COMPETITIVENESS AND COMPETITIVE ORIENTATIONS: EVALUATION OF STUDENTS

Introduction. Education of a competitive student is a strategically significant problem of the system of higher education in modern social and economic conditions. Personal competitiveness and competitive orientations – priority quality of future expert for successful future professional experience.

The aim of the present research is to study factors of competitive orientations formation and criteria for evaluation of competitiveness of student’s youth in the Russian society.

Methodology and research methods. Results of theoretical researches of Russian and foreign researchers are generalized; secondary analysis of data based on results of sociological researches and analysis of official statistical data are carried out. The results of the sociological survey undertaken in 2017 on the basis of statistical methods were processed and studied by the instrumentality of IBM SPSS Statistics 23 program; 1196 students of institutions of higher and secondary vocational education of the Tyumen region took part.

Results and scientific novelty. It is stated that senior students feel themselves more competitive. It is revealed that a quarter of students who took part in the survey, generally men, count themselves competitive. A continuous distance of goal-setting is recorded among these respondents; in every third case they have plans of professional growth for five and more years that allows them to build attractive competitive strategy.

The level of the competitiveness is directly connected with such indicators as “social stratum”, “overall life satisfaction”, “self-esteem of health”, “tendency to lead a healthy lifestyle” and “the level of trust in the surrounding people”. Mostly the students oriented on competition look into the future with confidence and optimism.

Respondents focused on the competitiveness were more tend to demonstrate their abilities and cause admiration, have a creative approach towards work, be ready for surprises, risk and adventures. At the same time, uncompetitive respondents try to be “simple and modest, not to attract attention to themselves”; focused on abidance by rules; avoid condemnation by the people surrounding them.

Triple, and sometimes, fivefold gap between some indicators received on the basis of response for different block questions of the questionnaire among competitive and noncompetitive students, demonstrates formation of essentially various vital strategy.

Practical significance. The emphasized factors of the formation of competitive orientations and criteria of competitiveness evaluation can provide a framework for the development of organizational and managerial decisions in the system of professional education. 

1. Gokhberg L. M., Zabaturina I. Yu., Kovaleva N. V., et al. Indikatory obrazovaniya: 2016 Statisticheskiy sbornik = Indicators of education: 2016 statistical collection [Internet]. Moscow: Natsional’nyy issledovatel’skiy universitet “Vysshaya shkola ekonomiki”; 2016 [cited 2017 Aug 1]. 320 p. Available from: https://www.hse.ru/data/2016/03/21/1128209800/Indikatory obrazovaniya 2016.pdf (In Russ.)

2. Gromov A. D., Platonova D. P., Semenov D. S., Pyrova T. L. Availability of the higher education in regions of Russia. Sovremennaya analitika obrazovaniya = Modern Analytics of Education [Internet]. 2016 [cited 2017 Aug 1]; 8: 32 p. Available from: https://ioe.hse.ru/data/2017/01/30/1114281696/SAO%208_finalelektronnyy.pdf (In Russ.)

3. Kuznetsova A. R., Yagafarova V. A. Education as key factor of increase in competitiveness of the country. Vysshee obrazovanie segodnya = Higher Education Today. 2013; 1: 31–33. (In Russ.)

4. Beschasnaya A. A., Beschasnyy A. A. Choice of profession and quality of education as factors of successful professional career of university graduates. Teoriya i praktika obshchestvennogo razvitiya = Theory and Practice of Social Development [Internet]. 2017 [cited 2017 Aug 1]; 1: 16–21. Available from: http://teoria-practica.ru/rus/files/arhiv_zhurnala/2017/1/sociology/beschasnayabeschasny.pdf (In Russ.)

5. L’vov L. V., Perevozova O. V. Formirovanie konkurentosposobnosti menedzherov v kompetentnostno-kontekstnoy sisteme professional’nogo obrazovaniya = Formation of competitiveness of managers in the competence-based and contextual system of professional education. Moscow: SGU; 2010. 250 p. (In Russ.)

6. Droppe A., Soderfeldt B. What is academic quality? On the decline of academic autonomy. Sociologisk Forskning. 2010; 47 (3): 57–74.

