Massive shift of schools towards distance learning in the estimates of a local pedagogical community

Introduction. In spring 2020, Russia, as all other countries around the world, faced the challenge of massive shift of schools to online learning. This shift revealed the lack of existing empirical data on technological and instructional readiness of the local teaching communities to such learning format. Having regulatory and platform capacities for distance education at the national level, there was a widening gap between local teaching communities regarding their facilities and readiness to transform traditional learning process.

Aim. This research is aimed at defining the attitude of teachers to the shift to distance learning, as well as their estimates of its potential for the learning process.

Methodology and research methods. The current research is based on the ideas of innovation and technology acceptance, as well as planed behaviour that have been suggested by F. Davis, T. Guskey, M. Fishbein and I. Ajzen, and R. Puentedura. The research materials were collected via a survey completed by 239 learners of the online upskilling programme “Digitization of the educational process”. The survey was conducted in March-April 2020. Texts collected for the open-ended questions in the survey were subjected to the content analysis.

Results. Judging from the survey results, local teaching communities multiplied their usage of online platforms and other e-learning technologies (messaging services, videoconferencing, etc.). Teachers highly evaluated their technological and instructional competencies for distance learning as early as in April 2020, while they perceived their pupils' readiness to such learning as moderate. At the same time, teachers moderately valued the state's contribution into the support of schools when they shift into massive distance learning, and showed significant interest in the non-state educational platforms. The majority of teachers believe that digital educational technologies are sufficient for high-quality teaching of their disciplines and achieving their learning objectives. The survey results demonstrated significant internal potential of the regional education system for a change, technological and instructional development.

Scientific novelty consists of a deep analysis of a specific local pedagogical community, based on the collection of material about the reflection of school staff on technological and methodological changes in education specifically in the period of active transformational changes. A high internal potential of the local pedagogical community for transformation on the basis of operational empirical measurements has been recorded.

Practical significance. The present research shows that respondents, who perform remote teaching during the Covid-19 quarantine, perceive digital technologies as approachable, helpful and already date-to-date tools; the regional teachers proved to be self-reflexing and flexible. The deficits and growing points that the teachers defined, should be used to navigate the actions of the decision makers responsible for distance learning at school during and after the quarantine.

distance education, digital educational technologies, secondary education, teachers, teachers' professional development, COVID-19

1. Dolidovich O. M., et al. Resistance to innovations of school teachers: Modern approaches to study. Chelvechesky capital = Human Capital [Internet]. 2018 [cited 2020 Jun 11]; 3: 84. Available from: http://humancapital.msk.ru/wp-content/uploads/2018/03/2018-3.pdf#page=78 (In Russ.)

2. Baepler P., Walker J. D., Driessen M. It's not about seat time: Blending, flipping, and efficiency in active learning classrooms. Computers & Education. 2014; 78: 227-236. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2014.06.006

3. Berrett D. How ‘flipping' the classroom can improve the traditional lecture. The Chronicle of Higher Education [Internet]. 2012 [cited 2020 Jun 11]; 12 (19): 1-3. Available from: https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ987290

4. Clark K. R. The effects of the flipped model of instruction on student engagement and performance in the secondary mathematics classroom. Journal of Educators Online [Internet]. 2015 [cited 2020 Jun 11]; 12 (1): 91-115. Available from: https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1051042

5. Hung H. Flipping the classroom for English language learners to foster active learning. Computer Assisted Language Learning. 2015; 28 (1): 81-96. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2014.967701

6. Kalugina O. A., Tarasevich N. A. Smart technology integration into EFL teaching at the non-linguistic higher school. XLinguae. 2018; 11 (1XL): 8-18. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18355/XL.2018.11.01XL.02

7. Love B., Hodge A., Grandgenett N., Swift A. Student learning and perceptions in a flipped linear algebra course. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology. 2014; 45 (3): 317-324. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2013.822582

8. Aizman R. I., Abaskalova N. P. Health and safety of all participants of educational process ore the priorities of modern education system. International Journal of Modern Education Research [Internet]. 2015 [cited 2020 Jun 11]; 2 (4): 29-33. Available from: http://www.aascit.org/journal/archive2?journalId=910&paperId=1856

9. Pelargos P. E., Nagasawa D. T., Lagman C., Tenn S., Demos J. V., Lee S. J., et al. Utilizing virtual and augmented reality for educational and clinical enhancements in neurosurgery. Journal of Clinical Neuroscience. 2017; 35: 1-4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jocn.2016.09.002

10. Efimova G. Z., Semenov M. Yu. Social portrait of the female teacher (on the example of the Tyumen Region). RUDN Journal of Sociology [Internet]. 2018 [cited 2020 Jun 11]; 18 (3): 521-531. Available from: http://journals.rudn.ru/sociology/article/download/19187/16081 (In Russ.)

