APPROACHES DEVELOPMENT TO FORMALIZED DESCRIPTION OF THE DISCIPLINARY COMPETENCE OF TESTABLE COMPONENT STRUCTURE

The purpose of this paper is a development of approaches and recommendations on the selection of quantitative and qualitative component structure of disciplinary competencies, as well as ways of its formal description. One of the main problems, which it is necessary to decide while developing a studying and methodical discipline complex (for example, a discipline program, a fund of estimation tools, etc.) of competence-oriented educational program, is designing of a component structure of each part of competence (a disciplinary competence), that is involved in the formation of the discipline. In this case, a significant impact on this process has not only the content of thematic plan and selected kinds of class and self works of students, but proposed control tools and diagnosing methods of learning outcomes specified in the competency format. 

Methods. It is proposed to use joint (testable) design component structure of disciplinary competencies and control tools (tests, test materials), check the level of development of their constituent elements described in the triad of «to know», «to be able to», «to master». Requirements to the basic quantitative and qualitative properties of disciplinary competence component structure are formulated and substantiated. A structure of diagnostic table that makes it possible to set a correspondence between disciplinary competence elements and components and their control tests, and also to fix outcomes of current control of development level (test reactions in the binary and not binary alphabets) is proposed and analyzed. A classification of diagnostic tests is given; their impact on format and properties of diagnostic table is shown. 

Scientific novelty. The approach to designing of a testable component structure of disciplinary competence is proposed; it allows setting some properties of control object, which can increase procedure effective and decoding precision of diagnosis of learning outcomes specified in the competency format. The sub product of using some methods of technical diagnosis for their application in the learning outcomes quality control on the competence-oriented educational programs is given. 

Practical significance. The research implications can be useful while designing of component structure with showing properties, and will allow teachers to make a test procedure more effectively and qualitatively; it is possible for student to estimate more adequately current level of training that is most significantly under a size and role of student self-work increase. The recommendations and guidelines for selection of a diagnostic table format may be used for designing disciplinary programs and estimating of tools funds in educational programs, wherein learning outcomes are specified in the competency format. 

1. Danilov A. N., Kon E. L., Yuzhakov A. A., Andrievskaya N. V., Bezukladnikov I. I., Freyman V. I., Kon E. M. K voprosu o podgotovke i ocenke kompetencij vypusknikov vysshej shkoly s ispol'zovaniem modulej «Vektor razvitija napravlenija» i «Kvalifikacionnye trebovanija rabotodatelej». [On Preparation and Evaluation of Competencies of Graduates of Higher School with Use of Modules «Vector of Direction» and «Qualification Requirements of Employers»]. Otkrytoe obrazovanie. [Open Education]. 2012. No 3. Р. 17–29. (In Russian)

2. Knyazeva M. D., Trapeznikov S. N. Sovremennye informacionnye tehnologii i kompleksy organizacii obrazovatel'nogo processa. [Contemporary Information Technologies and Complexes of Educational Process Organization]. Nauchnye trudy Vol'nogo ekonomicheskogo obshchestva Rossii. [Scholarly Works of Russian Free Economic Society]. 2012. No 164. Р. 49–57. (In Russian)

3. Kon E. L., Freyman V. I., Yuzhakov A. A. Analiz vozmozhnosti primenenija apparata i metodov tehnicheskoj diagnostiki dlja kontrolja i ocenki rezul'tatov osvoenija kompetentnostno-orientirovannyh obrazovatel'nyh program. [Concerning the Possibility of Use the Technical Diagnostics Methods for Control and an Assessment the Basic Educational Programs Development Results]. Izvestiia SPbGETU «LETI». [Bulletin of Saint Petersburg Electrotechnical University "LETI"]. 2014. No 7. Р. 66–71. (In Russian)

4. Kon E. L., Freyman V. I., Yuzhakov A. A. K voprosu o kontrole jelementov disciplinarnyh kompetencij v ramkah osnovnoj obrazovatel'noj programmy (na primere tehnicheskih napravlenij podgotovki). [To the Question about the Discipline Competence Elements Control at the Basic Educational Program (on the Technical Programs Example)]. Otkrytoe obrazovanie. [Open Education]. 2013. No 3. Р. 12–19. (In Russian)

5. Kon E. L., Freyman V. I., Yuzhakov A. A., Kon E. M. K voprosu o formirovanii kompetencij pri razrabotke osnovnoj obrazovatel'noj programmy. [Developing Competences at the Basic Educational Program Implementation]. Otkrytoe obrazovanie. [Open Education]. 2013. No 2. Р. 4–10. (In Russian)

6. Kon E. L., Freyman V. I., Yuzhakov A. A., Kon E. M. Podhod k formirovaniju komponentnoj struktury kompetencij. [The Approach to Formation of the Competence Component Structure]. Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii. [Higher Education in Russia]. 2013. No 7. Р. 37–41. (In Russian)

7. Kon E. L., Freyman V. I., Yuzhakov A. A. Prakticheskij podhod k formirovaniju kompetentnostnoj modeli vypusknika tehnicheskogo universiteta. [Practical Approach to Formation the Competence-based Model for a Technical University Graduate]. Universitetskoe upravlenie: praktika i analiz. [University Management: Practice and Analysis]. 2013. No 2 (84). Р. 52–58. (In Russian)

