Medium-term forecast of the age structure of teachers in secondary schools in the Russian Federation

Introduction. The trend of teaching staff aging in secondary schools is evident in many countries. A negative consequence of this is the growing gap between the personal resources of teachers and the requirements of the profession. Solving the problem of maintaining an optimal age structure involves studying its dynamics and forecasting its development in order to develop measures for personnel planning. The present paper presents the results of the analysis of the current age structure of teachers in the regional context (in the subjects of the Russian Federation) and develops a forecast for its development.

The aim of the current research was to present the results of the development of a medium-term (until 2024) forecast of the age structure of teachers in the subjects of the Russian Federation.

Methodology and research methods. The research was based on a general scientific methodology applying a systematic approach and the methods of statistical analysis, comparison, generalisation, systematisation, structuring, interpretation, extrapolation, forecasting, and graphical representation of data. The authors analysed the data in official statistics of the Russian Federation and the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development. The provisions of normative and legislative documents in the field of strategic regulation of education in the Russian Federation, scientific publications of Russian and foreign researchers in the Scopus, Web of Science, and Science Index databases were investigated as well.

Results. The authors identify and highlight the factors, which have the most significant impact on the current state of personnel support for educational activities in the world. The analysis of age-specific teacher characteristics in cross-country comparison is performed. The assessment of age structure of general education teaching personnel in Russia as a whole and at the regional level is carried out. The forecast for its development for the period up to 2024 is developed. Scientific novelty. The conceptual feature of the present study lies in the view of the trends in the development of age cohorts in homogeneous groups. The approach employed allows for increasing the accuracy of forecasting of teacher demand, taking into account the specifics of regional demand.

Practical significance. Taking the specifics of the regions into consideration, it will be possible to improve the quality of education. The results of the research can be used by specialists in the course of conducting international research, planning teacher training, and developing measures to enhance the prestige of teaching profession and to stimulate the influx of young personnel to schools at the Federal level and in the regions of the Russian Federation.

1. Darling-Hammond L., Podolsky A. Breaking the cycle of teacher shortages: What kind of policies can make a difference? Education Policy Analysis Archives [Internet]. 2019 [cited 2020 Jul 3]; 27 (34). Available from: https://epaa.asu.edu/ojs/article/view/4633/2226

2. See B. H., Gorard S. Why don’t we have enough teachers? A reconsideration of the available evidence. Research Papers in Education. 2020; 35 (4): 416–442.

3. Korneeva E. A. Actual problems of our time: Lack of teaching staff. Obrazovanie i vospitanie = Education and Upbringing [Internet]. 2017 [cited 2020 Aug 3]; 1: 7–9. Available from: https://moluch.ru/th/4/archive/52/1945 (In Russ.)

4. Agranovich M. L., Adamchuk D. V., Barinov S. L., et al. Rossiyskiye uchitelya v svete issledovatelskikh dannykh = Russian teachers in the light of research data. Moscow: Publishing House of the Higher School of Economics; 2016. 313 р. (In Russ.)

5. Klyachko T. A., Semionova E. A. Contribution of education to the socio-economic development of Russian regions. Ekonomika regiona = Regional Economy. 2018; 14 (3): 791–805. (In Russ.)

6. Lohmann M. J., White B., Johnson K. A. Increasing the rural special education teacher pipeline through asynchronous online instruction: A program description of the Colorado Christian University Alternative Certification Program. Rural Special Education Quarterly. 2019; 38 (3): 151–161.

7. García P. A., Moser K. M., Davis-Wiley P. Facing reality: A survey of methods instructors’ perspectives on world language teacher development. Foreign Language Annals. 2019; 52 (1): 165–183.

8. Weldon P. Early career teacher attrition in Australia: Evidence, definition, classification and measurement. Australian Journal of Education. 2018; 62 (1): 61–78.

9. Grissom J. A., Viano S. L., Selin J. L. Understanding employee turnover in the public sector: Insights from research on teacher mobility. Public Administration Review. 2016; 76 (2): 241–251.

10. Wright D. S., Balgopal M. M., Sample McMeeking L. B., Weinberg A. E. Developing resilient K-12 STEM teachers. Advances in Developing Human Resources. 2019; 21 (1): 16–34.

11. Falch T. Wages and recruitment: Evidence from external wage changes. Industrial and Labor Relations Review. 2017; 70 (2): 483–518.

