Global problems in education as a research object in international databases: a historical perspective

Introduction. Global problems of modernity and globalisation are appealing to scientists as a research subject not only for understanding their nature, development, and manifestations in various spheres of life (in the case of our study, in education) but also because a comprehensive analysis is essential to combat them. Aim. The study aimed to trace the history of scientific research on the impact of global issues on the education system. It utilised bibliometry to conduct a qualitative content analysis of selected works to identify existing research trends within the topic and factors influencing the research agenda both in Russian Federation and abroad. Methodology and research methods. The research utilizes bibliometric methods and qualitative content analysis of publications (articles, conference proceedings, monographs, and reports) from open-access scientific journals at the final stage of publication. The study also examines statistical reports from the international Scopus database for the period from 1978 to 2023, selected based on bibliometric criteria. Papers were analysed and classified according to their publication periods and the number of citations they received. Based on the results of a qualitative content analysis comparing scientific agendas worldwide and in Russian Federation, the study identified the topics, conceptual foundations, and key participants influencing the resolution of global education issues across various historical periods. Results. Four waves of interest in this topic were identified: 1988–1999, 2000–2012, 2013–2018, and 2019–2023. From 1988 to 1999, all studies can be broadly categorised into two groups: teaching methods and organisation of educational activities. The development of specific trends in the study of global education problems began only between 2000 and 2012. From 2013 to 2018, scientists focused on restructuring the educational process in new conditions. From 2019 to 2023, the focus shifted to the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the organisation and transformation of the educational process. It has been established that the thematic focus of research by Russian scientists and the international scientific community as a whole differs. The authors cite and analyse the possible historical reasons for this divergence. Scientific novelty is ensured by the absence of similar research in the international information space. Practical significance lies in the necessity, given the current socio-economic situation, to highlight global education issues for the purpose of planning and coordinating research efforts.

1. Zagvyazinsky V.I. Global problems of the development of Russian education. Obrazovanie i nauka = The Education and Science Journal. 2005;3. (In Russ.) Accessed February 14, 2024. https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/globalnye-problemy-razvitiya-rossiyskogo-obrazovaniya

2. Bobkov P.M. Globalization and problems of mankind. Vestnik CHelGU = Bulletin of ChelSU. 2007;16. (In Russ.) Accessed February 14, 2024. https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/globalizatsiya-i-problemy-chelovechestva

3. Ursul A.D. Globalistics and globalization studies: the formation of new integrative directions. Filosofskaya mysl’ = Philosophical Thought. 2018;4. (In Russ.) Accessed February 14, 2024. https:// cyberleninka.ru/article/n/globalistika-i-globalizatsionnye-issledovaniya-ctanovlenie-novyh-integrativnyh-napravleniy

4. Belova K.M., Sudakov V.A. Effectiveness of methods for assessing the text relevance. Preprinty IPM im. M. V. Keldysha = Preprints of the M. V. Keldysh Institute of Applied Mathematics. 2020;68. (In Russ.) doi:10.20948/prepr-2020-68

5. Simmons J.S. Tropical medicine and the challenge of global war. The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene. 1947;27(1):1–9. doi:10.4269/ajtmh.1947.s1-27.1.TMs1-270010001

6. Simmons J.S. Tropical medicine and the challenge of global peace. The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene. 1947;27(1):11–19. doi:10.4269/ajtmh.1947.s1-27.11

7. Hopkins R.F., Puchala D.J. Perspectives on the international relations of food international organization. Special Issue: The Global Political Economy of Food. 1978;32(3):581–616. doi:10.1017/S0020818300031878

8. Butler R.N., Adelman R. The Mount Sinai Medical Center, New York. Hospital Physician. 1988;24(3). Accessed February 14, 2024. https://static.ewg.org/reports/asbestos/documents/pdf/Selikoff.pdf

9. Pinfold V., Toulmin H., Thornicroft G., Farmer P., Graham T. Reducing psychiatric stigma and discrimination: evaluation of educational interventions in UK secondary schools. British Journal of Psychiatry. 2003;182:342–346. doi:10.1192/bjp.182.4.342

