Factors influencing the formation of creative student teams
https://doi.org/10.17853/1994-5639-2024-8-144-173
Abstract
Introduction. The research relevance is determined by the needs of Russian societal development in attracting active and talented youth to various spheres of economic and social activities. Aim. The present research aimed to identify the factors that contribute to the formation of creative student teams capable of effectively engaging in activities within the creative industry, research, scientific-technological projects, and socially significant projects. Methodology and research methods. The empirical basis of the article was the results of a sociological study on university students’ creativity using a questionnaire survey method. Through factor analysis, five groups of students were identified with conventional names: optimists, populists, versatile, disciplined, and outsiders. Results. The analysis of the research results allowed the authors to define the main parameters and present a typology of students based on their attitudes towards different types of activities, involvement in scientific and social university life, evaluations of the conditions of scientific, educational, and social activities at the university, engagement in social networks, and identification of the most crucial components of life success. Scientific novelty. On the basis of the authors’ methodology of sociological research on the creativity of university students, approaches to forming creative student teams are proposed. Practical significance. The practical significance of the article lies in the potential utilisation of the proposed methodology and the study results by teachers and specialists at universities involved in engaging students in research, creative endeavors, and socially significant projects.
About the Authors
Y. V. UshakovaRussian Federation
Yana V. Ushakova – Cand. Sci. (Sociology), Associate Professor, Department of Sectoral and Applied Sociology, Faculty of Social Sciences
Nizhny Novgorod
D. V. Zernov
Russian Federation
Dmitriy V. Zernov – Cand. Sci. (Politics), Associate Professor, Department of Sectoral and Applied Sociology, Faculty of Social Sciences
Scopus Author ID 56112413300
Nizhny Novgorod
I. V. Sitnikova
Russian Federation
Irina V. Sitnikova – Cand. Sci. (Sociology), Associate Professor, Department of Sectoral and Applied Sociology, Faculty of Social Sciences
Nizhny Novgorod
References
1. Khamidulin V.S. Modernisation of the model of project-oriented learning in higher education. Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii = Higher Education in Russia. 2020;29(1):135–149. (In Russ.) doi:10.31992/0869-3617-2020-29-1-135-149
2. Ambarova P.A., Zborovskiy G.E. Professional adaptation of university students in the changing world of professions. Obrazovanie i nauka = The Education and Science Journal. 2023;25(2):191–223. (In Russ.) doi:10.17853/1994-5639-2023-2-191-223
3. Tan C.-S., Tan S.-A., Hashim I.H.M., Lee M.-N., Ong A.W.-H., Yaacob S.-B. Problem-solving ability and stress mediate the relationship between creativity and happiness. Creativity Research Journal. 2019;31(1):15–25. doi:10.1080/10400419.2019.1568155
4. Mann S., Cadman R. Does being bored make us more creative? Creativity Research Journal. 2014;26(2):165–173. doi:10.1080/10400419.2014.901073
5. Meshkova N.V. Modern foreign studies of creativity: socio-psychological aspect. Social’naja psihologija i obshhestvo = Social Psychology and Society. 2015;6(2):8–21. (In Russ.)
6. Abisalova E.A. Comparative analysis of creativity measurement procedures. Vestnik RGGU. Serija “Psihologija. Pedagogika. Obrazovanie” = Vestnik RSUHU. Series “Psychology. Pedagogy. Education”. 2013;18(119):67–79. (In Russ.)
7. Grishina N.V. Behavior in everyday life: life style, everyday creativity and “life creativity”. Psihologicheskie issledovanija = Psychological Studies. 2017;10(56):2. (In Russ.)
8. Kirichenko N.S. Development of creativity in design students in the process of professional training. Mir nauki, kul’tury, obrazovanija = World of Science, Culture, Education. 2019;5(78):284–285. (In Russ.) doi:10.24411/1991-5497-2019-00116
9. Moroz V.V. Razvitie kreativnosti studentov = Development of Creativity of Students. Orenburg: Orenburg State University; 2011. 183 p. (In Russ.)
