The role of network culture and digital etiquette in student learning: a systematic review

Introduction. The rapid advancement of digital technologies is transforming the educational environment, presenting new challenges for communication among participants in the educational process. University online communities are becoming central platforms for academic interaction, where the culture of network communication and digital etiquette play a crucial role in enhancing the effectiveness of learning and the professional development of students.

Aim. This research aims to analyse the impact of network communication culture and digital etiquette on the effectiveness of students’ learning and professional development.

Methodology and research methods. Materials were sourced from the Web of Science database, covering the period from 1975 to 2025. Based on the inclusion criteria, five key studies were selected and analysed, authored by researchers affiliated with universities in the USA, Taiwan, Sweden, Spain, and New Zealand.

Results. The findings demonstrate an evolution from fundamental principles of network communication culture and digital etiquette to complex multimodal communication utilising artificial intelligence tools. This research reveals that effective online communication signifi-cantly impacts educational outcomes through three key mechanisms: (1) structured frameworks for digital interaction, (2) balanced integration of traditional and innovative communication methods, and (3) the development of professional digital competencies.

Scientific novelty. The research findings confirm the importance of network communication culture and digital etiquette as key factors influencing the quality of the educational process within online communities and shaping the trajectory of students’ professional development in the digital era.

Practical significance. The research materials can be utilised in the development of regulatory documents governing digital interactions within academic online communities of higher education institutions.

1. Telukdarie A., Munsamy M. Digitization of higher education institutions. In: 2019 IEEE International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management (IEEM). IEEE; 2019:716–721. doi:10.1109/IEEM44572.2019.8978701

2. Al-Abdullatif A., Gameil A. Exploring students’ knowledge and practice of digital citizenship in higher education. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (iJET). 2020;15(19):122– 142. doi:10.3991/ijet.v15i19.15611

3. Belyakova E.G., Bykov S.A., Zemlyanova M.P., Muraveva N.G. Students’ perception of digital opportunities in university education. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta = Tomsk State University Journal. 2022;479:199–212. (In Russ.) doi:10.17223/15617793/479/21

4. Jamiai A. The role of netiquettes in establishing relationships in virtual learning communities. International Journal of Language and Literary Studies. 2019;1(2). doi:10.36892/ijlls.v1i2.29

5. Soler-Costa R., Moreno-Guerrero A.J., López-Belmonte J., Marín-Marín J.A. Netiquette: ethic, education, and behavior on internet – a systematic literature review. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2021;18(3):1212. doi:10.3390/ijerph18031212

6. Farshadnia S., Marandi S.S. Netiquette practices and perceptions in TESOL-related online communities. The Journal of International Communication. 2024;30(2):1–25. doi:10.1080/13216597.2024.2374552

7. Mahmood S. Instructional strategies for online teaching in COVID-19 pandemic. Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies. 2021;3(1):199–203. doi:10.1002/hbe2.218

8. Clark J.T. Distance education. In: Dyro J., ed. Clinical Engineering Handbook. Academic Press; 2020:410–415. doi:10.1016/B978-0-12-813467-2.00063-8

9. Mistretta S. The new netiquette: choosing civility in an age of online teaching and learning. International Journal on E-Learning. 2021;20(3):323–345.

10. Rheingold H. The Virtual Community: Homesteading on the Electronic Frontier. Addison-Wesley; 1993. 325 p.

11. Shea V. Netiquette. Albion Books; 1994. 160 p.

12. Zheng Y., Zhang J., Li Y., Wu X., Ding R., Luo X., Fan M., Huang J. Effects of digital game-based learning on students’ digital etiquette literacy, learning motivations, and engagement. Heliyon. 2024;10(1):e23490. doi:10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e23490

13. Heitmayer M., Schimmelpfennig R. Netiquette as digital social norms. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction. 2024;40(13):3334–3354. doi:10.1080/10447318.2023.2188534

14. Syzdykbayeva A.D., Abdigapbarova U.M., Knissarina М.M., Seidualiyeva A.N., Mirza N.V. Network communication culture, digital etiquette, online community of university teachers and students: bibliometric mapping of the literature. Obrazovanie i nauka = The Education and Science Journal. 2025;27(4):97–121. doi:10.17853/1994-5639-2025-9173

15. Shachar M., Neumann Y. Differences between traditional and distance education academic performances: а meta-analytic approach. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning. 2003;4(2):1–20. doi:10.19173/irrodl.v4i2.153

16. MacGeorge E.L., Samter W., Gillihan S.J. Academic stress, supportive communication, and health. Communication Education. 2005;54(4):365–372. doi:10.1080/03634520500442236

17. Garrison D.R., Vaughan N.D. Blended Learning in Higher Education: Framework, Principles, and Guidelines. John Wiley & Sons; 2008. 272 p.