11. Leahy S. M., Holland C., Ward F. The digital frontier: Envisioning future technologies impact on the classroom. Futures. 2019; 113: 102422. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2019.04.009

12. Lytras M. D., Damiani E., Mathkour H. Virtual reality in learning, collaboration and behaviour: content, systems, strategies, context designs. Behaviour and Information Technology. 2016; 35 (11): 877-878. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/0144929X.2016.1235815

13. Kolesnikova E. M., Mitrokhina E. V. Kindergarten and school teachers on working conditions and organizational support. Vestnik instituta sotziologii = Bulletin of the Institute of Sociology [Internet]. 2017 [cited 2020 Jun 11]; 8 (1): 13-34. Available from: https://www.vestnik-isras.ru/files/File/Vestnik_2017_20/Kolesnikova,Mitrokhina.pdf (In Russ.)

14. Parabuchev A. I. Teacher in the era of social transformations - to the profession self-portrait. Voprosy obrazovaniya = Educational Studies Moscow [Internet]. 2005 [cited 2020 Jun 11]; 4: 246-259. Available from: https://vo.hse.ru/data/2013/10/20/1279377456/17par0.pdf (In Russ.)

15. Dmitriev M. E., Dmitrieva L. M., Serezhkina A. E. The attitude of higher school teachers towards distance education. Nauchnyj al'manah = Science Almanac [Internet]. 2016 [cited 2020 June 6]; 8 (1): 113-116. Available from: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=27156855 (In Russ.)

16. Zakharova U., Tanasenko K. MOOCs in higher education: Advantages and pitfalls for instructors. Voprosy obrazovaniya = Educational Studies Moscow [Internet]. 2019 [cited 2020 June 6]; 3: 176-202. Available from: https://vo.hse.ru/data/2019/09/16/1541238294/07%20Zakharova.pdf DOI: 10.17323/1814-9545-2019-3-176-202 (In Russ.)

17. Prokhorova M. P., Bulganina S. V. Perception of educational innovations by prospective students. Vestnik Nizhnevartovskogo Gosudarstvennogo Universiteta = Bulletin of Nizhnevartovsk State University [Internet]. 2017 [cited 2020 Jun 11]; 3: 50. Available from: http://vestnik.nvsu.ru/arhiv/52/580.pdf (In Russ.)

18. Bashkirova E. N. Opinion of future teachers about online learning. In: Razvitie poznavatel'nyh sposobnostej mladshih shkol'nikov. Materialy VI nauchno-prakticheskoj konferencii prepodavatelej i studentov, 6 nojabrja 2018 g. = Development of Cognitive Power in Elementary Schoolchildren. Materials of Scientific Practical Conference for Teaching Staff and Students; 2018; Moscow. Moscow: Publishing House Litres; 2020. p. 23. (In Russ.)

19. Astashova T. А. Readiness of first-year students of Russian universities to study using massive open online courses. Pedagogika i psihologija obrazovanija = Pedagogy and Psychology of Education [Internet]. 2019 [cited 2020 Jun 11]; 3: 126-135. Available from: http://pp-obr.ru/wp-content/uploads/2019/12/2019-3-126.pdf (In Russ.)

20. Kolesnikova E. M. The image of teachers' professional corporation in British and Russian media. Vestnik instituta sotziologii = Bulletin of the Institute of Sociology [Internet]. 2013 [cited 2020 Jun 11]. 4 (1): 252-277. Available from: https://www.vestnik-isras.ru/files/File/Vestnik_2013_6/Kolesnikova.pdf (In Russ.)

21. Levchuk L.V. On the concept of modernization for pedagogical education (or What teacher does Russia need in 21st century). Obrazovanie. Nauka. Innovacii: Juzhnoe izmerenie = Education. Science. Innovations: the Southern Dimension [Internet]. 2014 [cited 2020 Jun 11]; 3 (35): 25. Available from: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=22590255 (In Russ.)

22. Drobotenko Y. B. The alteration of the ethos of teaching profession in modern sociocultural conditions. Nauka o cheloveke: gumanitarnye issledovaniya = The Science of Person: Humanitarian Researches [Internet]. 2016 [cited 2020 Jun 11]; 1 (23). Available from: http://journal.omga.su/files/23/170-178.pdf (In Russ.)

23. Galina Z. Efimova. The young teacher: professional socialization and living standards. Vestnik Tjumenskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Social'no-jekonomicheskie i pravovye issledovanija = Tyumen State University Herald. Social, Economic, and Law Research [Internet]. 2015 [cited 2020 Jun 11]; 1 (3): 102-113. Available from: https://elib.utmn.ru/jspui/bitstream/rutsu/14039/1/Efimova%G.Z..._3%283%29-9.pdf (In Russ.)