12. Cowan J., Goldhaber D., Hayes K., Theobald R. Missing elements in the discussion of teacher shortages. Educational Researcher. 2016; 45 (8): 460–462.

13. Waldron-Soler K. M., Ruby S. F., Chaffin J. M. Learning from graduate training in related fields: A model online school psychology program. Rural Special Education Quarterly. 2019; 38 (2): 107–118.

14. Robinson O. P., Bridges S. A., Rollins L. H., Schumacker R. E. A study of the relation between special education burnout and job satisfaction. Journal of Research in Special Educational Needs. 2019; 19 (4): 295–303.

15. Billingsley B., Bettini E. Special education teacher attrition and retention: A review of the literature. Review of Educational Research. 2019; 89 (5): 697–744.

16. Mason-Williams L., Bettini E., Peyton, D., Harvey A., Rosenberg M., Sindelar P. T. Rethinking shortages in special education: Making good on the promise of an equal opportunity for students with disabilities. Teacher Education and Special Education. 2020; 43 (1): 45–62.

17. Cooc N. Teaching students with special needs: International trends in school capacity and the need for teacher professional development. Teaching and Teacher Education. 2019; 83: 27–41.

18. Brownell M. T., Bishop A. M., Sindelar P. T. Republication of “NCLB and the Demand for Highly Qualified Teachers: Challenges and Solutions for Rural Schools”. Rural Special Education Quarterly. 2018; 37 (1): 4–11.

19. Donitsa-Schmidt S., Zuzovsky R. Quantitative and qualitative teacher shortage and the turnover phenomenon. International Journal of Educational Research. 2016; 77 (1): 83–91.

20. Ogodo J. A. Comparing advanced placement physics teachers experiencing physics-focused professional development. Journal of Science Teacher Education. 2019; 30 (6): 639–665.

21. Carothers D., Aydin H., Houdyshell M. Teacher shortages and cultural mismatch: District and university collaboration for recruiting. Journal of Social Studies Education Research. 2019; 10 (3): 39–63.

22. Bowen B., Williams T., Napoleon L., Marx A. Teacher preparedness: A comparison of alternatively and traditionally certified technology and engineering education teachers. Journal of Technology Education. 2019. 30 (2): 75–89.

23. Heinz M., Keane E. Socio-demographic composition of primary initial teacher education entrants in Ireland. Irish Educational Studies. 2018; 37 (4): 523–543.

24. Kissau S., Davin K., Wang C., Haudeck H., Rodgers M., Du L. Recruiting foreign language teachers: An international comparison of career choice influences. Research in Comparative and International Education. 2019; 14 (2): 184–200.

25. Gorbovsky R. V., Mertsalova T. A. Monitoring of the education system: The contingent and personnel of primary, basic and secondary General education. Fakty obrazovaniya = Facts of Education. 2018; 2 (17): 32. (In Russ.)

26. Churkin K. A., Nurieva L. M. Kiselev S. G. On the need for teaching staff. Ekonomika obrazovaniya = Economics of Education [Internet]. 2014 [cited 2020 Jul 20]; 4: 11–21. Available from: http://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/k-voprosu-o-potrebnosti-v-pedagogicheskih-kadrah (In Russ.)

27. Maslinsky K. A., Ivanyushina V. A. To remain a teacher? Factors influencing attitudes towards leaving the teaching profession. Voprosy obrazovaniya = Education Issues. 2016; 4: 8–30. (In Russ.)

28. Andrushchenko T. Yu., Arzhanykh E. V., Vinogradov V. L., Minyurova S. A. Problems of professional adaptation of young teachers, etc. Psihologicheskaya nauka i obrazovanie = Psychological Science and Education. 2017; 9 (2): 1–16. (In Russ.)

29. McHenry-Sorber E., Campbell M.P. Teacher shortage as a local phenomenon: District leader sensemaking, responses, and implications for policy. Education Policy Analysis Archives [Internet]. 2019 [cited 2020 Jul 17]; 27 (87). Available from: https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1223729

30. Luschei T. F., Chudgar A. Teacher distribution in developing countries: Teachers of marginalized students in India, Mexico and Tanzania. 2016. p. 1–136.