8. Mikhalchuk A. A., Arefev V. P., Filipenko N. M. Sravnitel'nyj statisticheskij analiz parametricheskih i ne-parametricheskih metodov ocenivanija znanij v sisteme zaochnogo obuchenija. [Comparative Statistical Analysis of Parametrical and Nonparametric Methods of the Estimation of Knowledge in Correspondence Course System]. Sovremennye problemy nauki i obrazovaniia. [Modern Issues of Science and Education]. 2013. No 3. Р. 431. (In Russian)

9. Baidenko V. I. Osnovnye tendentsii razvitiia vysshego obrazovaniia: global'nye i Bolonskie izmereniia. [Main Tendencies of Development of the Higher Education: Global and Bologna Measurements]. Moscow, Issledovatel'skii tsentr problem kachestva podgotovki spetsialistov. [The Research Centre of Quality Issues of Experts Preparation]. 2010. 352 p. (In Russian)

10. Popov G. V., Lygina L. V., Vatutina M. N. Primenenie nakopitel'nogo metoda razrabotki pedagogicheskih izmeritel'nyh materialov dlja ocenki kompetencij v upravlenii kachestvom v vuze. [The Use of Cumulative Method of Measuring the Development of Educational Materials for the Assessment of Competence in Managing the Quality of the University]. Vestnik Voronezhskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta inzhenernykh tekhnologii. [Bulletin of Voronezh State University of Engineering Technologies]. 2012. No 4 (54). Р. 47–50. (In Russian)

11. Freyman V. I. K voprosu o formirovanii kompetentnostnoj modeli vypusknika. [To the Question of Formation a Graduate Competency Model]. Nauchnye issledovaniia i innovatsii. [Scientific Researches and Innovations]. 2012. No 1–4. Р. 43–55. (In Russian)

12. Kon E. L., Freyman V. I., Yuzhakov A. A. Ocenka kachestva formirovanija kompetencij studentov tehnicheskih vuzov pri dvuhurovnevoj sisteme obuchenija. [The Quality Control of Technical Universities Students Competences Forming with Two-level Education system]. Nauchnye issledovanija i ih prakticheskoe primenenie. [Scientific researches and their practical application]. Sovremennoe sostojanie i puti razvitija. [A current state and development ways]. ‘2012: sb. nauch. tr. mezhdunar. nauch.-prakt. konf., 2–12 oktjabrja 2012. [Materials of International Scientific Conference, d.d. 2-12 October, 2012]. Odessa, Publishing House KUPRIENKO, 2012. Vol. 9. Р. 39–41. (In Russian)

13. Kon E. L., Freyman V. I., Yuzhakov A. A. Primenenie integrodifferencial'nogo kriterija ocenki osvoenija komponentov kompetencij. [Implementing the Integral Differential Estimation Criterion of Competence Acquisition]. Obrazovanie i nauka. Izv. UrO RAO. [Education and science. News of Ural Branch of Russian Academy of Education]. 2013. No 6. Р. 47–63. (In Russian)

14. Freyman V. I. Primenenie metodov i procedur tehnicheskoj diagnostiki dlja kontrolja i ocenki rezul'tatov obuchenija, zadannyh v kompetentnostnom formate. [Application of the Technical Diagnostics Methods and Procedures to Monitor and Assess Studying Results, Specified in the Competency Format]. Izvestiia SPbGETU «LETI». [Bulletin of Saint Petersburg Electrotechnical University "LETI"]. 2014. No 6. Р. 79–85. (In Russian)

15. Kon E. L., Freyman V. I., Yuzhakov A. A. Realizacija algoritmov deshifracii rezul'tatov bezuslovnogo i uslovnogo poiska pri proverke urovnja osvoenija jelementov disciplinarnyh kompetencij. [The Realization of Conditional and Unconditional Searching Results Decoding Algorithms during the Discipline Competence Elements Level Marking Control]. Obrazovanie i nauka. Izv. UrO RAO. [Education and science. News of Ural Branch of Russian Academy of Education]. 2013. No 10. Р. 17–36. (In Russian)

16. Freyman V. I. Realizacija odnogo algoritma uslovnogo poiska jelementov kompetencij s nedostatochnym urovnem osvoenija. [An Algorithm of Conditional Search of Competence Elements with Insufficient Level of Development]. Informatsionno-upravliaiushchie sistemy. [Information-operating systems]. 2014. No 2 (69). Р. 93–102. (In Russian)

17. Freyman V. I. Razrabotka uchebno-metodicheskogo kompleksa discipliny v sootvetstvii s FGOS novogo pokolenija. [Development Training and Methodology Disciplinary Complex According to FSES of New Generation]. Vestnik Permskogo natsional'nogo issledovatel'skogo politekhnicheskogo universiteta. Elektrotekhnika, informatsionnye tekhnologii, sistemy upravleniia. [Bulletin of Perm National Research Polytechnic University. Electric Engineering, Information Technologies, Control Systems]. 2009. No 3. Р. 47–50. (In Russian)

18. Anderson L., Krathwohl D., Airasian P. A Taxonomy for Learning, Teaching, and Assessing: A Revision of Bloom's Taxonomy of Educational Objectives, Abridged Edition. New York: Longman, 2000. 352 p. (Translated from English)

19. Feigenbaum A. V. Total Quality Control. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1983. Р. 267. (Translated from English)

20. Patil A., Gray P. Engineering education quality assurance: a global perspective. London: Springer Science+Busines Media LLC, 2009. 316 p. (Translated from English)