The contextual method of Academician Verbitsky: is a revolution in didactics possible?

Introduction. The article provides an overview of the most notable pedagogical innovations (project method, programmed teaching, pedagogy of cooperation), mastered at the scientific level, but not widely used in educational practice. Special attention is paid to the paradigm of contextual education developed by the Academician of the Russian Academy of Education, Head of the Department of Social and Pedagogical Psychology in Sholokhov Moscow State University for the Humanities, A. A. Verbitsky and his scientific school. This paradigm accumulates many effective forms, methods and means, substantiated within the framework of various innovative approaches; however, it finds application only on the experimental sites of individual creative teachers of Russia.

The aim of the present publication is to investigate the reasons for the rejection by educational practice to apply pedagogical innovations, conditions and prospects.

Methodology and research methods. The author analyses the works of A. A. Verbitsky's scientific school, consistently developing the paradigm of contextual education in monographic and dissertation research, mastering it in the long-term teaching practice of the leading Russian university in the field of intelligent systems in humanities and applied humanities.

Results and scientific novelty. The author rejects the widespread opinion about the inhibition of innovations by the conservative pedagogical environment and shows their ideological incompatibility between the centralised management of education and the autocracy of Russian society as a whole. It is proved that the imperative of the perception of pedagogical innovations by education is a change in the social environment.

Practical significance. The author's assessments and conclusions create methodological prerequisites for developing a discussion about the mission of pedagogical science and the conditions for its development in modern Russian society. Thus, it could explain why the “didactocentrism”, proclaimed by John Amos Comenius, prevails in Russian education.

1. Feldstein D. I. Problemy kachestva psihologo-pedagogicheskih dissertacionnyh issledovanij. Analiticheskij doklad = Problems of the quality of psychological and pedagogical dissertation research. Analytical report [Internet]. 2011 [cited 2020 Dec 01]. Available from: https://refdb.ru/look/2167521.html (In Russ.)

2. Skinner B. F. Science and human behavior [Internet]. New York: Macmillan Publication; 1953 [cited 2020 Dec 01]. 461 p. Available from: http://www.bfskinner.org/bfskinner/Society_files/Science_and_Human_Behavior

3. Crowder N. O razlichijah mezhdu linejnym i razvetvljonnym programmirovaniem = On the differences between linear and branched programming. In: Programmirovannoe obuchenie za rubezhom: Sb. statej = Programmed learning abroad. Collection of articles. Ed. by Tihonov I. I. Moscow: Vysshaja shkola; 1968. p. 58-67. (In Russ.)

4. Bespalko V. P. Programmirovannoe obuchenie. Didakticheskie osnovy = Programmed learning. Didactic foundations. Moscow: Vysshaja shkola; 1970. 300 p. (In Russ.)

5. Amonashvili Sh. A. Sozidaja cheloveka = Creating a person. Moscow; 1982. 285 p. (In Russ.)

6. Verbitsky A. A., Larionova O. G. Lichnostnyj i kompetentnostnyj podhody v obrazovanii: problemy integracii = Personal and competence approaches in education: Problems of integration. Moscow; 2009. 401р. (In Russ.)

7. Verbitsky A. A., Trunova E. G. Kalashnikov V. G., et al. Psihologija i pedagogika kontekstnogo obrazovanija = Psychology and pedagogy of contextual education. Ed. by A. A. Verbitsky. Moscow; Saint Petersburg: Nestor-Istorija; 2018. 416 p. (In Russ.)

8. Kapterev P. F. Novaja russkaja pedagogika, ee glavnye idei, napravlenija i dejateli = New Russian pedagogy, its main ideas, directions and actors [Internet]. St. Petersburg; 1914 [cited 2020 Dec 01]. 117 р. Available from: http://elib.gnpbu.ru/ (In Russ.)

9. Smirnov I. P. Cycle of essays “Philosophy of Education”. Uchitel'skaja gazeta = Teacher's Newspaper. 2020-2021; 42-61. (In Russ.)

10. Tsirulnikov A. M. Kalmykija. Strana mezhdu dvumja beregami = Kalmykia. A country between two shores [Internet]. [cited 2020 Dec 01]. 214 p. Available from: http://rusac-ademedu.ru/news/neopoznannaya-pedagogika-proekt-anatoliya-cirulnikova-akademika-rao/ (In Russ.)

11. Blonsky P. P. Izbrannye pedagogicheskie proizvedenija. Institut teorii i istorii pedagogiki = Selected pedagogical works. Institute of Theory and History of Pedagogy [Internet]. Moscow: Publishing House APN RSFSR; 1961. 182 р. Available from: http://elib.gnpbu.ru/text/blonsky_izbrannye-proizvedeniya_1961/ (In Russ.)

12. Tolstoy L. N. Izbrannye publicisticheskie stat'i = Selected publicistic articles. In: Vospitanie i obrazovanie. Sobr. soch. v 22 tomah = Upbringing and education. Collection of essays in 22 volumes [Internet]. Vol. 16. [cited 2020 Dec 01]. p. 34. Available from: https://modernlib.net/books/tolstoy_lev_nikolaevich/tom_16_izbrannie_publicisticheskie_stati/read_1/ (In Russ.)

13. Balandina A. Marionetka chekistov: za chto borolsja Pavlik Morozov = Chekist puppet: What Pavlik Morozov was fighting for. Gazeta.ru [Internet]. 2018 Nov 14 [cited 2020 Dec 01]. Available from: https://www.gazeta.ru/social/2018/11/13/12057637.shtml (In Russ.)

14. Ushinsky K. D. Chelovek kak predmet vospitanija. Opyt pedagogicheskoj antropologii = Man as a subject of education. Experience in pedagogical anthropology. Collection of essays. 1867 Dec 7. Vol. 8. Moscow-Leningrad; 1950. p. 329. (In Russ.)

15. Wentzel K. N. Teorija svobodnogo vospitanija i ideal'nyj detskij sad = The theory of free education and the ideal kindergarten. 4th ed. St. Petersburg-Moscow: Knigoizdatel'stvo “Golos truda”; 1923. p. 9. (In Russ.)

16. Ushinsky K. Stat'i v “Syne otechestva” = Articles in “Son of the Fatherland”. In: Pedagogicheskie stat'i 1857-1861 gg. = Pedagogical articles 1857-1861. Moscow: Publishing House APN RSFSR; 1948. p. 254. (In Russ.)