Ensuring the unity of the federal system of scientific and methodological support for teacher professional development: Opportunities and risks
https://doi.org/10.17853/1994-5639-2023-9-12-43
Abstract
Introduction. Currently, the creation of conditions for the continuing professional development of teaching staff is one of the most relevant and discussed problems in international studies. This article suggests a solution to this problem through the integration of the resources of the education system to create a single educational space that may be of interest to the world pedagogical and scientific community. A number of documents aimed at ensuring the transition to a unified federal system of scientific and methodological support for teacher professional development are widely discussed in the Russian Federation. In this regard, an attempt has been made to identify and assess the attitude of Russian teachers and heads to the principles and directions towards the creation of the unified federal system of scientific and methodological support, and to determine resources to solve the problems outlined in the state order, taking into account the request, suggestions and evaluations of teaching staff. The research results presented in the article also meet the needs of world educational systems to build a systematic model of the continuing professional development for teachers, without which it is impossible to ensure the sustainable development of national education systems.
Aim. The present research aims to determine priorities, ways and means of ensuring the unity of the federal system of scientific and methodological support for teacher professional development.
Methodology and research methods. The methodological basis of the research is the system-based, integrative-variable and subject-oriented approaches. The leading method in the study is the analysis of pedagogical workers’ ideas about effective ways and formats of their professional development in an integrated educational space for more effective implementation of state educational policy, improving the quality of education in general and individual results of educational and pedagogical activities. To collect empirical research data, questionnaires were used. The questionnaires were developed on the basis of a comparative analysis of regulatory and legal documents defining the conceptual foundations for the construction of the unified federal system of scientific and methodological support, as well as an analysis of problems and trends in the continuing teacher training. The discussion of certain aspects of supporting teacher professional development in focus groups of teachers and heads of educational organisations was organised. The empirical study involved 7343 respondents from different regions of the Russian Federation.
Results. It is revealed that, according to the respondents, the main priority of the state policy of the Russian Federation in relation to the professional development of teaching staff is the creation of the unified federal system of scientific and methodological support to teaching staff. The study participants outlined the basic principles of the construction of the unified federal system of scientific and methodological support: the compliance of the formed unified federal system of scientific and methodological support with priority tasks in the field of education; the implementation of network interaction between subjects of scientific and methodological activity; joint planning and decision-making at the federal and regional levels; orientation and prompt response to professional deficits and requests of teaching staff and management personnel in conditions of rapid development of society and the education system. Among the urgent problems, hindering the development of scientific and methodological support systems, there is a lack of a unified approach to organising the activities of scientific and methodological services to support teaching staff at the regional and municipal levels; weak connection between scientific research and real pedagogical and managerial practice; lack of mechanisms for the formation of individual educational routes of continuing professional development of teaching staff and management personnel. It can be considered that the main ways and means of modernisation of the systems of teacher professional development are as follows: material and moral stimulation of teachers to professional development; improvement of the system of formal continuing professional education; the use of resource contexts of non-formal and informal continuing professional education, and other means.
Scientific novelty. The scientific novelty of the research consists in generalising the existing trends and problems of building regional systems of teacher professional development in accordance with the priorities of the state educational policy; determining priority tasks, directions, ways and means of integrating regional educational systems into a single scientific and methodological space of the Russian Federation.
Practical significance. The practical significance of the study lies in the fact that the research findings can be used to solve the problems of integrating the regions of the Russian Federation into a single scientific and methodological space.
Keywords
About the Authors
A. V. ZolotarevaRussian Federation
Angelina V. Zolotareva – Dr. Sci. (Education), Professor, Department of Pedagogical Technologies
Yaroslavl
L. V. Bayborodova
Russian Federation
Lyudmila V. Bayborodova – Dr. Sci. (Education), Professor, Head of the Department of Pedagogical Technologies
Yaroslavl
M. V. Gruzdev
Russian Federation
Mikhail V. Gruzdev – Dr. Sci. (Education), Associate Professor, Rector
Yaroslavl
I. G. Kharisova
Russian Federation
Inga G. Kharisova – Cand. Sci. (Education), Associate Professor, Department of Pedagogical Technologies
ResearcherID AAG-6060-2019
Yaroslavl
References
1. Heinz M. Why choose teaching? An international review of empirical studies exploring student teachers’ career motivations and levels of commitment to teaching. Educational Research and Evaluation. 2015; 21 (3): 258–297. DOI: 10.1080/13803611.2015.1018278
2. Brok P. D., Wubbels T., Tartwijk J. V. Exploring beginning teachers’ attrition in the Netherlands. Teachers and Teaching. 2017; 23 (8): 881–895. DOI: 10.1080/13540602.2017.1360859
3. Bondarenko N. V. Formation of continuous education in Russia: Analysis based on the results of all-Russian surveys of the adult population of the country. Monitoring jekonomiki obrazovanija. Informacionnyj bjulleten’ = Monitoring of Education Economy. Newsletter [Internet]. 2017 [cited 2023 Aug 20]; 5 (104). Available from: https://www.hse.ru/data/2017/03/30/1168527235/%23104.pdf (In Russ.)
