Author’s agency in a research article: From the grammar of language to the grammar of communication
https://doi.org/10.17853/1994-5639-2023-7-44-68
Abstract
Introduction. Writing for publication has been developed for two last decades as an independent field of research to help authors publish their research articles. Starting from the assessment that preparing the publication in a journal is an academic activity that requires learning to construct the author’s positioning in the manuscript, this paper points out the shortage of professionals to assume institutional organisation of training courses in Russia.
Aim. This paper aims to suggest a framework for informal practices based on autonomy and the collective organisation of authors to construct an authorial position in the manuscript or author’s agency toward a target journal.
Methodology and research methods. Various approaches applied in this paper are based on activity theory: situated learning, Change Laboratory, and expansive learning.
A review of Russian and foreign research in writing for publication shows that only one of the three types of authorial agency, that is, transformative agency, might help the author to prepare a manuscript for publication in a target journal. The framework needed for emerging author’s transformative agency re-conceptualises the model of the Change Laboratory for situated learning that aims at the author’s socialisation in the discursive practices of a target journal. Situated learning for writing for publication is based on the principles of the Change Laboratory: collectivity; double stimulation; overcoming the contradiction by ascending from the abstract to the concrete.
Results. A framework for three cycles of expansive learning aimed at the emergence of the author’s agency toward a target journal has been developed. The first cycle allows selecting a journal and revealing its implicit rules for manuscript production. The second cycle is focused on step-by-step manuscript revisions. Finally, a change of journal and/or author whose manuscript is discussed involves the third cycle of expansive learning.
Scientific novelty. The paper considers manuscript production for publishing in a journal as an academic activity requiring deliberate training in native and foreign languages. The framework for three cycles of expansive learning in writing for publication conceptualises the publication as the author’s participation in social practices involving the journal as a discursive community.
Practical significance. The framework suggested in this paper for emerging transformative agency in writing for publication might imply an alternative to the institutional training courses. Three cycles of expansive learning aim to develop the author’s publication competence and improve the quality of research articles.
About the Author
S. A. SheypakRussian Federation
Svetlana A. Sheypak – Cand. Sci. (Education), Associate Professor, Department of Foreign Languages, Philological Faculty
Scopus Author ID 36237763700
ResearcherID Z-2539-2019
RSCI AuthorID 480010
Moscow
References
1. Zborovsky G. E., Ambarova P. A. Scientific and pedagogical staff as a social community in the changing conditions of academic development. Obrazovanie i nauka = The Education and Science Journal. 2022; 24 (5): 147–180. DOI: 10.17853/1994-5639-2022-5-147-180 (In Russ.)
2. Vasilyev I. A. The research activity of the university teachers: Directions, results, and prospects. Sociological content. Obrazovanie i nauka = The Education and Science Journal. 2016; 4 (133): 4–18. (In Russ.)
3. Rotgon S. G. Writing centers in Russian universities: Goals, objectives and impediments. Nepreryvnoe obrazovanie: XXI vek = Lifelong Education: The 21st Century. 2019; 1 (25): 1–10. DOI:10.15393/j5.art.2019.4486 (In Russ.)
4. Squires A. Writing centers and academic professionalization in the Russian Federation [Internet]. In: Rajakumar M. (Ed.). Western higher education in global contexts. London: Lexington Books; 2018 [cited 2023 Feb 01]. Available from: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3116658
5. Bryan A., Volchenkova K. N. Practical challenges of the center of academic writing in Russia: South Ural State University experience. Vestnik Juzhno-Ural’skogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Serija: Obrazovanie. Pedagogicheskie nauki = Bulletin of the South Ural State University. Ser. Education. Educational Sciences. 2017; 9 (1): 36–41. DOI: 10.14529/ped170105
6. Li Y., Flowerdew J. Teaching English for Research Publication Purposes (ERPP): A review of language teachers’ pedagogical initiatives. English for Specific Purposes. 2020; 59: 29–41. DOI: 10.1016/j.esp.2020.03.002
7. Habibie P. Writing for scholarly publication in a Canadian higher education context: A case study. In: Badenhorst C., Guerin C. (Eds.). Research literacies and writing pedagogies for masters and doctoral writers. Leiden: Brill; 2016. p. 51–67.