18. Dabbagh N., Kitsantas A. Personal learning environments, social media, and self-regulated learning: A natural formula for connecting formal and informal learning. The Internet and Higher Education. 2012;15(1):3–8. doi:10.1016/j.iheduc.2011.06.002

19. Rheingold H. The Virtual Community: Finding Connection in a Computerized World. Addison-Wesley Longman Publishing Co.; 1993. 325 p.

20. Rheingold H. The Virtual Community, Revised Edition: Homesteading on the Electronic Frontier. MIT Press; 2000. 448 p.

21. Ellis D., Oldridge R., Vasconcelos A. Community and virtual community. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology. 2004;38(1):145–186. doi:10.1002/aris.1440380106

22. Hew K.F. Determinants of success for online communities: an analysis of three communities in terms of members’ perceived professional development. Behaviour & Information Technology. 2009;28(5):433–445. doi:10.1080/01449290802005995

23. Armstrong A., Hagel J. The real value of online communities. In: Lesser E.L., Fontaine M.A., Slusher J.A., eds. Knowledge and Communities. Routledge; 2009:85–95. doi:10.4324/9780080509785-7

24. Zhou T. Understanding online community user participation: a social influence perspective. Internet Research. 2011;21(1):67–81. doi:10.1108/10662241111104884

25. Park S., Na E.Y., Kim E.M. The relationship between online activities, netiquette and cyberbullying. Children and Youth Services Review. 2014;42:74–81. doi:10.1016/j.childyouth.2014.04.002

26. Page M.J., McKenzie J.E., Bossuyt P.M., Boutron I., Hoffmann T.C., Mulrow C.D., et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ. 2021;372:n71. doi:10.1136/bmj.n71

27. Syzdykbayeva A.D., Abdigapbarova U.M., Aitenova E.A., Iminova Y.B., Khassanova I.U. Studying the impact of network communication culture and digital etiquette on the effectiveness of learning and professional development of students in the university’s online community: a systematic review. INPLASY protocol 202520115. INPLASY – International Platform of Registered Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Protocols. doi:10.37766/inplasy2025.2.0115

28. Porritt K., Gomersall J., Lockwood C. JBI’s systematic reviews: study selection and critical appraisal. AJN, American Journal of Nursing. 2014;114(6):47–52. doi:10.1097/01.NAJ.0000450430.97383.64

29. Deroncele-Acosta A., Palacios-Núñez M.L., Toribio-López A. Digital transformation and technological innovation on higher education post-COVID-19. Sustainability. 2023;15(3):2466. doi:10.3390/su15032466

30. Gurianov I.O., Konopleva N.V., Gluzman N.A., Gorbunova N.V. Modernization of higher education teachers’ professional formation as a strategy of forming their professionalism. Revista on line de Política e Gestão Educacional. 2021;25(esp.1):506–515. doi:10.22633/rpge.v25iesp.1.14987

31. Dolzhikova A., Kurilenko V., Biryukova Y., Baryshnikova E., Shcherbakova O., Glazova O. Why did they keep silent? Some peculiarities of intercultural academic communication. Intercultural Education. 2021;32(1):83–99. doi:10.1080/14675986.2020.1845043

32. Jackson L.C., Jackson A.C., Chambers D. Establishing an online community of inquiry at the Distance Education Centre, Victoria. Distance Education. 2013;34(3):353–367. doi:10.1080/01587919.2013.835774

33. Lowe D., Goldfinch T., Kadi A., Willey K., Wilkinson T. Engineering graduates professional formation: the connection between activity types and professional competencies. European Journal of Engineering Education. 2022;47(1):8–29. doi:10.1080/03043797.2021.1901074

34. Mali D., Lim H. How do students perceive face-to-face/blended learning as a result of the Covid-19 pandemic? The International Journal of Management Education. 2021;19(3):100552. doi:10.1016/j.ijme.2021.100552

