Preview

The Education and science journal

Advanced search

THE EFFECT OF PSYCHOLOGICAL WELL-BEING ON THE STUDENT’S INTEGRAL INDIVIDUALITY STRUCTURE

https://doi.org/10.17853/1994-5639-2017-6-119-137

Abstract

Introduction. New Federal State Standards of the higher education impose increased requirements not only to the level of professional competence of university graduates, but also to their personal readiness for implementation of successful professional activity. Psychological well-being is one of the integrative personal bases defining effective and full realization of labour functions by an expert. This has caused the research relevance stated in the article.

The aim of this article is to analyze the specifics of the relationships of students’ integrated individuality of depending with the expression level of psychological well-being.

Methodology and research methods. Methodological base of work involve the concept of psychological well-being by K. Riff, and the theory of integrated identity by V. S. Merlin. The research was conducted with the use of a package of diagnostic methods: «Scales of psychological well-being» by K. Ryff modified by D. G. Orlova; methods of studying the temperament by J. Strelau (adaptation by N. N. Danilova and A. G. Shmelyov); Structure Of Temperament Questionnaire by V. M. Rusalov (STQ); Five-Factor Personal Questionnaire (5PFQ) in A. B. Khromov’s adaptation.

Results and scientific novelty. The retrospective analysis of researches on a psychological well-being phenomenon in foreign and Russian psychology is carried out. The author made an attempt to show the principle of polymorphism as one of the fundamental principles of the integrated identity theory on the example of studying the role of psychological well-being in the structure of a student identity. An empirical part of the present research, carried out on the basis of four higher educational institutions of Perm, showed the existence of general characteristics and significant distinctions on indicators of neurodynamic, psychodynamic and personal levels of integrated identity between two groups of respondents – students with low and high values of psychological well-being. In each group it was succeeded to reveal some unique correlations in interrelations of indicators of these levels. Interrelations of temperament indicators between nervous system and personality indicators, as well as interrelation of personality indicators between each other are specific to a group with low psychological well-being. Only interrelations of temperament indicators between each other are specific to a group with high psychological well-being.

Practical significance. The materials and findings provided in the article can be used for organization of the educational process in higher educational institutions.

About the Author

D. G. Orlova
Perm State Humanitarian Pedagogical University
Russian Federation

Senior Lecturer, Department of Theoretical and Applied Psychology, 

Perm



References

1. Idobaeva O. A. To the question of psycho-pedagogical model of formation of psychological well-being of the individual. Vestnik Moskovskogo gosudarstvennogo lingvisticheskogo universiteta = Bulletin of Moscow State Linguistic University. 2013. № 7 (667). Available at: http://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/k-voprosu-o-psihologo-pedagogicheskoy-modeli-formirovaniya-psihologicheskogo-blagopoluchiyalichnosti#ixzz4braMsPyi (Accessed 12 February, 2017). (In Russian)

2. Bradburn N. The Structure of Psychological well-being. Chicago: Aldine Pub. Co., 1969. 320 p. (Translated from English)

3. Diener E. Cross-cultural correlates of life satisfaction and self-esteem.. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1995. № 68. P. 653–663. ((Translated from English)

4. Diener E. Subjective well-being. Psychological Bulletin. 1984. № 95. P. 542–575. (Translated from English)

5. Diener E., Suh E. M., Lucas R., Smith H. L. Subjective Well-being: Three decades of progress. Psychological Bulletin. 1999. Vol. 125 (2). P. 276–302. (Translated from English)

6. Ryff C. D. Happiness is everything, or is it? Explorations on the meaning of psychological wellbeing. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1989. Vol. 57. P. 1069–1081. (Translated from English)

7. Ryff C. D. The structure of psychological well-being revisited. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1995. Vol. 69. P. 719–727. (Translated from English)

8. Shevelenkova T. D., Fesenko P. P. Psychological well-being (overview of basic concepts and methods of research). Psihologicheskaya diagnostika = Psychological Diagnostics. 2005. № 3. P. 95–129. (In Russian)

9. Leontiev D. A. Psihologia smysla: priroda, stroenie i dinamika smislovoi realnosti. [The psychology of meaning: Nature, structure and dynamics of semantic reality]. Moscow: Publishing House Smysl, 2003. (In Russian)

10. Shamionov R. M. Subjective well-being and value – semantic education of the person in the professional field. Izvestia Saratovskogo universiteta = Izvestiya of Saratov University. 2006. Vol.6. P. 104–109. (In Russian)

