Scientific and pedagogical staff as a social community in the changing conditions of academic development

Introduction. The urgency of the problem is due to the need to increase the scientific activity and productivity of scientific and pedagogical staff (SPS), acting as the flagship of the scientific development of universities. The article examines the social community of SPS of Russian universities as one of the drivers of the development of Russian higher education in the context of the implementation of the strategic academic leadership programme “Priority-2030”.

The aim of the article is to identify the directions and contradictions of the transformation of the scientific and pedagogical community in the changing conditions of academic development of Russian universities.

Methodology and research methods. The study uses the method of analysing statistical data on higher education in Russia and the Ural Federal District for 2000–2021 and Monitoring the effectiveness of universities for 2013–2021.

Results. The main results of the study presented in the article were quantitative, structure and substantive characteristics of the social community of the SPS. They were shown through the prism of indicators of their scientific activity and the requirements imposed on them by the university administration. An important result of the study was the analysis of the achievements and problems of scientific activity of the SPS in five universities of the Ural Federal District, representing five subjects of the Russian Federation on its territory – Sverdlovsk, Chelyabinsk, Tyumen, Kurgan regions, Khanty-Mansi Autonomous District. Among the universities coming into focus, there were three universities, which received support within the framework of the “5-100” Project. The article identifies the prospects and risks of implementing projects for the development of the university SPS in the “core zone”, which have received support under the “Priority-2030” strategic academic leadership programme, as well as the opportunities for academic development of the SPS of universities in the “semi-periphery” and “periphery” that do not have such large-scale state assistance.

The approaches are proposed to create favourable conditions for the SPS transformation. Taking into account such approaches, it is possible to overcome imitation and a steady increase in SPS scientific activity and productivity. The authors draw attention to the need to differentiate the conditions of professional activity of productive and unproductive SPS, a group of young SPS. The authors argue the importance to use the strategy of “growing” one’s own SPS as the basis for the real implementation of the strategic objectives of the “Priority-2030” programme and taking care of the human capital of universities. It is also concluded that the modern social context of Russian higher education limits the possibilities of solving this problem and needs to be changed.

Scientific novelty. The novelty of the research consists in a comparative analysis of trends and contradictions in the transformation of the SPS of Russian universities, their scientific potential, areas of activity and social functions in the changing conditions of academic development of universities.

The practical significance of the article is to demonstrate the possibilities and results of the transformation of the SPS on the way to their transformation into a driver of scientific development of universities.

1. Denisova-Schmidt E. Responses to the challenges of training and retaining scholars in Russian academia. Mir Rossii = Universe of Russia. 2021; 30 (3): 174–187. DOI: 10.17323/1811-038X-2021-30-3-174-187

2. Ylijoki O.-H., Henriksson L. Tribal, proletarian and entrepreneurial career stories: junior academics as a case in point. Studies in Higher Education. 2017; 42 (7): 1292–1308. DOI: 10.1080/03045079.2015.1092129

3. Denisova-Schmidt E. The end of the academic profession in Russia? Mir Rossii = Universe of Russia. 2020; 29 (3): 86–95. DOI: 10.17323/1811-038X-2020-29-3-86-95

4. Heffernan T. A., Heffernan A. The academic exodus: The role of institutional support in academics leaving universities and the academy. Professional Development in Education. 2019; 45 (1): 102–113. DOI: 10.1080/19415257.2018.1474491

5. Zborovsky G. E., Ambarova P. A. The universities can change themselves and the macro-region. Rossiya reformiruyushchayasya: ezhegodnik = Russia Reforming: Yearbook. 2018; 16: 373–392. Moscow: Publishing House Novyj Hronograf. DOI: 10.19181/ezheg.2018.16 (In Russ.)

6. Yadov V. A. Sociologicheskoe issledovanie: metodologiya, programmy, metody = Sociological research: Methodology, programs, methods [Internet]. Moscow: Publishing House Nauka; 1972 [cited 2021 Dec 24]. 240 p. Available from: https://www.isras.ru/publ.html?id=1373 (In Russ.)

7. Zborovsky G. E. Theoretical foundations of the study of social community. Sociologicheskie issledovaniya = Sociological Research [Internet]. 2010 [cited 2021 Dec 22]; 4: 3–12. Available from: https://ecsocman.hse.ru/data/2010/10/28/1214792045/Zborovski.pdf (In Russ.)