8. Uzuner S. Multilingual scholars’ participation in core/global academic communities: A literature review. Journal of English for Academic Purposes. 2008; 7 (4): 250–263. DOI: 10.1016/j.jeap.2008.10.007
9. Hyland K. Participation in publishing: The demoralizing discourse of disadvantage. In: Habibie P., Hyland K. (Eds.). Novice writers and scholarly publication. London: Palgrave; 2019. p. 13–33. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-95333-5_2
10. Badenhorst C., Guerin C. Post/graduate research literacies and writing pedagogies [Internet]. In: Badenhorst C., Guerin C. (Eds.). Research literacies and writing pedagogies for masters and doctoral writers. Leiden: Brill; 2016 [cited 2023 Feb 01]. p. 3–28. Available from: https://digital.library.adelaide.edu.au/dspace/bitstream/2440/96162/2/hdl_96162.pdf
11. Ivanič R. I is for interpersonal: Discoursal construction of writer identities and the teaching of writing. Linguistics and Education. 1994; 6 (1): 3–15. DOI: 10.1016/0898-5898(94)90018-3
12. Dugartsyrenova V. A. Supporting genre instruction with an online academic writing tutor: Insights from novice L2 writers. Journal of English for Academic Purposes. 2020; 44: 1–14. DOI: 10.1016/j.jeap.2019.100830
13. Alen’kina T. B. Rhetorical component: From experience of teaching academic writing course. Filologicheskie nauki. Voprosy teorii i praktiki = Philological Sciences. Issues of Theory and Practice [Internet]. 2018 [cited 2023 Feb 01]; 5: 110–113. Available from: https://vovr.elpub.ru/jour/article/view/1373 (In Russ.)
14. Strokova T. А. Building research competence of PhD students: An analysis of experience of a PhD school. Obrazovanie i nauka = The Education and Science Journal. 2018; 10 (20): 9–30. DOI: 10.17853/1994-5639-2018-10-9-30 (In Russ.)
15. Casanave C. P. Does writing for publication ever get easier? Some reflections from an experienced scholar [Internet]. In: Habibie P., Hyland K. (Eds.). Novice writers and scholarly publication. London: Palgrave; 2019 [cited 2023 Feb 01]. p. 135–151. Available from: https://typeset.io/papers/does-writing-for-publication-ever-get-easier-some-3al51amoq0
16. Flowerdew J. Discourse community, legitimate peripheral participation, and the nonnative-English-speaking scholar. TESOL Quarterly. 2000; 34 (1): 127–150. DOI: 10.2307/3588099
17. Korotkina I. B. English for research publication purposes as a new field of educational studies. Otechestvennaya i zarubezhnaya pedagogika = National and Foreign Pedagogy [Internet]. 2018 [cited 2023 Feb 01]; 1 (4): 115–130. Available from: https://ozp.instrao.ru/images/nomera/OZP_4_2_53_2018.pdf (In Russ.)
18. Bazanova E. M., Korotkina I. B. Russian writing centers consortium. Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii = Higher Education in Russia [Internet]. 2017 [cited 2023 Feb 01]; 4: 50–57. Available from: https://vovr. elpub.ru/jour/article/view/1009 (In Russ.)
19. Kempenaar L., Murray R. Analysis of writing programmes for academics: Application of a transactional and systems approach. Studies in Higher Education. 2018; 43 (12): 2371–2384. DOI: 10.1080/03075079.2017.1329817
20. Sorokin P. S., Vyatskaya Yu. A. International expert agenda in education: Key characteristics and problem areas. Obrazovanie i nauka = The Education and Science Journal. 2022; 24 (1): 11–52. DOI: 10.17853/1994-5639-2022-1-11-52 (In Russ.)
21. Ahearn L. M. Language and agency. Annual Review of Anthropology. 2001; 30 (1): 109–137. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.anthro.30.1.109
22. Flowerdew L. The Academic Literacies approach to scholarly writing: A view through the lens of the ESP/Genre approach. Studies in Higher Education. 2020; 3: 579–591. DOI: 10.1080/03075079.2019.1576165
23. Kwan B. S. An investigation of instruction in research publishing offered in doctoral programs: The Hong Kong case. Higher Education. 2010; 59 (1): 55–68.
