University management: Technology for monitoring the reputation of an educational brand

Introduction. The processes of formation of a multipolar world lead to changes in higher education. An important consequence of the ongoing changes is the reorientation of the activities of universities to the domestic market, the development of new educational programmes, and learning technologies. Against the background of growing competition in this direction, the reputation of an educational institution is acquiring an increasing importance in the eyes of various stakeholders.

Aim. The present research aimed to develop a technology for monitoring the reputation of an educational brand based on the opinions of stakeholders. The obtained technology, resulting from the analysis and generalisation of scientific works, was tested in Dostoevsky Omsk State University.

Methodology and research methods. The scientific basis of the research was the methodology of brand management, formed within the framework of the marketing approach to the organisation activities, and the cognitive methodology of research was applied. The authors used the following research methods: the analysis of the external environment, the cognitive methodology of knowledge networks research (ISM analysis), the structural matrix of the interaction of factors (SSIM), and focus groups with representatives of target groups of the public that determine the reputation of an educational brand.

Results. The authors developed the technology for monitoring the reputation of an educational brand. The technology includes: the structural characteristics of the research object; the selected and justified form of control of the managed object; the identified stakeholders of the educational institution; and the described procedure for monitoring the reputation of an educational brand. The key result of the study is that the proposed monitoring technology has a complex nature of analysing the influence of environmental factors on the reputation of the university brand, which allows building a hierarchy of environmental factors, as well as choosing the most effective behaviour strategy in relation to strengthening the reputation of the university in a timely manner. Scientific novelty.

The scientific novelty lies in the development of up-to-date technology for monitoring the reputation of an educational brand, which is available for implementation for any higher school in Russia in terms of labour intensity and financial costs.

Practical significance. The presence of a pool of strategies tied to the results of the implementation of monitoring technology allows communication activities of an educational institution to be immediately adjusted, strengthening its reputation in the market environment.

1. Prohorov A. University reputation management and media risks. Kommunikativnye issledovanija = Communication Studies. 2022; 9 (1): 29–46. DOI: 10.24147/2413-6182.2022.9(1).29-46 (In Russ.)

2. Xiao Y., Nguyen T. T. H., Nguyen H. N., Phan D. Q., Cao T. K., Dao T. H. A. University brand: А systematic literature review. Heliyon. 2023; 9 (6). DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e16825

3. Ivanenko J. A. The image of the organization as a factor in increasing its competitiveness. Vestnik Saratovskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta = Bulletin of Saratov State University [Internet]. 2006 [cited 2023 Jun 01]. Available from: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/imidzh-organizatsii-kak-faktor-povysheniya-ee-konkurentosposobnosti (In Russ.)

4. Lomovceva O. A., Sulimova D. M. University image as a factor in the competitiveness of Russian universities. Vestnik Volzhskogo instituta jekonomiki, pedagogiki i prava = Bulletin of Volga Institute of Economics, Pedagogy and Law [Internet]. 2020 [cited 2023 Jun 01]; 2: 75–80. Available from: https://www.vviepp.ru/images/vviepp2020no2.pdf (In Russ.)

5. Azizi L., Sassen R. How universities’ social responsibility activities influence students’ perceptions of reputation. Journal of Cleaner Production. 2023; 417. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.137963

6. Panda S., Pandey S. C., Bennett A., Tian X. University brand image as competitive advantage: A two-country study. International Journal of Educational Management. 2019; 33 (2): 234–251. DOI: 10.1108/IJEM-12-2017-0374

7. Jevons C. Universities: A prime example of branding going wrong. Journal of Product & Brand Management. 2006; 15 (7): 466–467. DOI: 10.1108/10610420610712856

8. Valitov Sh. M. University brand as a modern way of winning competitive advantage. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences. 2014; 152: 295–299. DOI: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.09.198

9. Popova L. G. Mechanisms for forming the image of an additional education institution. Vostochno-evropejskij nauchnyj zhurnal = East European Scientific Journal [Internet]. 2016 [cited 2023 Jun 01]; 13 (2): 83–86. Available from: https://eesa-journal.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/01/EESJ_13_2.pdf (In Russ.)

10. Sibirev V. V. Social and communicative aspects of university image management. Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo universiteta. Sociologija = Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Sociology [Internet]. 2013 [cited 2023 Jun 01]; 12 (1): 75–80. Available from: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/sotsialno-kommunikativnye-aspekty-upravleniya-imidzhem-vuza (In Russ.)

11. Lektorova Ju. Ju. Designing a university image in the context of public expectations. Vestnik Permskogo nacional’nogo issledovatel’skogo universiteta. Social’no-jekonomicheskie nauki = PNRPU Sociology and Economics Bulletin [Internet]. 2017 [cited 2023 Apr 14]; 2: 67–84. Available from: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/proektirovanie-imidzha-vuza-v-kontekste-obschestvennyh-ozhidaniy (In Russ.)

