Modelos multifactoriales de creatividad: enfoques estructurales y dinámicos en el diagnóstico psicológico

Introducción. El artículo está dedicado al problema del diagnóstico de la creatividad como un constructo complejo y multifactorial. Objetivo. El propósito del artículo es el análisis de modelos multifactoriales de creatividad e identificar aspectos estructurales y dinámicos del diagnóstico psicológico para determinar aspectos relevantes del desarrollo del diagnóstico psicológico de la creatividad. Metodología, métodos y procesos de investigación. El artículo analiza modelos multifactoriales de creatividad; se llevó a cabo una modificación de la matriz de investigación de la creatividad en diversas ramas de la psicología y se desarrolló una matriz de métodos para diagnosticar diversos aspectos de la creatividad de los sujetos. Resultados y novedad científica. Como resultado del análisis de varios modelos multifactoriales de creatividad (4P, 4C, 5A, 7C), se identificaron cinco factores estructurales generales de la creatividad (5T): personalidad creativa, proceso creativo, producto creativo, entorno creativo y creatividad conjunta. Se creó una matriz de métodos para diagnosticar la creatividad 5T × 4C, incluidos parámetros estructurales (5T) y dinámicos (4C). Se han identificado áreas de investigación con herramientas de psicodiagnóstico menos desarrolladas: el proceso creativo a nivel de creatividad profesional y destacada; entorno creativo al nivel de la creatividad pequeña y cotidiana; co-creación en diferentes niveles de creatividad. Significado práctico. La matriz 5T × 4C propuesta es la base para analizar los aspectos actuales del desarrollo del diagnóstico de la creatividad. El análisis de modelos multifactoriales y métodos de diagnóstico psicológico de la creatividad puede ser utilizado en el desarrollo de nuevos métodos de psicodiagnóstico con el propósito de estudiar el fenómeno de la creatividad.

1. Fürst G., Lubart T. An integrative approach to the creative personality: beyond the big five paradigm. The Cambridge Handbook of Creativity and Personality Research. 2017;1:140–164. doi: 10.1017/9781316228036.009

2. Taylor C.L., Kaufman J.C. The creative trait motivation scales. Thinking Skills and Creativity. 2021;39:100763. doi: 10.1016/j.tsc.2020.100763

3. Urban M., Urban K. Orientation toward intrinsic motivation mediates the relationship between metacognition and creativity. Journal of Creative Behavior. 2022;57:6–16. doi: 10.1002/jocb.558

4. Glaveanu V.P., Hanson M.A., Baer J., Barbot B., Clapp E.B., Corazza G.E., et al. Advancing creativity theory and research: a socio-cultural manifesto. Journal of Creative Behavior. 2019;54(3):741–745. doi: 10.1002/jocb.395

5. Rhodes M. An analysis of creativity. Phi Delta Kappan. 1961;42:305–311. Accessed March 28, 2024. https://www.jstor.org/stable/20342603?origin=JSTOR-pdf

6. Шумакова Н.Б. Творческий потенциал и его измерение в современных зарубежных исследованиях. Современная зарубежная психология. 2021;10(4):8–16. doi: 10.17759/jmfp.2021100401

7. Wu C.-L., Huang S.-Y., Chen P.-Z., Chen H.-C. A systematic review of creativity-related studies applying the remote associates test from 2000 to 2019. Frontiers in Psychology. 2020;11:573432. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.573432

8. Urban K.K. Assessing creativity: The Test for Creative Thinking-Drawing Production (TCT-DP). International Education Journal. 2005;6:272–280. Accessed March 28, 2024. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ854980.pdf

9. Guilford J.P. Creativity: a quarter century of progress. Perspectives Creativity.1975;1:35–39. Accessed March 28, 2024. https://www.taylorfrancis.com/chapters/edit/10.4324/9781315126265-2/creativity-guilford

10. Helfand M., Kaufman J.C., Beghetto R.A. The Four-C Model of Creativity: culture and context. In: V. P. Glăveanu, ed. Palgrave Handbook of Creativity and Culture Research. New York: Palgrave; 2017:15–36. doi: 10.1057/978-1-137-46344-9_2

11. Kaufman S.B. Opening up openness to experience: a four-factor model and relations to creative achievement in the arts and sciences. Journal of Creative Behavior. 2013;47(4):233–255. doi: 10.1002/jocb.33

12. Glăveanu V.P. Rewriting the language of creativity: The Five A’s framework. Review of General Psychology. 2013;17(1):69–81. doi: 10.1037/a0029528

13. Kharkhurin A.V. Creativity.4in1: four-criterion construct of creativity. Creativity Research Journal. 2014;26(3):338–352. doi: 10.1080/10400419.2014.929424

14. Lubart T., Thornhill-Miller B. Creativity: an overview of the 7C’s of creative thought. The Psychology of Human Thought: An Introduction. 2020;1:277–305. doi: 10.17885/heiup.470.c6678

