Information and educational environment of the university: priorities and development deficits

Introduction. In light of the increasing significance of training highly qualified specialists, enhancing the information and educational environment of Russian universities has emerged as a key trend in improving the effectiveness of teaching practices.

Aim. The present research aims to analyse students’ assessments of the characteristics of the information and educational environment in higher education within the context of digitalisation, identifying priorities and deficiencies in its development.

Methodology and research methods. The study employs systemic, situational, axiological, and socio-engineering approaches. This article presents the findings of an empirical investigation into the priorities and deficiencies in the development of the information and educational environment within higher education. A total of 1,107 students, aged 17 to 29 years, participated in the study. The primary method utilised was a questionnaire survey, which effectively captured the nuances of the information and educational environment in the context of digitalisation. It also reflected the students’ perceptions of the semantic meanings associated with digital transformations, as well as their opinions on the priorities and shortcomings in the evolution of the contemporary information and educational environment in higher education.

Results and scientific novelty. The data obtained allow us to discuss the positive expectations of young people regarding the digital transformation of the educational process in higher education. This analysis examines the influence of teachers’ digital skills on the meaningful enhancement of the information and educational environment, as well as the formation of new psychological and pedagogical opportunities for fostering cooperation during the educational process. Several barriers to the development of the information and educational environment have been identified, including insufficient material and technical resources in universities, a low level of digital competence among teachers, and a limited range of interactive technologies being utilised. Furthermore, it has been established that the psychological and pedagogical risks associated with the development of the information and educational environment are linked to a decline in students’ knowledge and communication skills.

Practical significance. The results obtained can be utilised by administrators and educators in higher education institutions when evaluating deficiencies in the development of the information and educational environment.

1. Aksenova N.I., Usacheva O.V., Chernyakov M.K. Comparative assessment of the state of digitalisation in higher education institutions. Obrazovanie i nauka = The Education and Science Journal. 2024;26(7):88–115. (In Russ.) doi:10.17853/1994-5639-2024-7-88-115

2. Aldhafeeri F.M., Alotaibi A.A. Reimagining education for successful and sustainable digital shifting. SAGE Open. 2023;13(1). doi:10.1177/21582440231154474

3. Nazarov V.L., Zherdev D.V., Averbukh N.V. Shock digitalisation of education: the perception of participants of the educational process. Obrazovanie i nauka = The Education and Science Journal. 2021;23(1):156–201. (In Russ.) doi:10.17853/1994-5639-2021-1-156-201

4. Ageev N.Ya., Tokarchuk Y.A., Tokarchuk A.M., Gavrilova E.V. The interaction of digital technologies with the development of cognitive and communication processes of adolescents and young adults: a review of empirical research. Psikhologo-pedagogicheskie issledovaniya = Psychological-Educational Studies. 2023;15(1):37–55. (In Russ.) doi:10.17759/psyedu.2023150103

5. Wang X.-M., Wang S.-M., Wang J.-N., Hwang G.-J., Xu S. Effects of a two-tier test strategy on students’ digital game-based learning performances and flow experience in environmental education. Journal of Educational Computing Research. 2023;60(8):1942–1968. doi:10.1177/07356331221095162

6. Gavrilova T.A., Osmolovskaya I.M. Zhigalova O.P., Baranova V.A. Methodology for the development of VR training simulators: opportunities for activity theory. Informacionnoe obshchestvo = Information Society. 2023;2:69–78. (In Russ.) doi:10.52605/16059921_2023_02_69

7. Volegzhanina I.S. The potential of scientific and education complex for development of future engineers’ professional competency in the age of digitalization. Vestnik Krasnoyarskogo gosudarstvennogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta im. V. P. Astaf’eva = Bulletin of the Krasnoyarsk State Pedagogical University named after. V. P. Astafieva. 2020;2(52):34–45. (In Russ.) doi:10.25146/1995-0861-2020-52-2-198

8. Gabdullina A.S. Impact of digitalisation on the cognitive functions of university students in the framework of foreign language learning. Pedagogika. Voprosy teorii i praktiki = Pedagogy. Theory and Practice. 2022;7(4):395–403. (In Russ.) doi:10.30853/ped20220073

9. Dautova O.B., Ignatieva E.Yu., Shilova O.N. Digital transformation of education is the driving force for transformations in teaching and learning. Pedagogicheskaya nauka i praktika = Pedagogical Science and Practice. 2021;3(33):70–85. (In Russ.)

