Transformation of students’ perceptions of disability as a result of inclusive education: a posse ad esse

Introduction. The relevance of the research is determined by the necessity to fill knowledge gaps related to understanding the socio-cultural transformations taking place in the student environment due to the extensive development of inclusive technologies in universities. Aim. The present research aimed to identify transformations in the public consciousness of students associated with the period of application of the inclusive approach and to determine the factors that determine them. Methodology and research methods. The study relies on the theoretical and methodological concept of constructing a metasystem “personality – group – society” in the context of an individual assimilating social experience. In determining the empirical basis of the study, the principle of unity and differentiation was applied to identify potential causal relationships between the socio-demographic characteristics of respondents and the development of predominant sentiments regarding the resolution of integration issues in society for individuals with disabilities. A comparison of the semantic dominants of the attitudes towards disabled students, who studied in 2008 (at the initial stage of awareness of the need for an inclusive approach) and in 2023 (at a mature stage characterised by many years of experience in ensuring a barrier-free educational environment in universities), allowed the authors to identify a number of fundamental socio-cultural characteristics of modern students for further qualitative research. Results. The research outcomes revealed that there have been no qualitative changes in the public consciousness of modern students regarding people with disabilities, despite the extensive development of inclusion in universities. Additionally, there are still persistent manifestations of stigmatisation of students with health problems. The negative impact of overestimating the effect of administrative factors on the inclusive process, on the one hand, and ignoring the need to support the development of social values in the student’s personality, on the other, was revealed. Scientific novelty. The research contributes to the development of scientific reflection methods in line with the phenomenological approach and clarifies the subject area of studying inclusive processes in universities. Practical significance. The presented materials and conclusions may be of scientific and practical interest to both researchers and organisers of inclusive processes in universities.

1. Dargan A.A. Sociological interpretation of the social subjectivity of people with disabilities. Znanie. Ponimanie. Umenie = Knowledge. Understanding. Skill. 2020;2:158–161. (In Russ.) Accessed November 07, 2023. https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/sotsiologicheskaya-interpretatsiya-sotsialnoy-subektnosti-lyudey-s-invalidnostyu

2. Wolfensberger W. Social role valorization: a proposed new term for the principle of normalization. Mental Retardation. 1983;21(6):234–239. Accessed September 30, 2023. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22126271

3. Block P. Niels Erik Bank-Mikkelsen. In: Encyclopedia Britannica. 2023. Accessed November 07, 2023. https://www.britannica.com/biography/Niels-Erik-Bank-Mikkelsen

4. Gildenbrandt I.A., Nikishova E.V., Rassadina D.S., Chechikova S.V. Invalidnost’ glazami obshhestva i rabotodatelja = Disability through the Eyes of Society and the Employer. Moscow: Analytical Center NAFI; 2020. 38 p. (In Russ.) Accessed November 07, 2023. http://nafi.ru:8080/projects/sotsialnoe-razvitie/invalidnost-glazami-obshchestva-i-rabotodatelya

5. Saharchuk E.S., Bagramyan E.R., Kiseleva I.A., Mikryukov D.Yu., Ozerina A.A., Ulyanina O.A. Faktory formirovanija sociokul’turnoj identichnosti studentov v uslovijah polikonfessional’nosti: teologicheskij i psihologo-pedagogicheskij podhody = Factors of Formation of Socio-Cultural Identity of Studentsin the Context of Multi-Confessional: Theological and Psychological-Pedagogical Approaches. Moscow: Publishing Centre of the Moscow State University of Humanities and Economics; 2023. 176 p. (In Russ.) Accessed November 04, 2023. https://www.edscience.ru/jour/article/view/3062/1142

6. Saharchuk E.S., Bagramyan E.R., Kiseleva I.A., Saharchuk A.L. Social focus of educational activities of the university: declaration of goals and practice. Obrazovanie i nauka = The Education and Science Journal. 2022;24(3):11–40. (In Russ.) doi: 10.17853/1994-5639-2022-3-11-40

7. Kon I. S. Psihologija junosheskogo vozrasta = Psychology of Adolescence. Moscow: Publishing House Prosveshchenie; 1979. 90 p. (In Russ.) Accessed November 04, 2023. https://djvu.online/file/bZ3siopCdy58e

8. Gusejnov A.Sh., Shipovskaya V.V. Molodezhnyj jekstremizm: psihologicheskie faktory riska, sistema profilaktiki i preodolenija = Youth Extremism: Psychological Risk Factors, Prevention and Overcoming System. Krasnodar: Kuban State University; 2020. 350 p. (In Russ.) Accessed November 01, 2023. https://www.elibrary.ru/ip_restricted.asp?rpage=https%3A%2F%2Fwww%2Eelibrary%2Eru%2Fitem%2Easp%3Fid%3D44491821