24. Corcoran J. N., Englander K., Muresan L.-M. (Editors). Pedagogies and policies for publishing research in English: Local initiatives supporting international scholars. London: Routledge, 2019. Available from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/331407968_PEDAGOGIES_AND_POLICIES_FOR_PUBLISHING_RESEARCH_IN_ENGLISH_LOCAL_INITIATIVES_SUPPORTING_INTERNATIONAL_SCHOLARS (date of access: 01.02.2023).
25. Bennett K. The political and economic infrastructure of academic practice: The ‘semiperiphery’ as a category for social and linguistic analysis. In: Bennett K. (Ed.). The semiperiphery of academic writing. London: Palgrave; 2015. p. 1–9. DOI: 10.1057/9781137351197_1
26. Hanauer D. I., Sheridan C. L., Englander K. Linguistic injustice in the writing of research articles in English as a second language: Data from Taiwanese and Mexican researchers. Written Communication. 2019; 36 (1): 136–154. DOI: 10.1177/0741088318804821
27. Swales J. M. Envoi. In: Corcoran J. N., Englander K., Muresan L.-M. (Eds.). Pedagogies and policies for publishing research in English [Internet]. London: Routledge; 2019 [cited 2023 Feb 02]. p. 284– 290. Available from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/331407968
28. Shchemeleva I. “There’s no discrimination, these are just the rules of the game”: Russian scholars’ perception of the research writing and publication process in English. Publications, MDPI. 2021; 9 (1): 1–21. DOI: 10.3390/publications9010008
29. Zheng Y., Cao Y. Publishing research in English for Chinese multilingual scholars in language-related disciplines: Towards a biliteracy approach. In: Corcoran J. N., Englander K., Muresan L.-M. (Eds.). Pedagogies and policies for publishing research in English. London: Routledge; 2019. p. 161–175.
30. Lave J., Wenger E. Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1991. 138 p.
31. Starfield S., Paltridge B. Journal editors: Gatekeepers or custodians? In: Habibie P., Hyland K. (Eds.). Novice writers and scholarly publication. London: Palgrave; 2019. p. 253–270.
32. Porter J. E. Intertextuality and the discourse community. Rhetoric Review. 1986; 5 (1): 34–47. DOI: 10.1016/j.jeap.2008.10.007
33. Kwan B. S. Reading in preparation for writing a PhD thesis: Case studies of experiences. Journal of English for Academic Purposes. 2009; 8 (3): 180–191. DOI: 10.1016/j.jeap.2009.02.001
34. Sheypak S. A. Publishing a research article: a dialogue between the author and the journal. Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii = Higher Education in Russia. 2021; 30 (3): 151–168. DOI: 10.31992/0869-3617-2021-30-3-151-168 (In Russ.)
35. Engeström Y. Learning by expanding: An activity-theoretical approach to developmental research [Internet]. New York: Cambridge University Press; 2015 [cited 2023 Feb 01]. Available from: https://assets.cambridge.org/97811070/74422/frontmatter/9781107074422_frontmatter.pdf
36. Daniels H. Applying activity theory in multiagency settings. Кul’turno-istoricheskaya psikhologiya = Cultural-Historical Psychology. 2016; 12 (3): 15–26. DOI: 10.17759/chp.2016120302 (In Russ.)
