Ideal teacher of higher school: Personal qualities and socio-professional competencies

Introduction. The increasing pace of knowledge renewal around the world and the unification of teacher requirements are changing the functioning and management of the higher education system. Transformational processes in the socio-economic sphere of Russia entail profound changes and increased requirements for the educational process at all its levels. The quality of education is largely determined by teachers, their level of training, the presence of the necessary personal characteristics and social and professional competencies.

The aim of the present article is to consider the approaches of Russian and foreign researchers to the classification of competencies of scientific and pedagogical workers, to determine the range of personal qualities and key socio-professional competencies of scientific and pedagogical workers in educational and research activities.

Methodology and research methods. Semi-structured expert interviews were conducted with 84 scientific and pedagogical workers of Tyumen State University, Tomsk State University, St. Petersburg Polytechnic University, St. Petersburg University of Information Technologies, Mechanics and Optics. The choice of universities is determined by their participation in the Project 5-100 (Russian Academic Excellence Project) and high positions in Russian university ratings.

Results and scientific novelty. A comparative analysis of research approaches allowed the authors to identify an unstructured list of priority competencies (necessary for educational and pedagogical activities) of scientific and pedagogical workers of higher educational institutions. Since educational activities at the university are aimed at the formation of certain professional competencies and values among students, the priority personal qualities and socio-professional competencies in educational activities include the following: highly specialised skills and general erudition; methodological skills; continuing professional development; motivation for pedagogical work; communication skills; emotional intelligence and stress resistance; charisma, modernity in communication; justice; critical thinking and reflection. Pedagogical activity at universities is closely related to the participation of the lecturer in scientific research. The success of pedagogical activity is largely determined by the following aspects: professionalism and desire to update competencies; operability and self-control; teamwork skills; analytical skills and academic writing skills; inclusion in the world scientific agenda; adherence to scientific ethics. The research novelty lies in the compilation of the structured list of personal qualities and socio-professional competencies of a modern teacher in educational and research activities.

Practical significance. Using the presented range of significant competencies of scientific and pedagogical workers, HR managers in universities can implement specific management projects aimed at developing personal qualities and social and professional competencies of employees, make informed decisions in the selection and development ofpersonnel, and personnel changes. The research results can also be employed by scientific and pedagogical workers of universities when building their individual trajectories of professional and personal development.

1. Andrushchak G., Kuzminov Ya., Yudkevich M. Menyayushchayasya real’nost’: rossijskoe vysshee obrazovanie i akademicheskaya professiya = Changing reality: Russian higher education and the academic profession. In: Budushhee vysshego obrazovanija i akademicheskoj professii: strany BRIK i SShA = The future of higher education and the academic profession: BRIC countries and the USA. Ed. by M. Yudkevich. Moscow: Higher School of Economics; 2013. 247 p. (In Russ.)

2. Vashurina E. V., Evdokimova Ya. Sh., Ovchinnikov M. N. On some approaches to the development of a typology of Russian universities. Universitetskoe upravlenie: praktika i analiz = University Management: Practice and Analysis. 2014; 4–5: 21–27. (In Russ.)

3. Boyatzis R. E. The competent manager: A model for effective performance. New York: John Wiley and Sons, Inc.; 1982. 308 p.

4. Bazarov T. Yu., Erofeev A. K., Shmelev A. G. The collective definition of the concept of “competence”: An attempt to extract semantic trends from blurred expert knowledge. Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Seriya 14. Psihologiya = Moscow University Herald. Series 14. Psychology. 2014; 1: 87–102. (In Russ.)

5. Lobanova T. N. Building a model of key competencies. Strategiya upravleniya personalom = HR Management Strategy. 2002; 11: 12–20. (In Russ.)

6. Zeer E. F. Professional’no-obrazovatel’noe prostranstvo lichnosti = Professional and educational space of personality. Ekaterinburg: USPU; 2002. 126 p. (In Russ.)

7. Zimnyaya I. A. Key competencies – a new paradigm of the result of education // Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii = Higher education in Russia. 2003; 5: 34–42. (In Russ.)

8. Politsinsky E. V., Politsinsky E. V. Personal qualities in building a successful professional career. Uspekhi sovremennogo estestvoznaniya = Successes in Modern Science. 2015; 9 (part 2): 365–368. (In Russ.)

9. Karitskaya I. M. Social and professional competence as the basis for successful professional activity. Omskij nauchnyj vestnik = Omsk Scientific Bulletin. 2009; 1 (75): 54–58. (In Russ.)

10. Navickienė V., Salienė V., Urnėžienė E., Valantinaitė I., Leonavičienė V. Substantiation of need for educational competences of higher education lecturers: Document analysis. Pedagogika. 2017; 126: 5–17. DOI: 10.15823/p.2017.16

11. Ohira K. Higher professional education and its strategy. Trends in the Sciences. 2004; 9: 23–26. DOI: 10.5363/tits.9.3_23

12. Griffin A., Smith S. Higher professional education: A recipe for success. Education for Primary Care. 2007; 18: 250–252. DOI: 10.1080/14739879.2007.11493625

13. Ionescu M. C. Predicting professional performance of higher education teachers. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences. 2013; 7615: 393–397.

14. Dulzon A. A., Vasilyeva O. M. Model of competence of a university teacher. Universitetskoe upravlenie: praktika i analiz = University Management: Practice and Analysis. 2009; 2: 29–37. (In Russ.)

15. Annenkova I. P. Competence and qualimetric approaches to the development of tools for monitoring the quality of professional activity of university research and teaching staff. Nauka i mir = Science and World. 2015; 8 (24): 32–36. (In Russ.)