11. Panina N. V. Indeks giznennoi udovletvorennosti. [The index of life satisfaction]. Moscow, 1993. (In Russian)

12. Kozmina L. B. Dynamics of psychological well-being of psychology students during training in high school. Teoria i praktika obshestvennogo razvitia = Theory and Practice of Social Development. 2013. № 11. P. 111–118. (In Russian)

13. Busseri M., Sadava S. W. A review of the tripartite structure of subjective wellbeing: Implications for conceptualization, operationalization, analysis, and synthesis. Personality and Social Psychology Review. 2011. № 15 (3). Р. 290–314. (Translated from English)

14. Kahneman D., Diener E., Schwarz N. Well-being: The Foundations of Hedonic Psychology. New York: Russell Sage Found, 1999. P. 3–25. (Translated from English)

15. Keyes C. L. M., Shmotkin D., Ryff C. D. Optimizing well-being: The empirical encounter of two traditions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 2002. Vol. 82. P. 1007–1022. (Translated from English)

16. Burns R. A., Machin M. A. Identifying gender differences in the independent effects of personality and psychological well-being on two broad affect components of subjective well-being. Personality and Individual Differences. 2010. № 48. P. 22–27. (Translated from English)

17. Linley P. A., Maltby J., Woodc A. M., Osborne G., Hurling R. Measuring happiness: The higher order factor structure of subjective and psychological wellbeing measures. Personality and Individual Differences. 2009. № 47. P. 878–884. (Translated from English)

18. Schimmack U. The structure of subjective well-being. The science of subjective well-being. New York, NY US: Guilford Press, 2008. Р. 97–123. (Translated from English)

19. Howell R. T., Kern M. L., Lyubomirsky S. Health benefits: Metaanalytically determining the impact of well-being on objective health outcomes. Health Psychology Review. 2007. № 1. Р. 83–136. (Translated from English)

20. Luhmann M., Schimmack U., Eid M. Stability and variability in the relationship between subjective well-being and income. Journal of Research in Personality. 2011. № 45 (2). Р. 186–197. (Translated from English)

21. Luhmann M., Hofman W., Eid M., Lucas R. E. Subjective Well-Being and Adaptation to Life Events: A Meta-Analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 2012. Vol. 102. № 3. P. 592–615. (Translated from English)

22. Dubrovina I. V. Psychological health of personality in the context of development of age. Razvitie lichnosti = Personal Development. 2015. № 2. Available at: http://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/psihologicheskoe-zdorovie-lichnostiv-kontekste-vozrastnogo-razvitiya (Accessed 01 March, 2017). (In Russian)

23. Voronina A. V. The problem of mental health and human well-being: review of concepts and experience structural-level analysis. Sibirskij psihologicheskij zhurnal = Siberian Psychological Journal. 2005. № 21. Available at: http://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/problema-psihicheskogo-zdorovya-i-blagopoluchiya-cheloveka-obzor-kontseptsiy-i-opyt-strukturno-urovnevogo-analiza (Accessed 01 March, 2017). (In Russian)

24. Smirnov N. К, Valugenich M. V. The creation of a space of psychological well-being as an urgent task of modern school. Nepreryvnoe pedagogicheskoe obrazovanie.ru = Continuous Pedagogical Education.ru. 2012. № 1. Available at: http://www. apkpro.ru/294.html (Accessed 12 February, 2017). (In Russian)

25. Minurova S. A., Zausenko I. V. Personal determinants of psychological well-being of the teacher. Pedagogicheskoe obrazovanie v Rossii = Pedagogical Education in Russia. 2013. № 1. P. 94–101. (In Russian)

26. Polishchuk E. S. Psychological Well-being of students with different levels of role victimization. Psikhologicheskaya nauka i obrazovanie = Psychological Science and Education. 2016. Vol. 8. № 1. P. 35–44. DOI: 10. 17759/psyedu.2016080104. (In Russian)

27. Merlin V. S. Ocherk integralnogo issledovania individualnosti. [Essay on integral research of individuality]. Moscow: Publishing House Pedagogy, 1986. 256 p. (In Russian)

28. Orlova D. G. Evaluation of the psychometric quality and modification of the questionnaire «Scales of psychological well-being» by C. D. Ryff. Vestnik Udmurtskogo universiteta = Bulletin of Udmurtia University. 2016. № 3. P. 53–62. (In Russian)


Review

For citations:


Orlova D.G. THE EFFECT OF PSYCHOLOGICAL WELL-BEING ON THE STUDENT’S INTEGRAL INDIVIDUALITY STRUCTURE. The Education and science journal. 2017;19(6):119-137. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17853/1994-5639-2017-6-119-137

Views: 1604


ISSN 1994-5639 (Print)
ISSN 2310-5828 (Online)