Generation Z and volunteering: A national culture perspective

Introduction. Volunteering in the modern world is one of the basic resources for solving society’s problems, an activity that helps students in different countries to build personal and professional competencies. The limited research that makes it possible to analyse the cross-cultural elements of student volunteering has led to a scientific interest in the problem of matching the cultural context and volunteer activities of students from universities in India, Russia and Croatia. The new research perspective covered the perception of volunteering, the behaviour of Generation Z, to which the students of the three countries under consideration belong, as well as the significance of the peculiarities of national culture for the volunteering activity of university youth.

The aim of this study is to assess the national cultural context and the level of its significance for the perception of volunteering, motivation and the experience of volunteering of students of management specialties at universities in India, Russia and Croatia.

Methodology and research methods. Comparative sociological research is implemented based on the theory of generations, Hofstede’s theory of cultural dimensions and the cultural factors of the macro level defined by him. The study involved students from regional universities in three countries: India, Russia and Croatia. The main method for collecting primary data was questionnaire survey. The questionnaire consisted of several blocks of questions, which allowed assessing the subjective perception of volunteering by students, their personal experience and motivation for volunteering, demographic characteristics of the respondents. The total sample was 943 people; the average age of the respondents was 21 years. Students participated anonymously on a voluntary basis, without any incentives. A one-way analysis of variance, the Leuven test, was used to analyse the data. The collected data was processed using the IBM SPSS Statistics 23.0 program.

Results and scientific novelty. The results of the study showed that, in general, Generation Z actually has certain specific characteristics regarding volunteering and volunteering, while these characteristics do not depend on the national culture of a particular state. On the basis of the respondents’ answers, the factors influencing students’ volunteering were identified. Thus, the results of the study proved that the motivation of students for volunteering in the present and in the future does not differ significantly in the compared countries. The study results also did not demonstrate differences in the importance of utilitarian and altruistic motives for volunteering students from different countries. It was found that university students in India are more motivated to volunteer due to utilitarian motives; they are more likely to volunteer in comparison with students from Russia and Croatia. The level of uncertainty avoidance by students, personal benefits from volunteering, and their perception of the value of volunteering in general were measured. The authors provide an overview of the development of volunteering in the three compared countries, defining the social and cultural context in them.

Practical significance. The conducted research in the context of popularisation of volunteering as a direction of practice-oriented education at universities in different countries enriches the field of knowledge about student volunteering and its cross-cultural elements.

The results of this work can be useful both for universities in the implementation of the “third mission” for the development of the local community, and for all those involved in the promotion of volunteer activities and recruitment volunteering both locally, nationally and internationally with the aim of more engaging Generation Z in the volunteer movement.

1. Putnam R. D. Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community. New York: Simon and Schuster; 2000. 544 p.

2. Music M. A., Wilson J., Bynum W. B. Race and formal volunteering: The differential effects of class and religion. Social Forces. 2000; 78: 1539–1571.

3. Randle M., Dolnicar S. Does cultural background affect volunteering behavior? Journal of Nonprofit & Public Sector Marketing. 2009; 21 (2): 225–247. DOI: 10.1080/10495140802529649

4. Inglehart R., Basáñez M. E., Díez-Medrano J., Halman L., Luijkx R. Human beliefs and values: A cross-cultural sourcebook based on the 1999-2002 value surveys. Mexico: Siglo XXI Editores; 2004. 498 p.

5. Hustinx L., Handy F., Cnaan R. A., Brudney J. L., Pessi A. B., Yamauchi N. Social and cultural origins of motivations to volunteer: A comparison of university students in six countries. International Sociology [Internet]. 2010 [cited 2020 May 17]; 25 (3): 349–382. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1177/0268580909360297

6. Curtis J. E., Grabb E. G., Baer D. E. Voluntary association membership in fifteen countries: A comparative analysis. American Sociological Review. 1992: 57; 139–152.

7. Salamon L. M., Anheier H. K. Social origins of civil society: Explaining the nonprofit sector cross-nationally. Voluntas. 1998; 9: 213–248.

8. Ruiter S., De Graaf N. National context, religiosity, and volunteering: Results from 53 countries. American Sociological Review [Internet]. 2006 [cited 2020 May 21]; 3: 349–382. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1177/0268580909360297

9. Haddad M. A. Civic responsibility and patterns of voluntary participation around the world. Comparative Political Studies. 2006; 39 (10): 1220–1242.

10. Handy F., Cnaan R. A., Hustinx L., Kang C., Brudney J. L., Haski-Leventhal D., Holmes K., Meijs L., Pessi A. B., Ranade B., Yamauchi N., Zrinscak S. A cross-cultural examination of student volunteering: Is it all about résumé building? Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly. 2010; 39 (3): 498–523.

11. Hustinx L., Cnaan R. A., Handy F. Navigating theories of volunteering: A hybrid map for a complex phenomenon. Journal for the Theory of Social Behavior. 2010; 40 (4): 410–434. DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-5914.2010.00439.x

12. Hofstede G. Cultural dimensions in management and planning. Asia Pacific Journal of Management. 1984; 1: 81–99.

13. Ozkan M., Solmaz B. The changing face of the employees – Generation Z and their perceptions of work (a study applied to university students). Procedia Economics and Finance [Internet]. 2015 [cited 2020 May 27]; 26: 476–483. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/S2212-5671(15)00876-X

14. Dekker P., Halman L. The values of volunteering: Cross-cultural perspectives. New York: Springer Science & Business Media; 2003. 240 p.

15. Wymer Jr W. W. Youth development volunteers: Their motives, how they differ from other volunteers and correlates of involvement intensity. International Journal of Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Marketing. 1998; 3 (4): 321–336.

