Employment of Graduates of Pedagogical Universities: Statistics vs Mythology

Introduction. Today, one of the most debatable issues currently discussed in the professional community is the problem of the effectiveness of teacher education system. A significant number of the leaders of the educational sector and the expert community are convinced that teacher training system has long ceased to meet the challenges of the time and needs to be reorganised. The most radical position was declared at the Higher School of Economics: “To stop the degradation of education, it is necessary to include all pedagogical institutions of higher education into the composition of classical universities, as it is done in most Anglo-Saxon countries”. The underlying claims to the pedagogical system are the significant extent to which graduates of pedagogical institutions avoid working in their specialty, as well as the overproduction of pedagogical specialists in the absence of need for them. Meanwhile, instead of substantiated quantitative estimates of these phenomena in the literature, we will find only approximate figures calculated on limited statistics obtained by experts.
The aim of the present research is to review the results of employment of graduates of higher education institutions trained in teacher specialties, relying on a new information base – federal statistical observation form No. ОО-1 “Information about the organisation providing training for educational programmes of primary general, basic general, secondary general education”, and the assessment of the effectiveness of teacher education system based on a quantitative approach.
Methodology and research methods. The methodological framework of the research is based on the systematic approach in which general scientific (comparative, retrospective analysis, systematization, generalisation) and statistical research methods (statistical and correlation analysis, etc.) were employed.
Results and scientific novelty. In the current research, it is proved that the allegations of low efficiency of the system of teacher education are untenable. In assessing the profile employment of graduates, the market for pedagogical labour is limited by experts to job vacancies in secondary schools, while institutions of pre-school, additional, special correctional, as well as secondary and higher professional education fall out of sight. Moreover, graduates of all pedagogical specialties (educators, masters of vocational training, speech therapists, psychologists, additional education teachers, etc.), as well as extramural graduates, are mistakenly included in the number of young specialists – teachers. As a result, the actual amount of teacher training is unjustifiably overstated. A comparison of overstated training with an understated number of jobs inevitably leads to erroneous estimates of the effectiveness of the training system.
In addition, it was established that the admission to schools of young teachers of higher qualification is 25–30% higher than the actual graduation of students of teaching specialties of the full-time department of universities, which would be impossible if the graduate employment profile was low. This excess is explained by the minimisation of the volume of teacher training to a critical level and the growing recruitment to teacher positions of non-specialists teachers, which is caused by errors in planning of determining the benchmarks for enrollment to study at universities.
Practical significance. The authors believe that this article will allow to clarify approaches to assessing the effectiveness of teacher education system and adjust the control figures for university admission in the field of “Education and Pedagogical Sciences” in accordance with the current personnel supply and demand.

1. Schleicher A. Building a high-quality teaching profession. Lessons from around the world, OECD Publishing [Internet]. 2013 [cited 2020 Aug 15]. Available from: https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED518775.pdf

2. Sutcher L., Darling-Hammond L., Carver-Thomas D. Understanding teacher shortages: An analysis of teacher supply and demand in the United States. Education Policy Analysis Archives [Internet]. 2019 [cited 2020 Aug 15]; 27 (35). Available from: https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1213618.pdf

3. Sidorkin A. Professional teacher training in the US: Lessons for Russia. Voprosy obrazovaniya = Educational Studies Moscow. 2013; 1: 136–157. (In Russ.)

4. Auguste B., Kihn P., Miller M. Closing the talent gap: Attracting and retaining top third graduates to a career in teaching [Internet]. 2010 [cited 2020 Aug 15]. Available from: https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/d4b3/398ecddb-442ba359e31a993f4c2571eb96ac.pdf

5. Omiunota N. The impact of shadowing culturally different students on preservice teachers’ disposition toward diversity. Multicultural Education [Internet]. 2004 [cited 2020 Aug 15]. Available from: https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ781918.pdf

6. Heineke A., Davin K. The seal of biliteracy: Considering equity and access for English learners. Education Policy Analysis Archive. Bedford, Amy [Internet]. 2018 [cited 2020 Aug 15]. Available from: https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1187941.pdf

7. Dudko S. A. Transformations in the system of higher pedagogical education in France after the reforms of 2013. Tsennosti i smysly = Values and Meanings. 2016; 5: 120–129. (In Russ.)

