DOES MODERN SCHOOL NEED A TEACHER-RESEARCHER?
https://doi.org/10.17853/1994-5639-2016-7-11-25
Abstract
The purpose of the publication is to draw attention of educators
of all levels to the need of improving quality of teacher training in research field.
Methods. Based on the results of observations, interviews and surveys of teachers aged between 23 and 30 years with teaching experience of 1 to 5–6 years, and analysis of teacher practice, the assessment of the current state of innovation processes in public school and quality of university training of pre-service teachers in research field is given.
Results. Insufficient training of young teachers for independent research has been revealed. It was established that the research experience acquired by them while writing the final qualifying work is non-demanded in modern educational work, where innovation is pushed out due to mismatch of educational policy and the actual educational practice. The reasons of reluctance of young professionals to combine educational activities and research are the following: lack of innovation environment, academic overload, household and personal problems, and, most importantly, unwillingness and inability to carry out independent scientific and pedagogical search. Also, the problems of final qualifying works supervision and management of pedagogical practice of students have been found out.
Scientific novelty. Self-assessment of young teachers, concerning their research activities, has been conducted; it included a cluster of research activities that constitute its subject matter. The point for the need to abandon the narrow, focused specialization in high school training of pre-service teachers and enhance their methodological preparation has been developed.
Practical significance. Different ways of organizing work with in-service teachers concerning combination of subject specific and research specific aspects of their professional activities have been presented.
About the Author
T. A. Strokova
Tyumen State University, Tyumen (RF)
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
PhD Pedagogical Sciences, Associate Professor, Academic Chair of Methodology and Theory of Socio-Educational Research
References
1. Belyakova E. G. The problems of modeling practice-oriented research activity of student – teachers within the dimension of university education. Vestnik Tjumenskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Gumanitarnye isledovanija. Humanitates. [Herald of Tyumen State University. Humanities]. 2015. Vol. 1. № 2 (2). Р. 170–180. (In Russian)
2. Borisenkov V. P. Improvement of school education quality in modern Russia. Pedagogika. [Pedagogics]. 2015. Vol. 10. Р. 14–24. (In Russian)
3. Vesmanov S. V., Vesmanov D. S., Zhadko N. V., Akopyan G. A. Training of teachers in a Research Master’s degree: the experience of Moscow City Pedagogical University. Psihologicheskaja nauka i obrazovanie. [Psychological Science and Education]. 2014. Vol. 19. № 3. Р. 160–166. (In Russian)
4. Degtyarev S. N. Development and Implementation of Creativity-Oriented Teaching Strategy. Obrazovanie i nauka. [Education and Science]. 2014. № 6. Р. 20–34. (In Russian)
5. Zagvyazinsky V. I. Issledovatel’skaja dejatel’nost’ pedagoga. [Research activity of the teacher]. Moscow: Publishing House Academija. [Academy]. 2010. 176 p. (In Russian)
6. Zimnaya I. A. Issledovatel’skaja dejatel’nost’ studentov v vuze kak ob’ekt proektirovanija v kompetentnostno-orientirovannoj OOP VPO. [Research activity of students in high school as a design object in the competence-oriented basic educational program of the higher vocational education]. Dlja programmy povyshenija kvalifikacii prepodavatelej vuzov v oblasti proektirovanija OOP, realizujushhih FGOS VPO. [For university professors training improvement programs in higher vocational education design, implemented FSES of Higher Professional Education]. Moscow: Issledovatel’skij centr problem kachestva podgotovki specialistov. [Research Center of Training Quality Problems]. 2010. 40 p. (In Russian)
7. Loginova E. A. Building individual strategies for teaching gifted students (in a foreign language course). Sovremennye naukoemkie tehnologii. [Modern High Technologies]. 2007. № 8. Р. 61–62. (In Russian)
8. Loginova E. A. Experience in design and implementation of individual learning strategies for gifted students (in teaching German language). Nauka i shkola. [Science and School]. 2007. Vol. 3. Р. 39–45. (In Russian)
9. Loginova E. A. Language portfolio as the way of forming the individual strategy in learning a foreign language (German is taken as the example). Nauchnyj vestnik Voronezhskogo gosudarstvennogo arhitekturno-stroitel’nogo universiteta. Serija: Sovremennye lingvisticheskie i metodiko-didakticheskie issledovanija. [Scientific Newsletter of Voronezh State University of Architecture and Civil Engineering. Series: Modern Linguistic and Methodical-and-Didactic Researches]. 2014. Vol. 1 (21). Р. 83–93. (In Russian)
10. Ostrizhnyaya S. G. Pedagogical technology on the basis of informativecommunicative maps: experience of development and use at the lessons of history. Obrazovanie i nauka. [Education and Science]. 2015. № 1 (120). Р. 123–136. (In Russian)
11. Strokova T. А. Criteria and diagnostic tools for monitoring quality assessment of pre-service teachers’ training for practice-oriented research activity. Obrazovanie i nauka. [Education and Science]. 2016. № 3 (132). Р. 29–43. (In Russian)
12. Tjumenskoe uchitel’stvo: rabota i kachestvo zhizni. [Tyumen teachers: work and quality of life]. In G. F. Shafranov-Kutsev (Eds). Tyumen: Tyumen State University, 2015. 264 p. (In Russian)
13. Federal’nyj gosudarstvennyj obrazovatel’nyj standart vysshego obrazovanija «Uroven’ vysshego obrazovanija Bakalavriat. [Federal State Educational Standard of Higher Education «Higher Education Bachelor]. Napravlenie podgotovki 44.03.01 Pedagogicheskie nauki» (utverzhden prikazom Ministerstva obrazovanija i nauki Rossijskoj Federacii ot 4 dekabrja 2015 g. № 1426). [Prospect of preparation 44.03.01 Pedagogical science» (approved by the Russian Federation Ministry of Education and Science, d.d. 4 December, 2015. № 1426)]. (In Russian)
14. Federal’nyj gosudarstvennyj obrazovatel’nyj standart vysshego obrazovanija «Uroven’ vysshego obrazovanija Magistratura. [Federal State Educational Standard of Higher Education «Master’s level of higher education]. Napravlenie podgotovki 44.04.01 Pedagogicheskoe obrazovanie» (utverzhden prikazom Ministerstva obrazovanija i nauki Rossijskoj Federacii ot 21 nojabrja 2014 g. № 1505). [Prospect of preparation 44.04.01 Teacher education» (approved by the Russian Federation Ministry of Education and Science, d.d. 21 November, 2014. № 1505)]. (In Russian)
15. Dorozhkin E. M., Zaitseva E. V., Tatarskikh B. Y. Impact of Student Government Bodies on Students’ Professional Development. IEJME – Mathematics Education. 2016. Vol. 11. № 7. Р. 2666–2677. (Translated from English)
16. Zeer E. F., Streltsov A. V. Technological Platform for Realization of Students’ Individual Educational Trajectories in a Vocational School. IEJME – Mathematics Education. 2016. Vol. 11. № 7. Р. 2639–2650. (Translated from English)
Review
For citations:
Strokova T.A. DOES MODERN SCHOOL NEED A TEACHER-RESEARCHER? The Education and science journal. 2016;(7):11-25. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17853/1994-5639-2016-7-11-25
Views:
1406
Email this article 