Preview

The Education and science journal

Advanced search

ARE ENTREPRENEURS BORN OR MADE? EFFECTIVE ACADEMIC MODELS TO FOSTER ENTREPRENEURIAL GRADUATES

https://doi.org/10.17853/1994-5639-2018-5-56-78

Abstract

Introduction. Professional training of the people possessing a wide range of entrepreneurial competencies is becoming an imperative in the conditions of a post-industrial society development characterized by a focus on innovation, priority of knowledge, a high level of competition and involvement of a big proportion of population in service industries. Universities are charged to play a key role in developing highly qualified specialists with an extensive creative and intellectual potential capable of implementing various business projects and becoming a driving force of a sustainable economic growth in their countries. Therefore, there is a big interest in practices of developing graduates’ entrepreneurial culture and literacy established in universities of developed countries.

Aim. The article is aimed at systematizing the existing experience of the US and UK universities in delivering entrepreneurship education based on academic models as well as considering a possibility of adapting the most efficient conceptions, teaching approaches and techniques within the Russian higher education system.

Methodology and research methods. The methods include a qualitative analysis of the concepts “entrepreneurship education” and “entrepreneurial competencies”. A case study method was used for describing the academic models applied for teaching entrepreneurship in different universities.

Results and scientific novelty. The processes and outcomes of entrepreneurship training in the US and UK higher educational institutions were characterized and compared. The paper provides the description of the academic models applied at the leading universities for providing business education. They integrate the elements of experiential learning, multidisciplinary, multicultural, interactive, learner-centered teaching approaches to developing entrepreneurial behavior patterns, key and variable competencies and “soft” skills.

The paper reveals the problems and drawbacks of entrepreneurship education delivery within the Russian higher education: a discrepancy between the competencies fixed in university curricula and the ones actually needed; an inadequacy of teaching methods and absence of consistency in the course of students’ acquisition of theoretical knowledge and practical skills for efficient entrepreneurship activity.

Practical significance. The recommendations for improving entrepreneurship education in the Russian higher education system were proposed. The authors grounded a need for implementing an academic model of experiential learning, which enables graduates to develop entrepreneurial competencies and acquire a system of knowledge in the field of entrepreneurship. 

About the Authors

I. L. Pluzhnik
University of Tyumen
Russian Federation

Doctor of Pedagogical Sciences, Professor, Head of Foreign Languages and Intercultural Communications Department for Law and Economics,

Tyumen



T. O. Ilnitskaya
University of Tyumen
Russian Federation

Senior Lecturer, Foreign Languages and Intercultural Communications Department for Law and Economics, Master of Economics,

Tyumen



F. Lucci
Quinsigamond Community College
Russian Federation

Doctor of Business Administration (D.B.A), Professor of Management/Marketing at Quinsigamond Community College in Worcester, Massachusetts;

Visiting Fulbright Scholar to Tyumen State University, spring of 2018



References

1. Keith Herrmann. NESTA, NCGE and CIHE report. Developing Entrepreneurial Graduates: Putting Entrepreneurship at the Centre of Higher Education. London, England: NESTA; 2008. 40 p.

2. Kauffman Panel on Entrepreneurship Curriculum in Higher Education. Entrepreneurship in American Higher Education: A Report from the Kauffman Panel on Entrepreneurship Curriculum in Higher Education [Internet]; Kansas City: Kauffman Foundation; 2008 [cited 2018 May 1]. 28 p. Available from: https://www.kauffman.org/ -/media/kauffman_org/research-reports-and-covers/2008/07/entrep_high_ed_report.pdf.

3. Kirsanova O. G. Professional training of entrepreneurs within higher education. In: Sovremennoye predprinimatel'skoye obrazovaniye. Sbornik yezhegodnoy mezhdunarodnoy nauchno-prakticheskoy konferentsii. = Contemporary Entrepreneurship Education. Proceedings of the Annual International Scientific and Practical Conference [Internet]; Moscow. 2018 Mar [cited 2018 May 5]; p. 20–27. Available from: http://ruaee.ru/projects/sovremennoe-predprinimatelskoe-obrazovanie-2018/ (In Russ.)

