PLAGIARISM IN DISSERTATIONS
https://doi.org/10.17853/1994-5639-2018-3-160-181
Abstract
Introduction. Originality and independence is the first, absolute and general requirement to the content of dissertations, regardless of an academic degree and research direction. At the same time, recently a considerable fraction of different types of plagiarism have been found out in the Russian dissertation works. The aim is an analysis of the most frequent plagiarism in candidate and doctoral dissertations. Results. We consider the established practices in the evaluation of independence in academic works. Unethical use of someone else’s work and materials by the authors of dissertations include, in particular, copying from official documents and abstracts without acknowledgement the source and with no citation; replication of existing reviews and chapters from already defended dissertations; falsification by refreshing of outdated data with substituted dates, and or wordfor-word copy-pasting with substitution of the research object. The latter type of the plagiarism involving fraud in experimental and statistical data constitutes a special peril for the science and for the society in general. The primary principle for assessment of independence in dissertations has to be proper citing and referencing that should allow a reader to distinguish the author’s contribution from someone else’s text. Undocumented verbatim quotations in dissertations are inadmissible, whether the author claims scientific novelty or not. At that, it does not matter whether well-known or unique data are provided, and whether the source is protected by a copyright. Practical significance. The qualitative analysis of the factual material, based on the author’s observations, can serve as a starting point for the subsequent quantitative analysis of plagiarism in scientific texts.
About the Author
M. S. Gelfand
A. A. Kharkevich Institute for Information Transmission Problems of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Doctor of Biological Sciences, Professor, Deputy Director for Science, A. A. Kharkevich Institute for Information Transmission Problems of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Member of the Presidium of the Higher Attestation Commission
Researcher ID: F-3425–2012
References
1. Kalimullin T. R. Russian market of dissertation services. Jekonomika ob-razovanija = Education Economy. 2013; 2: 119–144. (In Russ.)
2. Osipian A. L. Economics of corruption: The dissertations market. Economics of Education Review. 2012; 31: 76–83.
3. Korbut A. Plagiarism and a constitutive format of the dissertation text. Sociologicheskoe obozrenie = Sociological Review. 2013; 12 (2): 145–171. (In Russ.)
4. Ruvinskij V. Scientific degree to order. Harvard Business Review – Rossija = Harvard Business Review – Russia [Internet]. 2014 Apr 03 [cited 2018 Jan 11]. Available from: http://hbr-russia.ru/biznes-i-obshchestvo/fenomeny/a13364/ (In Russ.)
5. Rostovcev A. Dissernet. Experimental sociology. Vestnik obshhestvennogo mnenija. Dannye. Analiz. Diskussii = Bulletin of Public Opinion. Data. Analysis. Discussions. 2014; 3–4 (118): 127–138. (In Russ.)
6. Zenkin S. Specifics of the academic plagiarism. Sociologicheskoe obozrenie = Sociological Review. 2014; 13 (3); 193–197. (In Russ.)
7. Korbut A. Reflections on plagiarism. Sociologicheskoe obozrenie = Sociological Review. 2014; 13 (3): 197–203. (In Russ.)
8. Gel'fand M. Borrowings and falsifications in theses on natural sciences. Sociologicheskoe obozrenie = Sociological Review. 2014; 13 (3): 203–208. (In Russ.)
9. Braginskaja R. Mafia and school. Sociologicheskoe obozrenie = Sociological Review. 2014: 13 (3): 208–217. (In Russ.)
10. Mil'china V. Round table “Plagiarism in Science”; Russian State University for the Humanities; 2014 June 11. Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie = New Literary Review. 2014; 6 (130): 437–442. (In Russ.)
11. Shelepina E. A. Plagiarism in theses: Current state and tendencies of legal regulation. Vestnik instituta: prestuplenie, nakazanie, ispravlenie = Bulletin of Institute: Crime, Punishment, Correction. 2014; 1 (25): 71–74. (In Russ.)
