Modern types of consulting in the management system of an educational organisation

Introduction. In market economy, the internal and external processes of educational organisations are becoming more complex. There is a need to identify managerial practices, which can be delegated to external consultants. The process of defining such practices is not completely studied. The application of expert support from leaders and management teams is often situational.

The aim of the present research is to identify the range of managerial problems of educational organisations, which cause the need to resort to external consulting support.

Methodology and research methods. The application of the method of cluster analysis of text data of periodicals allowed the authors to investigate a potential market for consulting services, to identify the modern management needs of educational organizations and the experience of their solution by external organisations. The analysis of open data of consulting organisations was carried out to identify real practices.

Results. The main management problems of educational organisations and the types of consulting services necessary for their solution are considered and classified. The main approaches to defining the framework of educational consulting are highlighted. The authors have developed the method for monitoring the prospective market for consulting services. It was determined that the growing demand for consulting services and the expansion of the range of these services are associated with the formation of a market environment in the education system and the desire of management of educational organisations to provide a competitive advantage. The cases of Russian and foreign consulting organisations were analysed and grouped in accordance with the proposed typology.

Scientific novelty. In academic literature, the study of this issue is mainly limited to defining the boundaries of educational consulting. The authors have made an attempt to identify typical situations, in which managers of educational organisations need to request the services of external experts.

Practical significance. The results of the current research can serve as a guideline for the management of educational organisations, when making managerial decisions. It will allow the managers to determine the cases, in which it is possible to turn to external consultants according to the supply conditions on the market, and to identify the issues, regarding which it is desirable to rely solely on internal resources.

1. Ajayan S., Balasubramanian S. “New managerialism” in higher education: The case of United Arab Emirates. International Journal of Comparative Education and Development. 2020; 22 (2): 147–168. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/IJCED-11-2019-0054

2. Ma J., Todorovic Z. Making universities relevant: Market orientation as a dynamic capability within institutions of higher learning. Academy of Marketing Studies Journal. 2011; 15: 1–15.

3. Iskrin N. S., Chichkanova T. A. The systematic approach to management in education. Obrazovanie i nauka = The Education and Science Journal. 2015; 1: 7–21. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17853/1994-5639-2015-1-7-21 (In Russ.)

4. Potyomkina T. V. Studying of requests for services of expert and consulting character at subjects of education. Upravlenie obrazovaniem: teoriya i praktika = Management of Education: Theory and Practice. 2013; 4 (12): 109–116. (In Russ.)

5. Lavrentyev S. Yu., Krylov D. A. Features of innovative development of educational consulting abroad. Vestnik Marijskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta = Vestnik of the Mari State University. 2019; V. 13, 3 (35): 358–364. (In Russ.)

6. Fedorchuk Yu. M., Polyaninova Yu. V., Chekulaeva Yu. A. Organizational forms and technologies of professional development support of educational organizations heads. Chelovek i obrazovanie = Man and Education. 2017; 1 (50): 30–34. (In Russ.)

7. Novosyolova S. Yu. Administrative consulting in the field of organizational development of an education system. Standarty i monitoring v obrazovanii = Standards and Monitoring in Education. 2012; (3): 6–12. DOI: https://doi.org/10.12737/issn.1998-1740 (In Russ.)

8. Chechel I. D., Potemkina T. V. Administrative problem as object of the analysis of the expert-consultant in a development of education. Russian Journal of Education and Psychology. 2014; 6 (38). DOI: https://doi.org/10.12731/2218-7405-2014-6-23 (In Russ.)

9. Sahanskij N. B. The place and role of the consultant in the educational process. Upravlenie obrazovaniem: teoriya i praktika = Management of Education: Theory and Practice. 2015; 1 (17): 79–98. (In Russ.)

10. Sahanskij N. B. The main types of consulting activities in the field of education. Upravlenie obrazovaniem: teoriya i praktika = Management of Education: Theory and Practice. 2014; 3 (15): 108–130. (In Russ.)

11. Häyrinen-Alestalo M., Peltola U. The problem of a market-oriented university. Higher Education. 2006; 52: 251–281 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-004-2749-1

12. Vasilenko N. V. Features of consulting activities in education. Teoriya i praktika servisa: ekonomika, social’naya sfera, tekhnologii = Theory and Practice of Service The Economy, Social Sphere, Technology. 2010; 1 (3): 74–82. (In Russ.)