37. Virkkunen J., Newnham D. S. The Change Laboratory: A tool for collaborative development of work and education [Internet]. Rotterdam: Springer Science & Business Media; 2013 [cited 2023 Feb 01]. Available from: https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007/978-94-6209-326-3
38. Brevik L. M., Gudmundsdottir G. B., Lund A., Strømme Aanesland T. Transformative agency in teacher education: Fostering professional digital competence. Teaching and Teacher Education: An International Journal of Research and Studies. 2019; 86: 1–15. DOI: 10.1016/j.tate.2019.07.005
39. Martínez-Álvarez P., López-Velásquez A., Kajamaa A. Preparing educators for inclusive bilingual education: A boundary crossing laboratory between professional groups. Кul’turno-istoricheskaya psikhologiya = Cultural-Historical Psychology. 2021; 17 (3): 125–134. DOI: 10.17759/chp.2021170316
40. Rivera Maulucci M. S., Brotman J. S., Fain S. S. Fostering structurally transformative teacher agency through science professional development. Journal of Research in Science Teaching. 2015; 52 (4): 545–559. DOI: 10.1002/tea.21222
41. Engeström Y. Ascending from the abstract to the concrete as a principle of expansive learning. Psikhologicheskaya nauka i obrazovanie = Psychological Science and Education. 2020; 25 (5): 31–43. DOI: 10.17759/pse.2020250503
42. Engeström Y., Nuttall J., Hopwood N. Transformative agency by double stimulation: Advances in theory and framework. Pedagogy, Culture & Society. 2022; 30 (1): 1–7. DOI: 10.1080/14681366.2020.1805499
43. Haapasaari A., Engeström Y., Kerosuo H. The emergence of learners’ transformative agency in a Change Laboratory intervention. Journal of Education and Work. 2016; 29 (2): 232–262. DOI: 10.1080/13639080.2014.900168
44. Li M., Garcia Mayo P. Participation and interaction in wiki-based collaborative writing: An activity theory perspective. In: García Mayo M. P. (Ed.). Working collaboratively in second/foreign language learning. Boston/Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton; 2021. p. 227–248. DOI: 10.1515/9781501511318-010
45. Li M., Kim D. One wiki, two groups: Dynamic interactions across ESL collaborative writing tasks. Journal of Second Language Writing. 2016; 31: 25–42. DOI: 10.1016/j.jslw.2016.01.002
46. Vygotskii L. S. Myshlenie i rech’: Psikhologicheskie issledovaniya = Thinking and speech: Psychological studies. Moscow: Publishing House Nacional’noe obrazovanie; 2019. 368 p. (In Russ.)
47. Robotova A. S. Invisible laboratory of university lecturer’s mental work. Vysshee obrazovaniev Rossii = Higher Education in Russia [Internet]. 2016 [cited 2023 Feb 01]; 10. Available from: https://vovr.elpub.ru/jour/article/view/3661 (In Russ).
48. Zyryanov V. V. Research supervisor: Between the challenges of time and the realities of higher education. Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii = Higher Education in Russia. 2019; 28 (10): 25–37. DOI: 10.31992/0869-3617-2019-28-10-25-37 (In Russ.)
49. Dolzhenko R. A., Lobova S. V. Interrelation between the employment precarization and labour mobility of scientific and pedagogical workers of regional high schools: problem statement. Universitetskoe upravlenie: praktika i analiz = University Management: Practice and Analysis. 2018; 22 (2): 83–96. DOI: 10.15826/umpa.2018.02.019 (In Russ.)
50. Efimova G. Z., Sorokin A. N., Gribovskiy M. V. Ideal teacher of higher school: Personal qualities and socio-professional competencies. Obrazovanie i nauka = The Education and Science Journal. 2021; 23 (1): 202–230. DOI: 10.17853/1994-5639-2021-1-202-230 (In Russ.)
51. Popova N., Moiseenko Y., Beavitt T. Conformity in Modern Science: An Engine of Societal Transformation. Changing Societies & Personalities. 2017; 1 (3): 237–258. DOI:10.15826/csp.2017.1.3.017
52. Kuleshova A. V., Podvoyskiy D. G. Paradoxes of publication activity in the field of contemporary Russian Science: Genesis, diagnosis, trends. Monitoring obshhestvennogo mnenija: Jekonomicheskie i social’nye peremeny = Monitoring of Public Opinion: Economic and Social Changes. 2018; 4 (146): 169–210. DOI: 10.14515/monitoring.2018.4.10 (In Russ.)
53.
Review
For citations:
Sheypak S.A. Author’s agency in a research article: From the grammar of language to the grammar of communication. The Education and science journal. 2023;25(7):44-68. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17853/1994-5639-2023-7-44-68