TAXONOMY OF EDUCATIONAL OBJECTIVES OF EDUCATORS AND PARENTS OF PRESCHOOL CHILDREN IN THE CONTEXT OF THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE FEDERAL STATE EDUCATIONAL STANDARD
https://doi.org/10.17853/1994-5639-2016-7-88-104
Abstract
The purpose of the article is to describe the taxonomic model that
allows diagnosing the levels of formation of the basic competencies of educators and parents in the conditions of realization of the federal state educational standard in preschool organizations.
Methods. The methods of the research are based on qualimetric and competence approaches, which assume pedagogical expertise of the structure, content and levels of formation of basic competencies of subjects of educational process in the system of preschool education.
Results. The need of formation of basic competences of teachers of the preschool educational institutions (PEI) and parents of the kindergarten children is proved. It is shown how this process has to be reproduced in the individual educational routes directed to creation of optimum conditions for development of the child of early age.
Scientific novelty. A multi-functional taxonomic model of competencies formation among teachers and parents is proposed. This model reflects competenceoriented educational objectives of the members of educational process in preschool education, and makes it possible to examine the extent of its achievement.
Practical significance. Presented in the article taxonomic model can be used in the system of retraining and advanced training of educators of preschool organizations, as well as training of parents of preschool children to the implementation of the Federal State Educational Standard of preschool education.
About the Authors
V. B. Veretennikova
Institute for Advanced Studies and Retraining of Education, the Udmurt Republic, Izhevsk (RF)
Russian Federation
PhD student
Russian Federation
PhD student
O. F. Shikhova
M. T. Kalashnikov Izhevsk State Technical University, Izhevsk (RF)
Russian Federation
Doctor of Pedagogical Sciences, Professor, Department of Vocational Pedagogy
Russian Federation
Doctor of Pedagogical Sciences, Professor, Department of Vocational Pedagogy
Yu. A. Shikhov
M. T. Kalashnikov Izhevsk State Technical University, Izhevsk (RF)
Russian Federation
Doctor of Pedagogical Sciences, Professor, Head of the Department of Vocational Pedagogy
Russian Federation
Doctor of Pedagogical Sciences, Professor, Head of the Department of Vocational Pedagogy
References
1. Veretennikova V. B. Structural and functional model of quality competence-oriented educational process in system of preschool education. Kazanskij pedagogicheskij zhurnal. [Kazan Pedagogical Journal]. 2015. № 5. Part 2. P. 76– 81. (In Russian)
2. Veretennikova V. B. The educational activity of the subjects of the educational process in the modern system of preschool education. Kachestvo. Innovacija. Obrazovanie. [Quality Education Innovation]. 2015. № 9. P. 8–16. (In Russian)
3. Veretennikova V. B., Shikhova O. F. The strategic directions of development of a modern system of preschool education. Sovremennye problemy nauki i obrazovanija. [Modern Problems of Science and Education]. 2015. № 6. Available at: http://www.science-education.ru/130–23303. (In Russian)
4. Isayev T. A., Shikhova O. F. Training as a form of pedagogical practice of students. Obrazovanie i nauka. [Education and Science]. 2014. № 9 (118). P. 98–112. (In Russian)
5. Karpov A. V. et al. Psihologija truda. [Psychology of work]. Ed. By A. V. Karpov. 2nd edition. Moscow: Publishing House Jurajt, 2004. P. 350. (In Russian)
6. Rodionov B. U., Tatur S. A. Standarty i testy v obrazovanii. [Standards and tests in education]. Moscow: Moskovskij inzhenerno- fizicheskij institute. [Moscow Engineering Physics Institute]. 1995. P. 48. (In Russian)
7. Simonov V. P. Pedagogicheskij menedzhment. [Pedagogical management]. Moscow: Pedagogicheskoe obshhestvo Rossii. [Pedagogical Society of Russia]. 1999. P. 430. (In Russian)
8. Subetto A. I. Ontologija i jepistemologija kompetentnostnogo podhoda, klassifi-kacija i kvalimetrija kompetencij. [Ontology and epistemology of the competency approach, classification and qualimetry of competencies]. St.-Petersburg; Moscow: Issledovatel’skij centr problem kachestva podgotovki specialistov. [Research Center of Problems of Quality of Training of Specialists]. 2006. P. 72. (In Russian)
9. Shikhov Y. A. Kvalimetricheskij monitoring kachestva fundamental’noj podgotov-ki v tehnicheskom vuze. [Qualimetric quality monitoring fundamental training in a technical college]. Moscow; Sankt.-Petersburg; Izhevsk: Issledovatel’skij centr problem kachestva podgotovki specialistov. [Research Center of Problems of Quality of Preparation of Experts; Publishing House Styx; Izhevskij gosudarstvennyj tehnicheskij universitet. [Izhevsk State Technical University]. 2007. P. 208. (In Russian)
10. Shikhov Y. A. Conceptual bases of teaching quality monitoring in system of continuing education. Kazanskij pedagogicheskij zhurnal. [Kazan Pedagogical Journal]. 2008. Kazan. № 1. P. 3–6. (In Russian)
11. Shikhov Y. A. Some problems of monitoring the quality of training in the system of «school – high school». Kazanskij pedagogicheskij zhurnal. [Integration of Education]. 2004. № 2. P. 50–52. (In Russian)
12. Anderson L. A. Taxonomy for Learning, Teaching, and Assessing: A Revision of Bloom’s Taxonomy of Educational Objectives. New York: Longman, 2001. 336 р. ISBN 0–321–08405–5. (Translated from English)
13. Anderson S., Leithwood K., Strauss T. Leading data use in schools: organizational conditions and practices at the school and district levels. Leadership and Policy in Schools. № 9 (3). 2010. P. 292–327. (Translated from English)
14. Benjamin S. Bloom Taxonomy of Educational Objectives Book 1: Cognitive Domain 2-nd edition Wesley Publishing Company, 1985. 113 p. ISBN-13: 978–0582280106. (Translated from English)
15. Huber S., Pashiardis P. The recruitment and selection of school leaders. International handbook on the preparation and development of school leaders. 2008. P. 176–202. (Translated from English)
16. Humber S., Gordel B. Quality assurance in the German school system. European Educational Research Journal. 2006. № 5. P. 196–209. (Translated from English)
17. Leithwood K., Harris A., and Hopkins, D. Seven strong claims about successful school leadership. School Leadership and Management. 2008. № 28 (1). P. 27–42. (Translated from English)
18. Nichols N. and Griffith A. Talk, texts, and educational action: an institutional ethnography of policy in practice. Cambridge Journal of Education. 2009. № 39 (2). P. 241–255. (Translated from English)
19. Scout S. and Webber C. Evidence-based leadership development: the 4L framework. Journal of Educational Administration. 2008. № 46 (6). P. 762–776. (Translated from English)
Review
For citations:
Veretennikova V.B., Shikhova O.F., Shikhov Yu.A. TAXONOMY OF EDUCATIONAL OBJECTIVES OF EDUCATORS AND PARENTS OF PRESCHOOL CHILDREN IN THE CONTEXT OF THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE FEDERAL STATE EDUCATIONAL STANDARD. The Education and science journal. 2016;(7):88-104. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17853/1994-5639-2016-7-88-104
Views:
1329
Email this article 