PHYSICAL EDUCATION AND INDIVIDUAL CHARACTERISTICS OF THE AGE SPECIFIC DEVELOPMENT

The aim of this paper is scientific substantiation of the importance of the individual characteristics of the age specific youth development which will result in the rational modelling of students’ physical education.
Methodology and research methods. The methods involve collection of experimental data carried out by means of evaluation of motor abilities and general intelligence of students. Motor abilities of students were studied by measuring of strength (dead lift dynamometry), strength endurance (pull-up), speed and power abilities (standing jump), as well as speed ability (running 30, 60 or 100 m, depending on age), aerobic endurance (running 1000 or 3000 m, depending on age). The dynamics of integral physical preparedness (DIPP) of each student was calculated by calculation the arithmetic mean values of the growth rates of the development of motor abilities. Assessment of General Intelligence (GI) of the 8th, 10th and 11th-grades school pupils as well as the 1st to 3rd year students was carried out through the test of R. Amthauer in the adaptation of L. A. Yazykova, and school pupils of the 6th grade were assessed through the Intelligent Test (GIT).
Results. Discrepancies in the dynamics of the mental and motor areas development of maturing personality, which are interpreted as individual characteristics of the age specific development are experimentally revealed. Individual psychological differences leading to the different susceptibility to the development of motor and intellectual abilities appearing in adolescence and early adolescence are analysed. A leading role of activity in formation of the individual characteristics of the age specific development is substantiated. The conclusion of necessity to formulate to the students differing in individual characteristics of the age specific development differentiated in the complexity requirements and motor tasks in the course of physical training is made.
Scientific novelty. For the first time scientific evidence of sustained differences in the dynamics of the physical fitness of students with different levels of general intelligence is obtained on the basis of the experimental research. Scientific substantiation of factors affecting the formation of the individual characteristics of the age specific development is given.
Practical significance. The findings serve as the basis for developing of the differentiated approach to the organization of physical education, taking into account individual characteristics of the age specific development.

1. Fedorov V. A., Tretyakova, N. V. Quality management of educational institutions in protecting students’ health: conceptual and structural-functional innovations. Scientific Bulletin of National Mining University. 2015. № 6 (150). Р. 134–143. (Translated from English)

2. Tretyakova N. V., Fedorov V. A., Abramov D. V., Kalimulin D. M. Educational Institution Health Service Management: Key Aspects of Communication and Interaction Within the Team. IEJME-Mathematics Education. 2016. № 11(8). Р. 2841–2857. (Translated from English)

3. Volkov L. V. Teorija i metodika detskogo i junosheskogo sporta. [Theory and methods of children’s and youth sports]. Kiev: Publishing House Olimpijskaja literature. [Olympic literature]. 2002. 295 р. (In Russian)

4. Guba V. P., Tarpishchev Sh. A., Samoilov A. B. Osobennosti podgotovki junyh tennisistov. [Peculiarities of training of young tennis players]. Moscow: Publishing House SportAkademPress, 2003. 132 р. (In Russian)

5. Filin V. P. Teorija i metodika junosheskogo sporta. [Theory and methods of youth sports]. Moscow: Publishing House Prosveshhenie, 1987. 128 р. (In Russian)

6. Yasyukova L. A. Test struktury intellekta R. Amthaujera (IST): metodicheskoe rukovodstvo. [R. Amthauer test of intelligence structures (IST): methodological guidance]. St.-Petersburg: Publishing House IMATON, 2002. 80 р. (In Russian)

7. Akimova M. K., Borisova E. M., Gurevich K. M., Kozlova V. T., Loginova G. P. Rukovodstvo k primeneniju gruppovogo intellektual’nogo testa (GIT) dlja mladshih podrostkov. [Guide to the use of the intellectual group test (GIT) for younger teens]. Obninsk: Publishing House Printer, 1993. 40 р. (In Russian)

8. Revenko E. M. Age characteristics of physical fitness of students, different intelligence dynamics, as a condition of individualization of physical training. Uchenye zapiski universiteta imeni P. F. Lesgafta. [Scientific Notes. Lesgaft University]. 2016. № 3 (133). Р. 201–207. (In Russian)

9. Revenko E. M., Selova T. F. Intensity of the dynamics of physical preparedness in the process of students growing up with different levels of intelligence. Obrazovanie i nauka. [The Education and Science Journal]. 2016. № 7. Р. 152–164. DOI: 10. 17853/1994–5639–2016–7-152–164 (In Russian)