13. da Costa R. L., Antonio N. S., dos Santos J. B. Management consulting practices and praxis. International Journal of Learning and Change. 2019; 11 (1): 39–56. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1504/IJLC.2019.097182

14. Vukotiс S., Aniсiс J., Vukotiс R. The importance of consulting in contemporary business management. Journal of Process Management. New Technologies, 2017; 5 (3): 69–78. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5937/jouproman5-14307

15. Dobrea R., Ispas M. Comparative analysis of consulting services in five European countries. Valahian Journal of Economic Studies. 2017; 8 (2): 7–16. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/vjes-2017-0013

16. Bruhn M., Karlan D., Schoar A. The impact of consulting services on small and medium enterprises: Evidence from a randomized trial in Mexico. Journal of Political Economy. 2018; 126 (2): 635–687. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/696154

17. van Eck N. J., Waltman L. Citation-based clustering of publications using CitNetExplorer and VOSviewer. Scientometrics. 2017; 111 (2): 1053–1070. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-017-2300-7

18. Perianes-Rodriguez A., Waltman L., van Eck N. J. Constructing bibliometric networks: A comparison between full and fractional counting. Journal of Informetrics. 2016; 10 (4): 1178–1195. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2016.10.006

19. Yaakob M., Faiz M., Rushydi M., Akhmad H., Roskifzan O. Strategic management and Strategic Planning in school: Is it worth for teachers? Academy of Strategic Management Journal. 2019; 18 (3): 1–6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190224851.013.128

20. Bryson J., Edwards L. Strategic planning in the public sector. Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Business and Management. 2017. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190224851.013.128

21. Harris Z., Moynahan H., Vickery H., Henriksen H., Morello E., Kasemir B. Higher education strategic planning for sustainable development: A global perspective. Handbook of Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development in Higher Education. 2017; 4: 153–164. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-47877-7_11

22. Khan U. R., Khan S., Aslam S. M., Sana Mateen S., Punhal N. Total quality management in education. International Journal of Science and Business. 2018; 2 (2): 182-197. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1217770

23. Kislov A. G. Apropos of the quality management in higher education. Obrazovanie i nauka = The Education and Science Journal. 2012; 1 (7): 98–112. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17853/1994-5639-2012-7-98-112 (In Russ.)

24. Kuchma V. R., Sokolova S. B. Harmonization of European and Russian standards of evaluation of the quality of delivery of health care in educational organizations. Rossijskij pediatricheskij zhurnal = Russian Pediatric Journal. 2016; 19 (3): 157–162. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18821/1560-9561-2016-19-3-157-162 (In Russ.)

25. Liu M., Zha S., He W. Digital transformation challenges: A case study regarding the MOOC development and operations at higher education institutions in China. TechTrends. 2019; 63: 621–630. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-019-00409-y

26. Khitskov E. A., Veretekhina S. V., Medvedeva A. V., Mnatsakanyan O. L., Shmakova E. G., Kotenev A. Digital transformation of society: Problems entering in the digital economy. Eurasian Journal of Analytical Chemistry. 2017; 12 (5): 855– 873. DOI: https://doi.org/10.12973/ejac.2017.00216a

27. Krylova N. P., Antropova L. V., Levashov E. N. The impact of organizational, economic and socio-pedagogical factors on digitalization of educational environments. Science for Education Today. 2019; 9 (4): 124–143. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15293/2658-6762.1904.08 (In Russ.)

28. Rauschnabel P., Krey N., Babin B., Ivens B. Brand management in higher education: The University Brand Personality Scale. Journal of Business Research. 2016; 69 (8): 3077–3086. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2016.01.023

29. Ananishev V. M., Mashkova L. A. Marketing activities in educational institutions. Sistemnaya psihologiya i sociologiya = Systems Psychology and Sociology. 2015; 3 (15): 25–32. (In Russ.)

30. Sudarkina H. V. Marketing of educational services of higher education institution: Features, possibilities, prospects. Izvestiya YuFU. Tekhnicheskie nauki = Izvestiya SFedU. Engineering Sciences. 2012; 133 (8): 138–142. (In Russ.)