Preview

The Education and science journal

Advanced search

THE LEARNING PROCESS FROM THE PERSPECTIVE OF INTERDISCIPLINARY RESEARCH

https://doi.org/10.17853/1994-5639-2018-8-9-27

Abstract

Introduction. It is presently well understood that growth in new scientific knowledge often arises at the interface between different disciplines. Thus, the current growth in interdisciplinary research may be seen as a consequence of the logic of scientific development – from the highly specialized study of objects and phenomena to integration in terms of information gained through diverse scientific spheres that enable us to receive new knowledge. This paper presents a description of ongoing research (the beginning of which was covered in the Education and Science Journal1) into the developmental tendencies of key didactic concepts due to an expansion of the experimental field through the inclusion of achievements from related areas of knowledge (psycho-didactics, cognitive didactics, socio-didactics, lingo-didactics, etc).

The aim of this research stage was to reveal how the results of interdisciplinary research dynamically influence ideas about the process of educational development.

Methodology and research methods. In the course of the research, the authors analysed scientific literature in the field of interdisciplinary research, compared the results of interdisciplinary research and their generalisation, and contrasted the research outcomes with existing ideas about the learning process.

Results and scientific novelty. Based on the allocated and formulated features of interdisciplinary research applicable to a field of education, the “enriching model” (integrated psychology, didactics and methodology of teaching mathematics in the 5th-9th grades) developed by E. G. Gelfman and M. A. Kholodnaya) was used as an example. It was established that interdisciplinary research involves not just elements, data and new developments from different scientific spheres, but also uses a conceptual framework, a methodological base and the tools of various scientific branches integrated into the interdisciplinary space. Moreover, interdisciplinary research rediscovers available knowledge and finds new zones for theoretical and practical application. The valuable interaction between didactics and cognitive science was shown. Didactics is informed by qualitatively new scientific bases when designing learning process models through the cognitively-structured knowledge and forms of representation that provide knowledge transfer, knowledge of neural activity that happens in the brain at the moment of cognitive actions, bio-physiological restrictions of cognitive processes, etc. However, despite an initial stage of formation of many scientific directions related to didactics, the authors concluded that these disciplines already have a significant effect on the perceptive process of learning, in terms of its functions and structural components. The learning process is seen as more comprehensive and complete in the context of developmental cognitive structures of knowledge, formation of a linguistic picture of the world and social support for students.

Practical significance. In pedagogy, analysing interdisciplinary research identifies promising trends in the development of classical, non-classical and post-non-classical scientific paradigms as well as didactics (science focused on the best teaching methods). Moreover, interdisciplinary research provides the effective design of various learning models in a scientifically rigorous context. 

About the Authors

I. M. Osmolovskaya
Institute for Strategy of Education Development of the Russian Academy of Education.
Russian Federation
Moscow.


L. A. Krasnova
Institute for Strategy of Education Development of the Russian Academy of Education.
Russian Federation
Moscow.


References

1. Stepin V. S. O filosofskih osnovaniyah sinergetiki = About the philosophical bases of synergetrics. Sinergeticheskaya paradigma. Sinergetika obrazovaniya = Synergetic paradigm. Education synergetics. Moscow: Publishing House Progress-Tradiciya; 2007. p. 96–102. (In Russ.)

2. Krasnova L. A., Mamchenko A. A., Osmolovskaya I. M. and Zakhlebniyv A. N. Interdisciplinary researches of the process of training. In: International Conference “Education Environment for the Information Age” (EEIA-2017) [Internet]; 2017 Jun 7–8; Moscow, Russia. 2017 [cited 2018 Jun 19]. Available from: https://www.futureacademy.org.uk/files/images/upload/EEIA2017FAF046.pdf doi: dx.doi.org/10.15405/epsbs.2017.08.46

3. Kurovskaya Yu. G. Yazykovaya kartina mira v sovremennom uchebnike: kognitivno-lingvisticheskiy podkhod k izucheniyu = Language picture of the world in the modern textbook: Cognitive and linguistic approach to studying. Moscow: Publishing House ANOO IET; 2017. 268 p. (In Russ.)

4. Kholodnaya M. A. Psikhologiya intellekta: paradoksy issledovaniya = Psychology of the intellect: Paradoxes of the study. 2nd ed. St.-Petersburg: Publishing House Piter; 2002. 384 p. (In Russ.)

5. Gibel’gauz O. S. Psycho-didactic packaging technologies of training. Vestnik Altajskoj gosudarstvennoj pedagogicheskoj akademii = Bulletin of the Altai State Pedagogical Academy. 2014; 20: 44–46. (In Russ.)

6. Krutskij A. N. Psihodidaktika srednego obrazovanija = Psycho-didactics of secondary education. Barnaul: Bashkir State Pedagogical University; 2008. 254 p. (In Russ.)

