Attractiveness of a City as a Factor of Territorial Mobility in Student Estimates (on the Example of Ekaterinburg)

Introduction. The attractiveness of the city as a place to live and fulfill needs becomes one of the determining factors for the intensification of territorial mobility among young people. The image of the city and the image of the “future” are closely related and interdependent in consciousness of young people. Megalopolis as a high-resource territory is a special space for the implementation of students’ life plans. Hence, it is important to pay special attention to students as a potential driver for the development of the territory (city, region, country), creating an attractive urban environment.

Aim. Taking into account the results of a sociological study, the aims of the publication were the following: to analyse the attractiveness of the city, to characterise its place in the life planning of students and to determine the role in territorial movements.

Methodology and research methods. The empirical basis of the study was a semi-standardised questionnaire for students of 3–4 courses at 9 universities in Ekaterinburg (n = 200), and in-depth interviews with students representing different types of orientations to territorial mobility (n = 8). Collected data were processed by means of a method of thematic networks.

Results and scientific novelty. According to respondents, the factors, which provide comfort of life in the city, are considered; competitive advantages and shortcomings of the environment of the megalopolis are characterised; it is shown how its specific characteristics are reflected in vital plans of students. Two idealised ideas of the city as the place for life are allocated: 1) a “comfortable” city for everyday practices and open for innovations and creativity; 2) an “instrumental” city as the platform for career development and material welfare, which can be emotionally unattractive, but functionally effective. The factor constraining territorial mobility is the reproduction of social connections and relations in the current residence area; students view the movement as a type of risky behaviour. However, 42% of respondents include in their life plans a move to another city, located both in Russia and abroad. In the motivational structure of territorial mobility, the leading positions are occupied by the desire for independence, the idealised image of the city planned for life, and the discrepancy between the conditions of a particular city and the actual needs of the young generation. Hence, the strategic direction of planning and designing urban space is the increase in the socio-cultural, economic, and environmental sustainability of the territory. Administrative structures as the agents, initiating, introducing and regulating the complex strategy of increase in attractiveness of the territory, need to consider not only the territorial capital, which the megalopolis has, but also typical needs and interests of the target social groups, especially those related to the creative class.

Practical significance. The presented materials and the authors’ conclusions can be used to determine the priority directions of the development of urban environment and intra-urban youth policy and to develop programmes for forming students’ competencies related to life planning and territorial mobility.

1. Mainet H., Edouard J-Ch. Quality of life and attractiveness issues in SMSTs.: Innovative or commonplace policies? Hamdouch A., Nyseth T., et al. (eds). Creative approaches to planning and local development. Critical perspectives. Insights from Small and Medium-Sized Towns in Europe, Routledge Publisher; 2017 [cited 2018 Sep 29]. P. 234–248. Available from: https://hal.archivesouvertes.fr/hal-01464952/document

2. Kwiatek-Sołtys A., Mainet H. Quality of life and attractiveness of small towns: A comparison of France and Poland. Quaestiones Geographicae [Internet]. 2014 [cited 2018 Sep 26]; 33 (2): 103–113. DOI: 10.2478/quageo-2014–0019

3. Sinkien J., Kromalcas S. Concept, directions and practice of city attractiveness improvement. Viešoji politika ir administravimas. Public Policy and Administration [Internet]. 2010 [cited 2018 Sep 20]; 31: 147–154. Available from: https://www.mruni.eu/en/mokslo_darbai/vpa/archyvas/dwn.php?id=241406

4. Dai J., Zhou, S., Keane M., Huang Q. Mobility of the creative class and city attractiveness: A case study of Chinese animation workers. Eurasian Geography and Economics [Internet]. 2012 [cited 2018 Sep 26]; 53 (5): 649–670. DOI: 10.2747/1539–7216.53.5.649

5. Razinskaya V. D. Potential territorial mobility of Perm youth. Vlast’ = Power. 2015; 7: 111–115. (In Russ.)

6. Gavrilyuk V. V., Mehrishvili L. L., Skok N. I., et al. Osobennosti sotsial’noy mobil’nosti molodezhi XXI veka = Features of social mobility of young people of the XXI century. Tyumen: Tyumen Industrial University; 2016. 131 р. (In Russ.)