10. Christensen M., Nielsen K., O’Neill L. Embodied teacher identity: a qualitative study on ‘practical sense’ as a basic pedagogical condition in times of Covid-19. Advances in Health Sciences Education. 2022;27:577–603. doi:10.1007/s10459-022-10102-0

11. Kecherukova M.A. Higher education amid the COVID-19 pandemic: literature review. Obshchestvo: sociologiya, psihologiya, pedagogika = Society: Sociology, Psychology, Pedagogics. 2021;9(89):152–156. (In Russ.) doi:10.24158/spp.2021.9.25

12. Osipenko L.Ye., Kozitsyna Yu.V., Korotkov A.V. Research training and machine learning: from matching to convergence. Psikhologo-pedagogicheskie issledovaniya = Psychological-Educational Studies. 2022;14(4):127–146. (In Russ.) doi:10.17759/psyedu.2022140408

13. Sokolova Ju.V., Chalova O.A. Assessment of the readiness of the teaching staff of Russian technical universities to use information technologies in the new digital paradigm. Mir nauki. Pedagogika i psihologiya = World of Science. Pedagogy and Psychology. 2021;4. (In Russ.) Accessed January 12, 2025. https://mir-nauki.com/PDF/39PDMN421.pdf

14. Khrustaleva N.V. Formation of the educational environment in the digital economy. Vestnik Altajskoj akademii ekonomiki i prava = Bulletin of the Altai Academy of Economics and Law. 2023;5(1):155– 161. (In Russ.) doi:10.17513/vaael.2821

15. Frolova E.V., Rogach O.V. Dysfunctions of digitalization of higher education (experience of the Covid-19 pandemic). Monitoring obshchestvennogo mneniya: ekonomicheskie i social’nye peremeny = Monitoring of Public Opinion: Economic and Social Changes. 2022;6(172):84–107. (In Russ.) doi:10.14515/monitoring.2022.6.2265

16. Frolova E.V., Rogach O.V., Ryabova T.M. Digitalization of education in modern scientific discourse: new trends and risks analysis. European Journal of Contemporary Education. 2020;9(2):331–336. doi:10.13187/ejced.2020.2.331

17. Aseeva I.A. Anthropological dilemmas of digital reality: the essence and prospects for resolution. Informacionnoe obshchestvo = Information Society. 2023;2:22–30. (In Russ.) doi:10.52605/16059921_2023_02_22

18. Bulatova O.V., Vasileva I.V., Kozubovsky A.I., Krivonos D.Yu. Distance learning as a stress challenge/obstacle for students. Information society. Informacionnoe obshchestvo = Information Society. 2023;4(32–42). (In Russ.) doi:10.52605/16059921_2023_04_32

19. Hämäläinen R., Nissinen K., Mannonen J., Lämsä J., Leino K., Taajamo M. Understanding teaching professionals’ digital competence: What do PIAAC and TALIS reveal about technology-related skills, attitudes, and knowledge? Computers in Human Behavior. 2021;117(106672). doi:10.1016/j.chb.2020.106672

20. Koris R., Mato-Díaz F.J., Hernández-Nanclares N. From real to virtual mobility: Erasmus students’ transition to online learning amid the COVID-19 crisis. European Educational Research Journal. 2021;20(4):463–478. doi:10.1177/14749041211021247

21. Turnbull D., Chugh R., Luck J. Transitioning to E-Learning during the COVID-19 pandemic: how have higher education institutions responded to the challenge? Education and Information Technologies. 2021;26(5):6401–6419. doi:10.1007/s10639-021-10633-w

22. Van Schoors R., Elen J., Raes, A., et al. The charm or chasm of digital personalized learning in education: teachers’ reported use, perceptions and expectations. TechTrends. 2023;67:315–330. doi:10.1007/s11528-022-00802-0

23. Doz E., Cuder A., Caputi M., et al. Distance learning environment: perspective of Italian primary and secondary teachers during COVID-19 pandemic. Learning Environments Research. 2023;26:555–571. doi:10.1007/s10984-022-09451-9

24. Qorraj G., Kaçaniku F., Draghici A., Repanovici A., Ng P.K. Exploring digital transformation of teacher education in the Western Balkans: case of Kosovo. Human Systems Management. 2023;42(2):209217. doi:10.3233/HSM-220063

25. Willermark S. Who’s there? Characterizing interaction in virtual classrooms. Journal of Educational Computing Research. 2021;59(6):1036–1055. doi:10.1177%2F0735633120988530

26. Polyakova E.A. Risks and sociocultural threats of the digitalization era. Caucasian Science Bridge. 2023;6(2):93–96. (In Russ.) doi:10.18522/2658-5820.2023.2.12

27. Martynenko M.A. The influence of the digitalization era on the psychosomatic state of modern students. Scientist. 2024;2(28):1–3. (In Russ.)

28. Mifsud D., Orucu D. The experience of imposed digitalization of education provision across sectors: comparative autoethnographic experiences through a Foucauldian lens. European Educational Research Journal. 2025. doi:10.1177/14749041251319823