8. Zou T. X. P. Community-based professional development for academics: A phenomenographic study. Studies in Higher Education. 2019; 44 (11): 1975–1989. DOI: 10.1080/03075079.2018.1477129

9. Sennet R. The uses of disorder, personal identity and city style [Internet]. New York, London: W. W. Norton & Company; 1992 [cited 2021 Dec 28]. 220 p. Available from: https://openlibrary.org/works/OL1870896W/The_uses_of_disorder_personal_identity_city_life?edition=usesofdisorderpe00sennrich

10. Kyvik S., Reymert I. Research collaboration in groups and networks: Differences across academic fields. Scientometrics. 2017; 113 (2): 951–967. DOI: 10.1007/s11192-017-2497-5

11. Cherrington S., Macaskill A., Flutey J. Developing a pan-university professional learning community. International Journal for Academic Development. 2018; 23 (4): 298–311. DOI: 10.1080/1360144X.2017.1399271

12. Linquist S. Academic Development: A space, but is it an identity? In: C. Bossu, N. Brown (Eds.). Professional and Support Staff in Higher Education. Singapore: Springer; 2018. p. 23–37. DOI: 10.1007/978-981-10-1607-3_18-2

13. Wilkins S., Butt M. M., Annabi C. A. The influence of organizational identification on employee attitudes and behaviours in multinational higher education institutions. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management. 2018; 40 (1): 48–66. DOI: 10.1080/1360080X.2017.1411060

14. Bieliauskaite J. Solidarity in academia and its relationship to academic integrity. Journal of Academic Ethics. 2021; 19 (3): 309–322. DOI: 10.1007/s10805-021-09420-6

15. Tauginiene L. Embedding academic integrity in public universities. Journal of Academic Ethics. 2016; 14 (4): 327–344. DOI: 10.1007/s10805-016-9268-4

16. Kwiek M. Internationalists and locals: International research collaboration in a resource- poor system. Scientometrics. 2020; 124 (1): 57–105. DOI: 10.1007/s11192-020-03460-2

17. Szromek A. R., Wolniak R. Job satisfaction and problems among academic staff in higher education. Sustainability [Internet]. 2020 [cited 2021 Dec 28]; 12 (12). Paper No. 4865. Available from: https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/a99c/7172b7a351f98d99a70d43f1c6a5c-9058cbd.pdf?_ga=2.186837224.1305973242.1649471133-1709235933.1646200946 DOI: 10.3390/su12124865

18. Magi E., Beerkens M. Linking research and teaching: Are research-active staff members different teachers? Higher Education. 2016; 72 (2): 241–258. DOI: 10.1007/s10734-015-9951-1

19. Daumiller M., Dresel M. Teaching and research: Specificity and congruence of university faculty achievement goals. International Journal of Educational Research [Internet]. 2020 [cited 2021 Dec 27]; 99. Paper No. 101460. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0883035519300722?via%3Dihub DOI: 10.1016/j.ijer.2019.08.002

20. Kolesnikova I. A. Academic ghostwriting – the market of scientific and educational activity imitation. Neprerivnoe obrazovaniye: ХХI vek = Lifelong Education: ХХI Century [Internet]. 2017 [cited 2021 Dec 26]; 2 (18): 1–22. Available from: https://lll21.petrsu.ru/journal/article.php?id=3509 (In Russ.)

21. Kuzminov Ya. I., Yudkevich M. M. Universitety v Rossii: kak eto rabotaet = Russian universities: How the system works. Moscow: HSE Publishing House; 2021. 616 p. DOI: 10.17323/978-5-7598-2373-5 (In Russ.)

22. Ermolaeva S. G. Fragmentacija universitetskogo soobshhestva v uslovijah akademicheskogo menedzherializma = Fragmentation of the university community in the context of academic managerialism. In: Sociologiya i obshchestvo: tradicii i innovacii v social’nom razvitii regionov = Sociology and society: Traditions and innovations in the social development of regions. Moscow: RSS; 2020. p. 5228–5233. DOI: 10.19181/kongress.2020 (In Russ.)

23. Tomilin O. B., Klyuev A. K. “Black Swans” in organizational design of Russian universities. Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii = Higher Education in Russia. 2021; 30 (8–9): 44–55. DOI: 10.31992/0869-3617-2021-30-8-9-44-55 (In Russ.)

24. Litvinova L. I. Factors of scientific productivity and problems of its evaluation. Universitetskoye upravleniye: praktika i analiz = University Management: Practice and Analysis. 2018; 22 (1): 61–75. DOI: 10.15826/umpa.2018.01.006 (In Russ.)