9. Reichert S. The Role of Universities in Regional Innovation Ecosystems. EUA Study. European University Association; 2019. Accessed November 03, 2023. https://eua.eu/downloads/publications/eua%20innovation%20ecosystem%20report.pdf

10. Buchholz U. Interne Hochschulkommunikation. In: Fähnrich B., Metag J., Post S., Schäfer M., eds. Forschungsfeld Hochschulkommunikation. Wiesbaden: Springer VS; 2019:141–164. (In German) doi: 10.1007/978-3-658-22409-7_7

11. Borisova N.A. Osnovy inkljuzivnoj kul’tury = The Basics of Inclusive Culture. Cherepovets: Cherepovets State University; 2021. 214 p. (In Russ.) Accessed November 04, 2023. https://www.chsu.ru/upload/iblock/7f8/c0s1zvrc58ef0tkypn7wtnamcxyrn9zp/915-5_Основы%20инклюзивной%20культуры.pdf?utm_source=yandex.ru&utm_medium=organic&utm_campaign=yandex.ru&utm_referrer=yandex.ru

12. Zaitsev D.V., Selivanova J.V. The inclusive paradigm of modern education in Russia: regional specifics of implementation. Gumanitarnye nauki = The Humanities. 2018;2(42):43–51. (In Russ.) Accessed November 04, 2023. https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/inklyuzivnaya-paradigma-sovremennogo-obrazovaniya-v-rossii-regionalnaya-spetsifika-realizatsii

13. Utemov V., Gorbushina A. Psychological preparedness of university teachers to work in inclusion. In: Shirin A.G., Zvyaglova M. V., Fikhtner O.A., Ignateva E.Y., Shaydorova N.A., eds. International Scientific and Practical Conference Education in a Changing World: Global Challenges and National Priorities. 2021;114:332–348. doi: 10.15405/epsbs.2021.07.02.40

14. Sinyavskaya A.A. Inkljuzivnaja kul’tura pedagoga = Inclusive culture of a teacher. In: Kul’turologicheskij podhod v formirovanii obshheprofessional’nyh kompetencij studentov: sbornik nauchnyh trudov = The Cultural Approach in the Formation of General Professional Competencies of Students: A Collection of Scientific Papers. Tolyatti: Tolyatti State University, The International Center for Modern Problems of Education; 2017:72–78. (In Russ.) Accessed November 04, 2023. https://www.elibrary.ru/ip_restricted.asp?rpage=https%3A%2F%2Fwww%2Eelibrary%2Eru%2Fitem%2Easp%3Fedn%3Dykebfz

15. Yarskaya-Smirnova E.R., Romanov P.V. Accessibility of higher education for the disabled. Universitetskoe upravlenie: praktika i analiz = University Management: Practice and Analysis. 2005;1:89–99. (In Russ.) Accessed November 04, 2023. https://www.umj.ru/jour/article/view/209

16. Link B.G., Phelan J.C. Conceptualizing stigma. Annual Review of Sociology. 2001;27(1):363–385. doi: 10.1146/annurev.soc.27.1.363

17. Yarskaya-Smirnova E.R., Romanov P.V., Zajcev D.V., Naberushkina E.K. Policy in the field of higher education for the disabled. Zhurnal issledovanij social’noj politiki = The Journal of Social Policy Studies. 2004;2(1):91–114. (In Russ.) Accessed November 01, 2023. https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/politika-v-sfere-vysshego-obrazovaniya-invalidov

18. Karasaeva L., Gordievskaya E., Kuzmina I. Socio-psychological component of vocational rehabilitation of the disabled. Vrach = The Doctor. 2009;9:60–62. (In Russ.) Accessed November 04, 2023. http://elib.fesmu.ru/eLib/Article.aspx?id=208741

19. Lebedeva C.S. The implementation of social functions of education in the context of social protection of persons with disabilities. In: Polutin S.P., Muller N.V., eds. Development of the Common Educational Space of the CIS Member States: Achievements, Problems, Prospects. Materials of the International Scientific and Practical Videoconference. 2015. p. 91–98. (In Russ.) Accessed November 01, 2023. https://www.elibrary.ru/ip_restricted.asp?rpage=https%3A%2F%2Fwww%2Eelibrary%2Eru%2Fitem%2Easp%3Fedn%3Dshkwua

20. Shulga T.I. Peculiarities of socialization of group care alumni. Social’naja psihologija i obshhestvo = Social Psychology and Society. 2011;1:119–125. (In Russ.) Accessed November 07, 2023. https://psyjournals.ru/journals/sps/archive/2011_n1/sps_2011_n1_39741.pdf

