Mentoring in education: an analysis of international practices and their implementation in Russia

Introduction. In the context of an ongoing discussion about the necessity to enhance the institution of mentoring in Russia, the examination and critical analysis of the experiences of countries where the system of mentoring for novice teachers is regulated at the state level is of undeniable interest. Aim. The study aimed to identify the main features of mentoring in France and determine the potential for applying international experience in the Russian educational system. Methodology and research methods. The research employed the following methods: an analysis of pedagogical literature and normative documents in the field of education in France, and a questionnaire survey of novice teachers working as trainee teachers in primary schools in Paris. As a survey technique, a continuous online survey with a group was employed. Results and scientific novelty. The process of becoming a fully qualified lower primary teacher in France is outlined: it involves passing a competitive examination (CRPE) and successfully completing a probation period. During this probation period, candidates are required to work for one year in a school as a trainee teacher under the guidance of mentor teachers. The research focuses on mentoring practices in France, the pathways to becoming a new teacher mentor, their job requirements, professional training, certification processes, as well as their roles and responsibilities. Based on the results of a survey of trainee teachers, a social profile of a novice teacher in France was created. The main challenges and shortcomings of the participants were identified, and their interactions with mentors were analysed. The collected data enabled the authors to emphasise the benefits of the French education policy regarding entry into the teaching profession and to formulate recommendations for mentor selection and training in Russia. Practical significance. The content of the article will be beneficial for specialists in the field of comparative education and for members of the scientific and pedagogical community engaged in teacher training programmes.

1. Zeer E.F., Rezer T.M., Sуmaniuk N.V. Transformation of the capabilities of higher school teachers in conditions of uncertainty: problem statement. Obrazovanie i nauka = The Education and Science Journal. 2023;25(5):12–48. (In Russ.) doi:10.17853/1994-5639-2023-5-12-48

2. Ratner F.L., Tikhonova N.V. Quality of education: pedagogical aspect. Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii = Higher Education in Russia. 2019;12:87–96. (In Russ.) doi:10.31992/0869-3617-2019-28-12-87-96

3. Valeeva R.A., Kalimullin A.M., Baklashova T.A., Latypova L.A. Novice teacher induction in Russia: management and mentoring. In: Mena J., Clarke A., eds. Teacher Induction and Mentoring. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan; 2021:1–25. doi:10.1007/978-3-030-79833-8_1

4. Aydarova E.V. Teachers’ plight and trainees’ flight: perceived, lived, and conceived spaces of schools. Voprosy Obrazovaniya = Educational Studies Moscow. 2016;2:183–207. (In Russ.) doi:10.17323/1814-9545-2016-2-183-207

5. Ingersoll R.M., Strong M. The impact of induction and mentoring programs for beginning teachers: a critical review of the research. Review of Education Research. 2011;81(2):201–233. doi:10.3102/0034654311403323

6. Chernjavskaja A.P., Danilova L.N. Teacher-mentor as an assistant in adaptation of the young teacher in school. Jaroslavskij pedagogicheskij vestnik = Yaroslavl Pedagogical Bulletin. 2019;4(109):62–70. (In Russ.) doi:10.24411/1813-145X-2019-10453

7. Cornu B. Teacher education in France: universitisation and professionalisation – from IUFMs to ESPEs. Education Inquiry. 2015;6(3):289–307. doi:10.3402/edui.v6.28649

8. Feuillet P., Prouteau D. De l’entrée à la sortie de l’éducation nationale. Education & Formations. 2020;101:99–124. (In French) doi:10.48464/ef-101-05

9. Margolis A.A., Arzhanykh E.V., Khusnutdinova M.R. Institutionalization of mentoring as a resource for professional development of Russian teachers. Voprosy Obrazovaniya = Educational Studies Moscow. 2019;4:133–159. (In Russ.) doi:10.17323/1814-9545-2019-4-133-159

10. Rudenko I.V., Sarkisova I.V. Mentoring as a form of scientific and methodological support of the professional development of future teachers. Nauchny Vektor Balkan = Scientific Vector of the Balkans. 2021;5.2(12):15–20. (In Russ.) doi:10.34671/SCH.SVB.2021.0502.0003

11. Voskrekasenko O.A., Varnikova O.V., Konstantinov V.V., Pashkovskaya S.S., Shchelina T.T. Mentoring in the system of ensuring the adaptation of young teachers in a general education organization. Obschestvo: sotsiologiya, psihologiya, pedagogika = Society: Sociology, Psychology, Pedagogics. 2022;9:88–95. (In Russ.) doi:10.24158/spp.2022.9.13

12. Hobson A.J., Ashby P., Malderez A., Tomlinson P.D. Mentoring beginning teachers: what we know and what we don’t. Teaching and Teacher Education. 2009;25(1):207–216. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2008.09.001

13. Osipov P.N. Mentorship as a social and pedagogical phenomenon. Upravlenie ustoichivym razvitiem = Sustainable Development Management. 2023;1(44):102–108. (In Russ.) doi:10.55421/2499992X_2023_1_102

14. Irismetova I.I., Masalimova A.R., Bayanov D.I. Implementation of scientific and methodological support for the training of mentors in the conditions of modern enterprises. Kazanskiy pedagogicheskiy jurnal = Kazan Pedagogical Journal. 2022;6:175–181. (In Russ.) doi:10.51379/KPJ.2022.157.7.022

15. Dudina E.A. Mentoring the gifted: educational and psychological perspectives. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta = Tomsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin. 2022;2(220):39–49. (In Russ.) doi:10.23951/1609-624X-2022-2-39-49