7. Gibel’gauz O. S., Krutskij A. N. Psihodidakticheskie paketnye tehnologii obuchenija = Psycho-didactic packaging technologies of training. Barnaul: Altai State Pedagogical University; 2016. 179 p. (In Russ.)

8. Lebedeva V. P. Psychodidactics – a subject of scientific interest. Zhurnal nauchno-pedagogicheskoj informacii = Journal of Scientific and Pedagogical Information [Internet]. 2011 [cited 2018 Jun 19]; 7. Available from: http://www.paedagogia.ru/2011/68–07/223-lebedeva (In Russ.)

9. Panov V. I. Psikhodidaktika obrazovatel’nykh sistem: teoriya i praktika = Psychodactics of educational systems: Theory and practice. St.-Petersburg: Publishing House Piter; 2007. 352 p. (In Russ.)

10. Rahimov A. Z. Psihodidaktika = Psycho-didactics. Ufa; 2005. 328 p. (In Russ.)

11. Rahimov A. Z. Principy psihodidaktiki = Principles of psycho-didactics. Ufa; 2007. 160 p. (In Russ.)

12. Savenkov A. I. Psikhodidaktika = Psycho-didactics. Moscow: Publishing House Nacional’nyj knizhnyj centr; 2012. 36 p. (In Russ.)

13. Gelfman E. G., Kholodnaya O. V. Matematika: uchebnik dlya 5 klassa: v 2 ch. Ch. 1. 3-e izd. = Mathematics: A textbook for the 5th grade: in 2 parts. Part 1. 3rd ed. Moscow: Publishing House BINOM; Laboratorija znanij; 2014. 152 p. (In Russ.)

14. Gelfman E. G., Kholodnaya M. A. Psikhodidaktika shkol’nogo uchebnika = Psychodi-dactics of the school textbook. Intellektual’noe vospitanie uchashchikhsya = Intellectual education of pupils. St.-Petersburg: Publishing House Piter; 2006. 384 p. (In Russ.)

15. Lokalova N. P. 120 urokov psikhologicheskogo razvitiya mladshikh shkol’nikov = 120 lessons of psychological development of younger school students. Psikhologicheskaya programma razvitiya kognitivnoy sfery uchashchikhsya I–IV klassov: V 2 ch. = Psychological programm of development of the cognitive sphere of pupils of I–IV grades: In 2 parts. 4th ed. Moscow; 2008. 130 p. (In Russ.)

16. Sternberg R. J., Hessels M. G. P. What is Cognitive Education? Journal of Cognitive Education and Psychology. 2013; 12 (1): 3–124.

17. Robb B. E. A Paradigm shift in classroom learning practices to propose methods aligned with a neuroeducation conceptual framework. Theses and Dissertations. Paper 2. Portland: University of Portland; 2016. 120 p.

18. Apaydin M., and Hossary M. Achieving metacognition through cognitive strategy instruction. International Journal of Educational Management [Internet]. 2017 [cited 2018 Jun 19]; 31 (6): 696–717. Available from: https://doi.org/ 10.1108/IJEM-05–2016–0130

19. Kostromina S. N., Bordovskaya N. V., Iskra N. N., Chuvgunova O. A., Gnedykh D. S., Kurmakaeva D. M. Neuroscience, psychology and education: Problems and prospects of interdisciplinary research. Psikhologicheskiy zhurnal = Psychological Journal. 2015; 36 (4): 61–70. (In Russ.)

20. Kubryakova E. S. Yazyk i znanie: Na puti polucheniya znaniy o yazyke: Chasti rechi s kognitivnoy tochki zreniya = Language and knowledge: On the way of getting knowledge of the language: Parts of speech from the cognitive point of view. Rol’ yazyka v poznanii mira = The role of language in the knowledge of the world. Moscow: Publishing House Jazyki slavjanskoj kul’tury; 2004. 560 p. (In Russ.)

21. Frenkin R. Motivatsiya povedeniya: biologicheskie, kognitivnye i sotsial’nye aspekty. 5-e izd. = Motivation of behavior: Biological, cognitive and social aspects. 5th ed. St.-Petersburg: Publishing House Piter; 2003. 651p. (In Russ.)

22. Akhmetova L. V. Methods of cognitive learning: Psychological-didactic approach. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta = Bulletin of Tomsk State Pedagogical University. 2009; 7 (85): 48–52. (In Russ.)


Review

For citations:


Osmolovskaya I.M., Krasnova L.A. THE LEARNING PROCESS FROM THE PERSPECTIVE OF INTERDISCIPLINARY RESEARCH. The Education and science journal. 2018;20(8):9-27. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17853/1994-5639-2018-8-9-27

Views: 1884


ISSN 1994-5639 (Print)
ISSN 2310-5828 (Online)