31. Walde G. S. The actual status of general secondary school mathematics teaching and learning: The case of Ethiopia. Journal of Physics: Conference Series [Internet]. 2019 [cited 2020 Aug 10]; 1176 (4). Available from: https://iopscience.iop.org/arti-cle/10.1088/1742-6596/1176/4/042097/pdf

32. Tang M., Lan F. Blended learning for bilingual math, science and technology teachers’ professional development in China. ACM International Conference Proceeding Series. 2019; June: 48–52.

33. Li J., Shi Z., Xue E. The problems, needs and strategies of rural teacher development at deep poverty areas in China: Rural schooling stakeholder perspectives. International Journal of Educational Research [Internet]. 2020 [cited 2020 Aug 19]; 99. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0883035519305750

34. Gozali C., Luschei T. F., Diki D., Yukamana H. Indonesia Mengajar: An investment in hope. Educational Research for Policy and Practice. 2019; 18 (3): 241–261.

35. Dakarguli S. Problema pedagogicheskih kadrov dlja sel’skoj shkoly i sela v kontekstah modernizacii otechestvennogo obrazovanija = The problem of teaching staff for rural schools and villages in the context of modernization of national education [Internet]. 2016 [cited 2020 Aug 23]. Available from: https://pandia.ru/text/78/055/36.php (In Russ.)

36. Lebedev K., Vasilieva L., Sumenova E. Forecast for pedagogical workers age structure in general education of Russia. The European Proceedings of Social & Behavioral Sciences EpSBS [Internet]. 2019 [cited 2020 Sept 3]: 522–533. Available from: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=41813839

37. Langset I. D., Jacobsen D. Y., Haugsbakken H. Digital professional development: Towards a collaborative learning approach for taking higher education into the digitalized age. Nordic Journal of Digital Literacy. 2018; 13 (1): 24–39.

38. Sottimano I., Guidetti G., Converso D., Viotti S. We cannot be “forever young”, but our children are: A multilevel intervention to sustain nursery school teachers’ resources and well-being during their long work life cycle. PLoS ONE [Internet]. 2018 [cited 2020 Aug 10]; 13 (11): e0206627. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6211713

39. Fedorov A. A., Soloviev M. Yu., Ilaltdinova E. Yu., Kondratev G. V., Frolova S. V. Vozrastnaya struktura pedagogicheskogo soobshchestva: analiz i prognoz razvitiya: analiticheskiy doklad = Age structure of the pedagogical community: Analysis and forecast of development. Analytical report [Internet]. Nizhny Novgorod: Mininsky University; 2018 [cited 2020 Sept 10]. p. 78. Available from: https://search.rsl.ru/ru/record/01009709630 (In Russ.)

40. Pugach V. N., Utemov V. V. Expert and analytical assessment of the age structure of the personnel potential of educational organizations in the Kirov region. Nauchno-metodicheskij elektronnyj zhurnal “Koncept” = Scientific and Methodological Electronic Journal “Concept” [Internet]. 2016 [cited 2020 Aug 20]; 17: 974–986. Available from: http://e-koncept.ru/2016/46371.htm (In Russ.)

41. Lebedev K. V., Vasilyeva L. V., Sumenova E. S. Forecast of the age structure of teachers in the field of general education in Russia. In: Obrazovatel’noe prostranstvo v informacionnuju jepohu – 2019: Materialy Mezhdunarodnoj nauchno-prakticheskoj konferencii = Educational Space in the Information Age – 2019. Materials of the International Scientific and Practical Conference; 2019; Moscow. Moscow: Institute for Strategy of Education Development of the Russian Academy of Education; 2019. p. 63–81. (In Russ.)

42. Sumenova E. S., Lebedev K. V., Vasilyeva L. V. Forecast of general education development in the Russian Federation. Rossiya: Tendencii i perspektivy razvitiya = Russia: Trends and Prospects of Development [Internet]. 2020 [cited 2020 Aug 20]; 15 (2): 605–611. Available from: http://innclub.info/archives/18199 (In Russ.)

43. Agranovich M. L., Ermachkova Yu. V., Seliverstova I. V. Rossijskoe obrazovanie v kontekste mezhdunarodnyh indikatorov = Russian education in the context of international indicators, 2019. Analytical report. Moscow: Сenter for Statistics and monitoring of Education of Federal Institute for Education Development of the Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration; 2019. 96 p. (In Russ.)