CLASSIFICATION, DISTRIBUTION AND PRODUCTION OF KNOWLEDGE: THEORETICAL SUMMARY
https://doi.org/10.17853/1994-5639-2013-6-18-32
Abstract
The paper is devoted to systemizing the main theoretical approaches to classification, distribution and production of knowledge in the global economy. The author focuses on F. Machlup’s knowledge classification and the concept of useful knowledge by J. Mokyr.
The interpersonal and public channels of communication and acquisition of knowledge are observed taking into consideration the total changes caused by transition from industrial to postindustrial economy. The paper provides a comparative analysis of the given model and alternative concepts of knowledge generation: finalization of science, strategic research, post-normal science, academic capitalism, post-academic science, and the triple helix concept.
The author maintains that the current concepts of knowledge generation reflect the fact of transformation of modern institutional technical environment due to the global technological changes, and increasing contribution of knowledge to the economic development. Accordingly, the roles of the main participants of the given process are changing along with the growing integration of education and science, state and businesses.
About the Author
R. A. Tchupin
Уральский государственный экономический университет, Екатеринбург
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
ассистент кафедры мировой экономики
References
1. Власова Н. Ю., Чупин Р. А. К вопросу об эволюционном характере новой парадигмы развития мировой экономики // Образование. Наука. Научные кадры. 2012. № 4. С. 147–155.
2. Дежина И. Г., Киселева В. В. Государство, наука и бизнес в инновационной системе России. М.: ИЭПП, 2008. С. 24.
3. Информация для устойчивого управления природными ресурсами: ключевые соображения для реформаторов в странах восточной Европы, Кавказа и Центральной Азии. [Электронный ресурс]. Режим доступа: http://www.oecd.org/env/outreach/ 2011_Information%20for%20SRM%20in%20EECCA_RUS. pdf.
4. Мальцев А. А., Бедерак Д. А. Теоретические подходы к анализу неравномерного развития мировой экономики // Известия УрГЭУ. 2011. № 6 (38). С. 148–154.
5. Мокир Дж. Дары Афины. Исторические аспекты экономики знаний. М.: Институт Е. Т. Гайдара. 2012. С. 14–28.
6. Мокир Дж. Общество знания: теоретические и исторические основы // Вестник Ростовского государственного университета. 2004. Т. 2. С. 10–11.
7. Audretsch D. B., Feldman M. Knowledge spillovers and the geography of innovation // Handbook of urban and regional economics. Vol. 4. Elsevier-2003.
8. Autant-Bernard C., Massard N. Underlying mechanism of knowledge diffusion // IAREG Working papers 4.7. 2009.
9. Calvert J., Martin B. R. Changing conceptions of basic research? [Electronic resource]. URL: http://www.oecd.org/science/scitech/2674369.pdf.
10. Hessels L. K., van Lente H. Re-thinking new knowledge production: а literature review and a research agenda. [Electronic resource]. URL: http://www. academia. edu/205562/Re-thinking_new_ knowledge_production_A_literature_review_and_a_research_agenda.
11. Klarl T. Knowledge diffusion and knowledge transfer: two sides of the medal // Centre for European economic research. 2009.
12. Kraak A. Changing modes: a brief overview of the Mode 2 knowledge debates and its impact on South Africa policy formulation // Human science research. Pretoria. 2000. P. 9–19.
13. Kronh W. van den Daele, W. Science as an Agent of Change: Finalization and Experimental Implementation. [Electronic resource]. URL: http://www.uni-bielefeld.de/(en)/ZIF/FG/2006Application/PDF/ Krohn%20and%20van%20den%20Daele_essay. pdf.
14. Machlup F. Knowledge: it’s creation, distribution, and economic significance. Vol. I: Knowledge and knowledge production // Princeton university press. 1980. P. 10.
15. Machlup F. The production and distribution of knowledge in the United States // Princeton university press. 1962. P. 21–22.
16. Marshall A. Principles of economics // London. 8th Edition. 1920. P. 225.
17. Nowotny H., Scott P., Gibbons M. “Mode 2” Revisited: The New Production of Knowledge // Minerva. Vol. 41. № 3. Springer. 2003. P. 179–194.
18. Peri G. Knowledge Flows, R&D Spillowers and Innovation // Centre for European economic research. 2003. P. 5.
19. Smith M. J. Producing and Consuming Knowledge: The Relevance of the «New production of knowledge debate» for Disciplinary and Transdisciplinary Social Science:[Electronic resource]. URL: http://www.lancs.ac.uk/ias/events/general07/docs/interdisc/interdisc-Smith-Knowledge.pdf.
20. Ziman J. «Postacademic science»: Constructing knowledge with networks and norms. [Electronic resource]. URL: http:// tudelft.nl/fileadmin/UD/MenC/Support/Internet/TU%20Website/TU%20Delft/Homepage_TU_Delft/Onderzoek/Graduate_School/Ziman_-_Postacademic_science.pdf.
Review
For citations:
Tchupin R.A. CLASSIFICATION, DISTRIBUTION AND PRODUCTION OF KNOWLEDGE: THEORETICAL SUMMARY. The Education and science journal. 2013;(6):18-32. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17853/1994-5639-2013-6-18-32
Views:
1556
Email this article 