7. Oreshkina T. A., Odegov A. S. Civil culture of Sverdlovsk youth in the system of government. Vlast’ = Power. 2017: 9: 111–115. (In Russ.)

8. Abramova S. B. The image of the future: guidelines for modern youth. In: Sotsiokul’turnoye razvitiye bol’shogo Urala: trendy, problemy, perspektivy: materialy yubileynoy Vserossiyskoy nauchno-prakticheskoy konferentsii XX Ural’skiye sotsiologicheskiye chteniya = Socio-Cultural Development of the Big Urals: Trends, Problems, Prospects. Materials of the Anniversary All-Russian Scientific-Practical Conference XX Ural Sociological Readings;2015 Feb 27–28; Ekaterinburg. Ed. by Yu. R. Vishnevsky. Ekaterinburg: Ural Federal University; 2015. p. 3–8. (In Russ).

9. Zaborova E. N., Islamova A. F. The city as a social space. Sotsiologicheskiye issledovaniya = Sociological Studies. 2013; 2: 97–100. (In Russ.)

10. Antonova N. L., Rakevich E. V. Citizens as a subject of forming the image of the city. Vestnik Permskogo universiteta. Filosofiya. Psikhologiya. Sotsiologiya = Perm University Bulletin. Philosophy. Psychology. Sociology. 2016: 2 (26): 160– 166. (In Russ.)

11. Wirth L. Urbanism as a way of life. In: Wirth L. Izbrannyye raboty po sotsiologii: Sbornik perevodov = Selected works on sociology: Translation Collection. Moscow: Publishing House INION; 2005. p. 93–118. (In Russ.)

12. Simmel G. Big Cities and Spiritual Life. Logos = Logos. 2005: 3–4: 23–34. (In Russ).

13. Florida R. Kreativnyy klass. Lyudi, kotoryye sozdayut budushcheye = Creative class. People who create the future. Moscow: Publishing House Mann, Ivanov and Ferber; 2016. 384 p. (In Russ.)

14. Kurochkin V. I. City-megalopolis: problems of regulation of the legal status in the Russian Federation. Sotsiologiya vlasti = Sociology of Power. 2011: 3: 184–191. (In Russ.)

15. Chumakov D. S. Megalopolis as a social and political phenomenon. Srednerusskiy vestnik obshchestvennykh nauk = Srednerussky Bulletin of Social Sciences [Internet]. 2014 [cited 2018 Sep 24]; 2: 206–213. Available from: http://www.orel.ranepa.ru/upload/iblock/a2a/2014_02.pdf (In Russ.)

16. Zoryan A. A. Sociocultural analysis of a megalopolis as a phenomenon of urbanization. Vestnik MGUKI = The Bulletin of Moscow State University of Culture and Arts [Internet]. 2014 [cited 2018 Sep 20]; 6 (62): 68–71. Available from: http://files.mgik.org/Vestnik/2014/6/%D1%81%D1%82%D1%80.68-71.pdf (In Russ.)

17. Kuzmina N. V. Cultural landscapes of Russian megalopolises: Symbolic and semiotic aspect. Urbanistika = The Urban Studies Journal[Internet]. 2018 [cited 2018 Sep 23]; 1: 51–58. DOI: 10.7256/2310–8673.2018.1.25394 (In Russ.)

18. Costa P. B., Morais Neto G. C., Bertolde A. I. Urban mobility indexes: A brief review of the literature. Transportation Research Procedia[Internet]. 2017 [cited 2018 Sep 25]; 25: 3645–3655. DOI: 10.1016/j.trpro.2017.05330

19. Wilken L., Dahlberg M. G. Between international student mobility and work migration: experiences of students from EU’s newer member states in Denmark. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies[Internet]. 2017 [cited 2018 Sep 29]; 43 (8): 1347–1361. DOI: 10.1080/1369183X.2017.1300330

20. Komarov K. Yu. Methodological bases for the development of an innovative ̆model of a territorial educational space. Obrazovaniye i nauka = The Education and Science Journal. 2012; 5: 37–50. DOI: 10.17853/1994–5639–2012–5-37–50. (In Russ.)

