WORK WITH ENGLISH CORPORA AS A MEANS OF PROMOTING LEARNER AUTONOMY

 Introduction. Learner autonomy and the ability to determine their own learning paths are becoming the crucial components of graduates’ competitiveness. As Russian students at many higher educational institutions are often brought up in a teacher-oriented learning environment, they are often less adept at autonomous learning. Such skills are especially important nowadays as there tend to be fewer hours of classroom learning. This problem is further compounded by mother tongue interference which is as a rule undesired at advanced levels and also by difficulties of understanding and memorizing foreign language material. Therefore, this paper studies how English corpora and independent work may be used to enhance autonomy.

The aim of the research was to describe the potential of English corpora – alongside other sources – to teach English as a foreign language, and furthermore, to analyse and determine the effects of this innovative approach on learner autonomy and language proficiency.

Methodology and research methods. The research method involved at the pre-experiment stage was an extensive literature review of relevant studies. The basis for designing the abovementioned system of teaching techniques incorporated the methodology of corpus linguistics, systematization, analysis and consolidation of the best practices in this field of linguistics. The main tool of the pedagogical experiment whose aim was exploring the potential of corpus-based tasks to promote learner autonomy was the author’s methodology of teaching English to university students.

Results and scientific novelty. The author described a number of autonomy forming factors and the pedagogical principles underlying learner autonomy enhancement. A system of corpus-based tasks and activities in conjunction with tasks for intensive and extensive reading and listening for students’ independent work was developed. The designed system was implemented in a five-month experiment which took place at the Institute of Foreign Languages, Ural State Pedagogical University (Yekaterinburg). The research findings based on the pre-experiment and post-experiment data comparison suggest that foreign language teaching is more effective with corpus tasks as they promote learner autonomy. The experimental group (n = 13) became better, i.e. more independent, learners, which indicates their enhanced autonomy, and consequently, a higher level of language proficiency was demonstrated. Thus, corpus-driven language learning coupled with traditional forms of independent work contributes to students’ motivation and sufficient academic progress.

Practical significance. The obtained results may provide valuable insights which could be beneficial for foreign language teachers at any educational level. The findings of the study can be used as a framework for further theoretical and empirical research into the effect of the corpus-based approach as well as other forms of independent and classroom learning on enhancing learner autonomy. Another novel contribution of the paper is using the GloWbE corpus that is still relatively unknown in Russia for designing tasks. 

1. Prikaz Ministerstva obrazovaniya i nauki Rossiyskoy Federatsii ot 19 dekabrya 2013 g. = The Regulation of the Ministry of Education and Science of the Russian Federation № 1367 of December 19, 2013 [Internet]. 2014 [cited 2017 Jan 19]; Moscow. Available from: http://www.rg.ru/2014/03/12/obr-dok.html (In Russ.)

2. North B., Goodier T., Piccardo E. Common European Framework of Reference for Languages: Learning, Teaching, assessment. Companion volume with new descriptors [Internet]. Council of Europe; 2018 [cited 2018 Apr 10]. 235 p. Available from: https://rm.coe.int/cefr-companion-volume-with-new-descriptors2018/1680787989

3. Legenhausen L. Arguments for learner autonomy: analysing linguistic developments. In: Learner Autonomy: What does the Future Hold [Internet]. Alexandria: Teachers of English to Speakers of Other Languages, Inc; 2008 [cited 2018 Apr 10]. p. 33–48. Available from: http://www.tesol.org/docs/default-source/new-resource-library/symposium-on-learner-autonomy.pdf? sfvrsn=0

4. Blin F. CALL and the development of learner autonomy: Towards an activity-theoretical perspective. ReCALL. 2004; 16 (2): 377–395.

5. Borg S., Al-Busaidi S. Learner autonomy: English language teachers’ beliefs and practices [Internet]. London: British Council; 2012 [cited 2017 Nov 3]. 45 p. Available from: http://www.teachingenglish.org.uk/sites/teacheng/files/b459%20ELTRP%20Report%20Busaidi_final.pdf

6. Gardner D. Fostering autonomy in language learning [Internet]. Gaziantep: Zirve University; 2011 [cited 2017 Jan 14]. 279 p. Available from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/259368185_Fostering_autonomy_in_language_learning

7. Macaskill A., Denovan A. Developing autonomous learning in first year university students using perspectives from positive psychology. Studies in Higher Education. 2013; 38 (1): 124–142.

8. Römer U. Corpora and language teaching. In: Ludeling A., Kyto M., editors. Corpus linguistics. An international handbook. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter; 2008. p. 112–130.