10. Hemdan A.H., Kazem A.M. Creativity development of high-achieving students. Creativity Research Journal. 2019;31(3):296–308. doi:10.1080/10400419.2019.1641684
11. Delany D.E., Cheung R.R.M., Takahashi Y., Cheung C.S. Adolescents’ implicit theories of a creative person: a longitudinal investigation in three countries. Creativity Research Journal. 2019;31(1):52–61. doi:10.1080/10400419.2019.1577648
12. Kwang Ng A. A cultural model of creative and conforming behaviour. Creativity Research Journal. 2003;15(2-3):223–233. doi:10.1080/10400419.2003.9651414
13. Wu C.H., Cheng Y., Ip H.M., McBride-Chang C. Age differences in creativity: task structure and knowledge base. Creativity Research Journal. 2005;17(4):321–326. doi:10.1207/s15326934crj1704 3
14. Davidovitch N., Milgram R.M. Creative thinking as a predictor of teacher effectiveness in higher education. Creativity Research Journal. 2006;18(3):385–390. doi:10.1207/s15326934crj1803_12
15. Maksic S.B., Spasenovic V.Z. Educational science students’ implicit theories of creativity. Creativity Research Journal. 2018;30(3):287–294. doi:10.1080/10400419.2018.1488200
16. Andryukhina L.M. Concepts of creativity in management and business as an intellectual resource of education development. Nauchnoe obozrenie. Referativnyj zhurnal = Scientific Review. Abstract Journal. 2019;2:5–14. (In Russ.)
17. Oztop P., Katsikopoulos K., Gummerum M. Creativity through connectedness: the role of closeness and perspective taking in group creativity. Creativity Research Journal. 2018;30(3):266–275. doi:10.1080/10400419.2018.1488347
18. Yunlu D.G., Clapp-Smith R., Shaffer M. Understanding the role of cultural intelligence in individual creativity. Creativity Research Journal. 2017;29(3):236–243. doi:10.1080/10400419.2017.1360070
19. Volkov Y.G. Kreativnost’: tvorchestvo protiv imitacii = Creativity: Creativity versus Imitation. Moscow: Publishing House Alfa-M; 2013. 432 p. (In Russ.)
20. Volkov S.K., Efimov E.G. Portrait of a creative worker: a sociological approach. Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Ser. 6. Jekonomika = Vestnik of Moscow University. Series 6. Economics. 2022;2:175–188. (In Russ.) doi:10.38050/01300105202228
21. Baez J.M., Bergua J.A., Pac D. The creative class and the creative economy in Spain. Creativity Research Journal. 2014;26(4):418–426. doi:10.1080/10400419.2014.961769
22. Petrova I.E., Azerli D.A. Development of creative competence in the conditions of innovation implementation: prospects of complex interdisciplinary research. In: Strategii razvitija social’nyh obshhnostej, institutov i territorij. Materialy IX Mezhdunarodnoj nauchno-prakticheskoj konferencii = Strategies of Development of Social Communities, Institutions and Territories. Materials of IX International Scientific and Practical Conference; 2023; Ekaterinburg. Vol. 1. Ekaterinburg: Ural Federal University named after the First President of Russia B.N. Yeltsin; 2023:163–168. (In Russ.)
23. Kacerauskas T. Creativity and the concept of creative society in sociology. Sociologicheskie issledovanija = Sociological Research. 2017;10:26–35. (In Russ.) doi:10.7868/S0132162517100038
24. Julmi C., Scherm E. The domain-specificity of creativity: insights from new phenomenology. Creativity Research Journal. 2015;27(2):151–159. doi:10.1080/10400419.2015.1030310
25. Yu F., Peng Th., Peng K., Zheng S.X., Liu Z. The semantic network model of creativity: analysis of online social media data. Creativity Research Journal. 2016;28(3):268–274. doi:10.1080/10400419.2016.1195618
26. Volkov Y.G. Creative society as a goal of Russian modernization. Sociologicheskie issledovanija = Sociological Studies. 2011;11:22–28. (In Russ.)
