Transprofessional education in the student discourse: Demand, expectations, risks
https://doi.org/10.17853/1994-5639-2022-3-184-220
Abstract
Introduction. Modern concepts of developing labour market and education defined in the digital economy paradigm, enunciate the imbalance between the rapidly changing requirements of the new economy and the system of vocational training. The nonlinearity of professional and educational trajectories brings to the fore, and the practice of continuous professional development and retraining becomes particularly important. Hence, special attention is drawn to the idea of transprofessional education, which reflects a new direction in future personnel labour market development. The prospects and possibilities of implementing the concept of transprofessionalism in the modern system of higher education require understanding a number of conceptual and practical issues, therefore, it seems urgent and timely to analyse the needs of students themselves in obtaining this type of education.
Aim. The aim of the article was to analyse the demand for transprofessional education in the student discourse, as well as to articulate the actualised students’ expectations in the subjective assessments and risks associated with the spread of a new type of transprofessional specialists.
Methodology and research methods. The authors relied on the concepts of pedagogy, sociology and economics of education that allowed them to study the educational demand of students for transprofessional education. The study was built within the framework of a multiple strategy based on the “filling in the gaps” approach proposed by E. Bell and A. Bryman. The source of empirical data was the results of a sociological study conducted in February–May 2021. At the first stage of the study, on the basis of a target sample, 1357 students, who are studying various educational programs of the social and humanitarian profile of the bachelor’s degree and master’s degree, were interviewed. The representation of the results of a quantitative study is based on a statistical analysis of the survey data using nonparametric methods to check the relationship between variables. The qualitative analysis of the essay texts was carried out within the framework of historical discourse analysis, which required the use of a three-dimensional analytical apparatus that allowed the authors to reveal the linguistic and constructive features of the construction of texts identify argumentation strategies and fix personal meanings in the content of the essay.
Results and scientific novelty. The theoretical analysis carried out in the work allowed the authors to reveal the sociological component of the conceptualisation of the phenomenon of transprofessionalism, which consists in the aspect of the subjective interpretation of its content characteristics and the argumentation of the demand for new competencies. The educational demand of students for transprofessional education and the perception of transprofessionals in the labour market were empirically analysed. The survey showed that in most respondents’ opinions, the ability to go beyond a profession becomes one of the key characteristics of an in-demand specialist in modern conditions. Based on the texts of the essay, various ways of articulating personal positions in relation to the idea of transprofessionalism were identified; metaphors were presented that thematise transprofessional education in a particular context of understanding; expectations and risks explicated in the framework of subjective forecasting were studied. As the analysis of empirical materials has shown, the argumentation techniques of the majority of the study participants reflect the guidelines for the multidimensionality of professional competencies in the rapidly changing professional and labour sphere. At the same time, the students spoke most of all about the need for experience in mastering the related branches of specialisation. The desire to master another profession was much less frequent. It is important that most respondents experience going beyond their speciality as a necessary component of competencies in the modern world.
Practical significance. The obtained results can be applied in pedagogical practice when planning educational trajectories of students, as well as used as informative material in further research related to the study of the development of the higher education system and the changing world of professions in a digital society.
About the Authors
A. N. PinchukRussian Federation
Antonina N. Pinchuk – Cand. Sci. (Sociology), Associate Professor, Department of Political Science and Sociology; Senior Researcher
ResearcherID J-8648-2018
Moscow
S. G. Karepova
Russian Federation
Svetlana G. Karepova – Cand. Sci. (Sociology), Leading Research Associate
ResearcherID J-8658-2018
Moscow
D. A. Tikhomirov
Russian Federation
Dmitry A. Tikhomirov – Cand. Sci. (Sociology), Associate Professor, Department of Political Science and Sociology
ResearcherID AAS-4884-2021
Moscow
References
1. Kergroach S. Industry 4.0: New challenges and opportunities for the labour market. Foresight and STI Governance. 2017; 4 (11): 6–8. DOI: 10.17323/2500-2597.2017.4.6.8
2. Seidl da Fonseca R. The future of employment: Evaluating the impact of STI foresight exercises. Foresight and STI Governance. 2017; 4 (11): 9–22. DOI: 10.17323/1995-459X.2016.4.9.22.
