SYSTEMIC EFFECTS OF UNIVERSITY COMPLEXES
https://doi.org/10.17853/1994-5639-2017-2-89-101
Abstract
The aim of the present article is to reveal system effects of the university complexes including the organizations of professional education on different levels.
Methodology and research methods. Theoretical methods: receipt of scientific information on systems, collection of data on university complexes; empirical: comparison and correlation of the obtained data.
Results and scientific novelty. A university complex is designated as a system. The system effects being the results of integration of the organizations of professional education of different levels are educed: effect of instability of the hierarchical relations when preserving a certain structure of a university complex; effect of a single educational purpose, effect of influence of the external environment. These effects cause emergence of new quality of the integrated pedagogical system which is designated as «ability to self-regulating updating».
Practical significance. The materials and results of the study can be used for further development of university complexes as organizations that integrate the establishments of vocational education on different levels.
About the Authors
N. O. Vaganova
Novosibirsk Railway Transport Technical School
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Candidate of pedagogical sciences, Deputy Director for Studies
Novosibirsk (Russia)
V. M. Lopatkin
Altai State Pedagogical University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Doctor of Pedagogical Sciences, Professor of Department of Physics and Technique of Training in Physics
Barnaul (Russia)
References
1. Lopatkin V. M. Integrative trends in the development of educational systems: international and Russian experience. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta. [Bulletin of the Tomsk State Pedagogical University]. 2004. № 6. P. 141–148. (In Russian)
2. Arzhenovskiy S. V. Upravlenie universitetskimi kompleksami: matematicheskie modeli i metody. [Management of university complexes: mathematical models and methods]. Rostov-on-Don: SKNC VSh, 2002. 280 p. (In Russian)
3. Vasiliev V. N., Voronin A. V. University complex as a center of development of regional system of continuous education. Universitetskoe upravlenie: praktika i analiz. [University Management: Practice and Analysis.] 2001. № 3 (18). P. 12–24. (In Russian)
4. Kovalevsky V. P. Problems of the theory and methodology of a regional University complex. Universitetskoe upravlenie: praktika i analiz. [University Management: Practice and Analysis.] 2003. № 2 (25). P. 25–30. (In Russian)
5. Ilyasov D. F., Ilyasova O. A. Systemic effect in the context of the implementation of the priority national project «Education». Vestnik Juzhno-Ural’skogo nacio-nal’nogo universiteta. Serija: Obrazovanie. Pedagogicheskie nauki. [The Bulletin of the South Ural National University. Series: Education. Pedagogical Science]. 2010. № 23 (199). P. 14. (In Russian)
6. Afanasiev V. G. Obshhestvo: sistemnost’, poznanie i upravlenie. [Society: systemacity, knowledge and management]. Moscow: Publishing House Politizdat, 1981. 432 p. (In Russian)
7. Blauberg I. V. Problema celostnosti i sistemnyj podhod. [Problem of integrity and system-based approach]. Moscow: Publishing House Jeditorial URSS, 1997. 450 p. (In Russian)
8. Sadovskiy V. N. Osnovanija obshhej teorii sistem. [The foundation of the general theory of systems]. Moscow: Publishing House Nauka, 1974. 280 p. (In Russian)
9. Ujomov A. I. Sistemnyj podhod i obshhaja teorija sistem. [System approach and general systems theory]. Moscow: Publishing House Mysl’, 1978. 272 p. (In Russian)
10. Toporov V. N. From the field of theoretical toponomastics. Voprosy jazykoznanija. [Questions of Linguistics]. 1962. № 6. P. 3–12. (In Russian)
11. Bir S. Mozg firmy. [Brain of the firm]. Moscow: Publishing House Radio i svjaz’, 1993. 416 p. (In Russian)
12. Mesarovic M., Takahara Ya. Obshhaja teorija sistem: matematicheskie osnovy. [General systems theory: mathematical foundations]. Moscow: Publishing House Mir, 1978. 312 p. (In Russian)
13. Kraevskij V. V. Metodologija pedagogicheskogo issledovanija: posobie dlja pe-dagoga issledovatelja. [Methodology of pedagogical research: a guide for the teacher researcher]. Samara: SamGPI, 1994. 165 p. (In Russian)
14. Vaganova N. O. Teaching staff of the University complex. Professional’noe obrazovanie v sovremennom mire. [Professional Education in the Modern World]. 2016. Vol. 6. № 1. P. 141–145. (In Russian)
15. Afanas’ev A. N., Novikova O. D., Timofeeva O. G. Management of educational process in modern conditions. Jelektronnoe obuchenie v nepreryvnom obrazovanii. [E-Learning in Lifelong Education]. 2016. № 1 (3). P. 4–8. (In Russian)
16. Filatov S. A., Sukhorukova N. G. Lifelong education: the system-synergetic approach. Vestnik Novosibirskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta jekonomiki i upravlenija. [Bulletin of Novosibirsk State University of Economics and Management]. 2015. № 1. P. 18–27. (In Russian)
17. Kovalevsky V. P. The concept of the integrated task management of regional university complexes. Integracija obrazovanija. [Integration of Education]. 2004. № 2. P. 25–30. (In Russian)
18. Koenig A. Towards systemic change: on the co-creation and evaluation of a study programme in transformative sustainability science with stakeholders in Luxembourg. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability. 2015. № 16. P. 89–98. (Translated from English)
19. Holmes, Megan R., Tracy, Elizabeth M., Painter, Lori Long. Moving from Flipcharts to the Flipped Classroom: Using Technology Driven Teaching Methods to Promote Active Learning in Foundation and Advanced Masters Social Work Courses. Clinical social work journal. JUN. 2015. P. 215. (Translated from English)
20. Huszar Z. R. The role of financial synergies in corporate diversification. Journal of Financial and Quantative Analyses. 2009. № 1 (45). P. 231–242. (Translated from English)
21. Skvortsov V. N. Integration in education and ways of classifying integrated education systems. Vestnik gosudarstvennogo universiteta im. A. S. Pushkina. [Bulletin of State University named after A. S. Pushkin]. 2014. Vol. 6. № 3. P. 40–52. (In Russian)
22. Loor Duenas, Maria. Learning styles and environments construct: from contextual diagnosis to the teaching practices open to innovation within the first year of higher education. Cecilia journal of learning styles. 2016. Vol. 9. Issue 17. P. 206–239. (Translated from English)
23. Szymanowski J. V. Problems of organization of research work of students. Uchenye zapiski Rossijskogo gosudarstvennogo social’nogo universiteta. [Scientific Notes of the Russian State Social University]. 2016. Vol. 15. № 2 (135). P. 153–161. (In Russian)
Review
For citations:
Vaganova N.O., Lopatkin V.M. SYSTEMIC EFFECTS OF UNIVERSITY COMPLEXES. The Education and science journal. 2017;(2):89-101. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17853/1994-5639-2017-2-89-101
Views:
1112
Email this article 