Preview

The Education and science journal

Advanced search

Body image and its relationship to some psychological variables among students in the secondary stage of education in Saudi Arabia

https://doi.org/10.17853/1994-5639-2023-6-149-165

Abstract

   Introduction. Body image perceptions among adolescents are intrinsically linked to psychological factors such as self-esteem and social comparison. The secondary stage proves to be a critical period for exploring identity, with body image playing a vital role in shaping mental well-being and interpersonal relationships.
   Aim. The current research aims to examine the differences and to identify the relationship between adolescents in body image and some psychological variables (life satisfaction – psychological adaptation) according to the gender variable (males – females).
   Methodology and research methods. The sample of the current research consisted of 433 adolescents, with 220 male students and 213 female students; their ages ranged between 16–19 years. To achieve the research objectives, the author adopted the descriptive correlative approach to conduct this study, in addition to using the scale of body image, life satisfaction, and scale of psychological adaptation. After verifying the stability and validity of the tools, they were applied to the study sample.
   Results. The results revealed differences between male and female adolescents in body image in favour of adolescents, meaning that adolescents are more satisfied with their body image than female adolescents. In addition, there are differences between male and female adolescents in the degree of psychological adjustment in favour of adolescents. However, there are no differences between male and female adolescents in the degree of life satisfaction and there is a positive, statistically significant correlation between life satisfaction and psychological adjustment. Furthermore, there is a positive, statistically significant relationship between the body image scale and the psychological adjustment scale.
   Scientific novelty. The scientific novelty of this study lies in its comprehensive investigation into the complex interplay between body image and various psychological variables among adolescents in the secondary stage. This study adds to scientific knowledge in several ways. First, it provides insights into the complex relationship between body image and psychological variables among adolescents in the secondary stage, which can inform future research in this area. Second, the study’s findings on gender differences in body image and psychological adjustment can contribute to our understanding of how gender affects mental health outcomes in adolescence. Third, the study highlights the importance of addressing body image issues among adolescents and emphasises the need for targeted interventions and support systems. Overall, this study contributes to the growing body of literature on adolescent mental health and provides important insights for researchers, educators, and mental health professionals working with adolescents.
   Practical significance. The practical significance of this study lies in its potential to inform educators, parents, and mental health professionals about the importance of addressing body image issues among adolescents. By highlighting the differences in body image satisfaction between genders and the link between body image and psychological factors such as life satisfaction and psychological adjustment, the study emphasises the need for targeted interventions and support systems.

About the Author

N. A. Abu Hammad
Prince Sattam Bin Abdulaziz University
Saudi Arabia

Naser Addeen Ibrahim Abu Hammad, Associate Professor (Educational Psychology)

College of Education,

Al Kharj



References

1. Abu Hammad N. Body image and its relationship with optimism pessimism and feeling of psychological happiness among a sample of male and female adolescents at the secondary stage. Journal of Education Message [Internet]. 2017 [cited 2022 May 15]; 58 (2): 73–94. Available from: https://gesten.ksu.edu.sa/sites/gesten.ksu.edu.sa/files/4_4.pdf (In Arabic)

2. Cabras C., Mondo M. Coping strategies, optimism, and life satisfaction among first-year university students in Italy: Gender and age differences. Higher Education. 2017; 75 (4): 643–654. DOI: 10.1007/s10734-017-0161-x

3. Guo Y., Chen X. Relationship among satisfaction with life, family care degree, psychological dependency and subjective bias of senior high school student. Psychology. 2016; 7: 418–425. DOI: 10.4236/psych.2016.73044

4. Barakat F. Body image and its relationship with some psychological variables for university: Female students. Journal of Scientific Research in Arts [Internet]. 2011 [cited 2022 May 15]; 14 (3): 337–390. Available from: https://search.mandumah.com/Record/760916 (In Arabic)

5. Bardone C., Cass K., Ford J. Examining body dissatisfaction in young men within a biopsychosocial framework. Body Image. 2008; 5 (2): 183–194. DOI: 10.1016/j.bodyim.2007.12.004

6. Goldbeck L., Besier T., Herschbach P., Henrich G., Schmitz T. Life satisfaction decreases during adolescence. Quality of Life Research. 2007; 16 (6): 969–979. DOI: 10.1007/s11136-007-9205-5

7. Kim O., Kim K. Comparisons of body mass index, perception of body weight, body shape satisfaction, and self–esteem among Korean adolescents. Perceptual and Motor Skills. 2003; 97 (3_suppl): 1339–1346. DOI: 10.2466/pms.2003.97.3f.1339

8. Benjet C., Hernandez L. Gender differences in psychological well-being of Mexican early adolescents. Adolescences. 2001; 36 (141): 47–65.