3. Krause I. Coworking space: A window to the future of work? Foresight and STI Governance. 2019; 2 (13): 52–60. DOI: 10.17323/2500-2597.2019.2.52.60
4. Zeer E. F. Transprofessionalism as predictor of adaptation to the professional future of the personality. In: Innovatsii v professional’nom i professional’no-pedagogicheskom obrazovanii: Materialy 23-y Mezhdunarodnoy nauchnoprakticheskoy konferentsii, 24–25 аprelja 2018, g. Ekaterinburg = Innovations in Professional and Professional-Pedagogical Education. Materials of the 23rd International Scientific and Practical Conference; 2018 Apr 24–25; Ekaterinburg. Ekaterinburg: Russian State Vocational Pedagogical University; 2018. p. 375–378. (In Russ.)
5. Kudrin A. L. Liberal arts and sciences in the Russian university education system. Voprosy obrazovaniya = Educational Studies Moscow. 2015; 4: 62–71. (In Russ.)
6. Musabirov I. L., Sirotkin A. V. Minor in data science. Virtual learning environment with learning analytics support. Komp’yuternye instrumenty v obrazovanii = Computer Tools in Education. 2016; 4: 32–42. (In Russ.)
7. Almås S. H., Vasset F. Health and social care students pursuing different studies, and their written assignments from workshop and online interprofessional education. Nordic Journal of Nursing Research. 2015. DOI: 10.1177/0107408315606348
8. Dahlgren L., Gibbs D., Greenwalt S., Hahn L., Dietrich M. S. Getting it right from the start: An interprofessional orientation experience for graduate health sciences students, evaluating attitudes toward role. Open Access Library Journal. 2018; 5: e4460. DOI: 10.4236/oalib.1104460
9. Vasset F., Brynhildsen S., Kvilhaugsvik B. Interprofessional learning through a digital platform. Journal of Research in Interprofessional Practice and Education. 2019; 9 (1). DOI: 10.22230/jripe.2019v9n1a282
10. Haruta J., Kitamura K., Nishigori H. How do healthcare professionals and lay people learn interactively? A case of transprofessional education. TAPS. 2017; 3 (2). DOI: 10.29060/TAPS.2017-2-3/OA1033
11. Goto R., Haruta J. The process of transprofessional collaboration: How caregivers integrated the perspectives of rehabilitation through working with a physical therapist. Family Medicine and Community Health. 2020; 8 (4): e000378. DOI: 10.1136/fmch-2020-000378
12. Field J., Hervey T., Walsh S., Davis J., Garcia L. T., Valachovic R. W. ADEA-ADEE shaping the future of dental education III: From interprofessional education to transprofessional learning: Reflections from dentistry, applied linguistics, and law. Journal of Dental Education. 2020; 84 (1): 105–110. DOI: 10.1002/jdd.12023
13. Kislov A. G. From advance to trans-professional education. Obrazovanie i nauka = The Education and Science Journal. 2018; 20 (1): 54–74. DOI: 10.17853/1994-5639-2018-1-54-74 (In Russ.)
14. Zeer E. F., Symaniuk E. E. Methodological guidelines for the transprofessionalism development among vocational educators. Obrazovanie i nauka = The Education and Science Journal. 2017; 8 (19): 9–28. DOI: 10.17853/1994-5639-2017-8-9-28 (In Russ.)
15. Sillaste G. G. Transprofessional type specialist: Formation in the society of risk and modernization higher education. Nauka. Kul’tura. Obshchestvo = Science. Culture. Society. 2016; 2: 162–186. (In Russ.)
16. Guzanov B. N., Baranova A. A., Lovtsevich T. L. Project-based learning in transprofessional training in a technical university. Professional’noye obrazovaniye i rynok truda = Vocational Education and the Labour Market. 2019; 3: 44–52. (In Russ.)
17. Przhilenskaya I. The role of social and humanitarian knowledge in the training of transprofessionals in the field of culture and education. In: Sovremennoe obrazovanie: vektory razvitiya: Rol’ social’no-gumanitarnogo znaniya v podgotovke pedagoga: materialy V mezhdunarodnoj konferencii, 27 aprelja – 25 maja 2020, g. Moskva = Modern Education: Vectors of Development: The Role of Social and Humanitarian Knowledge in Teacher Training. Materials of the V International Conference; 2020 April 27–May 25; Moscow. Moscow: Moscow Pedagogical State University; 2020. p. 400–406. DOI: 10.37492/ETNO.2020.94.83.049 (In Russ.)
