Laboratory Ltd, 2001. 87 p. (Translated from English)
17. Ingebo G. S. Probability in the Measure of Achievement. Chicago: MESA Press, 1997. 148 p. (Translated from English)
18. Maslak A. A., Karabatsos G., Anisimova T. S., Osipov S. A. Measuring and Comparing Higher Education Quality between Countries Worldwide. Journal of Applied Measurement. 2005. V. 6. № 4. P. 432–442. (Translated from English)
19. Rasch G. Probabilistic models for some intelligence and attainment tests (Expanded edition, with foreword and afterword by Benjamin D. Wright). Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1980. 199 p. (Translated from English)
20. Smith E. V., Smith M. S. Introduction to Rush Measurement. Theory, models and applications. Maple Grove, Minnesota: JAM Press, 2004. 689 p. (Translated from English)
Review
For citations:
Erganova N.E., Kolyasnikova L.V. RATING CREATION FOR PROFESSIONAL EDUCATIONAL ORGANIZATIONS BASED ON THE ITEM RESPONSE THEORY. The Education and science journal. 2016;(4):46-64. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17853/1994-5639-2016-4-46-64
Views:
1056
Email this article 