35. Martin F., Wang C., Sadaf A. Student perception of helpfulness of facilitation strategies that enhance instructor presence, connectedness, engagement and learning in online courses. The Internet and Higher Education. 2020;44:100772. doi:10.1016/j.iheduc.2018.01.003

36. Rapanta C., Botturi L., Goodyear P., Guàrdia L., Koole M. Online university teaching during and after the Covid-19 crisis: Refocusing teacher presence and learning activity. Postdigital Science and Education. 2020;2(3):923–945. doi:10.1007/s42438-020-00155-y

37. Bond M., Marín V.I., Dolch C., Bedenlier S., Zawacki-Richter O. Digital transformation in German higher education during the COVID-19 pandemic: emergency remote teaching and beyond. Educational Technology Research and Development. 2021;69(1):201–224. doi:10.1007/s11423-020-09856-4

38. García-Peñalvo F.J., Corell A., Abella-García V., Grande-de-Prado M. Online assessment in higher education in the time of COVID-19. Education in the Knowledge Society. 2021;22:e26821. doi:10.14201/eks.25465

39. Holmes W., Bialik M., Fadel C. Artificial Intelligence in Education: Promises and Implications for Teaching and Learning. Center for Curriculum Redesign; 2022. 281 p.

40. König J., Jäger-Biela D.J., Glutsch N. Adapting to online teaching during COVID-19 school closure: teacher education and teacher competence effects among early career teachers in Germany. European Journal of Teacher Education. 2020;43(4):608–622. doi:10.1080/02619768.2020.1809650

41. Mishra P., Koehler M.J. Technological pedagogical content knowledge: a framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record. 2021;108(6):1017–1054. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9620.2006.00684.x

42. Graham C.R., Borup J., Short C.R., Archambault L. K-12 Blended Teaching: A Guide to Personalized Learning and Online Integration. EdTech Books; 2019. 174 p.

43. Liu H., Zhang X. Mobile learning in higher education: a systematic review of trends and empirical research. Sustainability. 2021;13(18):13566. doi:10.3390/su151813566

44. Tondeur J., Howard S.K., Yang J. One size does not fit all: towards an adaptive model for developing pre-service teachers’ digital competencies. Computers in Human Behavior. 2020;116:106659. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2020.106659

45. Falloon G. From digital literacy to digital competence: the teacher digital competency (TDC) framework. Educational Technology Research and Development. 2020;68(5):2449–2472. doi:10.1007/s11423-020-09767-4

46. Williamson B., Eynon R., Potter J. Pandemic politics, pedagogies and practices: digital technologies and distance education during the coronavirus emergency. Learning, Media and Technology. 2020;45(2):107–114. doi:10.1080/17439884.2020.1761641

47. Manouselis N., Vuorikari R., Van Assche F. Collaborative recommendation of e-learning resources: an experimental investigation. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning. 2010;26(4):227–242. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2729.2010.00362.x

48. Goett J.A., Foote K.E. Cultivating student research and study skills in Web-based learning environments. Journal of Geography in Higher Education. 2000;24(1):92–99. doi:10.1080/03098260085162

49. Liu K.Y. A design framework for online teacher professional development communities. Asia Pacific Education Review. 2012;13:701–711. doi:10.1007/s12564-012-9230-0

50. Ou A.W., Malmström H. ‘It becomes increasingly complex to deal with multiple channels’: materialised communicative competence and digital inequality in English-medium higher education in the digital era. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development. 2023:1–19. doi:10.1080/01434632.2023.2172630

51. Sánchez Vera F., Tellez Infantes A., Martínez Guirao J.E., Antón Hurtado F. Development of the pre-professional identity of vocational students during their training through a program based on OER-enabled pedagogy and an online community of practice. Sustainability. 2021;14(1):356. doi:10.3390/su14010356

52. Shephard K., Brown K., Guiney T., Deaker L., Hesson G. Exploring the use of social media by community-engaged university people. Innovations in Education and Teaching International. 2019;57(6):677–687. doi:10.1080/14703297.2019.1579661

53. Samarawickrema G., Benson R., Brack C. Different spaces: staff development for Web 2.0. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology. 2010;26(1):44–49. doi:10.14742/ajet.1101