27. Matraeva A.D. Aspects of the development of creativity of modern Russian students. Social’no-gumanitarnye znanija = Socio-Humanitarian Knowledge. 2017;4:350–356. (In Russ.)
28. Ivanov D.V., Asochakov Y.V., Bogomyakova E.S. Inclusion in Internet communication and creativity in social networks as indicators of social development. Zhurnal sociologii i social’noj antropologii = Journal of Sociology and Social Anthropology. 2021;24(2):56–80. (In Russ.) doi:10.31119/jssa.2021.24.2.3
29. Hoffmann J., Ivcevic Z., Brackett M. Creativity in the age of technology: measuring the digital creativity of millennials. Creativity Research Journal. 2016;28(2):149–153. doi:10.1080/10400419.2016.1162515
30. Rogach O.V., Frolova E.V. Analysis of the influence of social networks on modern teenagers: key problems and destructive consequences. Vestnik Permskogo universiteta. Filosofija. Psihologija. Sociologija = Vestnik of Perm University. Philosophy. Psychology. Sociology. 2022;2:305–314. (In Russ.) doi:10.17072/2078-7898/2022-2-305-314
31. Ivanov D.V. Internet communications as a social routine in Russian megacities. Sociologija nauki i tehnologij = Sociology of Science and Technology. 2022;1:97–115. (In Russ.) doi:10.24412/2079-0910-2022-1-97-115
32. Popel A.A. Prospects for the development of social creativity. In: Transformacija chelovecheskogo potenciala v kontekste stoletija. Materialy Mezhdunarodnoj nauchno-prakticheskoj konferencii = Transformation of Human Potential in the Context of the Century. Materials of International Scientific and Practical Conference; 2017; Nizhny Novgorod. Vol. 1. Nizhny Novgorod: NISOC; 2017:309–312. (In Russ.)
33. Rarenko A.A. To the question of creativity and ways of its study and measurement. Social’nye i gumanitarnye nauki. Otechestvennaja i zarubezhnaja literatura. Ser. 11. Sociologija: Referativnyj zhurnal = Social and Humanities. Domestic and Foreign Literature. Ser. 11. Sociology: Abstract Journal. 2020;3:93–103. (In Russ.) doi:10.31249/rsoc/2020.03.06
34. Conradty C., Bogner F.X. From STEM to STEAM: cracking the code? How creativity & motivation interacts with inquiry-based learning. Creativity Research Journal. 2019;31(3):284–295. doi:10.1080/10400419.2019.1641678
35. Korotayev S.A. Creativity and its factors: problems of conceptualisation in research. Sociologicheskij zhurnal = Sociological Journal. 2015;21(2):6–30. (In Russ.)
36. Guskova E.A., Tarabaeva V.B. Motivational aspects of students’ participation in research and design activities. Nauchnye vedomosti Belgorodskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Serija: Filosofija. Sociologija. Pravo = Scientific Vedomosti Belgorod State University. Series: Philosophy. Sociology. Law. 2015;8(205):72–75. (In Russ.)
37. Serebrovskaya N.E., Kochergina I.S. Creativity as a competence of specialists of socionomic professions. Psihologicheskie nauki = Psychological Sciences. 2020;06(96):146–151. (In Russ.) doi:10.23670/IRJ.2020.96.6.068
38. Florida R. Kreativnyj klass: ljudi, kotorye menjajut budushhee = Creative Class: People Who Change the Future. Translated from English. Moscow: Publishing House Klassika-XXI; 2007. 421 p. (In Russ.)
Review
For citations:
Ushakova Y.V., Zernov D.V., Sitnikova I.V. Factors influencing the formation of creative student teams. The Education and science journal. 2024;26(8):144-173. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17853/1994-5639-2024-8-144-173