9. Römer U. Using general and specialized corpora in English language teaching: past, present and future. In: Campoy-Cubillo M. C., Bellés-Fortuño B., Gea-Valor M. L., ed. Corpus-based approaches to English language teaching. London; New York: Continuum; 2010. p. 18–35.

10. Godwin-Jones R. Emerging technologies: autonomous language learning. Language Learning and Technology. 2011; 15 (3): 4–11.

11. Bennett G. R. Using CORPORA in the learning classroom: Corpus Linguistics for Teachers. The University of Michigan Press: Ann Arbor; 2010. 144 p.

12. Bernardini S. Exploring new directions for discovery learning. In: Ketterman B., Marko G., editors. Teaching and learning by doing corpus analysis. Proceedings of the fourth international conference on teaching and language corpora, Graz; 2000 Jul 19–24. Amsterdam: Rodopi; 2002. p. 165–182.

13. Kübler N. Corpora and LSP translation. In: Zanettin F., Bernardini S., Stewart D., ed. Corpora in translator education [Internet]. Manchester: St Jerome Publishing, 2003 [cited 2017 Nov 6]. Available from: https://www.academia.edu/4145310/Corpora_and_LSP_translation

14. Koyama Y., Tanaka S., Miyazaki Y., Fujieda M. Development of a corpus-assisted writing system for research papers by science and technology students. In: Hobbs M., Dofs K., ed. Autonomy in a networked world. ILAC selections. Independent learning association. Rutherford House: Victoria University of Wellington; 2013. p. 65–67.

15. Levchenko V. Use of Corpus-based classroom activities in developing academic awareness in doctoral students. The New Educational Review. 2017; 48 (2): 28–40. DOI: 10.15804/tner.2017.48.2.02

16. Yoon C. Concordancing in L2 writing class: An overview of research and issues. Journal of English for Academic Purposes. 2011; 10 (3): 130–139.

17. Zanettin F. Corpus-based translation activities for language learners. The Interpreter and Translator Trainer. 2009; 3 (2): 209–224.

18. Xiao R., McEnery T. Collocation, semantic prosody, and near synonymy: A cross-linguistic perspective. Applied Linguistics. 2006; 27 (1): 103–129.

19. Zuo Q. Using corpora in autonomous study of English vocabulary: a case study of STORM. In: Proceedings of the 16th conference of Pan-Pacific association of applied linguistics [Internet]. 2011 [cited 2017 Nov 19]. Available from: http:// www.paaljapan.org/conference2011/ProcNewest2011/pdf/graduate/G1–1.pdf

20. Van Lier L. Action-based teaching, autonomy and identity. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching. 2007; 1 (1): 46–65. DOI: 10.2167/illt42.0

21. Trim J. L. M., Coste D., North B., Sheils J. Common European Framework of Reference for Languages: Learning, teaching, assessment [Internet]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2001 [cited 2018 Apr 10]. 260 p. Available from: https://www.coe.int/t/DG4/linguistic/Source/CECR_EN.pdf

22. Gavioli L., Aston G. Enriching reality: language corpora in language pedagogy. ELT Journal. 2001; 55 (3): 238–246.

23. Braun S. Designing and exploiting small multimedia corpora for autonomous learning and teaching. In: Hidalgo E., Quereda L., Santana J., ed. Corpora in the foreign language classroom. Selected papers from TaLC6 [Internet]. Amsterdam: Rodopi; 2008 [cited 2017 Jan 31]. p. 31–46. Available from: http://epubs.surrey.ac.uk/1298/1/fulltext.pdf

24. Davies M. The corpus of contemporary American English as the first reliable monitor corpus of English. Literary and Linguistic Computing. 2011; 25: 447–465. DOI: 10.1093/llc/fqq018

25. Davis M., Fuchs R. Expanding horizons in the study of World Englishes with the 1.9 billion word Global Web-based English Corpus (GloWbE). English World-Wide. 2015; 36 (1): 1–28. DOI 10.1075/eww.36.1.01dav

26. Cammarata L. Foreign language teachers’ struggle to learn content-based instruction. L2 Journal. 2010; 2 (1): 89–118.

27. Lain S. Content-based instruction understood in terms of connectionism and constructivism. L2 Journal. 2016; 8 (1): 18–31.

28. Horn B. The future is now: Preparing a new generation of CBI teachers. English Teaching Forum. 2011; 3 (49): 2–9.

29. Mertler C. A. Designing scoring rubrics for your classroom. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation [Internet]. 2001 [cited 2017 Dec 19]; 7 (25). Available from: http://PAREonline.net/getvn.asp? v=7&n=25