16. Luria G., Cnaan R., Boehm A. Religious attendance and volunteering: Testing national culture as a boundary condition. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion. 2017; 56 (3): 577–599. DOI: 10.1111/jssr.12360

17. Adam O. State of youth volunteering in India. United Nations Development Programme Report [Internet]. 2017 [cited 2020 Oct 2]. 127 p. Available from: https://www.undp.org/content/dam/india/docs/UNV/State%20of%20Youth%20Volunteering%20in%20India-compressed.pdf

18. Kislyakov P. A., Shmeleva E. A., Gowin O. Contemporary volunteering in the formation of prosocial behaviour of a person. Obrazovanie i nauka = The Education and Science Journal. 2019; 21 (6): 122–145. (In Russ.)

19. Kuznetsova A. A., Solovyeva N. A. Dynamics of psychological characteristics of a student-volunteer in the process of professionally-oriented volunteering activity. Obrazovanie i nauka = The Education and Science Journal. 2018; 20 (7): 128–146. (In Russ.)

20. Leko-Šimić M., Perić J. Students’ volunteering in Croatia: Motivation and perceived benefits. Interciencia. 2018; 43 (3): 208–222.

21. Hofstede G. Dimensionalizing cultures: The Hofstede model in context. On-line Readings in Psychology and Culture. 2011; 2 (1): 8.

22. Kemmelmeier M., Jambor E. E., Letner J. Individualism and good works: Cultural variations in giving and volunteering across the United States. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology. 2006; 37: 327–344.

23. Ringov D., Zollo M. The impact of national culture on corporate social performance. Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society. 2007; 4: 476–485.

24. Fock H., Yim F. Social responsibility climate as a double-edged sword: How employee-perceived social responsibility climate shapes the meaning of their voluntary work? Journal of Business Ethics. 2013; 114: 665–674.

25. Luria G., Cnaan R. A., Boehm A. National culture and prosocial behaviors: Results from 66 countries. International Journal of Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly. 2015; 44 (5): 1041–1065.

26. Winterich K., Zhang Y. Accepting inequality deters responsibility: How power distance decreases charitable behavior. Journal of Consumer Research. 2014; 41 (2): 274–293. DOI:10.1086/675927

27. Parboteeah K. P., Cullen J. B., Lim L. Formal volunteering: A cross-national test. Journal of World Business. 2004; 39 (4): 431–441.

28. Groenlund H., Holme K., Kang C., et al. Cultural values and volunteering: A cross-cultural comparison of students’ motivation to volunteer in 13 countries. Journal of Academic Ethics. 2011; 13: 87–106.

29. Finkelstein M. A. Correlates of individualism and collectivism: Predicting volunteer activity. Social Behavior and Personality: An International Journal. 2011; 39 (5): 597–606.

30. Söderhielm R. Volunteering, gender and power making conditions visible and understanding male dominance in a volunteer context with a gender perspective [master’ thesis]. INDEK KTH Industrial Engineering and Management Industrial Management SE-100 44 Stockholm; 2014. 117 p.

31. Karniol R., Grosz E., Schorr I. Caring, gender role orientation, and volunteering. Sex Roles. 2003; 49 (1–2): 11–19.

32. Crotty J., Ljubownikow S. An examination of NPO volunteer management in the Russian Federation. Briarcliff Manor, NY: Academy of Management Proceedings; 2015. 10045 p.

33. Kamerade D., Crotty J., Ljubownikow S. Civil liberties and volunteering in six former Soviet Union countries. International Journal of Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly. 2016; 45 (6): 1150–1168.

34. Schewe C. D., Debevec K., Madden T. J., Diamond W. D., Parment A., Murphy A. “If you’ve seen one, you’ve seen them all!” Are young Millennials the same worldwide? Journal of International Consumer Marketing. 2013; 25 (1): 3–15.

35. Rochester C., Paine A. E., Howlett S., Zimmeck M., Paine A. E. Volunteering and society in the 21st century. London: Palgrave Macmillan; 2009. 273 p.

36. Burns D. J., Reid J., Toncar M., Anderson C., Wells C. The effect of gender on the motivation of members of Generation Y college students to volunteer. Journal of Nonprofit and Public Sector Marketing. 2008; 19: 99–118.

37. Tuglan B. Meet Generation Z: The second generation within the giant “Millennial” cohort. Rainmaker Thinning, Inc.: 125 New Haven, CT, USA; 2013. 13 p. 38. Finch J. What is Generation Z, and what does it want? Fast Company [Internet]. 2015 [cited 2020 Jun 19]. Available from: https://www.fastcompany.com/3045317/what-is-generation-z-and-what-does-it-want

38. Dill K. 7 things employers should know about the Gen Z workforce. Forbes [Internet]. 2016 [cited 2020 May 19]. Available from: http://www.forbes.com/pictures/fjle45mild/7-things-employers-shoul/

39. Wurpel H. Managing Generation Z: Strategic brief. Westbrook: Crescendo Consulting Group; 2011. p. 2–4.

40. Berry P. The downing of the age of Z. Leeds: True North Publishing; 2013. 37 р.

41. Laura A. Changes in consumer behavior: Embracing Generation Z in Russia [master’s thesis]. St. Petersburg: University Graduate School of Management; 2018; 59 p.

42. Pevnaya M., Kuzminchuk A. Motivations to volunteering among young people: Global trends or Russian country specifics? In: Proceedings from 9th International Days of Statistics and Economics; 2015 Sep 10-12; Prague, Chech Republic. Prague: Melandrium; 2015. p. 1281–1290.

43. Cho M., Bonn M. A., Han S. J. Generation Z’s sustainable volunteering: Motivations, attitudes and job performance. Sustainability. 2018; 10 (5): 1400.