21. Gehrau V. Anne Haage: Informationsrepertoires von Menschen mit Behinderung – Barrieren und Forderfaktoren fur die Gleichberechtigte Teilnahme an offentlichen Kommunikation. Publizistik. 2022;67(1):185–187. (In German) Accessed November 03, 2023. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/357762054_Anne_Haage_Informationsrepertoires_von_Menschen_mit_Behinderung_-_Barrieren_und_Forderfaktoren_fur_die_gleichberechtigte_Teilhabe_an_offentlicher_Kommunikation_Baden-Baden_Nomos_2021_348_Seiten

22. Reuker S., Rischke A., Kämpfe A., Schmitz B., Teubert H., Thissen A., Wiethäuper H. Inklusion im Spirtunterricht. Sportwissenschaft. 2016;46(2):88–101. (In German) Accessed November 03, 2023. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/321213686_INKLUSION_IM_SPORTUNTERRICHT

23. Karim S., Waldschmidt A. Ungehante Fahigkeiten? Behinderte Menschen zwischen Zuschreibung von Unfahigkeit und Doing Ability. Osterreichische Zeitschrift fur Soziologie. 2019;44(3):269–288. (In German) Accessed November 08, 2023. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/335874292_Ungeahnte_Fahigkeiten_Behinderte_Menschen_zwischen_Zuschreibung_von_Unfahigkeit_und_Doing_AbilityUnexpected_abilities_Persons_with_disabilities_between_ascriptions_of_inability_and_doing_ability

24. Wulf A., Reutlinger C. Rehabilitation bei Menschen mit Behinderungen. Zeitschrift für Epileptologie. 2022;35(3):230–234. (In German) Accessed November 08, 2023. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10309-022-00504-w

25. Booth T., Ainscow M. Index for Inclusion: Developing Learning and Participation in Schools. London: Centre for Studies on Inclusive Education; 2002. 106 p. Accessed November 03, 2023. https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Index-for-Inclusion%3A-Developing-Learning-and-in-Booth-Ainscow/dba04116b3801b0aaa6bf08773ec39f8a33e0603

26. Losada Puente L., Fiuza Asorey M., Bana Castro M. What defines inclusion in higher education institutions? Validation of an instrument based on the ‘index for inclusion’. International Journal of Disability Development and Education. 2022;69:91–105. doi:10.1080/1034912X.2021.1992752

27. Fröhlich C. Behinderung im Kulturvergleich: Einstellungen zu Behinderung und Behinderten in Deutschland und Russland. Zurich: Zurich Open Repository and Archive, University of Zurich; 2008. 100 p. (In German) Accessed November 03, 2023. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/50915201_Behinderung_im_Kulturvergleich_Einstellungen_zu_Behinderung_und_Behinderten_in_Deutschland_und_Russland

28. Rowenskaja K.R. Das Problem der Behinderten in Deutschland und in Russland. In: Aspire to Science: materialy gorodskoj nauchno-prakticheskoj konferencii shkol’nikov, studentov, magistrantov i aspirantov = Aspire to Science: Materials of the City Scientific and Practical Conference of Schoolchildren, Students, Undergraduates and Graduate Students. Novosibirsk: Novosibirsk State Technical University; 2017:443–445. (In German) Accessed November 03, 2023. https://www.elibrary.ru/ip_restricted.asp?rpage=https%3A%2F%2Fwww%2Eelibrary%2Eru%2Fitem%2Easp%3Fedn%3Dysnvfd

29. Losada Puente L., Fiuza Asorey M., Baña Castro M. How do children value educational inclusion? Opinions from primary schools. Revista Colombiana de Educación. 2023;88:138–160. doi: 10.17227/rce.num88-13472

30. Morfeld M., Koch-Gromus U. Behinderung und Gesellschaftliche Teilnahme. Bundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz. 2016;59(9):1045–1047. (In German) Accessed November 03, 2023. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27558144

31. Levanova E.A., Mudrik A.V., Seryakova S.B., Pushkareva T.V., Tarabakina L.V., Zvonova E.V. Education as a process of effective functioning of the “individual-group-society” metasystem. Vestnik Vyatskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta = Herald of Vyatka State University. 2020;3(137):65–75. (In Russ.) doi: 10.25730/VSU.7606.20.041

32. Zernova L.P. Updating family values as a factor in strengthening Russian statehood. Rossiya: tendencii i perspektivy razvitiya = Russia: Trends and Prospects of Development. 2015;10-3:207–211. (In Russ.) Accessed November 01, 2023. https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/aktualizatsiya-semeynyh-tsennostey-kak-faktor-ukrepleniya-rossiyskoy-gosudarstvennosti