10. Al-Balas M., Al-Balas H.I., Jaber H.M., Obeidat K., Al-Balas H., Aborajooh E.A. Al-Taher R., Al-Balas B. Distance learning in clinical medical education amid COVID-19 pandemic in Jordan: current situation, challenges, and perspectives. BMC Medical Education. 2020;20(1):341. doi:10.1186/s12909-020-02257-4

11. Ferguson D.L. International trends in inclusive education: the continuing challenge to teach each one and everyone. European Journal of Special Needs Education. 2008;23(2):109–120. doi:10.1080/08856250801946236

12. Sommer M. Where the education system and women’s bodies collide: the social and health impact of girls’ experiences of menstruation and schooling in Tanzania. Journal of Adolescence. 2010;33(4):521–529. doi:10.1016/j.adolescence.2009.03.008

13. Pellegrino E.D. The origins and evolution of bioethics: some personal reflections. Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal. 1999;9(1):73–88. doi:10.1353/ken.1999.0006

14. Young M. Rethinking teacher education for a global future: lessons from the English. Journal of Education for Teaching. 1998;24(1):51–62. doi:10.1080/02607479819917

15. Posch P. Changes in the culture of teaching and learning and implications for action research. Educational Action Research. 1994;2(2):153–161. doi:10.1080/0965079940020202

16. Bouchez M. High speed propulsion: a 10 years AEROSPATIALE-MATRA education contribution. Paper presented at: 9th International Space Planes and Hypersonic Systems and Technologies Conference; 1999. Accessed February 20, 2023. https://www.scopus.com/record/display.uri?eid=2-s2.0-84983099853&origin=resultslist&sort=plf-f&src=s&sid=ab5e247575e1720b2e828b4750483c62&sot=b&sdt=cl&s=TITLE-ABS-KEY%28global+challenges+school+education+educational%29&sl=61&sessionSearchId=ab5e247575e1720b2e828b4750483c62

17. Lemon A. Shifting inequalities in South Africa’s schools: some evidence from the Western Cape. South African Geographical Journal. 1999;81(2):96–105. doi:10.1080/03736245.1999.9713669

18. Frumin I., Kasprzhak A. Medium-term development of education and socialization in the Russian Federation. An expert group report. Voprosy obrazovaniya = Educational Studies Moscow. 2012;1:6–58. (In Russ.) Accessed February 20, 2023. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/319335776_Medium_-_term_development_of_education_and_socialization_in_the_Russian_Federation_An_expert_group_report

19. Talalakina E.V. Fostering cross-cultural understanding through e-learning: Russian-American forum case study. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning. 2010;5(3):42–46. doi:10.3991/ijet.v5i3.1290

20. Haq C., Rothenberg D., Gjerde C., Bobula J., Wilson C., Bickley L., Cardelle A., Joseph A. New world views: preparing physicians in training for global health work. Family Medicine. 2000;32(8):566–572.

21. Copland F., Garton S., Burns A. Challenges in teaching English to young learners: global perspectives and local realities. TESOL Quarterly. 2014;48(4):738–762. doi:10.1002/tesq.148

22. Davies L. Security, extremism and education: safeguarding or surveillance? British Journal of Educational Studies. 2016;64(1):1–19. doi:10.1080/00071005.2015.1107022

23. Bürgener L., Barth M. Sustainability competencies in teacher education: making teacher education count in everyday school practice. Journal of Cleaner Production. 2018;174:821–826. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.10.263

24. Quigley C.F., Herro D. “Finding the joy in the unknown”: implementation of STEAM teaching practices in middle school science and math classrooms. Journal of Science Education and Technology. 2016;25(3):410–426. doi:10.1007/s10956-016-9602-z

25. Kushner R.F., Van Horn L., Rock C.L., Edwards M.S., Bales C.W., Kohlmeier M., Akabas S.R. Nutrition education in medical school: a time of opportunity. American Journal of Clinical Nutritio. 2014;99(5). doi:10.3945/ajcn.113.073510

26. Kryukova E., Starostenkov N., Krapotkina S., Timoshina E., Makeeva D., Yudina T. Socio-economic problems of today’s high school students in the context of reforming the educational system of the Russian Federation. Journal of Advanced Research in Law and Economics. 2016;7(2):287–293.

