. Cultural, economic, and educational predictors of school exit exam scores in Azerbaijan
https://doi.org/10.17853/1994-5639-2022-10-103-123
Abstract
Introduction. The Ministry of Education (MOE) of the Azerbaijan Republic requires that students take an exit exam at the end of secondary schooling. The school exit exam (SEE) is administered to graduating students in 11th grade (i.e., high school equivalent) in three core subjects: (1) mathematics, (2) instructional language, and (3) foreign language. The State Examination Centre (SEC) has administered the SEE for over five years and recently changed the format, impacting university admissions (UA). In 2019, admission to a university was in two stages: (1) the SEE and (2) the university admissions exam. The current study used publicly available SEC data (N = 73) from Azerbaijan’s 2019/2020 academic year by region.
Aim. The current research aims to examine the cultural, economic, and educational predictors of the school exit exam (SEE) in Azerbaijan’s cities/regions according to the 2020 data. The article intends to demonstrate the relationship between economic, educational, and cultural precursors for successful versus unsuccessful SEE results.
Methodology and research methods. This correlational study used Multivariate (MANOVA) and Univariate (ANOVA) Analyses of Variance (RQ1) and Multiple Regressions (RQ2 and RQ3).
Results. For cultural predictors of the SEE, the Northern region had significantly higher Instructional Language (p = .010), English (p = .020), and Total scores (p = .010) compared to other regions. For economic indicators of the SEE, the average monthly salary was significantly predictive of Foreign Language (p = .035). For educational variables, the percentage of outstanding graduating students was predictive of all outcomes (p < .000 for all).
Scientific novelty and practical significance. Literature supports that the percentage of outstanding students and a family’s annual income are strong positive predictors of SEE scores for all four D.V.s. Thus, this study claims that regions with exceptional academic performance and high family income tend to produce higher SEE scores. This substantive finding highlights the inter-rater reliability between the MOE and the SEC, as academic achievement is assessed by the MOE and the exit exam by the SEC.
About the Author
G. A. AlasgarovaUnited States
Gunel Аkif Alasgarova – PhD Candidate (Educational Leadership), M. Ed. (Research, Measurement, and Statistics), Cand. Sci. (Educational Leadership)
State College
References
1. UNESCO. World data on education: Azerbaijan [Internet]. 2011 Aug [cited 2022 Apr 25]. 7th edition. Available from: http://www.ibe.unesco.org/fileadmin/user_upload/Publications/WDE/2010/pdf-versions/Azerbaijan.pdf
2. MOE. Execution term for educational programs (curriculums) [Internet]. 2010 [cited 2022 Apr 25]. Available from: https://edu.gov.az/en/page/303/2182
3. PIRLS Encyclopedia. Azerbaijan [Internet]. 2016 [cited 2022 Apr 25]. Available from: file:///C:/Users/ralas/Desktop/65515%20Quant/7%20articles/azer/Azerbaijan.pdf
4. Kazimzade E., Silova I. External examination system in Azerbaijan. Secondary school external examination systems: Reliability, robustness, and resilience. Amherst, NY: Cambria Press; 2009. p. 253–264.
5. SEC. Scientific-statistical analysis of the final exam results on students’ admission to higher and secondary outstanding educational institutions of the Republic of Azerbaijan and public education institutions for the 2019–2020 academic year. Annual Report [Internet]. 2020 [cited 2022 Apr 25]. Available from: http://dim.gov.az/activities/research/statistika/
6. SEC. A new model of school graduation and university entrance exams to be applied in 2019 [Internet]. 2019 [cited 2022 Apr 25]. Available from: http://dim.gov.az/en/news/2576/?sphrase_id=782065
7. Reyting. Ali məktəblərə qəbul imtahanlarının yeni qaydaları narazılıq yaradıb [Internet]. 2018 Oct 14 [cited 2022 Apr 25]. Available from: https://reyting.az/arasdirma/10337-alimekteblere-qebul-imtahanlarinin-yeni-qaydalari-naraziliq-yaradib.html (In Azerbaijani)
8. BBC News Azerbaijan. Ali məktəblərə yeni qəbul qaydaları: Gələn il abituriyentləri hansı yeniliklər gözləyir? [Internet]. 2018 Dec 24 [cited 2022 Apr 25]. Available from: https://www.bbc.com/azeri/azerbaijan-46646454 (In Azerbaijani)
9. President of the Republic of Azerbaijan Ilham Aliyev. Decree of the Republic of Azerbaijan’s President on establishing the State Examination Center of the Republic of Azerbaijan as a public legal entity [Internet]. 2016 Apr 11 [cited 2022 Apr 25]. Available from: https://president.az/articles/19240
10. Modern. Məleykə Abbaszadədən buraxılış və qəbul imtahanlarının yeni modeli ilə bağlı müraciət [Internet]. 2018 Oct 13 [cited 2022 Apr 25]. Available from: https://modern.az/az/news/180228/meleyke-abbaszadedenburaxilis-ve-qebul-imtahanlarinin-yeni-modeli-ilebagli-muraciet- (In Azerbaijani)
11. Ahmadov H. The strategy of education development in Azerbaijan. Saarbrucken, Baku: Lambert Academic Publishing; 2014. 256 p.
