Adaptation Potential of Teachers of the Third Age in the Conditions of Higher Education Transformation

Introduction. In many countries around the world, the increase in life expectancy leads to significant social transformations. Institutional structures, social protection policies and legislation on the life and employment of older citizens are being changed today. In Russian higher education, more than a third of professional community belongs to the group of teachers of the third (pre-retirement and retirement) age. The modernisation of this area and the raising of the retirement age will make it possible to study the peculiarities of this group of faculty members as a reserve of the vocational training system.

The aim of the present article is to characterise the adaptive potential of social community of teachers of the third age in the context of the transformation of higher education.

Methodology and research methods. The methodological framework of the article is based on the set of general scientific approaches: communal, comparative, institutional, resource. The first method provides an opportunity to consider teachers of the third age as a social community with their own specific features. The comparative approach is used to see specific features in dynamics (on the materials of official statistics) and to compare them with similar characteristics of teachers of other age groups. The institutional and resource approaches are aimed at identifying adaptive abilities of teachers of the third age against the background of current restructuring processes in higher education. The article is based on the materials of research projects conducted in 2017–2019 and on a mass survey of teachers. The general population consisted of 51 universities of the Ural Federal District. The volume of the sample of teachers is 810 people.

Results and scientific novelty. The study showed that teachers of the third age are characterised by a high level of adaptation to changes in higher education. They successfully fulfill themselves in scientific and pedagogical activities. They are characterised by relatively high publication and grant activities, realisation of new educational forms and high motivation and readiness to improve their com petencies and qualifications. At the same time, teachers of the third age estimate their social security in the professional sphere as extremely low. This community is characterised by a high level of criticality in relation to the implemented institutional changes in the field of higher education, which is based on a socially mature responsibility formed within their professional activities for the consequences of decisions taken.

Practical significance. The research undertaken demonstrates the stereotype inadequacy concerning non-adaptability of third-age university teachers to technological, content and organisational innovations. Moreover, teachers of the third age are a significant factor in the sustainable development of universities. Therefore, it is necessary to develop management models and create institutional conditions for maximum use of human capital of third-age teachers, whose peculiarities, needs and opportunities in the system of Russian higher education are inadequately taken into account today.

1. Vakhitov R. R. “Diseases” of our universities: Soviet universities in the post-Soviet era. Universitetskoye upravleniye: praktika i analiz = University Management: Practice and Analysis. 2017; 2 (108): 14–23. DOI: 10.15826/umpa.2017.02.027 (In Russ.)

2. Kuzminov Ya. I., Peskov D. N. Discussion “What is the future of universities?”. Voprosy obrazovaniya = Educational Issues. 2017; 3: 202–233. DOI: 10.17323/1814–9545–2017–3-202–233 (In Russ.)

3. Huisman J., Meek L., Wood F. Institutional diversity in higher education: А cross¬national and longitudinal analysis. Higher Education. 2007; 61 (4): 563−577.

4. Reichert S. Institutional diversity in European higher education. Tensions and challenges for policy makers and institutional leaders [Internet]. Brussels, European University Association; 2010 [cited 2019 Apr 21]; 164 р. Available from: http://www.aic.lv/bolona/2010/Reports/EUA_Instit_Diversity_web.pdf/

5. Abramov R. N., Gruzdev I. A. & Terent’ev E. A. Academic Profession and Ideology of “Slow Scholarship”. Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii = Higher Education in Russia. 2016; 10 (205): 62–70. (In Russ.)

6. Kurbatov M. V., Kagan E. S. Opportunism of university teachers as a way to adapt to strengthening external control activities. Journal of Institutional Studies. 2016; 3: 116−137. (In Russ.)

7. Abankina I. V., Abankina T. V., Filatova L. M. Pitfalls of differentiation in the financing of Russian universities. Aktualnyye problemy ekonomiki i prava = Actual Problems of Economics and Law. 2016; 10 (2): 38–58. (In Russ.)

8. Balatsky E. V. Management paradoxes of reforms in the university sector. Zhurnal novoy ekonomicheskoy assotsiatsii = Journal of a New Economic Association. 2016; 2 (26): 124–149. (In Russ.)

9. Krasinskaya L. F. Modernisation, Optimisation, Bureaucratisation... What awaits higher school tomorrow? Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii = Higher Education in Russia. 2016; 3: 73–82. (In Russ.)

10. Zborovsky G. E., Ambarova P. A., Katashinsky V. S., Klyuev A. K., Kuz’minchuk A. A., Kulpin S. V., et al. Formirovanie nelinejnoj sistemy vysshego obrazovanija v makroregione = Formation of a non-linear system of higher education in the macro-region. Ed. by G. E. Zborovsky. Ekaterinburg: University of the Humanities; 2018. 251 p. (In Russ.)

