Publication activity of Russian university students

Introduction. An investigation of student publication activity is an important element of the study of their research culture. The authors’ attention is focused on student publications in highly ranked journals reflecting the involvement of students in “adult” university science and making a serious contribution to it. A research on student publication activity is attracting considerable interest due to its significance for university scientific and educational practices, whereas this issue is not closely examined in theoretical and empirical terms.
Aim. The present paper aims to consider the features of the publication activity of students of Russian universities in the segment of highly ranked journals. It is revealed by solving the following research issues: evaluation of students’ attitude to publication activity; characterisation of quantitative indicators of students’ publication activity in highly ranked journals; identification of the specifics of students’ publication activity depending on belonging to different fields of scientific knowledge, level of training and other indicators.
Methodology and research methods. The article presents the results of an empirical study conducted in 2023 using the methods of an online survey of students of Russian universities localised in all federal districts (n = 3032 people), as well as applying content analysis of highly rated journals (indexed in RSCI, WoS, Scopus). The results and conclusions of the authors’ research are compared with Russian and foreign studies on similar topics.
Results. The main results of the study are the characteristics of the place of publication activity in the general structure of students’ research activities. Despite the fact that the preparation of articles is one of the most popular forms of research, it is shown that a small number of students are involved in youth science on a permanent basis. It is concluded that the authors of publications in highly ranked journals represent a special group of students, distinguished by cognitive and motivational readiness for such activities.
The article presents the features of the publication activity of a selected group of students: gender
asymmetry (predominance of female students among authors); multiple authorship; an increase in the degree of publication activity from junior to senior courses, from bachelor’s degree (specialty) to master’s degree. The question of the ethical side of student publications is discussed. It is justified as a promising area of research.
Various factors of success of student publications in the segment of highly ranked journals are discussed. The factors are as follows: involvement in research practices on a regular basis, the presence of a scientific mentor. In conclusion, the possibilities of using various theoretical frameworks for interpreting the publication activity of students are considered.
Scientific novelty of the research consists in the introduction into scientific circulation of new empirical data representing the all-Russian situation with the publication activity of students of the first two levels of education (bachelor’s/specialist’s and master’s degree), as well as their interpretation in a comparative perspective with foreign studies.
Practical significance of the article is the possibility of using the results and conclusions of the current study in the development of university programmes for involving students in research and scientific mentoring.

1. Scholtz D. Improving writing practices of students’ academic literacy development. Journal for Language Teaching. 2016; 50 (2): 37–55. DOI: 10.4314/jlt.v50i2.2

2. Gamidova L. V. Organizational and methodological aspects of teaching academic writing in a linguistic university on an interdisciplinary basis. Voprosy metodiki prepodavaniya v vuze = Teaching Methodology in Higher Education. 2021; 10 (37): 16–29. DOI: 10.18720/HUM/ISSN2227-8591.37.02 (In Russ.)

3. Belyaeva E. G. Methodological model of teaching academic writing to undergraduate students. Focus on Language Education and Research. 2022; 3 (1): 36–51. DOI: 10.35213/2686-7516-2022-3-1-36-51

4. Abramova I. E., Ananyina A. V. Systematic approach to teaching academic writing: Practical experience. Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii = Higher Education in Russia. 2021; 30 (7): 105–116. DOI: 10.31992/0869-3617-2021-30-7-105-116 (In Russ.)

5. Campbell M. Teaching academic writing in higher education. Education Quarterly Reviews. 2019; 2 (3): 608–614. DOI: 10.31014/aior.1993.02.03.92

6. Korotkina I. B. Academic writing in Russia: The urge for interdisciplinary studies. Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii = Higher Education in Russia. 2018; 27 (10): 64–74. DOI: 10.31992/0869-3617-2018-27-10-64-74 (In Russ.)

7. Savarese C. Understanding writing center use among community college students. Hempstead: Hofstra University; 2020. 30 р.

8. Uysal H.H., B. Selvi B. Writing centers as a solution to the problems of international scholars in writing for publication. International Online Journal of Education and Teaching [Internet]. 2021 [cited 2023 Аpr 30]; 8 (1): 288–309. Available from: https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1286514.pdf

9. Bazanova E. M. Laboratory of scientific communication: Russian experience. Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii = Higher Education in Russia. 2015; 8–9: 135–143. (In Russ.)

10. Gottlieb L. N. The quality of student papers. Canadian Journal of Nursing Research Archive. 2002; 34 (4): 3–6.

11. Tsigaris P. Formalized journal-style review process: Improving the quality of students’ work. Frontiers of Education. 2021; 6: 701978. DOI: 10.3389/feduc.2021.701978

12. Ananyina A. V. Student scientific article in the context of academic writing (based on the materials of the journal “StudArctic Forum”). Nepreryvnoe obrazovanie: XXI vek = Lifelong Education: The 21st Century. 2022; 3 (39). DOI: 10.15393/j5.art.2022.7845 (In Russ.)

13. Kiryushina M. A., Alekseeva Ya. I., Rudakov V. N. Prepodavatel’skie praktiki sotrudnikov vuzov i nauchnyh organizacij: informacionnyj byulleten’ = Teaching practices of employees of universities and scientific organizations: Newsletter. Moscow: Higher School of Economics; 2023. 40 p. (In Russ.)

14. Yurchenko I. Y. Publication of students’ articles: Science or the pursuit of a rating? (based on the material of the historiography of the Cossacks in 2016–2017). Vestnik NMS = Bulletin of the NMS. 2018; 11: 174–182. (In Russ.)

