ABOUT BARRIERS ON THE WAY OF REVIVAL OF THE RUSSIAN EDUCATION

The aim of the publication is to continue the discussion of a real state and the most major issues of modern Russian education.

Methods. The positive and negative tendencies in development of the general school and higher pedagogical education are identified and analysed. The aspects of process of restoration of a leader position of the Russian system of training and education in world space are analysed and generalized.

Results and scientific novelty. The most essential obstacles preventing full, positive work of comprehensive school are revealed: distinction of free secondary  education; subordination of educational process to the utilitarian purposes of preparation for Unified State Examination for entering a higher education institution; a hypertrophy of knowledgeable indicators and underestimation of education for achievement by pupils of a social maturity as an important purpose and criterion of success of educational activities; orientation to complete individualization (computerization) of education; subordination of reforming of educational system mainly to interests of its management; excessive overload of school teachers and unification of educational institutions leading to attenuation of creative activity of teachers and pedagogical staff. The author proposes real measures of overcoming the listed barriers on the way of the revival of the Russian education. It is stated that for maintenance of its normal functioning and development it is necessary to rely first of all on own traditions and valuable orientations checked by time, to deepen and increase achievements of mathematical preparation, to reveal and support talented, potentially gifted pupils, and, above all, – to work out an issue of strategic reference points of further development of education.

Practical significance. The problem solution of preparation of pedagogical personnel is of special importance for overcoming the residual crisis phenomena in education. It is emphasized that the immediate urgent task is transition from a formula of «double negative selection» (not the best graduates of school enter pedagogical educational institutions and not the best graduates get a job and stay at pedagogical educational institutions) to work on a formula of the «double positive selection» including real tenders in case of enrollment in higher educational institutions and competitive replacement of pedagogical positions. The experience of such work was accumulated at theTyumenStateUniversity in the late 90-s of the last century.

1. Adamskij A., Asmolov A. Manifesto «Humanistic pedagogics: The XXI centuries». Uchitel’skaja gazeta. [Teacher’s newspaper]. 17 November, 2015. № 46. (In Russian)

2. Beljakova E. G. Notion-oriented pedagogical line item. Pedagogika. [Pedagogics]. 2008. № 2. P. 49–54. (In Russian)

3. Zagvjazinskij V. I. Nastupit li jepoha Vozrozhdenija? Strategija innovacionnogo razvitija rossijskogo obrazovanija. [Whether there will come Renaissance? Strategy of innovative development of Russian education]. The 2nd edition. Moscow: Publishing House Logos, 2015. 140 p. (In Russian)

4. Zagvjazinskij V. I. Strategic reference points of development of domestic education and way of their implementation. Obrazovanie i nauka. [Education and Science]. 2012. № 4. P. 3–16. (In Russian)

5. Zagvjazinskij V. I. There is nothing more practical than methodology. Narodnoe obrazovanie. [Public Education]. 2015. № 3. P. 5–12. (In Russian)

6. Zagvjazinskij V. I. From social strategy to educational practice. Narodnoe obrazovanie. [Public Education]. 2015. № 6. P. 15–24. (In Russian)

7. Zagvjazinskij V. I. About communication of methodology and technology in a pedagogical research]. Obrazovanie i nauka. [Education and Science]. 2015. № 5. P. 4–14. (In Russian)

8. Zagvjazinskij V. I., Zakirova A. F. About standard regulation and forming of methodological culture of teachers-researchers. Obrazovanie i nauka. [Education and Science]. 2013. № 5. P. 3–17. (In Russian)

9. Zagvjazinskij V. I., Strokova T. A. Pedagogicheskaja innovatika: problem strategii i taktiki. [Pedagogical innovatics: problems of strategy and tactics]. Tyumen: Tjumenskij gosudarstvennyj universitet. [Tyumen State University]. 2011. 176 p. (In Russian)

10. Kuz’minov Ja. I., Frumin I. D., Zaharov A. B. Russian school: upgrade alternative from above. Voprosy obrazovanija. [Questions of Education]. 2011. № 3. P. 5–53 (In Russian)

11. Kurkin E. Where did innovators disappear? Uchitel’skaja gazeta. [Teacher’s newspaper]. 2016. № 24–25. (In Russian)

12. Shafranov-Kucev G. F. Jekonomika i upravlenie v vysshej shkole: diskurs na rubezhe vekov. [Economics and management at higher school: Discourse at the milestone of the century]. Moscow: Publishing House Logos. 2012. 406 p. (In Russian)

13. Platonova R. I., Levchenkova T. V., Shkurko N. S., Cherkashina A. G., Kolodeznikova S. I. & Lukina T. N. Regional Educational Institutions With in Modern System of Education. IEJME-Mathematics Education. 2016. № 11 (8). Р. 2937–2948. (Translated from English)

14. Zhakhina N. M., Kukubaeva A. K., Smagulov N. K. Studying innovation technologies in modern education. International Journal of Environmental and Science Education. 2016. № 11 (14). Р. 6512–6517. (Translated from English)