21. Kirch A. “Knowledge Workers” in the Baltic Sea Region: Comparative assessment of innovative performance of the countries in the macro-region. Baltic Journal of European Studies[Internet]. 2018 [cited 2018 Sep 28]; 8 (1, 24): 176– 196. DOI: 10.1515/bjes-2018–0010

22. Brooks R. The prevalence of “life planning”: Evidence from UK graduates. British Journal of Sociology of Education[Internet]. 2008 [cited 2018 Sep 29]: 29 (3): 325–337. DOI: 10.1080/01425690801966410

23. Filioglo L. D. Labour mobility of young people in an unstable economy. Nauchno-metodicheskiy elektronnyy zhurnal “Kontsept” = Scientific-Methodical Electronic Journal “Concept” [Internet]. 2015 [cited 2018 Sep 29]; 1: 36–40. Available from: http://e-koncept.ru/2015/15008.htm (In Russ.)

24. Pryamikova E. V., Vandyshev M. N., Veselkova N. V. Internal migration of young people in the Sverdlovsk region. In: Sotsiokul’turnoye razvitiye bol’shogo Urala: trendy, problemy, perspektivy: materialy yubileynoy Vserossiyskoy nauchnoprakticheskoy konferentsii XX Ural’skiye sotsiologicheskiye chteniya = Socio-Cultural Development of the Big Urals: Trends, Problems, Prospects. Materials of the Anniversary All-Russian Scientific-Practical Conference XX Ural Sociological Readings; 2015 February 27–28; Ekaterinburg. Ed. by Yu. R. Vishnevsky. Ekaterinburg: Ural Federal University; 2015. p. 416–420. (In Russ.)

25. Samoshkina I. S. Territorial Identity as a Subject of Socio-Psychological Research. Vestnik RGGU. Seriya “Psikhologiya” = Bulletin of the Russian State University for the Humanities Series “Psychology”. 2008; 3: 43–53. (In Russ.)

26. Gustafson P. Mobility and Territorial Belonging. Environment and Behaviour. 2009; 41 (4): 490–508. DOI: 10.1177/0013916508314478

27. Sager A. Critical cosmopolitanism and the ethics of mobility. Toward a Cosmopolitan Ethics of Mobility. Mobility & Politics [Internet]. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham; 2018 [cited 2018 Sep 21]. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-65759-2

28. Steinberg Ph. Sovereignty, territory, and the mapping of mobility: A view from the outside. Annals of the Association of American Geographers[Internet]. 2009 [cited 2018 Sep 26]; 99 (3): 467–495. DOI: 10.1080/00045600902931702

29. Bayona-i-Carrasco J., Gil-Alonso F., Rubiales-Perez M., et al. New spatial mobility patterns in large Spanish cities: From the economic boom to the great recession. Applied Spatial Analysis and Policy[Internet]. 2018 [cited 2018 Sep 24]; 11 (2): 287–312. DOI: 10.1007/s12061–017–9222-x

30. Santos S. Who are you calling sub/urban? Socio-spatial inequality and mobility in the Lisbon Metropolitan Area. Portuguese Journal of Social Science [Internet]. 2016 [cited 2018 Sep 29]; 15 (3): 387–407. https://doi.org/10.1386/pjss.15.3.387_1

31. Giambona F., Porcu M., Sulis I. Students mobility: Assessing the determinants of attractiveness across competing territorial areas. Social Indicators Research[Internet]. 2017 [cited 2018 Sep 20]; 133(3): 1105–1132. DOI: 10.1007/s11205–016–1407–1

32. Attride Stirling J. Thematic networks: An analytical tool for qualitative research. Qualitative Research[Internet]. 2001 [cited 2018 Sep 29]; 1 (3): 385– 405. DOI: 10.1177/146879410100100307