15. Glăveanu V.P., Kaufman J.C. The creativity matrix: spotlights and blind spots in our understanding of the phenomenon. Journal of Creative Behavior. 2020;54:884–896. doi: 10.1002/jocb.417

16. Rodriguez R.M., Silvia P.J., Kaufman J.C., Reiter-Palmon R., Puryear J.S. Taking inventory of the Creative Behavior Inventory: An item response theory analysis of the CBI. Creativity Research Journal. 2023;35(2):143–153. doi: 10.1080/10400419.2023.2183322

17. Silvia P.J., Rodriguez R.M., Beaty R.E., Frith E., Kaufman J., Loprinzi P.D., et al. Measuring everyday creativity: A Rasch model analysis of the Biographical Inventory of Creative Behaviors (BICB) scale. Thinking Skills and Creativity. 2021;39:100797 doi: 10.1016/j.tsc.2021.100797

18. Elisondo R.C. Creative Actions Scale: A Spanish scale of creativity in different domains. Journal of Creative Behavior. 2021;55:215–227. doi: 10.1002/jocb.447

19. Benić M. Translation and validation of the Kaufman Domains of Creativity Scale on a Croatian sample of early childhood and preschool education students. Center for Educational Policy Studies Journal. 2021;11(3):163–179. doi: 10.26529/cepsj.708

20. Carson S.H., Peterson J.B., Higgins D.M. Reliability, validity, and factor structure of the creative achievement questionnaire. Creativity Research Journal. 2005;17(1):37–50. doi: 10.1207/s15326934crj1701_4

21. Bobic M., Davis E., Cunningham R. Kirton Adaptation-Innovation Inventory: validity issues, practical questions. Review of Public Personnel Administration. 1999;19(2):18–31. doi: 10.1177/0734371X9901900204

22. Houtz J.C., Selby E., Esquivel G.B., Okoye R.A., Peters K.M., Treffinger D.J. Creativity styles and personal type. Creativity Research Journal. 2003;15(4):321–330. doi: 10.1207/S15326934CRJ1504_2

23. Chávez-Eakle R.A., Eakle A.J., Cruz-Fuentes C. The multiple relations between creativity and personality. Creativity Research Journal. 2012;24(1):76–82. doi: 10.1080/10400419.2012.649233

24. Cramond B. Assessing Creativity: A Palette of Possibilities. Appendix. Choosing a Creativity Assessment that is Fit for Purpose. Billund: The LEGO Foundation; 2020:1–34. Accessed March 28, 2024. https://cms.learningthroughplay.com/media/ynrbfpi4/appendix_assessingcreativity_pdf.pdf

25. Dollinger S.J., Dollinger S.M.C., Centeno L. Identity and creativity. Identity: An International Journal of Theory and Research. 2005;5(4):315–339. doi: 10.1207/s1532706xid0504_2

26. Haslam S.A., Adarves-Yorno I., Postmes T., Jans L. The collective origins of valued originality: a social identity approach to creativity. Personality and Social Psychology Review. 2013;17(4):384–401. doi: 10.1177/1088868313498001

27. Gocłowska M.A., Crisp R.J. How dual-identity processes foster creativity. Review of General Psychology. 2014;18(3):216–236. doi: 10.1037/gpr0000008

28. Glăveanu V.P., Tanggaard L. Creativity, identity, and representation: towards a socio-cultural theory of creative identity. New Ideas in Psychology. 2014;34:12–21. doi: 10.1016/j.newideapsych.2014.02.002

29. Дружинина С. В. Ресурсная роль интеллекта и креативности в самореализации подростков старшего возраста. Акмеология. 2015;4:66–71. Режим доступа: https://narodnoe.org/journals/akmeologiya/2015-4/resursnaya-rol-intellekta-i-kreativnosti-v-samorealizacii-podrostkov-starshego-vozrasta (дата обращения: 28.03.2024).

30. Sica L.S., Ragozini G., Di Palma T., Aleni Sestito L. Creativity as identity skill? Late adolescents’ management of identity, complexity and risk-taking. The Journal of Creative Behavior. 2019;53(4):457– 471. doi: 10.1002/jocb.221

31. Гудзовская А.А., Добрынина Е.И., Мышкина М.С. Социальная идентичность как контекст креативности в ситуации фрустрации. Социальная психология и общество. 2023;14(2):193–210. doi: 10.17759/sps.2023140212

32. Karwowski M., Lebuda I., Wiśniewska E. Measuring creative self-efficacy and creative personal identity. The International Journal of Creativity & Problem Solving. 2018;28(1):45–57. Accessed March 28, 2024. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/325070288_Measuring_Creative_Self-efficacy_and_Creative_Personal_Identity

33. Abulela M.A.A. Development and initial validation of a creative self-efficacy scale for undergraduates: categorical confirmatory factor analysis and multidimensional item response theory. Frontiers in Education. 2024:8:1306532. doi:10.3389/feduc.2023.1306532

