TRENDS IN HIGHER VOCATIONAL EDUCATION: PROFESSIONALIZATION OR DEPROFESSIONALIZATION?

Introduction. Student population is the most important social resource of development of post-industrial information society. Therefore, those students will take places of leading experts and will define the level of social and economic wellbeing of the country and its competitiveness in the world in the near future. In this regard, it is important to find out the potential of the student's environment in order to convert it without any loss into social and cultural capital of the state. First of all, this potential is made up by education, qualification and profession and students’ valuable relation to their occupation. Thereby, such valuable relation depends on a degree of a future specialist’ personal maturity, a degree of his/her responsibility for the activity, and readiness for professional selfimprovement.

The aims of the present publication are: to analyse the processes of professional self-determination among students; to reveal the tendencies of students’ professional self-determination.

Methodology and research methods. The methodological basis of the research involves modern scientific theories formulated within branches of Sociology – Sociology of Education and Sociology of Youth. Representative quota-cluster selective questionnaire survey was used as the main method; that was carried out in seven steps in 1995–2016. The total amount of selection involved 9133 students studying in higher education institutions of Sverdlovsk region – one of the largest administrative territories of Russia.

Results and scientific novelty. The results of a unique long-term monitoring are generalized and interpreted. In the course of the monitoring, the dynamics of professional self-determination of student youth was traced by means of such key indicators as follows: motives of the choice of the sphere of employment and educational institution; personal importance of future profession for students; professional plans of students after graduating from a higher education institution. The obtained data refer to a complex of problems and contradictions of functioning of institutes of education and a profession during the period of societal transformations. The main conclusion drawn by the authors consists in the fact of growing tendency towards the deprofessionalization of students.

Practical significance. The materials of the research could be useful to design and update vocational guidance of young people.

1. Akulich M. M., Batyreva M. V. Features of professional self-determination of graduates of schools in the conditions of an economic crisis. Aktual'nye problemy sociologii molodezhi = Current Problems of Sociology of Youth. Ed. by Yu. R. Vishnevsky. Ekaterinburg: Ural Federal University named after the first President of Russia B. N. Yeltsin; 2010. p. 58–63. (In Russ.)

2. Abramov R. N. A professional complex in social structure of society (according to Parsons). Sociologicheskie issledovaniya = Sociological Research. 2005; 1: 54–66. (In Russ.)

3. Ayvazyan A. A., et al. Grazhdanskaya kul'tura molodezhi Sverdlovskoj oblasti: tenden-cii, problemy, perspektivy = Civil culture of youth of Sverdlovsk region: Tendencies, problems, prospects. Ed. by Yu. R. Vishnevsky. Ekaterinburg: Ural State University; 2017. 244 p. (In Russ.)

4. Didkovskaya Ya. V. Dynamics of professional self-determination of students. Sociologicheskie issledovaniya = Sociological Research. 2001; 7: 132–135. (In Russ.)

5. Giddens A. Predislovie k pervomu izdaniyu = The introduction to the first edition. Teoreticheskaja sociologija: antologija = Theoretical sociology: Anthology [Internet]. In 2 parts. Transl. from English, French, German, Italian. Ed. by S. P. Bankovskaya. Moscow: Publishing House Universitet; 2002 [cited 2016 Apr 03]. Available from: http://finances.social/sotsiologiya_719/predislovie-pervomuizdaniyu-43402.html (In Russ.)

6. Zeer E. F. Psihologiya professij = Psychology of professions. 2nd edition. Moscow; Ekaterinburg: Publishing Houses Akademicheskij proekt; Delovaja kniga; 2003. 336 p. (In Russ.)

7. Ivanchenko G. V. On a threshold of professional career: Social problems and personal strategy of the choice. Mir Rossii = World of Russia. 2005; 2: 97–124. (In Russ.)