18. Malinovsky P. V. Transprofessional as a criterion of efficiency of management of human potential. Shkola Kul’turnoj Politiki = School of Cultural Policy [Internet]. 2003 [cited 2021 Jan 14]. Available from: http://shkp.ru/lib/actions/ss/malinovsky/publications/1 (In Russ.)
19. Zeer E. F. The methodology of the development of transprofessionalism of subjects of socionomic professions. Obrazovatel’nye tehnologii = Educational Technologies. 2018; 3: 46– 60. (In Russ.)
20. Maksimova E. A. Prospects and difficulties of transprofessional training. Gumanitarnye nauki i obrazovanie = Humanities and Education. 2013; 1 (13): 28–33. (In Russ.)
21. Behrman J., Kletzer L., McPherson M., Schapiro M. O. Microeconomics of College Choice, Careers, and Wages. Voprosy obrazovaniya = Educational Studies Moscow. 2008; 2: 108–121. (In Russ.)
22. Semenova L. A. Peculiarities of the vocational and labor self-determination of young people. Vestnik instituta sotziologii = The Bulletin of the Institute of Sociology. 2011; 2: 87–105. (In Russ.)
23. Vinston G. C. Subsidies, hierarchy and peers: The awkward economics of higher education. Voprosy obrazovaniya = Educational Studies Moscow. 2005; 1: 81–117. (In Russ.)
24. Filonenko V. I., Mosienko О.S., Magranov А.S. Students’ perceptions of career choices (based on the findings of cross-regional sociological studies conducted in 2006–2016. Voprosy obrazovaniya = Educational Studies Moscow. 2020; 1: 283–301. DOI: 10.17323/1814-9545-2020-1-283-301 (In Russ.)
25. Roshhin S.Ju., Rudakov V.N. Do Starting salaries for graduates measure the quality of education? A review of studies by Russian and foreign authors. Voprosy obrazovaniya = Educational Studies Moscow. 2015; 1: 137–181. (In Russ.)
26. Solntsev S. A. Demand for second higher education: Empirical evidence for Russian senior executives. Voprosy obrazovaniya = Educational Studies Moscow. 2015; 3: 208–229. (In Russ.)
27. Spence M. Job market signaling. The Quarterly Journal of Economics. 1973; 87 (3): 355–374.
28. Rosenbaum J. E., Kariya T., Settersten R., Maier T. Transition from high school to work: Their application to industrialized societies. Translated from English by D. Ershler. Voprosy obrazovaniya = Educational Studies Moscow. 2006; 3: 153–195. (In Russ.)
29. Bryman A., Bell E. Metody social’nyh issledovanij. Gruppy, organizacii i biznes = Business research methods. Kharkov: Publishing House Gumanitarnyj Centr; 2012. 776 p. (In Russ.)
30. Lukov Val. A. Tezaurusnaja sociologija: v 4 t. = Thesaurus Sociology: in 4 vol. Vol. 1. Moscow: Moscow University for the Humanities; 2018. 608 p. (In Russ.)
31. Lukov V. A., Lukov S. V. Russian students as experts of education policy: the results of an empirical research. Informacionnyj gumanitarnyj portal “Znanie. Ponimanie. Umenie” = Information Portal for the humanities “Knowledge. Understanding. Skill” [Internet]. 2012 [cited 2021 Jan 14]; 5. Available from: http://www.zpu-journal.ru/e-zpu/2012/5/Lukovs_Students-Experts-Education/ (In Russ.)
32. Titscher S., Wodak R., Meyer M., Vetter E. Metody analiza teksta i diskursa. = Methods of text and discourse analysis. Kharkov: Publishing House Gumanitarnyj Centr; 2017. 356 p. (In Russ.)
33. Koch I. A., Orlov В. A. Values and professional identity of student-age population. Obrazovanie i nauka = The Education and Science Journal. 2020; 22 (2): 143–170. DOI: 10.17853/1994-5639-2020-2-143-170 (In Russ.)
34. Merenkov A. V., Sandler D. G., Shavrin V. S. The features of changes in orientations to employment among bachelor’s graduates. Obrazovanie i nauka = The Education and Science Journal. 2019; 21 (10): 116–142. DOI: 10.17853/1994-5639-2019-10-116-142 (In Russ.)
35.
Review
For citations:
Pinchuk A.N., Karepova S.G., Tikhomirov D.A. Transprofessional education in the student discourse: Demand, expectations, risks. The Education and science journal. 2022;24(3):184-220. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17853/1994-5639-2022-3-184-220