Problems of training specialists in the field of digital transformation: The experience of Russia

Introduction. The structural reorganisation of the Russian economy will require a revision of approaches to training specialists in the field of information technology in the context of the “war for talents” unfolded in the world. HR digital revolution (digital transformation) is one of the conditions for Russia’s breakthrough into the sixth technological order to ensure digital sovereignty in Russia.

Aim. On the basis of identifying significant problems in the adaptability of the Russian higher education system to provide national economy with personnel, the present research aimed to formulate approaches to the strategy aimed at determining the number of university admission quotas in training programmes related to digital transformation.

The literature highlights two serious problems regarding the policy of distribution of admission quotas for higher education programmes: 1) the allocated admission quotas for the most part do not correspond to the structure of the regional economy; 2) violation of the norm of the number of students per 10 thousand of the population aged 17 to 30 years, as a result, in some regions, the number of school graduates significantly exceeds the number of budget places in universities. The hypothesis of the study consists in the assumption that the policy of distribution of admission quotas for training in higher education programmes is flexible, providing for an increase in enrolment for training in areas related to information and communication technologies with an increase in “demand” for training in these areas.

Methodology and research methods. The work was carried out on the basis of a systematic approach. Theoretical research methods (methods-operations) were used: analysis (literature on the research problem, normative documents), comparison and generalisation, induction, synthesis. The main theoretical method-action was the inductive-deductive method. At the first stage of the study, the analysis of the number of students enrolled for full-time study (computer science and computer engineering) at the expense of federal budget allocations (period 2016–2021) was carried out. As a result of data generalisation in certain areas of training and comparative analysis of the number of applicants with the allocated admission quotas, the discrepancy (gap) between compared values was established. At the second stage of the research, similar methods were used in areas related to computer and information sciences and information security to confirm the systemic nature of the identified phenomenon.

Results and scientific novelty. Based on the analysis of the admissions (period 2016– 2021) to the specialities related to information technology (computer science and computer engineering, computer and information science, information security), the author has identified a gap between admission to the university and admission quotas. The essence of this gap is that in the analysed areas of training, the number of full-time students accepted for full-time education at the expense of federal budget allocations is significantly lower than the volume of allocated admission quotas. Thus, according to the enlarged groups of specialities (EGS) “Computer Science and Computer Engineering”, the number of accepted undergraduate and graduate programmes was less than the allocated admission quotas for 37519 university places (17075 + 20444); the gap in the speciality “Computer and Information Sciences” (bachelor degree programme + master degree programme) was 3584 (1722 + 1862); “Information Security” (bachelor degree programme + specialist degree programme) – 4082 (1393 + 2689). The possible causes of the gap are analysed and proposals are formulated to improve the institutional provision of training for digital transformation.

Practical significance. The research results can be used to adjust the strategy for the development of scientific and educational sphere.

1. Tapscott D. Grown up digital: How the net generation is changing your world [Internet]. NY: McGrawHill; 2009 [cited 2021 Dec 20]. 384 p. Available from: http://socium.ge/downloads/komunikaciisteoria/eng/Grown_Up_Digital_-_How_the_Net_Generation_Is_Changing_Your_World_(Don_Tapscott).pdf

2. Caprile M., Palmen R., Sanz P., Dente G. Labour market situation and comparison of practices targeted at young people in different member states. European Union [Internet]. 2015 [cited 2021 Dec 20]. Available from: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/STUD/2015/542199/IPOL_STU(2015)542199_EN.pdf

3. Savey L., Daradkeh I. I., Gouveia L. B. The success of startups through digital transformation. International Journal of Open Information Technologies [Internet]. 2020 [cited 2021 Dec 20]; 8 (5): 53–56. Available from: https://elibrary.ru/download/elibrary_42858622_54232003.pdf

