STAFF SATISFACTION ESTIMATION SYSTEMS IN RUSSIAN NATIONAL RESEARCH UNIVERSITIES
https://doi.org/10.17853/1994-5639-2015-5-57-71
Abstract
The aim of the investigation is to study practical approaches to the assessment of employee satisfaction in higher education institutions; to identify and determine the maturity level of assessment systems established in the universities.
Methods. The methods involve general and special methods of scientific knowledge such as analogy, systemic and structural analysis, content analysis, and comparison method.
Results. The paper presents the results of practical research on Russian universities activities on the sphere of the employee satisfaction assessment. 29 Russian national research universities were selected for the analysis. The levels of systems development of a satisfaction assessment of the personnel and approaches to such procedures are designated on the basis of the content of internal university documents. It is noted that development of satisfaction assessment systems of the personnel of high schools, complex revealing both subjective, and its objective indicators will allow the staff to make more well-founded administrative decisions, and to raise interest of employees in evolution of activity of educational institution; expenses reduction by high school of time and intellectual resources can become an economic benefit.
Scientific novelty and practical significance. Material, presented in the paper, can be useful to employees of HR and quality control departments of higher educational institutions of Russia; as well as to managers who work in the education system and participate in the work of staff satisfaction evaluation. Theoretical aspects of the paper can become the basis for the formation and development of models of staff satisfaction evaluation systems and the starting point of any research related to the development of guidelines for the satisfaction staff assessment.
About the Author
Natalia A. Novokreshchenova
Ogarev Mordovia State University
Russian Federation
PhD student, Quality Management Department, Saransk (RF)
Russian Federation
PhD student, Quality Management Department, Saransk (RF)
References
1. Aliev V. G. Organisationnoe povedenie. [Organisational behaviour]. Moscow, 2004. 310 p. (In Russian)
2. Astashova O. Barometr motivacii personala kompanii. [The barometer of the company staff motivation]. Biznes bez problem. Personal. [Business without problem. Personnel]. 2002. № 11. Р. 38–43. (In Russian)
3. Barmakova N. Udovletvorennost' personal: vremja ocenit'. [Staff satisfaction: time to estimate]. Spravochnik po upravleniu personalom. [Manual for personnel management]. 2009. № 11. Р. 86–89. (In Russian)
4. Bondarenko V. V. Povishenie effectivnosti upravlenia trudovimi resursami v usloviach modernisatii I perehoda economiki na innovasionniy puy pasvitia. [The increasing of the efficiency of the human resources management in the terms of modernization and economy transformation to the way of innovation]. Penza, Publishing House RIO VZFJeI. 2012. 170 p. (In Russian)
5. Korotcov E. M. Upravlenie chelovecheskim kapitalom: jeffektivnost', delovaja reputacija, kreativnyj potencial. [The management of the human capital: efficiency, business reputation, creative potential]. Problemi teorii I practiki upravlenia. [The problems of the management theory and practice]. 2010. № 4. Р. 18–30. (In Russian)
6. Kulagin О. Ocenka udovletvorennosti personala. [Staff satisfaction estimation]. Spravochnik po upravleniu personalom. [Manual for personnel management]. 2009. № 8. Р. 56–60. (In Russian)
7. Novatorov E. Audit vnutrennego marketinga metodom «vazhnost'- ispolnenie». [The audit of the internal marketing on the base of the method «importance-performance»]. Marketing v Rossii i zarubezhom. [Marketing in Russia and abroad]. 2006. № 3. P. 40. (In Russian)
8. Obzor kljuchevyh bespokojstv prepodavatel'skogo soobshhestva: rezul'taty oprosa prepodavatelej NIU VShJe. [The survey of the key anxieties of the university teachers: the results of the questioning of the Higher school of Economics teachers]. Academicheskay sreda. [Academic sphere]. 2014. № 3. Р. 1–3. (In Russian)
9. Rukovodstvo dlja uchastnikov konkursa «Sistemy kachestva podgotovki vypusknikov obrazovatel'nyh uchrezhdenij professional'nogo obrazovanija». [Guidance for participants in the competition «The quality systems of the student training in universities»]. Federal'naja sluzhba po nadzoru v sfere obrazovanija i nauki. [Federal Education and Science Supervision Service]. Moscow, Publishing House of Standards. 2012. 31 p. (In Russian)
10. Salimova T., Novokreshchenova N. Udovletvorennost' personala vuza v sisteme sostavljajushhih kachestva trudovoj zhizni. [University staff satisfaction in the system of the quality of personnel life components]. Kachestvo. Innovacii. Obrazovanie. [Quality. Innovations. Education]. 2013. № 10. Р. 3–8. (In Russian)
11. Skripko L. E. Izuchenie predpochtenij rabotnikov i ih otnoshenija k rabotodateljam. [The study of the staff demands and their relation to employers]. Kadrovik. [HR manager]. 2012. № 2. Р. 96–104. (In Russian)
12. SMK-DP-4.1.-F-02. [Quality management system document 4.1.-F-02]. Otchet o rezul'tatah monitoringa udovletvorennosti potrebitelej. [The report on the stakeholders satisfaction monitoring]. Belgorod, 2012. 118 p. (In Russian)
13. SMK. DP 7.2.1-01-2010. [Quality management system document 7.2.1-01-2010]. Vzaimodejstvie s zainteresovannymi storonami. [Relationships with stakeholders]. Saransk, 2010. 69 p. (In Russian)
14. SMK STO. 8.2.02-09. [Quality management system document 8.2.02-09]. Monitoring udovletvorennosti zainteresovannyh storon. [Stakeholders satisfaction monitoring]. Moscow, 2009. 31 p. (In Russian)
15. Sokolova L. Formirovanie podsistemy izmereniya i analiza udovletvoryonnosti i vovlechennosti personala v processy sistemy menedzhmenta kachestva obrazovatel'noj organizacii. [The formation of the staff satisfaction and involvement system in the quality management system]. Tambov, Tambovskij gosudarstvennyj tehnicheskij universitet. [Tambov State technical University].2009. 124 p. (In Russian)
16. Aziri В. Job satisfaction: a literature review. Management research and practice. 2011. Vol. 3. Issue 4. P. 77–86. (Translated from English)
17. Büssing A., Bissels T., Fuchs V. & Perrar K-M. A dynamic model of work satisfaction: Qualitative approaches. Human Relations. 1999. № 52 (8). Р.999–1028. (Translated from English)
18. Dahlgaard-Park Su Mi. Core values – the entrance to human satisfaction and commitment. Total Quality Management & Business Excellence Journal. 2012. Vol. 23. № 2. P. 125–140. (Translated from English)
19. Locke E. A., Latham G. P. A theory of goal setting and task performance, Prentice Hall, 1990. (Translated from English)
20. Walker A. S., Sorce Р. А. Correlates of Job Satisfaction of Early Career Employees in Printing and Publishing Occupations. A Research Monograph of the Printing Industry Center at RITRochester, 2009. (Translated from English)
Review
For citations:
Novokreshchenova N.A. STAFF SATISFACTION ESTIMATION SYSTEMS IN RUSSIAN NATIONAL RESEARCH UNIVERSITIES. The Education and science journal. 2015;(5):57-71. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17853/1994-5639-2015-5-57-71
Views:
1289
Email this article 