4. Serkova D. Chto takoe nepreryvnoe obrazovanie? Institut nepreryvnogo obrazovanija = What is continuing education? Institute for continuing education. FB.ru: informacionno-spravochnyj portal = FB.ru: information-reference portal [Internet]. 2017 [cited 2023 Aug 20]. Available from: http://fb.ru/article/316277/chto-takoe-nepreryivnoe-obrazovanie-institutnepreryivnogo-obrazovaniya (In Russ.)
5. Tarkhanova I. Continuing education in the life strategies adults. In: Society. Integration. Education. Proceedings of the International Scientific Conference; 2017 May 26–27; Rezekne. Vol. III. Rezekne: Rezeknes Academy of Technologies; 2017. p. 556–564. DOI: 10.17770/sie2017vol2.2294
6. Akhmedov A. E., Smolyaninova I. V., Shatalov V. A. The system of continuing education as a driver for improving professional competencies. Nepreryvnoe obrazovanie innovacionnyj podhod = Continuous Education is an Innovative Approach [Internet]. 2016 [cited 2023 Aug 20]; 3: 26–28. Available from: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/sistema-nepreryvnogo-obrazovaniya-kak-drayver-sovershenstvovaniya-professionalnyh-kompetentsiy/viewer (In Russ.)
7. Cherednichenko G. A. Russian youth in the education system: From level to level. Voprosy obrazovaniya = Educational Studies Moscow. 2017; 3: 152–182. DOI: 10.17323/1814-9545-2017-3-152-182 (In Russ.)
8. Bagnall R. G. Lifelong learning: Concepts and conceptions. International Journal of Lifelong Education [Internet]. 2000 [cited 2023 Aug 20]; 19 (1): 20–35. Available from: https://libgen.ggfwzs.net/ireader/29034638
9. Griffin C. From education policy to lifelong learning strategies. In: Jarvis P. (Ed.). The age of learning [Internet]. London: Kogan Page; 2001 [cited 2023 Aug 20]. p. 41–54. Available from: https://www.taylorfrancis.com/chapters/edit/10.4324/9781315042459-6/education-policy-lifelong-learn-ing-strategies-colin-griffin
10. Egetenmeyer R., Schmidt-Lauff S., Boffo V. Adult learning and education in international contexts. Forthcoming challenges for its professionalisation. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang GmbH; 2017. DOI: 10.3726/b11144
11. Ainley J., Carstens R. Teaching and Learning International Survey (TALIS) Conceptual Framework. In: OECD Education Working Papers 2018. № 187. Paris: OECD Publishing; 2018. DOI: 10.1787/799337c2-en
12. Buonomo I., et al. Unravelling teacher job satisfaction: The contribution of collective efficacy and emotions towards professional role. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2020; 17: 736. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph17030736
13. Creasy K. L. Defining professionalism in teacher education programs. Journal of Education & Social Policy [Internet]. 2015 [cited 2023 Aug 20]; 2 (2): 23–25. Available from: https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED563997.pdf
14. Danielson C. Danielson’s framework for teaching evaluation. Children & Schools. 2011; 33: 61-63. DOI: 10.1093/cs/33.1.61
15. Schleicher А. TALIS 2018. Teaching and Learning International Survey Insights and Interpretations [Internet]. 2018 [cited 2023 Aug 20]. Available from: https://www.oecd.org/education/talis/TA-LIS2018_insights_and_interpretations.pdf.
16. Ansimova N. P. Obosnovanie i operacionalizacija ponjatija “kachestvo nepreryvnogo pedagogicheskogo obrazovanija” na osnove modeli universal’nyh pedagogicheskih kompetencij = Justification and operationalization of the concept of “quality of continuing pedagogical education” on the basis of a model of universal pedagogical competencies. In: Tarkhanova I. Yu. (Ed.). Metodologija edinogo obrazovatel’nogo prostranstva podgotovki pedagogov = Methodology of unified educational space for training teachers [Internet]. Yaroslavl: Yaroslavl State Pedagogical University named after K. D. Ushinsky; 2022 [cited 2023 Aug 20]. p. 87–108. Available from: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?edn=auqlhu (In Russ.)
17. Mitina L. M. Lichnostno-professional’noe razvitie uchitelja: strategii, resursy, riski = Personal and professional development of a teacher: Strategies, resources, risks [Internet]. Moscow, St. Petersburg: Publishing House Nestor-Istoriya; 2018 [cited 2023 Aug 20]. 454 p. Available from: https://chitat-online.org/str/lichnostno-professionalnoe-razvitie-uchitelya-strategii (In Russ.)
