BUREAUCRATISM AS AN INDICATOR OF SYSTEMIC CONTRADICTIONS IN THE EDUCATION SYSTEM

Introduction. The problem of a sharp increase in paperwork done by experts of an education system, educators and teachers has been repeatedly brought up by the pedagogical community. The teachers have to draw up endless reports, plans, schedules, references; as a consequence, teachers have less time and energy to perform direct professional duties – training and education of younger generation. Nevertheless, continuous appeals of “masses” and recurrent promises of “heads” to reduce the unreasonable bureaucratic reporting have not led even to the minimum positive changes. The aim of the publication is the identification and discussion of the causes of bureaucratism in education; comparison of the tendencies of development of the world pedagogical system with the processes of development of the Russian system of education.

Methodology and methods of research. The methodological framework is based on the holistic approach, the complex systems theory, and the synergetics foundations. The study is made up of the comparative, structural and functional analysis of educational systems with the methods of modeling and forecasting application.

Results and scientific novelty. It is proved that bureaucratism has objective nature; it is an indicator of a crisis situation, which in turn, is a consequence of systemic contradictions not only within the framework of the existing education system but also in the whole pedagogical system as an ideal foundation of the education institutions functioning. Having reflected own practice and analysed pedagogical publications, the author has systematized the crises of education according to the singled out levels of the contradictions which differ with degree of “globality”. The groups of contradictions of each of the levels that determine the depth of the crisis are formulated and described: contradictions between the existing global pedagogical system and the social, technical, natural world surrounding it; internal disagreement of elements of the system; particular and local discrepancies which are most often pointed out as the crisis reasons, but actually they are not. The latter involve insufficient financing, lack of teaching hours, low motivation of graduates of pedagogical universities for work within the specialty, etc. The mechanisms, dialectic character of the highlighted contradictions, and reaction of the governing structures to each of them are shown. The advantages and disadvantages of the “liberal” and “statist” approaches to the solution of problems of education are considered. The conclusion is drawn that global social, economic, technological changes and outlined trends in labour market reflect the demand for reorganization of the educational sphere which has less need of an integrated control center.

Practical significance. Identification of the facts of the crisis aggravation and accompanying growth of bureaucratism enables to distinguish the strategic discrepancy between the managerial decisions and the existing trends in the educational system and the society as a whole. It is stated that the only proper strategy is the freedom of education, creation of a favourable environment for it instead of imposing of one’s authoritative and grounded decisions.

crisis, contradictions of education, pedagogical system, bureaucratism, systemic, synergetic approach

1. Balackij E. V. Administrative paradoxes of reforms in the university sector. Zhurnal Novoj jekonomicheskoj associacii = Journal of New Economic Association. 2015; 2: 124–149. (In Russ.)

2. Donskih O. A. Multidirectional management of education as a result of stratification of the Russian society. Idei i ideally = Idea and Ideals. 2012; V. 1. № 4 (14): 136–144. (In Russ.)

3. Nurieva L. M., Kiselev S. G. The problems of measurement the higher professional education institutions efficiency. Obrazovanie i nauka = The Education and Science Journal. 2016; 4: 95–116. DOI:10.17853/1994–5639–2016–4-95– 116 (In Russ.)

4. Afanas’eva V. V. Five symptoms of a serious illness of the higher education. Sajt IA “Vzgljad-info” = Website of Vzglyad-Info News Agency [Internet]. 2017 Apr 10 [cited 2018 Feb 22]. Available from: http://www.vzsar.ru/news/2017/04/10/professor-sgy-rasskazala-glave-minobrnayki-o-krizise-vysshei-shkoly.html; lawinrussia.ru (In Russ.)

5. Fursej G. Cry from the heart of the Russian scientists and teachers: About crisis of science and education. Moskovskiye vedomosti [Internet]. 2018 Jan 30 [cited 2018 Feb 22]. Available from: http://mosvedi.ru/news/science/russia/21277.html (In Russ.)

6. Kazmin N. Nenavizhu: otkrytoe pis’mo = I hate: Open letter [Internet]. 2018 Jan 31 [cited 2018 Feb 23]. Available from: https://pedsovet.org/beta/article/ne-simbioz-a-parazitizm (data obrashhenija: 23.02.2018). (In Russ.)

7. Bodrova E. V., Nikitina S. B. Crisis of an education system. Search of a new paradigm of education at a turn of the 20–21st centuries [Internet]. [cited 2018 Feb 23]. Available from: http://www.mosgu.ru/nauchnaya/publications/2009/professor.ru/Bodrova&Nikitina.pdf (In Russ.)

8. Lebedev O. E. System crisis in education as subject of the analysis [Internet]. [cited 2018 Feb 23]. Available from: http://www.lihachev.ru/pic/site/files/lihcht/2005/st3/lih_2005_st3_09.pdf (In Russ.)

9. Karmanova D. Crisis of the Russian higher education: To the problem aspectization. Labirint: zhurnal social'no-gumanitarnyh issledovanij = Labyrinth. Journal Philosophy and Social Studies. 2012; 1: 78–84. (In Russ.)

10. Benin V. L. On the periphery of the subject field of pedagogical studies. Pedagogicheskoe obrazovanie = Pedagogical Education. 2017; 5: 6–10. (In Russ.) 11. Moren Je. Metod. Priroda prirody = Method. Kind of nature. Moscow: Publishing House Progress – Tradicija; 2005. 464 p. (In Russ.)

11. Illich I. Osvobozhdenie ot shkol. Proporcional’nost’ i sovremennyj mir: (fragmenty iz rabot raznyh let) = Liberation from schools. Proportionality and modern world (fragments from works of different years). Translated from German. Ed. by T. Shanin. Moscow: Publishing House Prosveshhenie; 2006. 149 p. (In Russ.)

12. Usol’tsev A. P. Osnovnye protivorechija razvitija pedagogicheskoj sistemy = Main contradictions of development of pedagogical system. Yekaterinburg:

13. Ural State Pedagogical University; 2016. 166 p. (In Russ.)

14. Hvedchenja L. V. Nature of crisis in modern education. Sociologija = Sociology. 2014; 1: 78–86. (In Russ.)

15. Fejgenberg I. Evolving crisis in education. Obrazovatel'naja politika =

16. Education Policy. 2010; 10 (47): 99–105. (In Russ.)

17. Nurieva L. M. Kiselev S. G. Average score of the Unified State Examination. Obrazovanie i nauka = The Education and Science Journal. 2017; 19 (6): 33– 51. DOI:10.17853/1994–5639–2017–6-33–51 (In Russ.)

18. Nurieva L. M., Kiselev S. G. Results of the Unified State Exam: Experience of interregional comparisons. Obrazovanie i nauka = The Education and Science Journal. 2016; № 10 (139): 1–38. DOI:10.17853/1994–5639–2016–10–11–38 (In Russ.)

19. Brylina I. V. Philosophy of management of education development: Development of methodological bases of assessment model for quality management of certification in education. Izvestija Tomskogo politehnicheskogo universiteta. Inzhiniring georesursov = Proceedings of Tomsk Polytechnic University. Georesources Engineering. 2013; 6: 149–155. (In Russ.)

20. Bryzgalina E. V, Kiselev V. N. About some characteristics and contradictions in development of modern education. Al’manah “Prostranstvo i vremja” =

21. Almanac “Space and Time”. 2015; V. 9. № 1: 8. (In Russ.)

22. Kartashova A. A. Difficult thinking and its influence on educational process at the higher school. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo arhitekturno-stroitel'nogo universiteta = Bulletin of Tomsk State University of Architecture and Building. 2013; 3: 9–13. (In Russ.)