12. Kaushal V., Ali N. University reputation, brand attachment and brand personality as antecedents of student loyalty: A study in higher education context. Corporate Reputation Review. 2020; 23 (4): 254–266. DOI: 10.1057/s41299-019-00084-y

13. Foroudi P., Nazarian F., Ziyadin S., Kitchen Ph., et al. Co-creating brand image and reputation through stakeholder’s social network. Journal of Business Research. 2020; 114: 42–59. DOI: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.03.035

14. Sirkeci I., O’Leary S. The role of research reputation in choosing a UK Business School and the contrasting perspectives of students and research leaders. The International Journal of Management Education. 2022; 20 (1). DOI: 10.1016/j.ijme.2021.100566

15. Hemsley-Brown J., Melewar T. C., Nguyen B., Wilson E. Exploring brand identity, meaning, image, and reputation (BIMIR) in higher education: A special section. Journal of Business Research. 2016; 69 (8): 3019–3022. DOI: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2016.01.016

16. Novikova U. I., Chernyshjova N. I., Kolesnikova. Assessment of the influence of environmental factors on the formation and further development of industrial and consumer brands in the Russian Federation. Molodoj uchenyj = Young Scientist [Internet]. 2011 [cited 2023 Jan 30]; 2 (25): 126–130. Available from: https://moluch.ru/archive/25/2726/ (In Russ.)

17. Sidorova N. V. Study of university brand perception by target groups (using the example of INRTU). Social’naja kompetentnost’ = Social Competence [Internet]. 2020 [cited 2023 May 01]; 2 (16): 260–270. Available from: http://sociacom.ru/journals/2020-5/n2/a10/ (In Russ.)

18. Malyh S. V. University reputation as the basis for development. Sociologija = Sociology [Internet]. 2020 [cited 2023 May 11]; 2: 281–287. Available from: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/reputatsiya-universiteta-kak-osnova-razvitiya (In Russ.)

19. Gray J. G. Managing the corporate image: The key to public trust. London: Bloomsbury Academic; 1986. 178 p.

20. Davies G., Miles L. Reputation management: Theory versus practice. Corporate Reputation Review. 1998; 1 (1): 16–27. DOI: 10.1057/palgrave.crr.1540064

21. Ind N. The corporate image: Strategies for effective identity programmers. London: Kogan Page; 1990. 205 p.

22. Fombrun Ch., Shanley M. What’s in a name? Reputation building and corporate strategy. Academy of Management Journal. 1990; 33 (2): 233–258. DOI: 10.2307/256324

23. Rekom J. Coorporate idendity: The operationalization of a broad concept. Tinbergen Institute Research Bulletin. 1993; 5 (1): 49–55. DOI: 10.1108/eb060635

24. Balmer J. Corporate branding and connoisseurship. Journal of General Management. 1995; 21 (1): 24–46. DOI: 10.1177/030630709502100102

25. Aaker D. A. Building strong brands [Internet]. New York: Simon & Schuster; 2011 [cited 2023 May 11]. 380 p. Available from: https://www.academia.edu/34383247/David_A_Aaker_Building_Strong_Brands

26. Kotler Ph., Kartajaya H., Setiawan C. Marketing 4.0: Moving from traditional to digital. Canada: John Wiley & Sons; 2016. 208 p.

27. Liu A., Shu Ch., Xiao Zh. Entrepreneurial orientation, political ties, and corporate reputation: The moderating roles of institutional environments. Journal of Business Research. 2024; 170. DOI: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2023.114347

28. Cian L., Cervai S. The Multi-Sensory Sort (MuSeS): A new projective technique to investigate and improve the brand image. Qualitative Market Research. 2011; 14 (2): 138–159. DOI: 10.1108/13522751111120666

29. Dobni D., Zinkhan G. M. In search of brand image: A foundation analysis. Advances in Consumer Research. 2017; 17 (1): 110–119. DOI: 10.4236/jcdsa.2017.74031

30. Keller K. Strategic brand management: Building, measuring, and managing brand equity. 4th edition. London: Pearson; 2013. 608 p.

31. Coj M. E., Zor’kina A. A. Development of a methodology for assessing the essence of a brand (mathematical ranking of factors influencing brand perception). Molodoj uchenyj = Young Scientist [Internet]. 2016 [cited 2023 May 10]; 9 (113): 126–130. Available from: https://moluch.ru/archive/113/28893/ (In Russ.)

32. MacMillan K., Money K., Downing S., Hillenbrand C. Reputation in relationships: Measuring experiences, emotions and behaviors. Corporate Reputation Review. 2005; 8 (2): 214–232. DOI: 10.1057/palgrave.crr.1540251

33. Schuler M. Management of the organizational image: A method for organizational image configuration. Corporate Reputation Review. 2004; 7 (1): 37–53. DOI: 10.1057/palgrave.crr.1540210

34. Shajmardanov Zh. K., et al. On the formation and assessment of the university’s image. Vysshee obrazovanie = Higher Education [Internet]. 2022 [cited 2023 May 09]; 5-6: 15–21. Available from: https://typeset.io/pdf/the-role-of-the-digital-portfolio-of-competencies-in-the-4beq2qrf.pdf (In Russ.)

35. Sidorin D., Prohorov N. Upravlenie reputaciej v Internete = Online reputation management. Moscow: Synergiy Book; 2020. 168 p. (In Russ.)

36. Sun X., Zhang Y., Feng J. Impact of online information on the pricing and profits of firms with different levels of brand reputation. Information & Management. 2024; 61 (1). DOI: 10.1016/j.im.2023.103882

37. Warfield J. Developing interconnected matrices in structural modeling. IEEE Transcript on Systems, Men and Cybernetics. 1974; 4: 51–81. DOI: 10.1109/TSMC.1974.5408524

38. Rezajjan A., Bageri R. Modeling of factors influencing the implementation of knowledge networks. Forsajt i upravlenie NTI = Foresight and Management of NTI. 2018; 12 (1): 56–67. DOI: 10.17323/2500-2597.2018.1.56.67 (In Russ.)

39.