8. Orlova V. V. Social maturity of youth: Social and psychological aspects. Mezhdunarodnyj zhurnal prikladnyh i fundamental'nyh issledovanij (Rossijskaya akademiya estestvoznaniya) = International Journal of Applied and Basic Research (Russian Academy of Natural Sciences). 2009; 5: 124–130. (In Russ.)

9. Bauman S. Individualizirovannoe obshchestvo = The individualized society. Ed. by V. L. Inozemtsev. Moscow: Publishing House Logos; 2005. 390 p. (In Russ.)

10. Melamed D. A. Social and psychological features of educational and professional motivation of students. Psihologicheskaya nauka i obrazovanie = Psychological Science and Education [Internet]. 2011 [cited 2016 May 11]; 2. Available from: http://www.psyedu.ru/journal/2011/2/2116.phtml (in Russ.)

11. Toffler E., Toffler X. Revolyucionnoe bogatstvo: kak ono budet sozdano i kak ono izmenit nashu zhizn' = Revolutionary wealth: As it will be created and as it will change our life. Transl. from English by M. Sultanova, N. Tsyrkun. Moscow: Publishing House AST; 2008. 569 p. (In Russ.)

12. Beck U. Obshchestvo riska = Society of risk. Na puti k drugomu modernu = On the way to other modernist style. Transl. from German. Moscow: Publishing House Progress; Tradicija; 2000. 384 p. (In Russ.)

13. Toshchenko Zh. T. The precariat – a new social class. Sociologicheskie issledovaniya = Sociological Research. 2015; 6: 3–13. (In Russ.)

14. Standing G. Prekariat: novyj opasnyj klass = The precariat: The new dangerous class. Transl. from English by N. Usov. Moscow: Publishing House Ad Marginem; 2014. 328 p. (In Russ.)

15. Konstantinovskiy D., Abramova M., Voznesenskaya E., Goncharova G., Kostiuk V., Popova E. & Cheredninichenko G. Novye smysly v obrazovatel'nyh strategiyah molodezhi: 50 let issledovaniya = New meanings in educational strategies of youth: 50 years of research. Moscow: Social Forecasting and Marketing Center; 2015. 232 p. (In Russ.)

16. Abdiraiymova G., Shnarbekova M. & Sanghera, B. Youth of Kazakhstan: Current patterns of professional choice. 10th International Technology, Education and Development Conference (INTED); 2016 Mar 07–09; Valencia, Spain. 2016. p. 579–588.

17. Timostsuk I., Ugaste A. & Kailas L. Factors that affect occupational choice for future teachers in Estonia. ICEEPSY 2016: 7th International Conference on Education and Educational Psychology; 2016 Oct 10–15; Rhodes, Greece. 2016. p. 229–239. DOI: 10.15405/epsbs.2016.11.24

18. Giersch J. A test of personal and social utility values and the appeal of a career in teaching. Springer, Educational Research for Policy and Practice. 2016; 15 (3): 163–173. DOI: 10.1007/s10671–016–9194–7

19. Watt B. Skilled trades to university student: Luck or courage? Emerald Group Publishing Ltd Education and Training. 2016; 58 (6): 643–654. DOI: 10.1108/ET-01–2016–0016

20. Albulescu M. & Albulescu I. Motivational Benchmarks for teaching career choice. 3rd International Conference on Education Reflection Development (ERD); 2015 Jul 03–04; Cluj-Napoca, Romania. 2015; 209: 9–16. DOI: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.11.219

21. Dyachenko O. V., Zarubezhnov E. S. Reindustrialization of the industry of the Ural Federal District. Economics & Law. 2016; 11–1 (69): 23–32. (In Russ.)

22. Gushchin O. V. Budushchee rodnogo Urala – za iniciativoj i otvetstvennost'yu molodezhi! = The future of the native Urals – behind an initiative and responsibility of youth! [Internet]. 2004 [cited 2016 Nov 25]. Available from: http://zazdoc.ru/docs/2800/index-683827–1.html (In Russ.)