34. Тимощенко А.С., Грязева-Добшинская В.Г., Кадышева М.В. Творческое лидерство педагога как ресурс педагогического влияния. Психология. Психофизиология. 2019;12(1):83–91. doi: 10.14529/psy190108

35. Mednick S.A. The Remote Associates Test. The Journal of Creative Behavior. 1968;2(3):213–214. doi: 10.1002/j.2162-6057.1968.tb00104.x

36. Kim K.H. The Torrance tests of creative thinking-figural or verbal: Which one should we use? Creativity. Theories-Research-Applications. 2017;4(2):302–321. doi: 10.1515/ctra-2017-0015

37. Almeida L.S., Prieto L.P., Ferrando M., Oliveira E., Ferrándiz C. Torrance Test of Creative Thinking: the question of its construct validity. Thinking Skills and Creativity. 2008;3(1):53–58. doi: 10.1016/j.tsc.2008.03.003

38. Puryear J.S., Kettler T., Rinn A.N. Relationships of personality to differential conceptions of creativity: a systematic review. Psychology of Aesthetics Creativity and the Arts. 2017;11(1):59–68. doi: 10.1037/aca0000079

39. Yin Y., Han J., Huang S., Zuo H., Childs P. A study on student: assessing four creativity assessment methods in product design. Proceedings of the Design Society. 2021;1:263–272. doi: 10.1017/pds.2021.27

40. Kaufman J.C., Baer J., Agars M.D., Loomis D. Creativity stereotypes and the consensual assessment technique. Creativity Research Journal. 2010;22(2):200–205. doi: 10.1080/10400419.2010.481529

41. Kaufman J.C., Baer J., Cole J.C. Expertise, domains, and the consensual assessment technique. The Journal of Creative Behavior. 2009;43:223–233. doi: 10.1002/j.2162-6057.2009.tb01316.x

42. Cropley D.H., Kaufman J.C. Measuring Functional creativity: non-expert raters and the Creative Solution Diagnosis Scale. The Journal of Creative Behavior. 2012;46:119–137. doi: 10.1002/jocb.9

43. Amabile T.M., Conti R., Coon H., Lazenby J., Herron M. Assessing the work environment for creativity. The Academy of Management Journal. 1996;39(5):1154–1184. doi: 10.2307/256995

44. Basadur M., Taggar S., Pringle P. Improving the measurement of divergent thinking attitudes in organizations. The Journal of Creative Behavior. 1999;33:75–111. doi: 10.1002/j.2162-6057.1999.tb01040.x

45. Грязева-Добшинская В.Г. Синергия взаимодействия субъектов в совместной творческой деятельности как механизм творческого лидерства. Психология интеллекта и творчества. Традиции и инновации: материалы научной конференции, посвященной памяти Я. А. Пономарева и В. Н. Дружинина; 201; Москва. Москва: издательство Института психологии РАН; 2010:298– 309.

46. Karwowski M. Culture and psychometric studies of creativity. In: Glăveanu V.P., ed. The Palgrave Handbook of Creativity and Culture Research. New York: Palgrave Macmillan/Springer Nature; 2016:159–186. doi: 10.1057/978-1-137-46344-9_8

47. Kaufman J.C., Plucker J.A. Intelligence and creativity. In: Sternberg R.J., Kaufman S.B., eds. The Cambridge Handbook of Intelligence. Cambridge University Press; 2011:771–783. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511977244.039

48. Silvia P.J., Winterstein B.P., Willse J.T., Barona C.M., Cram J.T., Hess K.I., et al. Assessing creativity with divergent thinking tasks: exploring the reliability and validity of new subjective scoring methods. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts. 2008;2(2):68–85. doi: 10.1037/1931-3896.2.2.68

49. Piffer D. Can creativity be measured? An attempt to clarify the notion of creativity and general directions for future research. Thinking Skills and Creativity. 2012;7(3):258–264. doi: 10.1016/j.tsc.2012.04.009

50. Kim K.H. Can we trust creativity tests? A review of the Torrance Tests of Creative Thinking (TTCT). Creativity Research Journal. 2006;18(1):3–14. doi: 10.1207/s15326934crj1801_2

51. Sidi Y., Torgovitsky I., Soibelman D., Miron-Spektor E., Ackerman R. You may be more original than you think: predictable biases in self-assessment of originality. Acta Psychologica. 2020;203:103002. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2019.103002

52. Silvia P.J., Wigert B., Reiter-Palmon R., Kaufman J.C. Assessing creativity with self-report scales: a review and empirical evaluation. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts. 2012;6(1):19–34. doi: 10.1037/a0024071

53. Kaufman J.C., Kaufman S.B., Lichtenberger E.O. Finding creative potential on intelligence tests via divergent production. Canadian Journal of School Psychology. 2011;26(2):83–106. doi: 10.1177/0829573511406511