PRESCHOOL ORGANISATIONAL CULTURE FROM THE PERSPECTIVE OF TEACHERS’ ATTITUDES TO ETHICAL DILEMMAS

 Introduction. Both the level and the specific character of the organisational culture of preschool pedagogical staff influence the degree of psychological comfort of the environment in which younger children are brought up. The relevance of the research is related to the need to improve the quality of preschool education through the creation of emotionally favourable conditions for forming pupils’ individuality and preserving their health. In addition, it is important to acquaint the staff of nursery schools with the content of the new methodological requirements (the formation of interaction between a tutor, a child and parents) recorded in the Federal State Educational Standard.

The aim of this research paper was to identify the specific features of teachers’ ethical choices when dealing with difficult professional situations according to the type of organisational (corporate) culture established in a pre-school educational institution.

Methodology and research methods. In the course of the research, teachers were selected to participate in an anonymous online poll and a follow-up questionnaire. The authors developed a face-to-face feedback approach using the cases of difficult professional situations and parameters to build the corporate culture profile of the organisation. The obtained data were processed by qualitative and quantitative means through the approaches of content analysis, analysis of variance (ANOVA) and intercrossing of confidence intervals calculated by a standard procedure in the R programming language.

Results and scientific novelty. A model of differentiated types in the organisational culture of the system of education was designed. “Democratic”, “leaderfollowing”, “laissez-faire” and “bureaucratic” (these terms do not carry an evaluation characteristic) kinds of the corporate cultures of preschool educational institutions were identified and characterised. The concepts of “ethical dilemma” and “difficult situation requiring a direct professional action” were clarified. The first abovementioned concept refers to a contradiction between two equivalent values, while the second denotes a confrontation between new, progressive approaches to implementing professional duties with the stereotypes and traditions entrenched in the teaching process. The diagnostic tools allowed the authors to establish that different solutions to resolving problem situations or ethical dilemmas are often derived from the different values prevailing among preschool teachers as representatives of the various types of organisational cultures. 

Practical significance. The authors concluded that to ensure permanent improvement of preschool education (increase in the efficiency of participants’ interaction of the learning process) it is important to count not on members’ formal characteristics, but on basic characteristics which often can be seen as implicit representations. The diagnostic tools proposed by the authors and the joint interpretation of findings by all members of the teaching staff with participation of the invited experts and parents will help to identify formal and basic characteristics. 

1. Belolutskaya A. K., Le-van T. N., Holodova O. L. Peculiarities of the interaction of teachers with children of preschool age in solving ethically contradictory situations: The results of a pilot study. Sovremennoye doshkol’noye obrazovaniye = Modern Preschool Education. 2018; 4 (86): 4–17. DOI: 10.244 11/1997–9657– 2018–00013 (In Russ.)

2. Zinsser K. M., Curby T. W. Understanding preschool teachers’ emotional support as a function of center climate. SAGE Open. 2014; 4 (4): 1–9. DOI: 10.1177/2158244014560728

3. Tsvyk V. A. Professional’naya etika: osnovy obshchey teorii = Professional ethics: The foundations of a general theory. Moscow: Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia; 2014. 288 p. (In Russ.)

4. Sidenko A. S. On the model of in-service teachers training for the preparation of schools for the implementation of the FSES of the second generation. Innovatsionnyye proyekty i programmy v obrazovanii = Innovative Projects and Programs in Education. 2011; 4: 41–44. (In Russ.)

5. Makeev V. A., Gribov V. D. Korporativnaya kul’tura kak faktor effektivnoy deyatel’nosti organisatsii = Corporate culture as a factor in the effective activity of the organisation]. Ed. by V. D. Gribov. Moscow: Publishing House LENAND; 2017. 248 p. (In Russ.)

6. Giddens Je. Ustroenie obshhestva: Ocherk teorii strukturacii = Organisation of society: Sketch of the structuration theory. Moscow: Publishing House Akademicheskij proekt; 2003. 528 p. ISBN 5–8291–0232–3 (In Russ.)

7. Kennedi D. Zhestkij menedzhment. Zastav’te ljudej rabotat’ na rezul’tat = Ruthless management of people and profits: The ultimate, no holds barred, kick butt, take no prisoners guide to really getting rich. Moscow: Publishing House Al’pina Pablisher; 2012. 292 p. (In Russ.)

8. Ouchi W. G. Making schools work: A Revolutionary plan to get your children the education they need. New York: Simon and Schuster; 2003. ISBN 0– 7432–4630–6

9. Fedulova E. A. Axiological approach in the formation of the image of preschool educational institution. In: Samorealisatsiya lichnosti v sovremennom sotsiume: sbornik nauchnykh trudov po materialam IV mezhdunarodnogo foruma “Dukhovnaya samorealisatsiya lichnosti v sovremennom sotsiume” = Self-Realisation of an Individual in Modern Society. Collection of Scientific Papers on the Materials of the 6th International Forum “Spiritual Self-Realisation of the Individual in Modern Socium”. Moscow; 2015. p. 174–178. (In Russ.)

10. Korovina O. Yu. Influence of organisational culture on the effectiveness of management of a general educational institution. Yaroslavskiy pedagogicheskiy vestnik = Yaroslavl Pedagogical Bulletin. 2010; 2 (3): 26–29. (In Russ.)

11. Steklova O. E. Organisacionnaja kul’tura = Organisational culture. Ulyanovsk: Ulyanovsk State Technical University; 2007. 127 p. (In Russ.)

12. Prigozhin A. I. Celi i cennosti. Novye metody raboty s budushhim = Purposes and values. New methods of work with the future. Moscow: Publishing House Delo; 2010. 432 p. (In Russ.)

13. Piaget J. Moral’noye suzhdeniye u rebenka = Moral judgment of the child. Moscow: Publishing House Akademicheskij proekt; 2006. 480 p. (In Russ.)

14. Tassy S., Oullier O., Mancini J., Wicker B. Discrepancies between judgment and choice of action in moral dilemmas. Frontiers in Psychology. 2013; 4 (250): 1–8. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00250

15. Feldmanhall O., Mobbs D., Evans D., Hiscox L., Navardy L., Dalgleish T. What we say and what we do: The relationship between real and hypothetical moral choices. Cognition. 2012; 123: 434–441. DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2012.02.001

16. Catacutan M. R. G., de Guzman A. B. Ethical decision-making in academic administration: A qualitative study of college deans’ ethical frameworks. Australian Educational Researcher. 2015; 42, 4 (30): 483–514.

17. Ştefan C. A., Rebega O. L., Cosma A. Romanian preschool teachers’ understanding of emotional and behavioral difficulties: Implications for designing teacher trainings. Journal of Early Childhood Teacher Education. 2015; 36, Issue 1: 61–83.

18. Decker-Woodrow L. The relationship between internal teacher profiles and the quality of teacher-child interactions in prekindergarten. Journal of Research in Childhood Education. 2018; 32, Issue 1: 32–51.

19. Shane E. H., Spivak V. A. Organisatsionnaya kul’tura i liderstvo = Organisational culture and leadership. Ed. by V. A. Spivak. St.-Petersburg: Publishing House Piter; 2002. 336 p. (In Russ.)

20. Code of Ethics. Handbook for Early Childhood Professionals. An essential companion for daily practice: December 2015 [cited 2018 Jul 14]. Available from: www.aeces.org

21. NAEYC. Code of Ethical Conduct. Supplement for Early Childhood Program Administrators [Internet]. 2004 [cited 2018 Jul 14]. Available from: http://www.naeyc.org/files/naeyc/file/positions/PSETH05_supp.pdf