27. Lisitsky D.V., Osipov A.G., Kicheev V.G., Savinykh V.N., Makarenko N.N. Dynamics of higher education paradigms in Russia (from the end of the 19th century to the beginning of the 21st century). Vestnik Novosibirskogo gosudarstvennogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta = Novosibirsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin. 2017;7(3):157–175. (In Russ.) doi:10.15293/2226-3365.1703.10

28. Pevzner M.N., Sheraizina R.M., Petriakov P.A., Donina I.A., Migunova E.V., Shirin A.G. Historical stages and the modern models of children and adults territorial communities. Review of European Studies. 2015;7(9):97–111. doi:10.5539/res.v7n9p97

29. Gerasimenko V., Molchanova O. Global pressure or national identity: strategic challenges for Russian business schools. Serbian Journal of Management. 2017;12(1):133–141. doi:10.5937/sjm12-12048

30. Armstrong-Mensah E., Ramsey-White K., Yankey B., Self-Brown S. COVID-19 and distance learning: effects on Georgia State University School of public health students. Frontiers in Public Health. 2020;8:576227. doi:10.3389/fpubh.2020.576227

31. Sá M.J., Serpa S. The Covid-19 pandemic as an opportunity to foster the sustainable development of teaching in higher education. Sustainability (Switzerland). 2020;12(20):8525. doi:10.3390/su12208525

32. Lal R., Bouma J., Brevik E., et al. Soils and sustainable development goals of the United Nations: an international union of soil sciences perspective. Geoderma Regional. 2021;25:e00398. doi:10.1016/j.geodrs.2021.e00398

33. Auld E., Morris P. Science by streetlight and the OECD’s measure of global competence: a new yardstick for internationalisation? Policy Futures in Education. 2019;17(6):677–698. doi:10.1177/14782103188192

34. Tomyuk O.N., Dyachkova M.A., Kirillovа N.B., Dudchik A.Yu. Digitalization of the educational environment as a factor of personal and professional self-determination of students. Perspektivy nauki i obrazovania = Prospects of Science and Education. 2019;6(42):422–434. (In Russ.) doi:10.32744/pse.2019.6.35

35. Fedorov A., Mikhaleva G. Current trends in media and information literacy in research and scientific publications of the early 21st century. International Journal of Media and Information Literacy. 2020;5(2):153–163. doi:10.13187/ijmil.2020.2.153

36. Lyalin A.М., Zozulya A.V., Eremina T.N., Zozulya P.V. Current trends in training specialists in the coal industry. Ugol’ = Russian Coal Journal. 2020;9:50–53. (In Russ.) doi:10.18796/0041-5790-2020-9-50-53

37. Lubkov A.V. Modern problems of pedagogical education. Obrazovanie i nauka = The Education and Science Journal. 2020;22(3):36–54. (In Russ.) doi:10.17853/1994-5639-2020-3-36-54

38. Sorokin P.S., Vyatskaya Yu.A. International expert agenda in education: Key characteristics and problem areas. Obrazovanie i nauka = The Education and Science Journal. 2022;24(1):11–52. (In Russ.) doi:10.17853/1994-5639-2022-1-11-52

39. Hanvey R.G. An attainable global perspective. The American Forum for Global Education. New York; 2004. Accessed February 14, 2024. https://docplayer.net/60696-Anattainable-global-perspective-by-robert-g-hanvey.html

40. Petrovskij A.B., Pronichkin S.V., Sternin M.Yu., Shepelev G.I. Organization and management of science: the experience of Russia. Trudy ISA RAN = Proceedings of the ISA RAS. 2018;68(4):53–73. (In Russ.) doi:10.14357/2079027918040

41. Yip G. China’s next strategic advantage: from imitation to innovation. Cambridge: MIT Press; 2016. Accessed February 20, 2023. https://www.gbv.de/dms/zbw/844957798.pdf

42. Klees S.J. Human capital and rates of return: Brilliant ideas or ideological dead ends? Comparative Education Review. 2016;60(4):644–672. doi:10.1086/688063

43.