33. Kabisov A. G. The theory of urbanism and the practice of modernism: George Simmel’s Essay “Big Cities and Spiritual Life” and the Modernist Novel of the “Big City”. Izvestiya Saratovskogo universiteta = Izvestiya of Saratov University [Internet]. 2009 [cited 2018 Sep 29]; 2: 66–69. Available from: https://www.sgu.ru/sites/default/files/journals/izvestiya/pdf/2013/12/13/2009._tom_9.2.17.pdf (In Russ.)

34. Oldenburg R. Tret’ye mesto. Kafe, kofeyni, knizhnyye magaziny, bary, salony krasoty i drugiye mesta “tusovok” kak fundament soobshchestva = The great good place: Cafes, coffee shops, bookstores, bars, hair salons, and other hangouts at the heart of a community. Moscow: New Literary Review; 2014. 454 p. (In Russ.)

35. Karavaeva E. N., Savchenkov Yu. I. Changes in the traits of temperament when moving to another region for permanent residence. Sibirskoye meditsinskoye obozreniye = Siberian Medical Review[Internet]. 2011 [cited 2018 Sep 26]; 4: 53–56. Available from: http://smr.krasgmu.ru/files/32_1418029749_smo_2011,_n4_70_.pdf (In Russ.)

36. Barkhatov V. I. Nature and evolution of Russian capitalism. Vestnik Chelyabinskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Ekonomicheskiye nauki = Bulletin of the Chelyabinsk State University. Economics.2017; 2 (398): 5–18. (In Russ.)

37. Lysgаrd H. K., Rye S. A. Between striated and smooth space: Exploring the topology of transnational student mobility. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space[Internet]. 2017; 49 (9): 2116–2134. DOI: 10.1177/0308518X17711945

38. Ilinykh S. A., Tabarkov A. V. Megalopolis as an object of sociological research. Diskussiya = The Discussion Journal. 2016; 3 (66): 80–85. (In Russ.)

39. Ruksha G. L., Kudrina E. L. Megalopolis as a socio-cultural phenomenon. Vestnik Kemerovskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta kul’tury i iskusstv: zhurnal teoreticheskikh i prikladnykh issledovaniy = Bulletin of the Kemerovo State University of Culture and Arts: Journal of Theoretical and Applied Research[Internet]. 2011 [cited 2018 Sep 21]; 17–2: 199–204. Available from: http://vestnik.kemgik.ru/images/stories/vestnik172.pdf (In Russ.)

40. Martyanov V. S., Rudenko V. N. Russian megalopolises: From industrial cities to the strategy of multifunctional agglomeration. Nauchnyy yezhegodnik Instituta filosofii i prava Ural'skogo otdeleniya Rossiyskoy akademii nauk = Scientific Yearbook of the Institute of Philosophy and Law of the Ural Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences. 2012; 12: 316–330. (In Russ.)

41. Osipova O. S. A Study of the territorial migration of youth (according to RLMS data, a survey of 23 waves). In: Sotsial’no-ekonomicheskiye preobrazovaniya i problemy. Sbornik nauchnykh trudov = Socio-Economic Transformations and Problems. Collection of Scientific Papers; 2015; N. Novgorod. N. Novgorod: Publishing House NISZ; 2015. p. 96–109. (In Russ.)

42. Zeer E. F. Socio-professional mobility of young students as a factor in preparing for a dynamic professional future. Obrazovanie i nauka = The Education and Science Journal.2014; 8: 33–48. DOI: 10.17853/1994–5639–2014–8-33–48 (In Russ.)

43. Wong P., Wing L. Career and life planning education in Hong Kong: Challenges and opportunities on the theoretical and empirical fronts. Hong Kong Teachers’ Centre Journal [Internet]. 2017 [cited 2018 Sep 28]; 16: 125–148. Available from: https://www.edb.org.hk/HKTC/download/journal/j16/C01.pdf