VIRTUAL COMPETITIVENESS: YOUTHS’ VIEWS

Introduction. Nowadays, the use of information and communication technologies (ICT) has become an integral part both of every individual’s life and of the society in general. It is no longer possible to deny the impact of virtual environment on socialisation and development of the identity of young people. In this regard, the investigation of young people’s view on virtual social networks, and the possibility of students’ own competitiveness realization through various web services. The aim of the research presented in the article is to study the factors of students’ assessment of virtual social networks as a tool of personal fulfillment. Methodology and research methods. Content analysis and synthesis of scientific publications studies were carried out at a theoretical stage of the research; secondary sampling analysis of sociologic data material sources was conducted. The empirical research stage involved the instrument of questionnaire surveys, statistical data processing and interpretation of the results. Results and scientific novelty. The social survey conducted in 2017 with the participation of 1087 high school students and 1196 college students of the Tyumen Region shown that the more competitive students consider themselves, the more competitive they perceive the people having great popularity on the Internet. At that, compared to girls, young people are more inclined to consider the people having great popularity on the Internet competitive. It is determined that having a popular virtual media account for the young person is less worthwhile than for female respondents. The author explains this fact: male representatives regard it as “social capital” which can contribute to growth of their competitiveness in society as well as to achieve some profit. The author concludes that youth views on competitiveness are not directly related to the activity in virtual social networks. Frequent use by respondents of the Internet and ICTs both in the course of training, and in spare time does not depend on the perception of personal level of competitiveness in society; although, the importance of having own popular social media account on the Internet is directly proportional to the level of own competitiveness assessment. Practical significance. The materials of the present research can be applied to develop and design recommendations for psychological and pedagogical maintenance of the process of youth socialization.

1. Wakefield Marie A., Rice Cynthia J. The Impact of cyber communication on today‘s youth. (ACAPCD-14). Alexandria, VA: American Counseling Association; 2008.

2. Sobkin V. S. A modern teenager in social networks. Pedagogika = Pedagogics. 2016; 8: 61–73. (In Russ.)

3. Jafarzadeh-Kenarsari F., Pourghane P. College students’ experiences on smart phone technology usage: A qualitative content analysis study. Qualitative Report. 2017; 22 (11): 2864–2880.

4. Boyd D. M., Ellison N. B. Social network sites: Definition, history, and scholarship. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication. 2007; 13 (1): 210–230.

5. Akulich M. M., Batyreva M. V., Golovanova Yu. I. Couchsurfing as a social practice. Vestnik Rossiiskogo universiteta druzhby narodov. Seriya: Sotsiologiya = Bulletin of Russian Peoples’ Friendship University. Series Sociology. 2017; 17 (4): 568–577. (In Russ.)

6. Solovyev V. S. Criminality in the social networks of the Internet (crimino-logical research on the materials of judicial practice). Kriminologicheskiy zhurnal Baykal'skogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta ekonomiki i prava = Criminological Journal of the Baikal State University of Economics and Law. 2016; 10 (1): 60–72. (In Russ.)

7. Voiskunsky A. E., Evdokimenko A. S., Fedunina N. Yu. Alternative identity in social networks. Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Seriya 14: Psikhologiya = The Moscow University Herald. Series 14: Psychology. 2013; 1: 66–83. (In Russ.)

8. Shchekoturov A. V. From flirting to changing sex online: Adolescent practices of alternative self-presentations in the social network “Vkontakte”. Monitoring obshchestvennogo mneniya: Ekonomicheskiye i sotsial’nyye peremeny = Monitoring of Public Opinion: Economic and Social Changes. 2017; 6: 327–343. (In Russ.)

9. Gubanov D. A., Chkhartishvili A. G. The conceptual approach to the analysis of online social networks. Upravleniye bol’shimi sistemami = Management of Large Systems. 2013; 45: 222–236. (In Russ.)

10. Korshunov A. V., Gomzin A. G., Andrianov I. A. etc. Analysis of social networks: methods and applications. Trudy Instituta sistemnogo programmirovani-ya RAN (elektronnyy zhurnal) = Proceedings of the Institute for System Programming of the Russian Academy of Sciences (e-journal) [Internet]. 2014 [cited 2017 Nov 27]; 26 (1): 439–456. Available from: http://ubs.mtas.ru/archive/search_results_new.php? publication_id=19123 (In Russ.)

11. Field J. Social Capital. London; New York: Routledge; 2008. 168 p.

12. Soldatova G. U., Nestik T. A. Youth in the network: Strength and weakness of social capital. Obrazovatelnaya politika = Educational Policy. 2010; 3–4: 24–40. (In Russ.)

13. Pike J., Bateman P., Butler B. “You Saw THAT?: Social networking sites, self-presentation, and impression formation in the hiring process” [Internet]. AMCIS Proceedings. 2012 [cited 2017 Nov 27]: 8. Available from: http://aisel.ais-net.org/amcis2012/proceedings/EndUserIS/8

14. Efimova G. Z. Competitiveness and competitive orientations: Evaluation of students. Obrazovaniye i nauka = The Education and Science Journal. 2017; 7 (19): 97–118. (In Russ.)

15. Patarakin E. D. Pedagogical design of social network Scratch. Obrazovatelnyye tekhnologii i obshchestvo = Educational Technologies and Society [Internet]. 2013 [cited 2017 Nov 27]; № 2: 505–528. Available from: http://ifets.ieee.org/russian/depository/v16_i2/pdf/12.pdf (In Russ.)

16. Frison E., Eggermont S. Browsing, posting, and liking on Instagram: The reciprocal relationships between different types of Instagram use and adolescents’ depressed mood. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking. 2017; 20 (10): 603–609.

17. Blight M. G., Ruppel E. K., Schoenbauer K. V. Sense of community on Twitter and Instagram: Exploring the roles of motives and parasocial relationships. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking. 2017; 20 (5): 314– 319.

18. Kohn A. Instagram as a naturalized propaganda tool: The Israel Defense Forces Web site and the phenomenon of shared values. Convergence. 2017; 23 (2): 197–213.

19. Zverev A. L., Fedorova A. P. Social network as an instrument of political manipulation (on the example of organization in Hong Kong in 2014). Vestnik Bur-yatskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta = Bulletin of the Buryat State University. 2015; 7: 149–154. (In Russ.)

20. Garifova L. F. Russian small business “goes” into the Instagram. Ekonomika i predprinimatelstvo = Journal of Economy and Entrepreneurship. 2016; 10–1 (75–1): 293–296. (In Russ.)