12. Rostovtsev A. Some observations on the subject of dissertation fraud in Russia. Higher Education in Russia and Beyond. 2015; 3 (5): 17–18.
13. Grove J. Mass-produced PhDs lie at heart of Russia’s ‘plague’ of doctoral fraud. Times Higher Education. World University Rankings [Internet]. 2015 Oct 04 [cited 2018 Jan 11]. Available from: https://www.timeshighereducati-on.com/news/mass-produced-phds-lie-heart-russias-plague-doctoral-fraud
14. Rostovcev A. A. Data-sociology and some problems of scientific certification. Nauka. Innovacii. Obrazovanie = Science. Innovations. Education. 2015; 2: 243–254. (In Russ.)
15. Gel'fand M. An infection. Troickij variant – Nauka = Troitsk Edition – Science. 2013 May 07; 128: 3. (In Russ.)
16. Lipman M. Russia’s dissertation-fraud muckrackers. The New Yorker [Internet]. 2013 Mar 09 [cited 2018 Jan 11]. Available from: https://www.newyorker.com/news/news-desk/russias-dissertation-fraud-muckrakers
17. Point of view. Efficiency of Dissernet. PostNauka = Post-Science [Inter-net]. 2014 Jan 23 [cited 2018 Jan 11]. Available from: https://postnauka.ru/talks/22244 (In Russ.)
18. Neyfakh L. The craziest black market in Russia. Slate [Internet]. 2016 May 22 [cited 2018 Jan 11]. Available from: http://hbr-russia.ru/biznes-i-http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/cover_story/2016/05/the_thriving_russian_black_market_in_dissertations_and_the_crusaders_fighting.html
19. MacFarquar N. By Russian standards, Melania Trump would be a plagiarism amateur. The New York Times [Internet]. 2016 July 22 [cited 2018 Jan 11]. Available from: https://www.nytimes.com/2016/07/23/world/europe/russia-plagiarism-among-officials.html
20. Demina N., Rostovcev A. Plagiarist: Genesis. The New Times [Internet]. 2017 Feb 01 [cited 2018 Jan 11]; 2 (432). Available from: https://newti-mes.ru/articles/detail/116533 (In Russ.)
21. Kuprijanov A. The horror has to proceed: What to do with plagiarism in theses. Indikator: novosti nauki i tehniki: informacionno-servisnyj portal = The indicator: News of Science and Technology: Information and Service Portal [Internet]. 2017 Sep 27 [cited 2018 Jan 11]. Available from: https://indicator.ru/article/2017/09/27/aleksej-kupriyanov-o-dissernete/ (In Russ.)
22. Shahraj S. M., Arister N. I., Tedeev A. A. O plagiate v dissertacijah na soiskanie uchenoj stepeni = About plagiarism in theses for a scientific degree competition. Moscow: Moscow Islamic Institute; 2015. (In Russ.)
23. Filippov V., Zajakin A. “My zhe nosom ob stol prikladyvaem” = “We put a nose on the table”. Novaja gazeta = New Gazette. 2016 Apr 13: 39. (In Russ.)
24. Gel'fand M. The Moscow regional court confirmed the solution of the Noginsk city: It is possible to call plagiary as plagiarism. Troickij variant – Nauka = Troitsk Edition – Science [Internet]. 2012 Jan 31 [cited 2018 Jan 11]; 96. Available from: http://trv-science.ru/2011/11/22/noginskijj-gorodskojj-sud-plagiatmozhno-nazyvat-plagiatom/ (In Russ.)
25. Rjabov A. A. Dissertation as an object of an author's right. Civilist = Civilian. 2013; 4: 70–78. (In Russ.)
26. Levin V. I. Plagiarism, its essence and fight against it. Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii = Higher Education in Russia. 2018; 1 (219): 143–150. (In Russ.)
Review
For citations:
Gelfand M.S. PLAGIARISM IN DISSERTATIONS. The Education and science journal. 2018;20(3):160-181. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17853/1994-5639-2018-3-160-181
Views:
2180
Email this article 