9. Wade S. Differences in body image and self-esteem in adolescents with and without scoliosis [dissertation]. Adler School of Professional Psychology; 2007. P. 10–45.

10. Huber I. Variables contributing to body image and peer relationships for males and females indulge environment. Sex Roles. 2006; 45 (3/4): 199–215.

11. Cardosi C. Effect of media on female adolescents’ satisfaction with their body image [unpublished doctoral dissertation]. University of Virginia; 2006. DOI: 10.18130/v34k9t

12. Davison T., McCabe M. Adolescent body image and psychosocial functioning. The Journal of Social Psychology. 2005; 146 (1): 15–30. DOI: 10.3200/socp.146.1.15-30

13. Olivardia R., Borowiecki J., Cohane G. Biceps and body image: The relationship between muscularity and self-esteem, depression, and eating disorder symptoms. Psychology of Men & Masculinity. 2002; 5 (2): 112–120.

14. Lu L. Personal and environmental causes of happiness: A longitudinal analysis. Journal of Social Psychology. 1999; 139 (1): 79–90. DOI: 10.1080/00224549909598363

15. Diener D. Subjective well-being: The science of happiness and a proposal for a national index. American Psychology. 2000; 55 (1): 34–43.

16. Reber S. A., Reber E. The Penguin dictionary of psychology. 3<sup>rd</sup> ed. London: Penguin Books; 2001. 831 p.

17. Fredrickson B. The role of positive emotions in positive psychology: The broaden-and-build theory of positive emotions. American Psychologist. 2001; 56 (3): 218–226. DOI: 10.1037/0003-066x.56.3.218

18. Klassen A., Pusic A., Scott A., Klok J., Cano S. Satisfaction and quality of life in women who undergo breast surgery: A qualitative study. BMC Women’s Health. 2009; 9 (11): 11–22. DOI: 10.1186/1472-6874-9-11

19. Harper F., Guilbault M., Tucker T., Austin T. Happiness as a goal of counseling: Cross-cultural implications. International Journal for the Advancement of Counseling. 2007; 29: 123–136. DOI: 10.1007/s10447-007-9030-0

20. Cohen R. Psychology & adjustment, values, culture, and change. Boston Allyn and Bacon, USA; 1994. 579 p.

21. Al-Khatib B., Awamleh H., Samawi F. Student’s adjustment to college life at Albalqa Applied University. American International Journal of Contemporary Research [Internet]. 2012 [cited 2022 Jul 12]; 2 (11): 7–16. Available from: http://www.aijcrnet.com/journals/Vol_2_No_11_November_2012/2.pdf

22. Hansen J., Stevic R., Warner R. Counseling: Theory and process [Internet]. 2<sup>nd</sup> ed. Boston: Allyn and Bacon; 1985 [cited 2022 May 15]. 538 p. Available from: https://www.worldcat.org/title/174372330

23. Rosen J. C., Srebnik D., Saltzberg E., Wendt S. Development of a body image avoidance questionnaire. Psychological Assessment. 1991; 3 (1): 32–37.

24. Calvete E., Jenninfer K. Perceived social support coping, and symptoms of distress in American and Spanish students. Anxiety, Stress & Coping. 2006; 19 (1): 47–65. DOI: 10.1080/10615800500472963

25. Simon L., Annie B. Social support processes: Mediators of attachment state of mind and adjustment in late adolescence. Attachment & Human Development. 2001; 3 (1): 96–120. DOI: 10.1080/14616730010024762

26. Anwar M. The relationship of body image to some personality variables in adolescents. Journal of the College of Education, Zagazig University [Internet]. 2011 [cited 2022 May 15]; 38 (2): 127–153. Available from: https://search.mandumah.com/Record/112302/Details (In Arabic)

27. Abboud H. Body image and its relationship to aggressive behavior among female students of the College of the Physical Education / University of Diyala. Childhood and Maternity Research Center [Internet]. 2009 [cited 2022 May 15]; 9 (3): 33–60. Available from: http://search.shamaa.org/PDF/Articles/IQJssd/JssdNo11Y2012/jssd_2012-n11_131-160.pdf (In Arabic)


Review

For citations:


Abu Hammad N.A. Body image and its relationship to some psychological variables among students in the secondary stage of education in Saudi Arabia. The Education and science journal. 2023;25(6):149-165. https://doi.org/10.17853/1994-5639-2023-6-149-165

Views: 1077


ISSN 1994-5639 (Print)
ISSN 2310-5828 (Online)