4. Mazzone D. M. Digital or death: Digital transformation – the only choice for business to survive smash and conquer [Internet]. 1st ed. Mississauga, Ontario: Smashbox Consulting Inc.; 2014 [cited 2021 Dec 20]. 166 p. Available from: https://books.google.ru/books?hl=ru&lr=&id=nI8ZBQAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PT4&dq=Mazzone,+M.:+Digital+or+death:+digital+transformation+is+the+only+choice+for+a+business+to+survive,+smash+and+conquer,+1st+edn.+Smashbox+Consulting+Inc.+(2014)&ots=X9hd-pIIx8&sig=rqHSpVFPWWfiaUlA5we8LcBdBLA&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q=Mazzone%2C%20M.%3A%20Digital%20or%20death%3A%20digital%20transformation%20is%20the%20only%20choice%20for%20a%20business%20to%20survive%2C%20smash%20and%20conquer%2C%201st%20edn.%20Smashbox%20Consulting%20Inc.%20(2014)&f=false

5. Vial G. Understanding digital transformation: A review and a research agenda. Journal of Strategic Information Systems. 2019; 28 (2): 118–144. DOI: 10.1016/j.jsis.2019.01.003

6. Roland K.-H., Hanseth O. Managing path dependency in digital transformation processes: A longitudinal case study of an enterprise document management platform. Procedia Computer Science. 2021; 181 (1): 765–774. DOI: 10.1016/j.procs.2021.01.229

7. Hinings B., Gegenhuber T., Greenwood R. Digital innovation and transformation: An institutional perspective. Information and Organization. 2018; 28 (1): 52–61. DOI: 10.1016/j.infoandorg.2018.02.004

8. Mergell I., Edelmann N., Haug N. Defining digital transformation: Results from expert interviews. Government Information Quarterly. 2019; 36 (4): 101385. DOI: 10.1016/j.giq.2019.06.002

9. Berman S. J. Digital transformation: Opportunities to create new business models. Strategy & Leadership. 2012; 40 (2): 16–24. DOI: 10.1108/10878571211209314

10. Romanov Е. V. Traps in the scientific and educational sphere: Nature and mechanism of elimination. Obrazovanie i nauka = The Education and Science Journal. 2020; 22 (9): 107–147. DOI: 10.17853/1994-5639-2020-9-107-147 (In Russ.)

11. Romanov E. V. Higher education development trends in the context of academic and teaching staff training and professional growth. Perspektivy nauki i obrazovania = Perspectives of Science and Education. 2018; 35 (5): 33–43. DOI: 10.32744/pse.2018.5.4 (In Russ.)

12. Gabdrakhmanov N. K., Leshukov O. V., Platonova D. P. Accessibility of regional higher education systems in accordance with demographic trends. University Management: Practice and Analysis. 2019; 23 (4): 32–45. DOI: 10.15826/umpa.2019.04.027 (In Russ.)

13. Nurieva L. M., Kiselev S. G. Distribution of university admission quotas: Problems of competitive selection process. Obrazovanie i nauka = The Education and Science Journal. 2019; 21 (6): 46–71. DOI: 10.17853/1994-5639-2019-6-46-71 (In Russ.)

14. Koksharov V. A., Sandler D. G., Kuznetsov P. D., Klyagin A. V., Leshukov O. V. The pandemic as a challenge to the development of university networks in Russia: Differentiation or collaboration? Voprosy obrazovaniya = Educational Studies Moscow. 2021; 1: 52–73. DOI: 10.17323/1814-9545-2021-1-52-73 (In Russ.)

15. Zborovskiy G. E., Ambarova P. A. From educational failure to social success. Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii = Higher Education in Russia. 2019; 28 (11): 34–46. DOI: 10.31992/08693617-2019-28-11-34-46 (In Russ.).

16. Yusupova R. A. On the problem of federal financing of services higher education in the regions. Ekonomika i upravlenie: nauchno-prakticheskij zhurnal = Economics and Management: A Scientific and Practical Journal. 2021; 159 (3): 133–138. DOI: 10.34773/EU.2021.3.24 (In Russ.)

17. Zulkarnay I. U., Islakaeva G. R. Analysis of interregional differences in the provision of higher education services by the federal center. Ekonomicheskij analiz: teoriya i praktika =Economic Analysis: Theory and Practice [Internet]. 2010 [cited 2021 Dec 20]; 178 (13): 29–33. Available from: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/analiz-mezhregionalnyh-razlichiy-v-predostavlenii-uslug-vysshego-obrazovaniya-federalnym-tsentrom-1/viewer (In Russ.).

