The model of ontological reflection of ecological and economic value orientations formation in the process of vocational education
https://doi.org/10.17853/1994-5639-2020-2-53-77
Abstract
Introduction. In modern Russia, the environmental problems affected all developing countries are growing and the postponement of these problems could lead to economic collapse. The fundamental transformation of social and economic institutions is necessary to avoid environmental degradation. Primarily, science requires a transition to a paradigm, which integrates economic well-being and environmental security of current and future generations. The translator of such synthesis can and should be a vocational training system.
The aim of the present article is to demonstrate and justify the model of ecological and economic value orientations formation in vocational education members; since this model ensures integrity, systemacity, continuity of work and parity of actions of all participants in the educational process.
Methodology and research methods. The design of the model was based on holistic, synergistic and professiographic approaches. The principles of personal targeting, self-reflection, ecosinergism and continuity were applied. Reflexive analysis was the leading method in the research.
Results and scientific novelty. The authors give the definition of ecological and economic value orientations, considering them as formations in the structure of individual consciousness, which are subjective ideal samples and objective bases of responsible ecological and economic activity of the individual, social institutions and production enterprises. However, the formation and development of such orientations in the vocational education system is very difficult without the certain economic order to train specialists in order to make cost-effective and moral focused on environmental issues. Today’s graduates of non-ecological specialties have superficial ideas of the nature and its relationship with the state of society and they are practically unaware of the basics of environmental management and ecological-economic risks. In recent decades, the gap between education and scientific achievements has become increasingly obvious in the field of genetic engineering, cyber production, autotrophic and chemical-biological technologies with the use of artificially grown living systems, etc., which change initial ideas about ecology and can raise civilisation to a new level of evolution. It is necessary not only to transmit the latest discoveries and ecological knowledge to students, but also to try to change their world view by instilling ecocentric morality. In this regard, the model for ontological reflection of ecological and economic values formation has been developed. This model emphasises that professional readiness in the modern world is determined not only by a set of certain competencies, but also by the ability to analyse the whole set of external externalities to prevent environmental threats, without losing the economic benefit of activities.
Practical significance. The authors believe that the introduction of a reflexive model into educational practice could be applied to train highly qualified specialists with a full range of professional competencies, value orientations and personal qualities, which correspond to the realities of unstable ecological and economic state of society.
Keywords
About the Authors
A. A. SalamatovRussian Federation
Artem A. Salamatov – Doctor of Pedagogical Sciences, Professor, Head of the Department of Economic Theory and Regional Development
SPIN code 8243–9019, Author ID 427905
ChelyabinskD. S. Gordeeva
Russian Federation
Darya S. Gordeeva – Candidate of Pedagogical Sciences, Associate Professor, Department of Economics, Management and Law
SPIN code 7696–7671, Author ID 832523
Chelyabinsk
References
1. Rozenberg G. S., Kostina N. V., Kudinova G. E., Rozenberg A. G. Environmental modernization: the basin approach on the example of the largest rivers in Asia and Europe. Bulletin of the Samara State University of Economics. 2014; 8: 25-34.
2. Ryabchuk P., Salamatov A., Gordeeva D., Gnatyshina E., Fedoseev A., Korneev D., et al. Eco-Economic security of the region: Expanding the management system for assessing the state of development. International Journal of Supply Chain Management [Internet]. 2018 [cited 2019 May 12]; 7, № 6 (201). Available from: https://ojs.excelingtech.co.uk/index.php/IJSCM/article/view/2680
3. Bordovskaya N. V. Challenges of time and new models of developing educational environment. Chelovek i obrazovanie = Man and Education. 2013; 2 (35): 4-11. (In Russ.)
4. Zeer E. F. Psihologija razvivajushhegosja professional’no-obrazovatel’nogo prostranstva cheloveka = Psychology of developing professional and educational space man. Ekaterinburg: Russian State Vocational Pedagogical University; 2008. 239 p. (In Russ.)
5. Leonova E. V. Formation of general cultural competences of students of technical high school. Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii = Higher Education in Russia. 2010; 2: 124-131. (In Russ.)
6. Novikov V. N. Educational environment of the University as a professionally and personally stimulating factor. Jelektronnyj zhurnal “Psihologicheskaja nauka i obrazovanie” = Electronic journal “Psychological Science and Education” [Internet]. 2012 [cited 2019 May 12]; 1. Available from: www.psyedu.ru (In Russ.)
7. Slastenin V. A. Pedagogika = Pedagogy. Moscow: Publishing House Akademija; 2007. 576 p. (In Russ.)
8. Tulkibaeva N. N., Bolshakov Z. M. Pedagogical objective: The meaning and function. Vestnik Cheljabinskogo gosudarstvennogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta = Bulletin of the Chelyabinsk State Pedagogical University. 2014; 9/1: 206-213. (In Russ.)
9. Guliants S. M. the Essence of personality oriented approach in education from the point of view of modern educational concepts. Vestnik Cheljabinskogo gosudarstvennogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta = Bulletin of the Chelyabinsk State Pedagogical University. 2009; 2: 40-52. (In Russ.)
10. Zagvyazinsky V. I. Nastupit li jepoha Vozrozhdenija? Strategija innovacionnogo razvitija rossijskogo obrazovanija = Will there be a Renaissance? Strategy of innovative development of Russian education. 2 nd ed. Moscow: Publishing House Logos; 2015. 140 p. (In Russ.)
11. Kalashnikov V. G. Contextual approach to the development of quality criteria of educational systems. Pedagogika i psihologija obrazovanija = Pedagogy and Psychology of Education. 2011; 4: 11-14. (In Russ.)