7. King R. B., McInerney D. M., Watkins D. A. Competitiveness is not that bad… at least in the East: Testing the hierarchical model of achievement motivation in the Asian setting. International Journal of Intercultural Relations. 2012; 36 (3): 446–457.

8. Antonio Garcia-Martinez J., Gutierrez-Hita C., Sanchez-Soriano J. Competitiveness, cooperation, and strategic interaction a classroom experiment on oligopoly. Revista internacional de sociologia. 2012; 70 (1): 167–187.

9. Tang Shi-Ming, Shi Fang-Miao, Chen Xi. Career Competitiveness of College Graduates: Issues and Problem Solving. International Conference on Sociology and Psychology (ICSP); 2015; Changsha, PEOPLES R CHINA. p. 171–175.

10. Radaev V. V. What is the competition? Ekonomicheskaya sotsiologiya = Economic sociology [Internet]. 2003 [cited 2017 Aug 1]; 4 (2): 16–25. Available at: https://ecsoc.hse.ru/data/2011/12/08/1208204948/ecsoc_t4_n2.pdf#page=16 (In Russ.)

11. White H. C. Markets from networks: Socioeconomic models of production. Princeton: Princeton University Press; 2002. p. 38–79.

12. Terelyanskaya I. V. Research of competitiveness of students of higher education institution as integrated characteristic of the personality. Vysshee obrazovanie segodnya = Higher Education Today. 2012; 4: 26–28. (In Russ.)

13. L’vov L. V., Perevozova O. V. The maintenance of a phenomenon «competitiveness» in professional education. Vestnik Chelyabinskoy gosudarstvennoy agroinzhenernoy akademii = Bulletin of the Chelyabinsk State AgroEngineering Academy. 2014. Tom 67/2: 52–57. (In Russ.)

14. Andreev V. I. Konkurentologiya. Uchebnyy kurs dlya tvorcheskogo samorazvitiya konkurentosposobnosti = Competitiveness studies: Training course for creative self-development of competitiveness. Kazan: Tsentr innovatsionnykh tekhnologiy; 2013. 468 p. (In Russ.)

15. Reznik S. D. Who will teach the student to live? Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii = Higher Education in Russia. 2015; 1: 146–152. (In Russ.)

16. Parygin B. D. Praktikum po sotsial’no-psikhologicheskomu treningu = Workshop on social psychologically training. St.-Petersburg: V. A. Mikhaylov’s Publishing House; 2000. 352 р. (In Russ.)

17. Reznik S. D., Konovalova E. S., Sochilova A. A. Konkurentoorientirovannost’ i konkurentosposobnost’ studencheskoy molodezhi Rossii = Competitive orientations and competitiveness of student’s youth of Russia. Opyt, problemy, perspektivy = Experience, problems, prospects. Moscow: Publishing House NITs Infra-M; 2013. 213 p. (In Russ.)

18. Reznik S. D., Konovalova E. S. The problem of students’ competitiveness in higher educational institutions. Ekonomicheskoe vozrozhdenie Rossii = Economic Renovation of Russia. 2012; 1: 18–26. (In Russ.)

19. Reznik S. D., Chernikovskaya M. V., Sochilova A. A. Competitive orientations and competitiveness of the university graduates: Experience, prospects of scientific search. Problemy sovremennoy ekonomiki = Problems of Modern Economics. 2013; 3 (47): 399–402. (In Russ.)

20. Zanaev S. S. Competitiveness and competitive orientations as pedagogical categories. Vestnik Chechenskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta = Bulletin of Chechen State University. 2015; 4: 221–225. (In Russ.)

21. Gorshkov M. K., Tikhonova N. E. Middle class as social base of ensuring competitiveness of Russia. Rossija reformirujushhajasja: Ezhegodnik – 2005 = Russian Reformation: Annals – 2005 [Internet]. 2006 [cited 2017 Aug 1]; 5; 10–43. Available from: http://www.civisbook.ru/files/File/Srednij klass kak socialnaya baza.pdf (In Russ.)