16. Gagnon B., Goyette N. Ouellet M. La création d’un modèle d’accompagnement mentoral, d’un dispositif de développement professionnel et d’un répertoire de ressources pour soutenir le développement d’un agir compétent chez les enseignants mentors dans un centre de services scolaire. Enjeux et societe: Approches transdisciplinaires. 2022;9(2):120–149. (In French) doi:10.7202/1092843ar

17. Vivegnis I. Quelles compétences pour accompagner des enseignants débutants ? Étude multicas. Revue des sciences de l’éducation de McGill. 2020;55(2):1–21. (In French) doi:10.7202/1077970ar

18. Martineau S., Mukamurera J. Tour d’horizon des principaux programmes et dispositifs de soutien à l’insertion professionnelle en enseignement. Phronesis. 2012;1(2):45–62. (In French) doi:10.7202/1009059ar

19. Blinov V.I., Esenina E.J., Sergeev I.S. Mentoring in education: you need a well sharpened tool. Professional’noe obrazovanie i rynok truda = Professional Education and the Labor Market. 2019;3:4–18. (In Russ.) doi:10.24411/2307-4264-2019-10301

20. Bazarnova N.D. Effective practices of pedagogical mentoring from 1931 to 1953. Gumanitarnie nauki i obrazovaniye = The Humanities and Education. 2022;13(1-49):7–12. (In Russ.) doi:10.51609/2079-3499_2022_13_01_07

21. Yakovleva E.N., Krasilova I.Y. From the experience of supporting young teachers in the EU countries. Obrazovanie i nauka = The Education and Science Journal. 2016;5(134):158–175. (In Russ.) doi:10.17853/1994–5639–2016–5–158–175

22. Vivegnis I. La formation des mentors de futurs enseignants: comment s’y prendre? In: Raucent B., ed. Accompagner les étudiants: Rôles de l’enseignant, dispositifs et mises en oeuvre. Louvain-la-Neuve: De Boeck Supérieur; 2021:329–350. (In French) doi:10.3917/dbu.rauce.2021.01.0329

23. Deprit A., Bernal Gonzalez A., Collonval P., Van Nieuwenhoven C. Accompagner l’enseignant débutant. Identifier les tâches spécifiques de l’enseignant débutant et moduler l’accompagnement en fonction de ses besoins. Education & Formation. 2019;e-315:47–63. (In French) Accessed September 01, 2023. https://orbi.umons.ac.be/bitstream/20.500.12907/9869/1/e_315_00_Editorial_BDL03.pdf

24. Zimmermann P., Demogeot N., Metz C., Flavier E. L’aide professionnelle individualisée, un dispositif local pour prévenir le décrochage professionnel des enseignants novices. Les dossiers des sciences de l’éducation. 2021;47:121–135. (In French) Accessed September 01, 2023. https://hal.science/hal-03188367/

25. Dammerer J., Ziegler V., Bartonek S. Tutoring and coaching as special forms of mentoring for young teachers starting their careers. Yaroslavskij pedagogicheskij vestnik = Yaroslavl Pedagogical Bulletin. 2019;1(106):56–69. (In Russ.) doi:10.24411/1813-145X-2019-10278

26. Ciavaldini-Cartaut S. Multimodalité numérique en situation de supervision de stage. Éducation permanente. 2016;206:61–74. (In French)

27. Gouin J.-A., Colognesi S. Supervision à distance de la gestion de classe en enseignement primaire. In: Petit M. Accompagner les stagiaires en enseignement à l’aide du numérique. Éditions JFD; 2021:58– 86. (In French)

28. Petit M., Dionne L., Brouillette L. Supervision de stage à distance: état de la recherche dans différents domaines de formation postsecondaire. Nouveaux cahiers de la recherche en éducation. 2019;21(1):96–118. (In French) doi:10.7202/1061719ar

29. Dubos M., Dejean C. Le tutorat par coenseignement pour les bénévoles en contexte associatif. Recherches en didactique des langues et des cultures. 2023;(21-1). (In French) Accessed September 01, 2023. http://journals.openedition.org/rdlc/11900

30. Baudrit A. L’investigation collaborative: de la pratique d’enquête à la collaboration à distance. Bruxelles: Peter Lang; 2023. 154 p. (In French)

31. Moussay S., Blanjoie V. Le tutorat mixte: tension entre deux logiques comme opportunité d’articulation entre activité et compétence. In: Chaliès Sébastien, Lussi Borer Valérie. Activité et compétence en tension dans le champ de la formation professionnelle en alternance. Octares Editions; 2020:82–92. (In French) Accessed September 01, 2023. https://uca.hal.science/hal-03003995/

32. Amathieu J., Chaliès S. Activités de formation des enseignants novices et trajectoire de satisfaction professionnelle: conceptualisation et illustration. Activités. 2021;18-2. (In French) doi:10.4000/activites.6670

33. Ravez C. Former à enseigner: activités, mutations, tensions. Dossier de veille de l’Ifé. 2023;143:1–40. (In French) Accessed September 01, 2023. https://veille-et-analyses.ens-lyon.fr/DA-Veille/143-mai-2023.pdf

34. Netto S., Voulgre E., Villemonteix F. Agir avec les technologies comme néo-inspecteur de l’Éducation nationale: Entre acceptations et renoncements. Le numérique à l’école primaire. 2019;87–106. (In French) doi:10.4000/books.septentrion.99472

35. Dukhanina L.N. The role of perception of school leadership in emotional burnout and commitment to school among Russian teachers. Integration of Education. 2022;26(4):722–739. (In Russ.) doi:10.15507/1991-9468.109.026.202204.722-739