THE RESULTS OF ENGLISH TEACHING AS A FOREIGN LANGUAGE FOR ACADEMIC STAFF IN THE ARTIFICIAL BILINGUALISM ENVIRONMENT

Introduction. In the conditions of the modern globalization, one of the most significant indicators of competitiveness of the universities is the academic mobility of students, graduate students, teachers and research associates that implies their free and competent enough foreign language skills, first of all English. Yet, until recently, comparatively little attention has been paid to foreign language skills of the Russian academic teaching staff. However, in recent years, with regard to the process acceleration of internationalization of the higher education to provide own effective functioning and remain a demanded one in education and training market, domestic higher education institutions are forced to quickly fill in the gaps of foreign language knowledge among academic teaching staff. The aim of this article is to analyse and describe the tuition outcomes for academic teaching staff based on the official exam results from Cambridge English Language Assessment for three years (2015–2017). Methodology and research methods. The research, which is grounded in interdisciplinary approach and lies at the intersection of psychology, linguistics and pedagogics, was conducted on the basis of the statistical analysis and generalization of mean scores of English language testing results, taking into account qualitative and quantitative standards of speech skills: reading, writing, listening, speaking and use of English (for levels B2, C1). Results and scientific novelty. The essential strengthening and development of the Cambridge English system for level increase of proficiency in English among the Russian academic teaching staff is proved. The data of external peer evaluation provided by exam centre Cambridge English Language Assessment including the foreign language training results of academic teaching staff are analysed. The results obtained show that contrary to the wide-spread opinion that productive skills (speaking and writing) take longer to develop and are difficult to acquire, university teachers demonstrate a different trend: the worst developed skill is listening, then comes reading, writing and speaking. Practical significance. The research provided in the article gives additional understanding of specifics of English training for adults, namely academic teaching staff, and features of their cognitive age processes when foreign language skills acquisition. The materials of the presented publication will be useful to teachers of a foreign language and higher education institution authorities while organizing additional learning foreign languages education in the conditions of artificial bilingualism, also, when teaching programmes updating for the purpose of strengthening of its efficiency.

1. Altbach, P. G., Knight, J. The internationalization of higher education: Motivations and realities. Journal of Studies in International Education. 2007; 11 (3/4): 290–305. DOI:10.1177/1028315307303542

2. Bedenlier S., Zawacki-Richter O. Internationalization of higher education and the impacts on academic faculty members. Research in Comparative and International Education. 2015; 10 (2): 185–201. DOI: 10.1177/1745499915571707

3. Tamtik M., Kirss L. Building a norm of internationalization: The case of Estonia’s higher education system. Journal of Studies in International Education. 2016; 20 (2): 164–183. DOI: 10.1177/1028315315587107

4. Knowles M. S., Holton III E. F., Swanson R. A. The adult learner: The definitive classic in adult education and human resource development. New York: Routledge; 2014.

5. Pew S. Andragogy and Pedagogy as Foundational Theory for Student Motivation in Higher Education. Student Motivation [Internet]. 2007 [cited 2017 June 9]; 2: 14–25. Available from: http://insightjournal.park.edu/wp-content/uploads/2015/08/1-Andragogy-and-Pedagogy-as-Foundational-Theory-for-Student-Motivation-in-Higher-Education.pdf

6. Thompson M. A., Deis M. Andragogy for adult learners in higher education. Allied Academies International Conference. Proceedings of the Academy of Accounting and Financial Studies; 2004; New Orleans. Vol. 9 (1): 107–111.

7. Okhotnikova A., Daminova, J., Muzafarova A., Rasskazova T., Verbitska-ya N., University HR strategy: Ways of facilitating internationalization. In: The 2nd Anniversary International Conference CSR: University Builds the Country Conference Proceedings; September 11–14; Prague, Czech Republic. 2015; Vol. 1: 130–139.

8. Rasskazova T. P., Muzafarova A. D. Organisational conditions for training University professors to work in an international teaching and learning environment (Ural Federal University case study). Pedagogichesky zhurnal Bashkortostana = Pedagogical Journal of Bashkortostan. 2015; 4: 110–117. (In Russ.)

9. Rasskazova T. P., Muzafarova A. D., Verbitskaya N. Motivation of Russi-an University professors in conditions of adaptation towards international teaching and learning environment (Ural Federal University case study). Sovremenniye problem nauki i obrazovaniya = Contemporary Issues of Science and Education [In-ternet]. 2015 [cited 2017 Sept 2]; 1–1. Available from: http://www.science-education.ru/121–18650 (In Russ.)

10. Slesarenko I. Professional training–English as foreign language enhancement courses for content teachers at technical university. In: 4th International Conference on Education and New Learning Technologies; 2012 July 2–4; Barcelona. Spain: IATED; 2012.p. 5566–5570.

11. Chernichkina E. K. Koncepcija iskusstvennogo bilingvizma v teorii jazyka = Artificial bilingualism concept in the theory of language. Volgograd: Publishing House Peremena; 2007. (In Russ.)

12. Thornbury S. An A-Z of ELT. Pearson; 2006.

13. Vandergrift L., Baker S. Learner variables in second language listening comprehension: An exploratory path analysis. Language Learning. 2015; Vol. 65, Issue 2: 390–416. DOI:10.1111/lang.12105

14. Vandergrift L., Goh C. C. Teaching and learning second language listening: Metacognition in action. New York: Routledge; 2012.

15. Vandergrift L. Listening to learn or learning to listen? Annual Review of Applied Linguistics. 2004; 24: 3–25.

16. Buck G. Assessing listening. New York: Cambridge University Press; 2001.

17. Rasskazova T. P., Glukhanyuk N. S. Listening as a cognitive age-related resource for foreign language learning. In: 11th Annual International Technology, Education and Development Conference; 2017 Mar 6–8; Valencia. Valencia: IN-TED; 2017. p. 4600–4609. DOI: 10.21125/inted.2017.1079

18. Archila-Suerte P., Zevin J., Hernandez A. E. The effect of age of acquisition, socioeducational status, and proficiency on the neural processing of second language speech sounds. Brain and Language. 2015; 141: 35–49. DOI: 10.1016/j.bandl.2014.11.005

19. Avivi-Reich M., Danema M., Schneider B. A. How age and linguistic competence alter the interplay of perceptual and cognitive factors when listening to conversations in a noisy environment. Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience. 2014; 8. DOI: 10.3389/fnsys.2014.00021

20. Bonifacci P., Tobia V. Crossing barriers: Profiles of reading and comprehension skills in early and late bilinguals, poor comprehenders, reading impaired, and typically developing children. Learning and Individual Differences. 2016; 47: 17–26. DOI:10.1016/j.lindif.2015.12.013