8. Pisareva L. I. Factors of professional growth of teachers in Germany: An individual trajectory of education and pedagogical activity. Otechestvennaya i zarubezhnaya pedagogika = Domestic and Foreign Pedagogy. 2016; 6: 88–99. (In Russ.)

9. Mashkina O. A. Formation of a new model of training school teachers in modern China. Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Ser. 20: Pedagogicheskoe obrazovanie = Bulletin of Moscow University. Ser. 20. Teacher Education. 2013; 3: 108–123. (In Russ.)

10. Churkin K. A., Kiselev S. G. On the issue of employment of graduates of pedagogical institutions and staffing educational institutions. In: Spros i predlozhenie na rynke truda i rynke obrazovatel’nyh uslug v regionah Rossii: sbornik dokladov po materialam Dvenadcatoj Vserossijskoj nauchno-prakticheskoj internet-konferencii (28–29 oktjabrja 2015 g.). Kn. II. = Demand and Supply in the Labour Market and the Market of Educational Services in the Regions of Russia: Proceedings of the Twelfth All-Russian Scientific and Practical Internet Conference; 2015 Oct 28–29; Petrozavodsk. Book II. Petrozavodsk: Petrozavodsk State University; 2015; p. 225–236. (In Russ.)

11. Malatras J., Gais T., Wagner A. A background on potential teacher shortages in the United States [Internet]. 2017 [cited 2020 Aug 15]. Available from: https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED605640.pdf

12. Owen S., Kos Ju., McKenzie Ph. Teacher workforce data and planning processes in Australia [Internet]. 2008 [cited 2020 Aug 15]. Available from: https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED536212.pdf

13. Doti J., Cardinal D. Forecasting demand for California credentialed teachers. Issues in Teacher Education [Internet]. 2005 [cited 2020 Aug 15]; 2 (14): 7–23. Available from: https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ796368.pdf

14. Robst J. Education and job match: The relatedness of college major and work. Economics of Education Review [Internet]. 2007 [cited 2020 Aug 15]; 8 (26): 397–407. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econedurev.2006.08.003

15. Carroll D. A Panel data investigation of the relationship between graduate job search and employment outcomes. Journal of Institutional Research [Internet]. 2013 [cited 2020 Aug 15]; 18 (1): 47–55. Available from: https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1094091.pdf

16. Stokes A. Factors influencing the decisions of university students to become high school teachers. Issues in Educational Research [Internet]. 2007 [cited 2020 Aug 15]; 17 (1): 127–145. Available from: http://www.iier.org.au/iier17/stokes.html

17. Aydarova E. Teachers’ plight and trainees’ flight: Perceived, lived, and conceived spaces of schools. Voprosy obrazovaniya = Educational Studies Moscow [Internet]. 2016 [cited 2020 Aug 15]; 2: 183–207. Available from: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/teachers-plight-and-trainees-flight-perceived-lived-andconceived-spaces-of-schools/viewer

18. Kimbrel L. Teacher hiring: The disconnect between research based best practice and processes used by school principals. Administrative Issues Journal: Connecting Education, Practice, and Research [Internet]. 2019 [cited 2020 Aug 15]; 9 (2): 12–27. Available from: https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1238404.pdf

19. Bruno P., Strunk K. Making the cut: The effectiveness of teacher screening and hiring in the los angeles unified school district. National Center for Analysis of Longitudinal Data in Education Research (CALDER) [Internet]. 2018 [cited 2020 Aug 15]. Available from: https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED583631.pdf

20. Darling-Hammond L., Rothman R. Teacher and leader effectiveness in high-performing education systems. Washington, DC: Alliance for excellent education; Stanford, CA: Stanford Center for Opportunity Policy in Education [Internet]. 2011 [cited 2020 Aug 15]. Available from: https://mk0all4edorgjxiy8xf9.kinstacdn.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/06/TeacherLeaderEffectivenessReport.pdf

21. Kasprzhak А. Institutional deadlocks of the Russian teacher training system. Voprosy obrazovaniya = Educational Studies Moscow. 2013; 4: 261–282. (In Russ.)

22. Maslinsky K., Ivaniushina V. To remain a teacher? Factors influencing attitudes to leaving the teaching profession. Voprosy obrazovaniya = Educational Studies Moscow. 2016; 4: 8–30. (In Russ.)