15. Aquino-Canchari C. R., Osco-Mueras A. J., Santivañez-Isla L. A., Huamán Castillón K. M. Accessibility to student publication in dental journals in the world. Brazilian Journal of Oral Sciences. 2022; 21: e226694. DOI: 10.20396/bjos.v21i00.8666694

16. Jensen E., Yordanova D., Denhard L., Zazzi K., Mejia J., Shar T., Iseman J., Hoeniges T., Mitchell M. Engaging undergraduate student-athletes in research and publication opportunities. The Sport Journal [Internet]. 2022 [cited 2023 Аpr 30]. Available from: https://thesportjournal.org/article/engaging-undergraduate-student-athletes-in-research-and-publication-opportunities/

17. Parker S. M., Vona-Davis L. C., Mattes M. D. Factors predictive of publication among medical students participating in school-sponsored research programs. Cureus. 2021; 13 (9): e18176. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.18176

18. Wilton A., Pananwala H. Publication in the Australian medical student journal is associated with future academic success: A matched-cohort study. BMC Medical Education. 2022; 22: 586. DOI: 10.1186/s12909-022-03607-0

19. Al-Busaidi I. S., Wells C. I., Wilkinson T. J. Publication in a medical student journal predicts short- and long-term academic success: a matched-cohort study. BMC Medical Education. 2019; 19 (1): 271. DOI: 10.1186/s12909-019-1704-x

20. Waaijer C. J. F., Ommering B. W. C., van der Wurff L. J., van Leeuwen T. N., Dekker F. W. Scientific activity by medical students: The relationship between academic publishing during medical school and publication careers after graduation. Perspectives on Medical Education. 2019; 8: 223–229. DOI: 10.1007/s40037-019-0524-3

21. Markin D. A., Yakovenko N. S., Varnavskaia E. V. Analysis of student publication activity in the field of medical sciences. Molodezhnyj innovacionnyj byulleten’ = Youth Innovative Bulletin. 2019 [cited 2023 May 02]; 8 (2): 562–563. Available from: https://www.new.vestnik-surgery.com/index.php/2415-7805/article/view/5763 (In Russ.)

22. Vasilyeva E. V., Nastusheva T. L., Kulakova E. N., Neverov A. V. Publication activity of future pediatricians: Analysis of current practice. Rossijskij vestnik perinatologii i pediatrii = Russian Bulletin of Perinatology and Pediatrics. 2022; 2: 114–120. DOI: 10.21508/1027-4065-2022-67-2-114-120 (In Russ.)

23. Bazhenov R. I. Arranging student scientific research as an educational technology: The Experience of regional universities of Russia. Education Research International. 2019; 2019: 8358954. DOI: 10.1155/2019/8358954

24. Kanaeva L. V. Causes and correction of publication deviations in “student science”. Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii = Higher Education in Russia. 2017; 12: 112–119. (In Russ.)

25. Kim N. J., Kim M. K. Teacher’s perceptions of using an artificial intelligence-based educational tool for scientific writing. Frontiers of Education. 2022; 7: 755914. DOI: 10.3389/feduc.2022.755914

26. Babl F. E., Babl M. P. Generative artificial intelligence: Can ChatGPT write a quality abstract? Emergency Medicine Australasia. 2023; 10. DOI: 10.1111/1742-6723.14233

27. Shcheglova I. A., Dremova O. V. Vneuchebnaja dejatel’nost’ kak faktor akademicheskoj uspeshnosti studentov: informacionnyj bjulleten’ = Extracurricular activities as a factor of academic success of students: Newsletter. Moscow: Higher School of Economics; 2022. 36 p. (In Russ.)

28. Kogan E. A. Attitude of university students to research work. Chelovecheskij kapital = Human Capital. 2020; 8: 179–187. (In Russ.)

29. Assar A., Matar S. G., Hasabo E. A., et al. Knowledge, attitudes, practices and perceived barriers towards research in undergraduate medical students of six Arab countries. BMC Medical Education. 2022; 22 (1): 44. DOI: 10.1186/s12909-022-03121-3

30. Ferguson L. M., Yonge O., Myrick F. Students’ involvement in faculty research: Ethical and methodological issues. International Journal of Qualitative Methods. 2004; 3 (4): 56–68. DOI: 10.1177/160940690400300405

31. Riantoputra C. D. Multiple authorship: Gold mines or booby traps? Makara Human Behavior Studies in Asia. 2019; 23 (1): 1. DOI: 10.7454/hubs.asia.1310719

32. Macfarlane B. The ethics of multiple authorship: Power, performativity and the gift economy. Studies in Higher Education. 2015; 42 (7): 1194–1210. DOI: 10.1080/03075079.2015.1085009

33. Schoenherr J. R. Social-cognitive barriers to ethical authorship. Frontiers in Psychology. 2015; 6: 877. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00877

34. Nasser R. N., Alkhateeb H. Students learning about research through the process of publishing academic papers in Qatar. Near and Middle Eastern Journal of Research in Education. 2013; 2013 (1): 1. DOI: 10.5339/nmejre.2013.1

35. Putsche L., Storrs D., Lewis A., Haylett J. The development of a mentoring program for university undergraduate women. Cambridge Journal of Education. 2008; 38 (4): 513–528. DOI: 10.1080/03057640802482322

36. Stockemer D., Reidy T., Teodoro A., Gerba G. Student publishing in peer reviewed journals: Evidence from the International Political Science Review. Learned Publishing. 2022; 35 (3): 341–349. DOI: 10.1002/leap.1468