18. Firsova A. A. Analysis of the balance of development of regional systems of higher education. Aktual’nye problemy ekonomiki i menedzhmenta =Actual Problems of Economics and Management [Internet]. 2018 [cited 2021 Dec 20]; 4: 109–118. Available from: https://elibrary.ru/download/elibrary_37286881_91842324.pdf (In Russ.)

19. Firsova A. A. Structural imbalances of regional higher education systems and the labor market. Ars Administrandi. 2020; 12 (4): 639–655. DOI: 10.17072/2218-9173-2020-4639-655 (In Russ.)

20. Blinova T. N., Fedotov A. V. Higher education in the Far East: Market position and development needs of the region. Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii = Higher Education in Russia. 2019; 28 (7): 54–70. DOI: 10.31992/0869-3617-2019-28-7-54-70 (In Russ.)

21. Blinova T. N., Fedotov A. V., Kovalenko A. A. The structure of personnel training within getting higher education meets the needs of economy: Problems and solutions. Universitetskoe upravlenie: praktika i analiz = University Management: Practice and Analysis. 2021; 25 (2): 13–33. DOI: 10.15826/umpa.2021.02.012 (In Russ.)

22. Balatsky E. V., Ekimova N. A. Regional and sectoral personnel imbalances in Russia: Postindustrial challenges. Problemy razvitiya territorii = Problems of Territory’s Development. 2021; 25 (4): 24–42. DOI: 10.15838/ptd.2021.4.114.2 (In Russ.)

23. Balatsky E. V., Ekimova N. A. Inertia of the model of functioning of Russia’s regional universities in the post-industrial economy. Problemy razvitiya territorii = Problems of Territory’s Development. 2021; 25 (6): 32–50. DOI: 10.15838/ptd.2021.6.116.2 (In Russ.)

24. Frolov Yu. V., Bosenko T. M. Statistical data research on staff training for the digital economy in the Russian Federation. Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii = Higher Education in Russia. 2021; 30 (11): 29–41. DOI: 10.31992/0869-3617-2021-30-11-29-41 (In Russ.)

25. Bolgova M. A., Podlegayev A. V. Strategies for the activities of higher education institutions in the context of the modernization of higher education in the Russian Federation. Socio–economic analysis. Vestnik Magnitogorskogo gosudarstvennogo tehnicheskogo universiteta im. G. I. Nosova = Vestnik of Nosov Magnitogorsk State Technical University [Internet]. 2015 [cited 2021 Dec 20]; 52 (4): 117–122. Available from: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/strategii-deyatelnosti-obrazovatelnyh-organizatsiy-vysshego-obrazovaniya-v-usloviyah-modernizatsii-vysshego-obrazovaniya-v (In Russ.)

26. Maltseva V. A., Shabalin A. I. The non-bypass trajectory, or the boom in demand for TVET in Russia. Voprosy obrazovaniya = Educational Studies Moscow. 2021; 2: 10–42. DOI: 10.17323/1814-9545-2021-2-10-42 (In Russ.)

27. Dudyrev F. F., Romanova O. A., Shabalin A. I., Abankina I. V. Molodye professionaly dlja novoj jekonomiki: srednee professional’noe obrazovanie v Rossii = Young professionals for the new economy: Secondary vocational education in Russia. Moscow: HSE; 2019. 272 p. DOI: 10.17323/978-5-7598-1937-0 (In Russ.)

28. Malinovskiy S. S., Shibanova E. Yu. Regional differentiation of access to higher education in Russia [Internet]. Moscow: HSE; 2020 [cited 2021 Dec 20]. 68 p. Available from: https://publications.hse.ru/mirror/pubs/share/direct/425740019.pdf (In Russ.)

29. Konstantinovskiy D. L., Popova E. S. Vocational vs higher education. Mir Rossii = Universe of Russia. 2020; 29 (2): 6–26. DOI: 10.17323/1811-038X-2020-29-2-6-26 (In Russ.)

30. Romanov E. V. What capitalism does Russia need?: Methodological guidelines of the “new industrialisation”. Ekonomicheskie i social’nye peremeny: fakty, tendencii, prognoz = Economic and Social Changes: Facts, Trends, Forecast. 2017; 10 (2): 90–108. DOI: 10.15838/esc.2017.2.50.5 (In Russ.)