11. Borman W. C., Hedge J. W. The Oxford handbook of work and aging. New York: Oxford University Press; 2015.

12. Bal P. M., Kooij D. T.A.M, Rousseau D. M. Aging workers and the employee-employer relationship. Switzerland: Springer International Publishing; 2015. DOI: 10.1007/978–3-319–08007–9

13. Klepikova E. A., Kolosnitsyna M. G. Ageism in the Russian labour market: Wage discrimination. Rossiyskiy zhurnal menedzhmenta = Russian Management Journal. 2017; 15 (1): 69–88. (In Russ.)

14. Sze Y. L., Kawachi I. Discrimination and telomere length among older adults in the United States: Does the association vary by race and type of discrimination? Public Health Reports. 2017; 132 (2): 220–230. DOI: 10.1177/ 0033354916689613

15. Fisher G. G., Truxillo D. M., Finkelstein L. M. Age discrimination: Potential for adverse impact and differential prediction related to age. Human Resource Management Review [Internet]. 2017 [cited 2019 Apr 16]; 27(2): 316–327. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrmr.2016.06.001

16. Iweins C., Desmette D., Yzerbyt V., Stinglhamber F. Ageism at work: The impact of intergenerational contact and organizational multi-age perspective. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology. 2013; 22: 331–346.

17. Evans L. University professors as academic leaders: Professorial leadership development needs and provision. Educational Management Administration & Leadership. 2017; 45 (1): 123–140.

18. Weijden I., Belder R., Arensbergen P., Besselaar P. How do young tenured professors benefit from a mentor? Effects on management, motivation and performance. High Education. 2015; 69: 275–287. DOI: 10.1007/s10734–014– 9774–5

19. Matthews J. R. To retire or not to retire? That is the question. Teaching of Psychology. 2013; 40 (4): 330–332.

20. Volyn L. B. Prestige of age. Sotsiologicheskiye issledovaniya = Sociological Studies. 2000; 7: 120–124. (In Russ.)

21. Molevich E. F. To the analysis of the essence and form of social old age. Sotsiologicheskiye issledovaniya = Sociological Studies. 2001; 4: 61–64. (In Russ.)

22. Patrushev G. A. Pensioner: his work, life and rest. Sotsiologicheskiye issledovaniya = Sociological Studies. 1997; 12: 54–63. (In Russ.)

23. Dzhurinskiy A. N. Education for people of the “Third Age” in Russia. Obrazovaniye i nauka = The Education and Science Journal [Internet]. 2018 [cited 2019 Apr 16]; 20 (10): 156–175. Available from: https://doi.org/10.17853/1994– 5639–2018–10–156–175. (In Russ.)

24. Cuyvers G., Thomése F., van Tilburg T. Participation narratives of Third Age adults: Their activities, motivations and expectations regarding civil society organisations. Journal of Aging Studies [Internet]. 2018 [cited 2019 Apr 16]; 46: 10–16. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaging.2018.05.003

25. Uteeva E. N. Model of social activity in the Third Age. Sotsialnaya politika i sotsiologiya = Social Policy and Sociology. 2009; 11 (2): 168–175. (In Russ.)

26. Shmerlina I. A. Age constructs and lifestyle in the older age. Monitoring obshchestvennogo mneniya: ekonomicheskiye i sotsialnyye peremeny = Monitoring of Public Opinion: Economic and Social Changes. 2014; 1: 181–187. (In Russ.)

27. Voitovich I. K. “Third Age” in classical universities: International experience and Russian reality. Mnogoyazychiye v obrazovatelnom prostranstve = Multilingualism in the Educational Space. 2016; 8 (8): 126–132. (In Russ.)

28. Mokroguz E. D. On the formation of the theory of education for people of the Third Age. Problemy sovremennogo pedagogicheskogo obrazovaniya = Problems of Modern Pedagogical Education. 2016; 52(4): 119–126. (In Russ.)

29. Mokroguz E. D. Education of people of the “third age”: Sociocultural analysis of development trends. Chelovek i obrazovaniye = Man and Education. 2015; 4: 169–173. (In Russ.)

30. Vidyasova L., Grigoryeva I. Russia in the international quality of ageing indexes. Zhurnal Sotsiologii i Sotsialnoy Antropologii = The Journal of Sociology and Social Anthropology. 2016; 1 (19): 181–193. (In Russ.)

31. Shimoni S. “Third Age” under neoliberalism: From risky subjects to human capital. Journal of Aging Studies [Internet]. 2018 [cited 2019 Apr 16]; 5: 39– 48. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaging.2018.10.004