UTILITARIANISM AS A PHILOSOPHY OF EDUCATION
https://doi.org/10.17853/1994-5639-2016-5-11-24
Abstract
Aim. The article is devoted to the representation of utilitarianism as the philosophy of education. The main problem is the relevance of utilitarian strategies for the present stage of development of education in Russia.
Methods, results and scientific novelty. Utilitarianism is presented as an educational strategy, nominating at the forefront the principle of usefulness of education, positioning education as a means of achieving social and individual wellbeing. The author represents the basic principles of utilitarian philosophy, and also reveals how these principles have been refracted in the philosophy of education using the methods of value-semantic reduction and qualitative content analysis. The first part of the article is devoted to the history of utilitarianism as the philosophy of education in the Euro-American pedagogical culture, as well as the analysis of modern utilitarianism as widely existent in this culture of philosophy of education. In the second part of the article the author explicates the role of utilitarianism in the education strategies of the Russian pedagogical culture, past and present.
The main idea of the article is the idea that we have two value-semantic forms of utilitarianism: narrowly understood (tactical) utilitarianism and widespread (strategic) utilitarianism. Within the tactical utilitarianism as socially and/or individually useful education is considered to be vocationalism, claimed the currently market education. This kind of education is characterized by its focus on learning/teaching applied science and recognition of the futility of Sciences fundamental and philosophical. Under the strategic utilitarianism individually and/or socially beneficial is considered: first, the versatile education characterized by its focus on learning/teaching not only applications, but also fundamental and philosophical disciplines, secondly, eclectic education aimed at obtaining different professional competences. Versatile, eclectic education contributes to the development of creative abilities of the person, as well as provides opportunities for occupational mobility in a changing market.
The main conclusion. The author concludes that narrowly understood utilitarianism is destructive because of its focus on instant profit and situational success.
About the Author
Elena N. YarkovaRussian Federation
Doctor of Philosophical Sciences, Professor, Department of Philosophy, Tyumen State University, Tyumen, Russia (RF).
References
1. Trockij L. Lenin i staraya Iskra. [Lenin and old Spark]. Siluehty: politicheskie portrety: A. Lunacharskij, K. Radek, L. Trockij. [Silhouettes: political portraits: A. Lu-nacharsky, K. Radek, L. Trotsky]. Moscow: Publishing House Politizdat, 1991. P. 8–37. (In Russian)
2. Yarkova E. N. Istoriya i metodologiya nauki. [History and methodology of science]. Tyumen, 2007. 320 p. (In Russian)
3. Yarkova E. N. Massovyj utilitarizm kak impul’s dinamiki obshchestva. Obshchestvennye nauki i sovremennost’. [Social sciences and present]. 1998. No 6. P. 51–63. (In Russian)
4. Barrow R. Plato, utilitarianism and education. London; New York: Routledge, 2010. (Translated from English)
5. Bentham J. An Introduction to the Principles of Morals and Legislation. London: Athlon Press, 1970. (Translated from English)
6. Burn J. H. Happiness and Utility: Jeremy Bentham’s Equation. Utilitas. 2005. Vol. 17. No 1. P. 46–61. (Translated from English)
7. Calo-Blanco A., Villar A. Education, Utilitarianism and Equality of Opportunity. Documentos de trabajo. Fundación BBVA. Publisher, Fundacion BBVA. Vol. 13–2009. (Translated from English)
8. De Meulmeester J.-L. Reforming Higher education in Europe since 80s: between utilitarianism and justice? CEB Working Paper. 2011. No 11/058. (Translated from English)
9. Haber J. MOOCs and Utilitarianism. 2013. Available at: http://degreeoffreedom.org/moocs-and-utilitarianism. (Translated from English)
10. Hare R. Moral Thinking: Its Levels, Method and Point. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1981. (Translated from English)
11. Itzkin Elissa S. Bentham’s Chrestomathia: Utilitarian Legacy to English Education. Journal of the History of Ideas. 1978. Vol. 39. No 2. P. 303–316. (Translated from English)
12. Kopkas J. Is the Casting of Utilitarian as Discordant with Arts Education Philosophy Justified? Journal of Thought. Spring. 2013. P. 52–72. (Translated from English)
13. Levarda M. L. A Victorian utilitarian education in Hard Times. Synergy. 2014. V. 10. No 1. P. 109–116. (Translated from English)
14. Mill J. S. Utilitarianism, fourth edition. Longmans, Green, Reader, and Dyer: London, 2010. (Translated from English)
15. Monroe P. A Brief Course in the History of Education. New York: The Macmillan Company, 1970. (Translated from English)
16. Neem J. N. Making Sense of the Higher Education Debate. Inside Higher Ed. 2013. September 6. Available at: https://www.insidehighered.com/views/2013/09/06/understanding-different-perspectives-higher-ed-debate-essay. (Translated from English)
17. Schneewind J. B. Sidgwick’s Ethics and Victorian Moral Philosophy Clarendon Press: Oxford University Press, 1977. (Translated from English)
18. Tarrant I., Tarrant J. Satisfied Fools: Using J. S. Mill’s Notion of Utility to Analyse the Impact of Vocationalism in Education within a Democratic Society. Journal of Philosophy of Education. 2004. Vol. 38. No 1. P. 107–120. (Translated from English)
19. The Cambridge Companion to utilitarianism. Editors Ben Eggleston, Dale E. Miller. Cambridge University Press, 2014. (Translated from English)
20. The Cambridge dictionary of philosophy. Second edition / General Editor Robert Audi. Cambridge University Press, 1999. (Translated from English)
21. Udas K. Utilitarian Education and Obligations of the University. Latent Pattern Transmission. 2012. No28. Available at: http://www.kenudas.com/ 2012/11/utilitarian-education-and-bligations.html. (Translated from English)
Review
For citations:
Yarkova E.N. UTILITARIANISM AS A PHILOSOPHY OF EDUCATION. The Education and science journal. 2016;(5):11-24. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17853/1994-5639-2016-5-11-24
Views:
21158
Email this article 