10. Revenko E. M., Salnikov V. A. Vzaimosvjazi dvigatel’nyh i umstvennyh sposobnostej v processe vzroslenija. [Relationships motor and mental abilities in the process of growing up]. Omsk: Publishing House SibADI, 2014. 392 р. (In Russian)

11. Vygotsky L. S. Voprosy detskoj (vozrastnoj) psihologii. [Questions on child (age) psychology]. Coll. Op.: 6 vol. Moscow, 1984. V. 4. 432 р. (In Russian)

12. Arshavskiy I. A. Fiziologicheskie mehanizmy i zakonomernosti individual’nogo razvitija. [Physiological mechanisms and patterns of the individual development]. Moscow, 1979. 150 р. (In Russian)

13. Slobodchikov V. I. Age category in psychology and pedagogy development. Voprosy psihologii.[Questions of Psychology]. 1991. № 2. Р. 37–49. (In Russian)

14. Salnikov V. A., Revenko E. M. Age factor in the structure of individual development. [Teorija i praktika fizicheskoj kul’tury]. Theory and Practice of Physical Culture. 2014. № 4. Р. 98–103. (In Russian)

15. El’konin D. B. Izbrannye psihologicheskie trudy. [Selected psychological works]. Moscow: Publishing House Pedagogika, 1989. 560 р. (In Russian)

16. Teplov B. M. Trudy po psihofiziologii individual’nyh razlichij. [Proceedings on Psychophysiology of individual differences]. Moscow: Nauka, 2004. 444 р. (In Russian)

17. Revenko E. M. Modification of student assessment criteria as a condition of motivation increasing for physical education lessons. Obrazovanie i nauka. [The Education and Science Journal]. 2016. № 1. Р. 118–132. DOI: 10.17853/1994-5639-2016-1-118-132 (In Russian)

18. Ilyin E. P. Differencial’naja psihofiziologija. [Differential psychophysiology]. St.-Petersburg: Publishing House Piter, 2001. 464 р. (In Russian)

19. Ilyin E. P. Psihomotornaja organizacija cheloveka. [Psychomotor organization of a man]. St.-Petersburg: Publishing House Piter, 2003. 384 р.

20. Rubinstein S. L. Osnovy obshhej psihologii. [Foundations of general psychology]. St.-Petersburg: Publishing House Piter, 2000. 712 р. (In Russian)

21. Leites N. S. Vozrastnaja odarennost’ i individual’nye razlichija. [Age endowments and individual differences]. Moscow; Voronezh, 1997. 448 р. (In Russian)

22. Ilyin E. P. Differencial’naja psihofiziologija fizicheskogo vospitanija i sporta. [Differential psychophysiology of physical education and sport]. Leningrad, 1979. 84 р. (In Russian)

23. Boomsma D., K. Van Baal. Longitudinal genetic study of the IQ twins aged 5–7 years. Voprosy psihologii. [Questions of Psychology]. 1997. № 4. Р. 117–153. (In Russian)

24. Covas J. V., Tikhomirov T. N. Malykh S. B. Problem of stability and variability of general abilities in psychogenetics. Voprosy psihologii. [Questions of Psychology]. 2011. № 6. Р. 67–77. (In Russian)

25. Egorova M. S., Maryutina, T. M. Developmental biology of individuality. Voprosy psihologii. [Questions of Psychology]. 1990. № 3. Р. 9–16. (In Russian)

26. Volochkov A. A. Activity as the subject of mental development factor (hypotheses, models, facts). Psihologicheskij zhurnal. [Psychological Journal]. 2003. Vol. 24. № 3. Р. 22–31. (In Russian)

27. Segalowitz S. The constructivism concept of the developmental psychology and neuroscience. International Society for the Study of Behavioral Development. Newsletter. 2003. Vol. 1. № 43. Р. 2–4. (Translated from English)

28. Scarr S. Developmental theories for the 1990s: Development and individual differences. Child Development. 1992. № 63. Р. 1–19. (Translated from English)

29. Scarr S., McCarmey K. How people make their own environments: A theory of genotype environment effects. Child Development. 1983. № 54 Р. 424–435. (Translated from English)

30. Maryutina T. M. Individualization of mental development in the context of a systematic approach. Psihologicheskaja nauka i obrazovanie. [Psychological Science and Education]. 2004. № 3. Р. 44–45. (In Russian)