18. Tarkhanova I. Yu. Edinoe obrazovatel’noe prostranstvo podgotovki pedagogov: istorija i sovremennost’ = Unified educational space for training of teachers: History and modernity. In: Tarkhanova I. Yu. (Ed.). Metodologija edinogo obrazovatel’nogo prostranstva podgotovki pedagogov = Methodology of unified educational space for training teachers [Internet]. Yaroslavl: Yaroslavl State Pedagogical University named after K. D. Ushinsky; 2022 [cited 2023 Aug 20]. p. 9–24. Available from: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?edn=auqlhu (In Russ.)
19. Kharisova I. G. Value-semantic model of formation of successive results in teacher training. Vestnik Kostromskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Serija: Pedagogika. Psihologija. Sociokinetika = Bulletin of Kostroma State University. Series: Pedagogy. Psychology. Sociokinetics. 2021; 27 (4): 257–264. DOI: 10.34216/2073-1426-2021-27-4-257-264 (In Russ.)
20. Khutorskoy A. V. Metodologija innovacionnoj praktiki v obrazovanii = Methodology of innovative practice in education. Moscow: Publishing House Ridero; 2021 [cited 2023 Aug 20]. 162 p. Available from: https://online-biblio.tk/bookid_64335291/ (In Russ.)
21. Kyriacou C., Coulthard M. Undergraduates’ views of teaching as a career choice. Journal of Education for Teaching. 2000; 26: 117–126. DOI: 10.1080/02607470050127036
22. Richardson P. W., Watt H. M. G. Who chooses teaching and why? Profiling characteristics and motivations across three Australian universities. Asia Pacific Journal of Teacher Education. 2006; 34: 27-56. DOI: 10.1080/13598660500480290
23. Flores M. A., Day C. Contexts which shape and reshape new teachers’ identities: A multi-perspective study. Teaching and Teacher Education. 2012; 22 (2): 219–132. DOI: 10.1016/j.tate.2005.09.002
24. Smak M., Walczak D. The prestige of the teaching profession in the perception of teachers and former teachers. Edukacja [Internet]. 2017 [cited 2023 Aug 20]; Nov: 22–40. Available from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/321190505_The_prestige_of_the_teaching_profession_in_the_perception_of_teachers_and_former_teachers
25. Manning M., Patterson J. Unfulfilled promise: Ensuring quality teachers for our Nation’s schools. Childhood Education [Internet]. 2005 [cited 2023 Aug 20]; 1 (4): 249–250. Available from: https://archive.org/details/ERIC_ED485953
26. Serikov V. V. Continuous self-education as a professional function of a teacher. In: Obrazovanie cherez vsju zhizn’: nepreryvnoe obrazovanie v interesah ustojchivogo razvitija: Materialy vtorogo jetapa 15-j mezhdunarodnoj nauchno-prakticheskoj konferencii = Long Life Learning: Continuing Education for Sustainable Development. Materials of the Second Stage of the 15th International Scientific and Practical Conference [Internet]. Yaroslavl: Yaroslavl State Pedagogical University named after K. D. Ushinsky; 2017 [cited 2023 Aug 20]; p. 20–24. Available from: https://conf.yspu.org/wp-content/uploads/sites/12/2018/01/Elektron-noe-izdanie-Teh.red.-Sbornik-YUdin-ITOG-2.pdf (In Russ.)
27. Zolotareva A. V. Continuity in the training and professional development of personnel in the field of additional education of children: Problems and options for solving them. Upravlenie obrazovaniem = Education Management [Internet]. 2017 [cited 2023 Aug 20]; 4: 81–92. Available from: https://narodnoe.org/journals/upravlenie-obrazovaniem/2017-4/preemstvennost-v-podgotovke-i-professionalnom-raz-vitii-kadrov-sferi-dopolnitelnogo-obrazovaniya-deteiy-problemi-i-varianti-ih-resheniya (In Russ.)
28. Zolotareva A. V. Scientific and methodological foundations for ensuring professional and career growth of a teacher in the field of additional education of children. Jaroslavskij pedagogicheskij vestnik = Yaroslavl Pedagogical Bulletin [Internet]. 2018 [cited 2023 Aug 20]; 4: 89–98. Available from: http://vest-nik.yspu.org/releases/2018_4/14.pdf (In Russ.)
29. Schleicher A. Preparing teachers and developing school leaders for the 21st century: Lessons from around the world [Internet]. OECD Publishing; 2021 [cited 2023 Aug 20]. Available from: https://www.arlindovsky.net/wp-content/uploads/2012/03/Preparing-Teachers-and-Developing-School-Lead-ers-for-the-21st-Century.pdf
30. Li J., Li J. Educational policy development in China in the 21st century: A multi-flows approach. Beijing International Review of Education [Internet]. 2019 [cited 2023 Aug 20]; 1 (1): 196–220. Available from: https://brill.com/view/journals/bire/1/1/article-p196_196.xml?language=en&ebody=cited-by-67985
Review
For citations:
Zolotareva A.V., Bayborodova L.V., Gruzdev M.V., Kharisova I.G. Ensuring the unity of the federal system of scientific and methodological support for teacher professional development: Opportunities and risks. The Education and science journal. 2023;25(9):12-43. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17853/1994-5639-2023-9-12-43