23. Morozov G. B. Why do graduates of pedagogical universities do not work in the educational field? Elektronnyy nauchnyy zhurnal “Sovremennoye obshchestvo i vlast’” = Electronic Scientific Journal “Modern Society and Power”. 2016 [cited 2020 Aug 15]; 4: 64–67. (In Russ.)

24. Pitukhin E. A. Golubenko V. A. Modeling the functional-temporal dependence of the elements of the matrix of vocational qualification matching and taking into account the impact of innovative changes in the economy. In: Spros i predlozhenie na rynke truda i rynke obrazovatel’nyh uslug v regionah Rossii: sbornik dokladov po materialam Sed’moj Vserossijskoj nauchno-prakticheskoj internet-konferencii (13–14 oktjabrja 2010 g.). Kn. II. = Supply and Demand in the Labour Market and the Market of Educational Services in the Regions of Russia: Proceedings of the Seventh All-Russian Scientific and Practical Internet Conference; 2010 Oct 13–14; Petrozavodsk. Book II. Petrozavodsk: Petrozavodsk State University; 2010. p. 173–182. (In Russ.)

25. Gurtov A. A., Pitukhin E. A. Forecasting the needs of the economy in qualified personnel. Review of approaches and practices of application. Universitetskoye upravleniye: praktika i analiz = University Management: Practice and Analysis. 2017; 4: 130–161. (In Russ.)

26. Churkin K. A., Nurieva L. M., Kiselev S. G. To the question of the need for teaching staff. Rektor vuza = Rector of the University, 2014; 6: 36–46. (In Russ.)

27. Vitchenko N. N., Epp V. Ya. The basic principles and results of forecasting the need for personnel in the system of general secondary education of the Tomsk region until 2000. Vestnik Elabuzhskogo gosudarstvennogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta = Bulletin of Yelabuga State Pedagogical University. 1997; 1: 90–94. (In Russ.)

28. Agranovich M. L. Teacher education – preparing teachers for school or? (analysis of graduation statistics on pedagogical specialties). In: Tendencii razvitija obrazovanija: Kadry reshajut vsjo? Materialy X Mezhdunarodnoj nauchno-prakticheskoj konferencii. Moskva, 20–21 fevralja 2013 goda = Trends in the Development of Education: Does personnel decide everything? Materials of the X International Scientific and Practical Conference; 2013 Feb 20–21; Moscow. Moscow: Publishing House Delo; 2014. p. 100–107. (In Russ.)

29. Lyubimov L. L. Is pedagogical education effective in Russia? Ekonomika obrazovaniya = Economics of Education. 2008; 3: 131–142. (In Russ.)

30. Sobkin V. S., Tkachenko O. V. Student of a pedagogical university: Life and professional prospects. Trudy po sotsiologii obrazovaniya = Proceedings of the Sociology of Education. Vol. XI–XII. Iss. XXI. Moscow: Center for Sociology of Education, Russian Academy of Education; 2007. 200 p. (In Russ.)

31. Margolis A. A. Problems and prospects for the development of teacher education in the Russian Federation. Psikhologicheskaya nauka i obrazovaniye = Psychological Science and Education. 2014; 3: 41–57. (In Russ.)

32. Borisenkov V. P. Education quality and issues of pedagogical staff training. Obrazovaniye i nauka = The Education and Science Journal [Internet]. 2015 [cited 2020 Aug 15]; 1 (3): 4–28. Available from: https://doi.org/10.17853/1994-5639-2015-3-4-28 (In Russ.)

33. Lysenko O. V. About “unsuccessful” teachers: Is there a “double negative selection” in pedagogy? Labirint. Zhurnal sotsial’no-gumanitarnykh issledovaniy = Labyrinth. Journal of Social and Humanitarian Research. 2016; 3/4: 26–39. (In Russ.)

34. Klyachko T., Semionova E., Tokareva G. Labour and wages of teachers – what has changed? Ekonomicheskoye razvitiye Rossii = Economic Development of Russia. 2018; 11: 46–62. (In Russ.)

35. Nurieva L. M., Kiselev S. G. Distribution of university admission quotas: Problems of competitive selection process. Obrazovaniye i nauka = The Education and Science Journal [Internet]. 2019 [cited 2020 Aug 15]; 21 (6): 46–71. Available from: https://doi.org/10.17853/1994-5639-2019-6-46-71 (In Russ.)