16. Wibowo T. S., Badi’ati A. Q., Annisa A. A., Wahab M. K., Jamaludin M. R., Rozikan M., Mufid A., Fahmi K. Purwanto A., Muhaini A. Effect of hard skills, soft skills, organizational learning and innovation capability on Islamic university lecturers’ performance. Systematic Reviews in Pharmacy. 2020; 11 (7): 556–569.

17. Shimada S. The mutual transmission of knowledge and competencies between generations: An enabler of dynamic capabilities. In: Proceedings of the 12th European Conference on Knowledge Management (ECKM 2011); 1–2 Sep 2011; University of Passau, Germany. Vol. 2. UK: Academic Publishing Ltd.; 2011. p. 1073–1080.

18. Cacheiro-Gonzаlez M. L., Sаnchez-Romero C., Gonzаlez-Lorenzo J. M. Digital teacher competence. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology (November Special Issue IETC). 2017; 1: 180–190.

19. Shafranov-Kutsev G. F., Efimova G. Z. Professional education and the formation of competitiveness of an individual, a social community. Vestnik Tyumenskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta = Tyumen State University Herald. 2014; 8: 28–39. (In Russ.)

20. Bezruchko P., Shatrov Yu., Maksimova M. Competencies of the unclear future. Harvard Business Review Russia [Internet]. 2020 [cited 2020 Jun 20]. Available from: https://hbr-russia.ru/karera/professionalnyy-i-lichnostnyy-rost/p26131 (In Russ.)

21. Valisova A., Subrt J. The social competence – significant part of teacher’s professional authority. In: Proceedings of the 2015 International Conference on Interactive Collaborative Learning (ICL 2015); 2015 Sept 20–24; Florence, Italy. Piscataway, NJ: IEEE; 2015. p. 1–5. DOI: 10.1109/ICL.2015.7318024

22. Fuler S. Sociologiya intellektual’noj zhizni: kar’era uma vnutri i vne akademii = Sociology of intellectual life: The career of the mind inside and outside the academy. Moscow: Publishing House “Delo” RANEPA; 2018. 384 p. (In Russ.)

23. Kokoeva R. T., Khetagov V. K. Professional competencies of a teacher of higher education. Sovremennye problemy nauki i obrazovaniya = Modern Problems of Science and Education [Internet]. 2019 [cited 2020 Jun 20]. Available from: http://www.science-education.ru/ru/article/view?id=28800 (In Russ.)

24. Kennedy M. M., Ahn S., Choi J. The value added by teacher education. In: M. Cochran-Smith, S. Feiman-Nemser, D. J. McIntyre, K. E. Demers (Eds.), Handbook of research on teacher education. New York, NY: Routledge; 2008. p. 1249–1273.

25. Maryfield E. Lyubitel’. Iskusstvo delat’ to, chto lyubish’ = Lover. The art of doing what you love. Translated from English by A. Borovikova, E. Izotova. Moscow: Publishing House AdMarginem; 2018. 200 p. (In Russ.)

26. Šereš Laslo, Pavlićević V., Tumbas P. Digital transformation of higher education: Competing on analytics. In: Proceedings of the 12th International Technology, Education and Development Conference (INTED 2018); 2018 Mar 5–7; Valencia, Spain. Valencia: IATED; 2018. p. 9491–9497. DOI: 10.21125/inted.2018.2348

27. Kraevsky V. V., Berezhnova E. V. Metodologiya pedagogiki: novyj etap = The methodology of pedagogy: A new stage. Moscow: Publishing Center “Akademija”; 2008. 400 p. (In Russ.)

28. Bolshunov A. Ya., Tyurikov A. G. The formation of professional subjectivity as a criterion for the quality of higher education. Innovacii v obrazovanii = Innovations in Education. 2018; 11: 45–52. (In Russ.)

29. Kane R., Sandretto S., Heath C. An investigation into excellent tertiary teaching: Emphasizing reflective practice. Higher Education. 2004; 47: 283–310.

30. Schaeffer G., Epting K., Zinn T., Buskit W. Student and faculty perceptions of effective teaching: A successful replication. Teaching of Psychology. 2003; 30: 133–136.

31. Walker C., Gleaves A. Constructing the caring higher education teacher: A theoretical framework. Teaching and Teacher Education. 2016; 54: 65–76.

32. Henner E. K. Professional knowledge and professional competencies in higher education. Obrazovanie i nauka = The Education and Science Journal. 2018; 20 (2): 9–31. (In Russ.)

33. Zagvyazinsky V. I. University lecture in the structure of the modern educational process. Obrazovanie i nauka = The Education and Science Journal. 2014; 2 (111): 34–46. (In Russ.)

34. Affero I., Hassan R., Bakar A., Hussin H., Hanafiah M., Asary L. The development of TVET educator competencies for quality educator. Journal of Technical Education and Training. 2018; 10: 38–48. DOI: 10.30880/jtet.2018.10.02.004

35. Ganieva Y., Sayfutdinova G., Yunusova A., Sadovaya V., Schepkina N., Scheka N., Gutman E., Salakhova V. Structure and content of higher professional school lecturer education competence. Review of European Studies [Internet]. 2015 [cited 2020 Apr 27]; 7: 32–38. DOI: 10.5539/res.v7n4p32Available from: http://www.ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/res/article/download/45297/24534

36. Kolomiychenko L. V. Methodological culture as the most important component of professional competence. Permskij pedagogicheskij zhurnal = Perm Pedagogical Journal. 2014; 6: 49–51. (In Russ.)

37. Furuhagen B., Holmén J., Säntti J. The ideal teacher: Orientations of teacher education in Sweden and Finland after the Second World War. History of Education. 2019; 48 (6): 784–805.