12. Yamburg E. A. Harmonisation of pedagogical paradigms-strategy of development of education. In: Problemy vnedrenija psihologo-pedagogicheskih issledovanij v sisteme obrazovanija: sbornik statej mezhdunarodnoj nauchno-prakticheskoj konferencii = Problems of Introduction of Psychological and Pedagogical Research in the System of Education. Collection of Articles of Scientific-Practical Conference; 2004; Moscow. Moscow: Publishing House ERGO; 2004. p. 92-96. (In Russ.)
13. Antichina A. V., Dolmatov A. V. Formation of ecological competence and culture in the learning process and education of students. Chelovek i obrazovanie = Man and Education. 2014; 1 (38): 45-50. (In Russ.)
14. Ermakov D. S. Ecological competence of students: content, structure, features of formation. Vestnik Rossijskogo universiteta druzhby narodov. Serija: Psihologija i pedagogika = Bulletin of the Russian University of Peoples’ Friendship. Series: Psychology and Pedagogy. 2008; 1: 86-91. (In Russ.)
15. Amend A. F., Salamatov A. A. Continuous ecological and economic education of pupils of comprehensive schools. Obrazovanie i nauka: Izvestija Ural’skogo otdelenija RAO = Education and Science: News of the Ural Branch of the Russian Academy of Education. 2003; 3 (21): 86-96. (In Russ.)
16. Davankov A. Yu. Sovremennye metodologicheskie podhody k mezhdisciplinarnym issledovanijam territorial’nyh socio-jekologo-jekonomicheskih system = Modern methodological approaches to interdisciplinary studies of territorial socio-ecological and economic systems. Ekaterinburg: Institute of Economics, Ural Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences; 2014. 133 p. (In Russ.)
17. Dvinin D. Yu. Clarification of the concept of “environmental management” in order to identify it relative to other forms of environmental management. Vestnik Cheljabinskogo gosudarstvennogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta = Bulletin of the Chelyabinsk State Pedagogical University. 2008; 17: 18-23. (In Russ.)
18. Ryabinina N. p. Modular content of building ecological and economic education of the future teacher. Vestnik Cheljabinskogo gosudarstvennogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta. Serija: Obrazovanie. Pedagogicheskie nauki = Bulletin of the Chelyabinsk State Pedagogical University. Series: Education. Pedagogical Sciences. 2015; 4 (137): 24-28. (In Russ.)
19. Salamatov A. A. Ecological and economic security of Russia: The future in retrospect. Part 1. Socium i vlast’ = Society and Power. 2015; 1 (51): 102-108. (In Russ.)
20. Bainer D. L., Cantrell D., Barron P. Professional development of environmental educators through partnerships. In: Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the North American Association for Environmental Education. Vancouver; 1997 Aug 15-19; British Columbia, Canada. 31 p.
21. Bucheit J., Dorn T., Matheny K. Collection and coding of Dissertation studies in environmental education and related fields. 1991-2000. Melbourne. Florida. U. S.: Unpublished master’s research project. Florida Institute of Technology; 2006. p. 439.
22. Otto S., Kaiser F. G. Ecological behavior across the lifespan: Why environmentalism increases as people grow older. Journal of Environmental Psychology. 2014; 40: 331-338.
23. Hurst M., Dittmar H., Bond R., Kasser T. The relationship between materialistic values and environmental attitudes and behaviors: A meta-analysis. Journal of Environmental Psychology. 2013; 36: 257-269.
24. Gordeev D. S. Unsolved problems of continuous professional education at the interface of ecology and economy. Azimut nauchnyh issledovanij: pedagogika i psihologija = The Azimuth of Research: Pedagogy and Psychology. 2017; V. 6 № 3 (20): 63-68. (In Russ.)
25. Moiseeva L. V., Barsanova M. V. Princip kojevoljucii v obrazovanii dlja ustojchivogo razvitija. Noosfernoe obrazovanie v evrazijskom prostranstve = The principle of coevolution in education for sustainable development. Noospheric education in Eurasia. Vol. 7: in 2 books. St. Petersburg: Publishing House Asterion; 2017. 718 p. Book 1. p. 93-121. (In Russ.)
26. Zhilbaev Zh. O., Moiseeva L. V., Barsanova M. V. Pedagogical bases of educational policy for sustainable development of Eurasia. Obrazovanie i nauka = The Education and Science Journal. 2018; 20 (6): 9-28. (In Russ.)
27. Glazachev S. N., Perfilova O. E. Jekologicheskaja kompetentnost’: stanovlenie, problemy, perspektivy = Ecological competence: Formation, problems, prospects. Moscow; 2008. p. 12-34. (In Russ.)
28. Mamedov N. M. New aspects for environmental education. Jekologicheskoe obrazovanie = Environmental Education. 2011; 4: 13-15. (In Russ.)
29. Lefebvre V. A. Refleksija = Reflection. Moscow: Publishing House Kogito-centr; 2003. 496 p. (In Russ.)
30. Baresia U., Vellab K. J., Sipea N. G. Bridging the divide between theory and guidance in strategic environmental assessment: A path for Italian regions. Environmental Impact Assessment Review. 2017 Jan; 62: 14-24.
31. Amin S. L’eccccchange inegal et la loi de la valeur. La fin d’un débat. 2018; 7: 152.
Review
For citations:
Salamatov A.A., Gordeeva D.S. The model of ontological reflection of ecological and economic value orientations formation in the process of vocational education. The Education and science journal. 2020;22(2):53-77. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17853/1994-5639-2020-2-53-77