4. Nikitina N. Yu. Problems of entrepreneurial education in the era of the development of digital technologies. In: Sovremennoye predprinimatel’skoye obrazovaniye. Sbornik yezhegodnoy mezhdunarodnoy nauchno-praktichesko ykonferentsii. = Contemporary Entrepreneurship Education. Proceedings of the Annual International Scientific and Practical Conference [Internet]; Moscow. 2018 Mar [cited 2018 May 5]; p. 63–66. Available from: http://ruaee.ru/projects/sovremennoepredprinimatelskoe-obrazovanie-2018/ (In Russ.)

5. Lyubanenko A. V. On the system of teaching entrepreneurial competencies in the Tyumen State University. In: Sovremennoye predprinimatel'skoye obrazovaniye. Sbornik yezhegodnoy mezhdunarodnoy nauchno-praktichesko ykonferentsii. = Contemporary entrepreneurship education. Proceedings of the annual international scientific and practical conference [Internet]; Moscow. 2018 Mar [cited 2018 May 5]; p. 49–53. Available from: http://ruaee.ru/projects/sovremennoepredprinimatelskoe-obrazovanie-2018/ (In Russ.)

6. Wilson K. E. Entrepreneurship Education in Europe. European Foundation for Entrepreneurship Research. Chapter 5. OECD; 2008. 20 p.

7. Petrosyants D. V. Entrepreneurial university: foreign experience and the Russian reality. Regional’naya ekonomika: teoriya i praktika = Regional Economy: Theory and Practice. 2013; 31: 41–48. (In Russ.)

8. Karpov A. A. Modern university as the driver of economic growth: Models and missions. Voprosy ekonomiki = Issues of Economics. 2017; 3: 58–76. (In Russ.)

9. Korotkov A. V., Fonotov A. G. Comparative analysis of entrepreneurship education in technical universities in Russia and the United States. Obrazovaniye i innovatsii = Education and Innovation. 2015; 10 (204): 58–76. (In Russ.)

10. Heidi M. Neck and Andrew C. Corbett. The Scholarship of teaching and learning entrepreneurship. Entrepreneurship Education and Pedagogy.2018; Vol 1. Issue 1: 8–41.

11. Mwasalwiba E. S. Entrepreneurship Education: A review of its objectives, teaching methods, and impact indicators. Education and Training. 2010; 52 (1): 20–47.

12. Colombo M. G. and Grilli L. Founders’ human capital and the growth of new technology-based firms: a competence-based view. Research Policy. 2005; Vol. 34: 795–816.

13. Nuthall P. L. Determining the important management skill competences: the case of family farm business in New Zealand. Agricultural Systems. 2006; Vol. 88 (2/3): 429–450 р.

14. Hytti U., Kuopusjärvi P. Three perspectives to evaluating entrepreneurship education: Evaluators, programme promoters and policy makers. In: European Foundation for Management Development, 34th Entrepreneurship, Innovation and Small Business Conference; 2004; Turku, Finland. 6 p.

15. Entrepreneurship in higher education, especially within non-business studies – Final Report of the Expert Group. Brussels: European Commission. Enterprise and Industry Directorate-General. 2008. 69 p. Available from: http://ec.europa.eu/DocsRoom/documents/2214/attachments/1/translations/en/renditions/native

16. Chang J. and Rieple A. Assessing students’ entrepreneurial skills development in live projects. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development. 2003; 20 (1): 225–241. Available from: https://dx.doi.org/10.1108/146260013 11298501.