24. Konstantinovsky D. L. School and “external” factors. Voprosy obrazovaniya = Educational Studies Moscow [Internet]. 2011 [cited 2020 Jun 11]; 4: 245-267. Available from: https://vo.hse.ru/data/2013/11/12/1334859432/VO4_11%20Konst.pdf (In Russ.)

25. Farkhatdinov N., Evstigneeva N., Kurakin D., Malik V. Patterns of Managing Secondary Schools under reforms: Sociological Analysis Experience. Voprosy obrazovaniya = Educational Studies Moscow [Internet]. 2015 [cited 2020 June 6]; 2: 196-219. Available from: https://vo.hse.ru/data/2015/06/30/1082453417/Farhatdinov.pdf (In Russ.)

26. Chen L., Chen T. L. Students' perspectives of using cooperative learning in a flipped statistics classroom. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology. 2015; 31 (6): 621-640. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.1876

27. Ovchinnikova M. V. Profile education in senior classes and e-learning: Myth or Reality? Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta = Tomsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin [Internet]. 2015 [cited 2020 Jun 11]; 12 (165): 99103. Available from: https://vestnik.tspu.edu.ru/files/vestnik/PDF/articles/ovchinnikova_m._v._99_103_12_165_2015.pdf (In Russ.)

28. Hutchings M., Quinney A. The flipped classroom, disruptive pedagogies, enabling technologies and wicked problems: Responding to “the bomb in the basement”. Electronic Journal of e-Learning [Internet]. 2015 [cited 2020 Jun 11]; 13 (2): 106-119. Available from: https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1060159.pdf

29. Khlynova Yu. Yu., Shishkina A. G. Distance learning of young schoolchildren. Realistic? Perspectively? In: Cifra v pomoshh' uchitelju: materialy Vserossijskoj nauchno-metodicheskoj konferencii s mezhdunarodnym uchastiem = Digit to Help the Teacher. Collection of Materials of the All-Russian Scientific and Methodological Conference with International Participation [Internet]; 2020 Jan 10; Cheboksary. 2020 [cited 2020 Jun 11]: 73-79. Available from: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=42397769 (In Russ.)

30. Sukhareva L. M., Kulakova A. B. Distance education: Theoretical and methodological aspect. Sotsial'noe prostranstvo = Social Area [Internet]. 2016 [cited 2020 Jun 11]; 1: 6. Available from: http://socialarea-journal.ru/article/1807 (In Russ.)

31. Tsopanova A. Yu. Sociology and education as in the case of secondary schools in Nothern Osetia - Alania respublic. Nauka. Kultura. Obschestvo = Science. Culture. Society [Internet]. 2010 [cited 2020 Jun 11]; 2: 104-112. Available from: https://docplayer.ru/48598501-Nauka-kultura-obshchestvo.html (In Russ.)

32. Zair-Bek S., Mertsalova T., Anchikov K. Gotovnost' rossijskikh shkol I semej k obu-cheniyu v usloviyakh karantina: otsenka bazovykh pokazatelej = Readiness of Russian schools and families for teaching and learning under quarantine: Evaluation of basic indicators. Moscow: National Research University “Higher School of Economics”; 2020. 32 p. (In Russ.)

33. Wolski S., Jackson S. Technological diffusion within educational institutions: Applying the technology acceptance model. In: Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference. Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE) [Internet]; 1999 Feb 28 - Mar 4; San Antonio, TX. 1999 [cited 2020 Jun 11]; p. 17181723. Available from: https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED432301.pdf

34. Gibson S. G., Harris M. L., Colaric S. M. Technology acceptance in an academic context: faculty acceptance of online education. Journal of Education for Business. 2008; 83 (6): 355-359. DOI: 10.3200/JOEB.83.6.355-359

35. Guskey T. R. Professional development and teacher change. Teachers and Teaching. 2002; 8 (3): 381-391. DOI: 10.1080/135406002100000512

36. Puentedura R. R. Building transformation: An introduction to the SAMR model [Internet]. 2014 [cited 2020 Jun 11]. Available from: http://www.hippasus.com/rrpweblog/archives/2014/08/22/BuildingTransformation_AnIntroductionToSAMR.pdf

37. Hamilton E. R., Rosenberg J. M., Akcaoglu M. The Substitution Augmentation Modification Redefinition (SAMR) model: A critical review and suggestions for its use. TechTrends. 2016; 60: 433-441. DOI: 10.1007/s11528-016-0091-y