12. Huseynov V. Azerbaijan. In: C. L. Glenn, J. De Groof (Eds.). Balancing freedom, autonomy, and accountability in education. Vol. 4 (7–21). Tilburg, NL: Wolf Legal Publishers; 2012. 312 p.
13. Mammadov R., Abasli K. Teachers’ views on the problems of Azerbaijan education system after independence. Doğu Anadolu Sosyal Bilimlerde Eğilimler Dergisi. 2019; 3 (2): 43–59.
14. Mahmouds K. F. Peculiarities of the development of education in Azerbaijan in the 50– 60s of the XX century. Uchenye zapiski Orlovskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta = Scientific Notes of Orel State University. 2013; 55 (5): 20–24. (In Russ.)
15. Mardanov M. Azerbaijani education looks at the recent past, present, and future. 525 Newspaper. 2010 May 28. p. 10–11.
16. Mikayilova U. Inclusive education reform/s in Azerbaijan: An attempt at critical policy analysis. Azerbaijan Journal of Educational Studies. 2019; 3: 37–48.
17. Karimova Y., Kazimzade E., Silova I. Azerbaijan: The role of teachers in curriculum reform. In: N. Ivanenko (Ed.). Education in Eastern Europe and Eurasia (Education around the World). London: Bloomsbury Academic; 2014. p. 259–276. DOI: 10.5040/9781472593474.ch-013
18. World Bank Group Azerbaijan Partnership Program Snapshot [Internet]. 2016 Apr [cited 2022 Apr 25]. Available from: https://www.worldbank.org/content/dam/Worldbank/document/Azerbaijan-Snapshot.pdf
19. SSC. The State Statistical Committee of the Republic of Azerbaijan. Regions [Internet]. 2020 [cited 2022 Apr 25]. Available from: https://stat.gov.az/source/regions/?lang=en
20. Eafford R. F. The impact of high school exit exams and other predictors on college readiness: A national study [dissertation]. The University of Toledo; 2015 Dec. 207 p.
21. Azerbaijans. Bölgələr haqqında [Internet]. 2021 [cited 2022 Apr 25]. Available from: https://www.azerbaijans.com/content_434_az.html (In Azerbaijani)
22. Travel Agency. Şimal Bölgəsi [Internet]. 2021 [cited 2022 Apr 25]. Available from: https://ritm.tourismboard.az/idea-banki/simal-bolgesi (In Azerbaijani)
23. Hess A. J. Rich students get better SAT scores—here’s why [Internet]. 2019 [cited 2022 Apr 25]. Available from: https://www.cnbc.com/2019/10/03/rich-students-get-bettersat-scores-heres-why.html
24. Khavenson T., Solovyova A. Relationship between the Unified State Exam and higher Education performance. Educational Studies. 2014; 1: 176–199.
25. Saprykina T. A. The transition “school – university”: Predictors of academic performance of first-year students. Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii = Higher Education in Russia. 2017; 213 (6): 76–87. (In Russ.)
26. American Institute for Research. Predictors of Postsecondary Success [Internet]. The College and Career Readiness and Success Center; 2013 [cited 2022 Apr 25]. Available from: file:///C:/Users/ralas/Desktop/Research%20in%20Evaluation/CCRS%20Center_Predictors%20of%20Postsecondary%20Success_final_0.pdf
Review
For citations:
Alasgarova G.A. . Cultural, economic, and educational predictors of school exit exam scores in Azerbaijan. The Education and science journal. 2022;24(10):103-123. https://doi.org/10.17853/1994-5639-2022-10-103-123