17. Fayolle A. Essay on the nature of entrepreneurship education [Internet]. 2007 [cited 2015 Feb 2]. 18 p. Available from: https://www.kmu-hsg.ch/rencontres/2006/Topics06/A/Rencontres_2006_Fayolle.pdf

18. Developing entrepreneurship competencies. In: SME Ministerial Conference [Internet]; 2018 Feb 22–23; Mexico City. OECD; 2018: 10 p. Available from: https://www.oecd.org/cfe/smes/ministerial/documents/2018-SME-MinisterialConference-Parallel-Session-3.pdf

19. Harrison Helena et al. Case study research: Foundations and methodological orientations. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung. 2017; V. 18, 1. Art. 19 [cited 2018 May 5]. Available from: http://www.qualitative-research.net/index.php/fqs/article/view/2655/4079

20. Merriam-Webster Dictionary. Available from: https://www.merriamwebster.com/dictionary/case%20study%20method.

21. Mehta A., Yoon E., Kulkarni N., Finch D. An exploratory study of entrepreneurship education in multi-disciplinary and multicultural environment. Journal of Entrepreneurship Education. 2016; 19 (2): 120–138.

22. Ward T., Baruah B. J., Enhancing entrepreneurial skills of students through entrepreneurship education a case study of an interdisciplinary Engineering Management Programme. In: 13th International Conference on Information Technology based Higher Education and Training (ITHET) [Internet]; 11–13 Sep 2014; York. The University of York: IEEE; 2014 Sep. 13: p. 1–6. Available from: http://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/84695/1/ithet2014_submission_34.pdf.

23. Noyes E. Teaching entrepreneurial action through prototyping: The Prototype-It Challenge. Entrepreneurship Education and Pedagogy. 2018; Vol. 1 (1): 118–134.

24. Kolb D. A. Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice-Hal; 1984. 38 p.

25. 21st Century Knowledge and Skills in Educator Preparation. 2010 [cited 2018 May 6]. 40 p. Available from: http://www.p21.org/storage/documents/aacte_p21_whitepaper2010.pdf.

26. Trukhin N. V. Osnovy predprinimatel’skoj dejatel’nosti. Uchebno-metodicheskij kompleks. Rabochaja programma dlja studentov = Basics of entrepreneurial activity. Training and methodology complex. Work program for students of direction Pedagogical Education. Tyumen: Tyumen State University; 2014. 32 p. Available from: http://www.umk3plus.utmn.ru/files/0000191297.pdf (In Russ.)

27. Abakumova O. A. Osnovy organizacii sobstvennogo biznesa. Uchebnometodicheskij kompleks. Rabochaja programma dlja studentov = Basics of organizing your own business. Training and methodology complex. Work program for students of direction Economic Security. Tyumen: Tyumen State University; 2016. 35 p. Available from: http://www.umk3plus.utmn.ru/files/0000197761.pdf (In Russ.)

28. Trukhin N. V. Osnovy predprinimatel’skoj dejatel’nosti. Uchebno-metodicheskij kompleks. Rabochaja programma dlja studentov = Fundamentals of entrepreneurial activity. Training and methodology complex. Work program for students of direction Mechatronics and Robotics. Tyumen: Tyumen State University; 2017. 38 p. Available from: http://www.umk3plus.utmn.ru/files/0000253767.pdf (In Russ.)

29. Druker P. F. Innovation and Entrepreneurship. Harper Business; Reprint edition 2006. 285 p. Available from: http://businessnowllc.com/downloads/%5BDrucker,%201985%5D%20Innovation%20and%20Entrepreneurship.pdf.


Review

For citations:


Pluzhnik I.L., Ilnitskaya T.O., Lucci F. ARE ENTREPRENEURS BORN OR MADE? EFFECTIVE ACADEMIC MODELS TO FOSTER ENTREPRENEURIAL GRADUATES. The Education and science journal. 2018;20(5):56-78. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17853/1994-5639-2018-5-56-78

Views: 5031


ISSN 1994-5639 (Print)
ISSN 2310-5828 (Online)